Classical vs. Christian values

[Anonymous No.16559024]

Which is superior? sidetone: what should I read to further understand and familiarize myself with Classical values on their own merits?

[Anonymous No.16559060]

>>16559024
Who made this retarded chart?

[Anonymous No.16559072]

What mouth that drools
What wit so low
Created such an image?

[Anonymous No.16559081]

>>16559060
>>16559072
>image is retarded, BUT I'M NOT GOING TO SPECIFY WHAT'S WRONG WITH IT

[Anonymous No.16559089]

>>16559024

>black and white thinking
>not understanding reversals

[Anonymous No.16559094]

>>16559081
>I need other posters to do my critical thinking for me

[Anonymous No.16559208]

>>16559024
Last column es marxism, not contemporary values, megafaggot

[Anonymous No.16559226]

>>16559024
Not the worst chart out there. at a bare reductive pov its decent. dont let polemisicts say it is 100percent right or wrong.

There is not exact cut off, but as an abstract catagorization with overlaping features (saints can be heros, A classical person can be an athiest, etc, etc) its decent.

[Anonymous No.16559251]

>>16559024
Neoplatonism is undeniably both Hellenic at its core but also thoroughly weaved into Medieval Christianity through Scholasticism.
Christian "slave morality" was only true for the late Roman Empire and the late Enlightenment Europe Nietzsche was reacting to.
Medieval Christendom was a blend of the "Christian values" OP posted and the "Classical values".

Moreover, most esoteric, noble cults, especially pythagoreans/orphics were monotheistic (specifically henotheist)

[sneed No.16559259]

>>16559024
>>16559081
>retard image
>wojak
yep this is gonna be a sage and hide, sneed goes in all fields.

[Anonymous No.16559321]

>>16559081
it's reductive to the point of being useless and is basically just an advertisement for some retarded neo-/pol/ack's view of LE EPIC STRONK PAGANISM
there I explained it for you, now go read a book

[Anonymous No.16559656]

i dont think you can really reduce deeply spiritual, psychological and cultural values down to bullet points and get any accurate sense of them. actually, you can for modern values since they are superficial, but not the other two.

[Anonymous No.16559676]

>>16559081
Classic Values seem to imply Greco-Roman but for some reason they throw in Druids and "Pagan Priests" whatever that fucking means. Contemporary Values could have been a decent list but It's obvious the author has a modern political bias. It's an interesting idea but whoever made this is fucking retarded.

[Anonymous No.16559699]

>>16559024
>classicist shitting on contemporary values for being statist
>when you want an absolute monarchy

[Anonymous No.16559725]

>>16559024
>the atheist chart
This was made by a Christian who lost a debate to a (based) atheist.

[Anonymous No.16559746]

>>16559725
>theism
cringe
>atheism
cringe
>agnostic pantheism
BASED BASED BASED

[Anonymous No.16560218]

>>16559208
>Last column es marxism, not contemporary values, megafaggot
HAHAHAHA imagine being this brainwashed by prager U and neocon talking points

[Anonymous No.16560882]

>>16559024