/lit/ - Literature

[femanon No.16432342]

men trying to interpret art

[Anonymous No.16432367]

>>16432342
men can't understand women and women can't understand men. we hate each other.

[Anonymous No.16432370]

>>16432367
Luv pusy
Ha' women
Simple as

[Anonymous No.16432372]

>>16432342
based
fuck women and their overly socialized garbage

[femanon No.16432373]

>>16432367
correction, women DO understand men. There's no complexity in men, don't flatter yourself

[Anonymous No.16432374]

[Anonymous No.16432394]

Prove him wrong

[Anonymous No.16432398]

>>16432373
What complexity is there to women?

[Anonymous No.16432404]

>>16432342
Is that true?

[Anonymous No.16432408]

>>16432404
It’s a metric based on self-loathing and journal collecting

[Anonymous No.16432412]

>>16432398
>>16432408
Meant to respond to this

[Anonymous No.16432416]

>>16432373
There's more complexity in men than women.
Women want two things: material comfort and entertain a social circle.
Men on the other hand, you cannot even begin to grasp us.

[femanon No.16432418]

>>16432398
men should know this better, they're ones that say it the most

[Anonymous No.16432420]

>>16432372
They (the Austins) and their stories are a product of male culture. Stop messing around with over socialized computer hardware and go love innawoods already

[Anonymous No.16432423]

>>16432370
>Ha' women
what english language accent would drop the t in hate
what are you trying to do
explain yourself

[Anonymous No.16432424]

[Anonymous No.16432427]

>>16432416
No.
Men just don’t understand. You certainly have a problem with generalizations

[Anonymous No.16432429]

Cool, another thread where /lit/ brags about never getting laid. Pussy is confusing and scary. Have your mother heat up another hot pocket.

[Anonymous No.16432437]

>>16432416
based

[femanon No.16432439]

>>16432416
about your pic, it's literally the opposite. I see a new post about women nearly every minute here.

[Anonymous No.16432441]

>>16432373
>>16432416
shut the fuck up retards

[Anonymous No.16432444]

[Anonymous No.16432453]

>>16432429
I hope she sees this post bro

[Anonymous No.16432456]

>>16432439
This

[Anonymous No.16432458]

>>16432398
Men = low Kolmogorov complexity.
Women = high Kolmogorov complexity.
The best, the most intelligent explanation of a phenomenon is the simplest one (i.e. that takes the least amount of code do describe). Low Kolmogorov complexity = simple, elegant, intelligent, efficient. If you have a sequence like 1,2,3,4,5, and are asked to continue it, a low Kolmogorov complexity continuation would assume that it goes like 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9, 10, ... and so on, i.e. all natural integers.
A high Kolmogorov complexity continuation would be something like 1,2,3,4,5,192,1123,3914,... where the n'th value is f(n-1) with f as in the image. It's a possible continuation, indeed f(0)=1, f(1)=2, f(2)=3, f(3)=4, f(4)=5 so it's consistent with the data. However, it's a retarded continuation that's way more complex than necessary. The amount of code you need to describe the sequence is way larger than that of simple 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,....
Women are like that. They have a whole clusterfuck of retarded reasons and behaviors for ultimately simple things. Asking to understand a woman is like asking to understand the mind of someone who continued the sequence 1,2,3,4,5, with ,192,1123,3914. There's no point, they're obviously retarded. Whatever reasons they have, if they have any, are going to be retarded and not worth your time.
That's why you don't try to have complicated conversations with women. There's no point. They will only confuse you because at their essence they're extremely confused and retarded beings. They are good for mothering children and for fucking.

[Anonymous No.16432460]

>>16432373
I think generally both understand each other fairly well, with exceptions. However, I have yet to meet a woman who fully understands the nuances of masculine friendship and hatred. I think that's part of modern women's infatuation with homosexual men: gay men make more sense to them.

[Anonymous No.16432462]

>>16432453
Their mothers?

[Anonymous No.16432465]

Reminder to spam ALL gender war threads with giantess images

[Anonymous No.16432484]

>>16432465
That was the only one I had.
You have anymore yuri type?

