[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 186 KB, 640x640, 0BF5860B-7255-4515-9D1B-CB23DA9DFBCB.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17023373 No.17023373 [Reply] [Original]

For me? It’s Marxian and Freudist thought

>> No.17023376

>>17023373
>Marxian
Based
>Freudist
Cringe

>> No.17024073

I keked ok. Now do something better with your time frogtard.

>> No.17024079

>>17023376
Fpbp

>> No.17024171

>>17023376
fpwp

>> No.17024174

>>17023373
fucking modernist retard

>>17023376
go fuck your dad faggot

>> No.17024247

>>17023373
Great. Hey, Marx abandons the LTOV in volume 3 of Capital. That way next time some faggot tries to tell you Marxism is dumb cuz my LTOV you can say? Oh, I see you haven't read volume three of Capital...pleb! And you can do so without having to read Marx. Yw.

>> No.17024254

>Marxian
is this different than Marxist?

>> No.17024259

>>17024254
>>17023373
ohh wait
i see what you did there. fuck i'm slow.

>> No.17025643

Weberian and Darwinist, thank you.

>> No.17025654

>>17024254
It is actually different though
Marxians base themselves on what Marx actually wrote
Marxists have never read Marx but he defines their personality, or at least his distorted image does
The best way to filter them out is by asking "what did Marx mean when he said "religion is the opium of the masses""

>> No.17025693

>>17024254
Marxians live on Marx

>> No.17025704

>>17025654
Marxist meant that religion provided comfort but at the cost of obscuring reality, or least he seemed to mean that when he went into more detail than into the manifesto and compared religion to a camera obscura. Now am I a marxist or a marxian?

>> No.17025708

>>17023373
I'm gonna go with surrealist Jungian sorry

>> No.17025716

>>17025643
Lightyears ahead of OP

>> No.17025731
File: 802 KB, 753x432, file.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17025731

marx is cringe

>> No.17025785

...anon ...Freud was against bolshevism. You'd know it if you actually read him.

>> No.17025855

>>17024254
Marxist thought is the academic récupération of the original radical doctrine of Marx. Institutions neuter radicality, they trivialize and sterilize, then inject the inactivated strain back into the current discourse. Marxists want to reform political economy, Marx wants to abolish it entirely. Marxians do not recognize marxism as the continuation of radical thought, but it is not a fixed ideology, nor a clearly defined group.

One a side note; where institutions act as a vaccine to neuter potential radicality, you can find in Debord and Kaczynski the inverted vaccine (détournement, the system's neatest trick) Kaczynski delineates a path towards revolution, and most of his works serve the purpose of filtering domesticated assets and counter-revolutionaries from joining and subverting the movement. Debord has theorized as well but many of his side concepts are temporal and useless as of today. Don't know how to say it in english but basically, un élement, une idéologie, une temporalité contre révolutionnaire reconduit la domination du capital éternellement, toute lutte qui n'est pas maximaliste est une fausse lutte. C'est précisément la reconduite permanente qui est à la fois le moteur et le produit de toutes les idéologies, à la manière de la rétroaction cybérnetique. Il faut l'enrayer.

>>17025693
kek

>>17025643
Darwinism is such a sorry excuse of capitalist domination it's baffling that so many people fall for it kek. It is the second copernican revolution, a discourse that only serves the current ideological framework to support and renew eternal submission. The copernican revolution paved the way towards peripheral ontology (leading to the eventual annhilation of the subject by structuralists) darwinism is the industrial version of it. It is pure ideology.

>> No.17025864

Nothing about Engels?

>> No.17025883

>>17023373
For me, it's Hegel and Jung

>> No.17025902

>>17023373
Midwit thought.

>> No.17025924
File: 85 KB, 305x374, Bohm.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17025924

>Marx

No, I don't think so.

>> No.17025936

>>17025855
Do you have an opinion on whether Darwinian evolution is actually true or not, or only whether it's useful for capitalism

>> No.17026088

For me, it's Jesus and Christ

>> No.17026189

>>17025883
weird but okay

>> No.17026232

>>17024259
It’s ok I don’t think anyone got my retarded joke either