[Anonymous No.16432525]

>>16432367
simple as, mate

[Anonymous No.16432555]

>>16432420
This "male culture" is based around pandering to women with unearned self importance. Try being independent for once.

[Anonymous No.16432559]

>>16432484

[Anonymous No.16432651]

>>16432423
norfs

[Anonymous No.16432784]

>>16432373
>women DO understand men
Exploiting a man's base instinct doesn't require intelligence, it's just another instinct. Being slightly less retarded than a retard doesn't make you intelligent.

[Anonymous No.16432792]

>>16432342
based
jane austen sucks

[Anonymous No.16432806]

Meanwhile, men are responsible for almost all of the greatest art in history

[Anonymous No.16432841]

>>16432342
boooooooop brap bing bong wing wong gooop goop gwap gworp gooooo goo gaaa geee bring bring br-r-r-r-r-ing booba biba binga boi-oi-oi-oi-oi-oi-ng

[Anonymous No.16432848]

[Anonymous No.16432852]

If a novel doesn't make me coom, into the trash it goes, simple as

[Anonymous No.16432865]

>>16432342
based mr carlton b morgan

[Anonymous No.16432881]

>>16432342
Austen is shit, the Brontes are more deserving of being known as "muh woman author"

[Anonymous No.16432918]

>>16432373
lol sure

[Anonymous No.16432947]

>>16432373
https://www.instagram.com/p/CFSdd-Uluxb/?utm_source=ig_web_copy_link

[Anonymous No.16432959]

>>16432423
Bri'ish accen

[Anonymous No.16432991]

>>16432423
Foo' off, innit

[Anonymous No.16433013]

i hate women, niggers and janny

[Anonymous No.16433160]

>>16432806
>Meanwhile, men are responsible for almost all of the greatest atrocities and architects of our own extinction.
Ftfy

[Anonymous No.16433161]

>>16432367
Women are shallow but have an infinite depth to their shallowness which is incomprehensible.

The problem of never understanding a woman is eternal.

[Anonymous No.16433174]

>>16433161
Why are you males so dumb?

[Anonymous No.16433179]

[Anonymous No.16433217]

>>16433174
Being smart is for chinlet nerds. Excuse me while I coom on this tinder thots fat ass.

[Anonymous No.16433220]

>>16433160
Meanwhile, that doesn't change the fact that men are responsible for almost all of the greatest art in history

[Anonymous No.16433262]

>>16432423
Cockney accent would also drop the h. Hate would sound more like "ey" sandwiched inbetween two glottal stops

[Anonymous No.16433291]

>>16433174
It's not my quote, it's Nietzsche's.

Also unless you're at least 7/10, don't talk to me.

[Anonymous No.16433471]

>>16432373
He was a simple guy, I'm sure.

[Anonymous No.16433895]

>>16432424
>>16432374
>>16432444
>>16432456
>>16432465
>>16432559
>>16432848
>>16433179
Enough of you sperg! Nobody shares your blasted fetish for horse cock trannies. Away with you.

[Anonymous No.16433929]

>>16432342
Okay, okay, for real, seriously, someone tell me the actual truth on this.
Are these anti-male gender war posts actually made by women? Do women browse /lit/, like really? Because I find that extremely hard to believe. I'm not including trannies in this.
Is it just men making these posts for the purposes of trolling? Or, is it all trannies? Or are these posts made by lifelong women?
It just seems very strange to me.

[Anonymous No.16433940]

>>16433895

[Anonymous No.16433941]

@16433291
>9/10: walks away

[Anonymous No.16433945]

>>16433929
No, it goes without saying that these posts are made by men as women do not browse this website unless they upload a picture of them with their tits hanging out and a time stamp.

[Anonymous No.16433953]

>>16433940
Baste. My fapping folder grows in power.

[Anonymous No.16434072]

>>16433940
Do necks that tiny exist in reality

[Anonymous No.16434171]

>>16432373
Men are all the philosophers and scientists in human history

[Anonymous No.16434190]

>>16433160
It's better to be on both ends of the extremes than being a complete mediocrity.

[Anonymous No.16434212]

>>16434171
You think that’s complex?

[Anonymous No.16434215]

>>16434190
rekt

[Anonymous No.16434222]

>>16433161
>Women are shallow but have an infinite depth to their shallowness which is incomprehensible
This means nothing

[Anonymous No.16434241]

>>16432342
Femanon here, For Withering Heights, I hate main characters and thought she was playing both her love interests with her arrogant indecision. Meanwhile my boyfriend loved the story. What gives?

[Anonymous No.16434296]

>>16434241

[Anonymous No.16434340]

>>16432416
>rent free

[Anonymous No.16434352]

>>16434241
You hate Cathy because you know that she is like you, but you reject that side of yourself to pretend you're a good and moral women. Your boyfriend loves it because he is based and redpilled, and can see the insights it gives into the darker sides of human nature that exist in all men and women.

[femanon No.16434385]

>>16434190
>being trash is better than being a normal human

[femanon No.16434393]

>>16434385
this

[Anonymous No.16434421]

>>16434385
>>16434393
>the blatant samefagging
kek, you alright

[femanon No.16434882]

>>16434421
yes

[Anonymous No.16434896]

>>16434882

[Anonymous No.16434902]

>>16432416
Not really. Do you think most normie men think for anything more than going to work and trying to fuck some random thot.

[Anonymous No.16434908]

>>16433160
Both are true

[Anonymous No.16434975]

>>16432423
ha som wa n cool ya beans

[freak bitych No.16435137]

>>16432342

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA that review IS BASED

[Anonymous No.16435191]

>>16432458
WHY IS NOBODY RESPONDING TO MY POST!!!

[Anonymous No.16435266]

>>16432458
>>16435191

[Anonymous No.16435313]

>>16433160
Being responsible for shit comes from being an agent rather than an object.

[Anonymous No.16435615]

>>16432458
Women aren't complicated, you're just autistic.

[Anonymous No.16435646]

>>16435615
It's not that women are complicated, its that their thought process is less streamlined

[Anonymous No.16435889]

>>16432458
i think in general men tend to think about principles in order to determine actions; they have a worldview that is used to decide what to do. women often shape their worldview around their actions (so their "reasoning" seems strange to you because its actually retrofitted to justify their actions)

[Anonymous No.16435895]

>>16435889
>its actually retrofitted to justify their actions
Imagining thinking men don't also do this

[Anonymous No.16435905]

>>16435895
plenty of men do it, and plenty of women determine actions through principles. but i think the general rule i outlined is true for the majority

[Anonymous No.16435979]

>>16432342
We're not all bad, the lowest common denominator isn't impressive but the same is true for women. We are sapient beings of the same species and both capable of higher thinking. The issue feminists don't realize is men are as controlled by societal mores as them and it can be damaging regardless. I can't fully understand a woman and she can't fully understand me because no one can ever fully understand another person. We all have a depth to us that can be both brighter and darker than we show and all of us hide this.

[Anonymous No.16436010]

>>16432373
this is why they see a group of guys watching boxing or MMA and always say,
>"That doesn't appeal to me, but I completely understand why you're watching that."

[Anonymous No.16436017]

>>16436010
No human being says that outside of reddit

[Anonymous No.16436018]

>>16432398
Boys often mistake contradictory behaviour for "being complex".
Men do not.

[Anonymous No.16436083]

>>16435313
So stop whining about “muh culture” when you slate it to be whipped from universal memory.

Men are a pox!

[Anonymous No.16436172]

>>16436083

[Anonymous No.16436179]

I wish I was a man, women are worthless for things that matter

[Anonymous No.16436195]

>>16436179

[Anonymous No.16436298]

>>16434385
refuted by a white man

Isn’t every accomplishment of genius in
this world the result of the one genius going against the inertia of the masses? What is the
statesman supposed to do if flattery fails to win the crowd’s approval for his plans? Is he
supposed to accept it? Is he supposed to abandon the tasks which he knows are vital to the
people and go home or retire? Does he quit even if he knows failure resulted from the
stupidity of his fellow citizens? Or is he to stay regardless? In a case like this, doesn’t a man
of real character fall into hopeless conflict between his insight and his honorable intentions?
Where is the dividing line between duty to the community and duty to one’s personal
honor? Shouldn’t every true leader refuse to be degraded by acting as a political juggler? On
the other hand, shouldn’t every juggler feel a call to go into politics since the ultimate
responsibility falls on some undefined mob and not him? Must our parliamentary majority
lead to the total destruction of the leader concept? Can anyone believe that this world
comes from the brain of majorities and not from the heads of individuals? p 54/55

[Anonymous No.16436315]

>>16436298

[Anonymous No.16436406]

>>16436315
instead of thanking me for enlightening info you insult me, a leaf. Humble yourself for the sake of humanity

[Anonymous No.16436430]

>>16436195
you are the most based poster on 4chan, please never change

[Anonymous No.16436443]

>>16432367
man I fucking love boomer comedy

[Anonymous No.16436465]

>>16436430
I second this. Saving /lit/ one giantess post at a time.

[Anonymous No.16436507]

>>16434222
>t.woman

[Anonymous No.16436575]

>>16436430
>>16436465
Thanks frens
I'm going to turn this into a thing I do going forward

[Anonymous No.16436579]

>>16436507
>>16434222
Woman here.

It means men cannot comprehend the instinctual intellect of women. We know the truth philosophers are still scratching their heads over.

[Anonymous No.16436586]

>>16432367
Women hate each other

[Anonymous No.16436590]

>>16436579

[Anonymous No.16436602]

>>16436586
And don’t invite them to dinner parties.
Men also hate each other. They kill them. They enslave them and their families

>>16436590
Why?

[Anonymous No.16436604]

>>16436602

[Anonymous No.16436605]

>>16436590
I want to sniff her pits.

[Shakespeare No.16436616]

>>16432416
>Men on the other hand, you cannot even begin to grasp us.
gay

[Anonymous No.16436641]

>>16436616
How tf did you reincarnate?

[Anonymous No.16436664]

>>16432373
11/10 collateral damage

[Anonymous No.16436682]

>>16436602
Yes, and women, eternal nigger of gender, NEETs of sex have hutzpah to complain. Better prepare some food dinnermaker.

[Anonymous No.16436686]

>>16436682

[Anonymous No.16436695]

>>16436682
Ask me how I know you're a jew

[Anonymous No.16436707]

>>16436686
Is that yuri giantess?
>>16436695
Because I live rent free in your head?

[Anonymous No.16436897]

>>16432374
>>16432424
>>16432444
>>16432456
>>16432465
>>16432559
>>16432848
>>16433179
>>16433940
>>16434296
>>16434896
>>16435266
>>16436172
>>16436195
>>16436575
>>16436590
>>16436604
put your trip back on, butterfly
you're making me horny

[Anonymous No.16437130]

>>16436897
I'm not butters

[Anonymous No.16437154]

>>16436897
Why would I be into giant straight couples? This >>16432456 is the only one you got right.

[Anonymous No.16437861]

>>16437154
i can become a girl for u

[Anonymous No.16438119]

>>16432373
What's wrong with simplicity?

[Anonymous No.16438129]

>>16438119
>Simple women: bad.
>Simple men: good.

[Anonymous No.16438151]

>You’ve no idea how women are. They love misfortune. They’re only happy when they can feel sorry for themselves, when they really—but really—have some reason to feel sorry for themselves, when they can abase themselves and delight in it, frenetically, passionately, dramatically. And as they are all hams at heart they need their audience to play to, a public, even an imaginary one, before they offer themselves up as a holocaust. A woman never gives herself, she sacrifices herself. Thus she can always believe that she’s acting according to a superior principle. This is why every one of them is convinced that we’re doing her dirt, and calls the whole world to witness the purity of her intentions. The explanation of prostitution lies not in a desire to be depraved but in an egocentric sentiment that relates everything to the self and makes women consider their bodies as being something very special, precious, unique and rare; it’s a matter of honour for them to put a price on it. This explains the vulgar streak that’s to be found even among the most distinguished women; it explains the adventures worthy of a scullery-maid that the noblest females get mixed up in every day.

[Anonymous No.16438156]

>>16433471
I'm a simple guy and i absolutely hated reading pride and prejudice.
It's too formal and not that intricate. feels like a spongy teeth drama with no real repercussions and a plotline focused on marriage. what a waste.

Atleast Sylvia Plath's bell jar redeemeed female writers for me.

[Anonymous No.16438161]

>>16432342
He’s not wrong.

I still like the book, but he’s not wrong.

[Anonymous No.16438204]

>>16438129
No.
Women are desirable no matter what unless they have some serious physical condition.
Men on the other hand... tough shit if they dont stand out from the crowd.

I still think this is a positive thing for men, it means that they're forced to drive innovation, pursue boundaries and have an easier time finding their things.

[Anonymous No.16438587]

>>16438204
>uggo virgin women don't exist
>men have to be spectacular to get tail
kek

[Anonymous No.16438634]

>>16432373
women aren't complex they're convoluted

[Anonymous No.16439546]

>>16433160
Maybe, but modern civilization is being destroyed by women more than it is being destroyed by men. Male postmodernist philosophers created the blue prints of western civilization's collapse, but the worker executing the plan are women.

[Anonymous No.16439561]

>>16432416
men just want to be men the methods they use to validate don't matter

[Anonymous No.16439600]

>>16432373
It takes insight to realise you don't understand something, men have enough insight to realise they don't understand women, or at least that they understand them somewhat, but that they fail to make sense of it all.
Women, on the other hand, are so unsuspecting of what men think that they are convinced they understand us. Women understand our basic instincts, our weaknesses, too, in short, they perfectly understand the devil in men, and it's often enough to control the basic man.
But they will never understand how God inhabits us. They will never understand why we can be loyal and die for our country, they will never understand true brotherhood, that they often interpret as homosexuality. They will never understand how a man could give his life for others. For the most precious possession of the woman is herself, the most precious possession of the man is his relationship with God.

[Anonymous No.16439607]

>>16432373
Guaranteed (You)s. Good job, anon

[Anonymous No.16439637]

>>16436017
I think anon was being sarcastic.

[Anonymous No.16439647]

>>16432416
Imagine the insane amounts of faggotry you have to keep in your system to actually post such an image.
If you actually think this is in any way true you are an actual <90 IQ retard.

[Anonymous No.16439705]

>>16439647
It's not even true "in any way"?

[Anonymous No.16439711]

>>16438587
>statement of general trend
>ummm don't you know there are counterexamples
Remember how people used to mock the "not all men" argument?

[Anonymous No.16439874]

>>16439705
No, because applying a gender bias to something as rare as engaging with a truthful approach to trascendental matters is inmensely stupid.
You all know perfectly well that almost the whole of the human population doesn't give a fuck about any of those things, either male or female. And we know that people come here because they enjoy the social aspet of discussing literature, but there is nothing meaningful to be gained from coming here other than the facade of social interaction centerd around a really niche interest like philosophy/literature. This is extremely clear when you look at the catalogue and see that 80% of the post are either low effort memes, lewd pics or weak pol bait masquerading as book recommendations.
So 99% of you motherfuckers jerking yourselves off thinking how basic women are, are either insecure as fuck coming here to vent
or exactly as shallow and stupid, just trying to differenciate yourselves from the lowly masses you despise by reading books you lack the capacity to truly comprehend, hence the shilling of actual jokes like Evola.

[Anonymous No.16439887]

>>16433160
Meanwhile, men are also responsible for

Democracy
Human rights
Natural law
Literature
Classical music
Symphony orchestras
String quartets
Western painting
Western drawing
Western sculpture
Opera
Poetry
Film
Television
Telecommunications
Motorized vehicles and the culture the grew from them from design to racing to drive-in movie theatres to traffic systems on and on.
Trains and rail systems
Airplanes and flight systems
Motor ships and shipping systems (which provide about 90% of everything to every country worldwide)
Modern military technology (and the great majority of older military tech)
Dramatic theatre (plays)
Comedic theatre (plays, performance such as vaudeville, stand-up comedy, etc)
Musical theatre (musicals)
Downhill skiing
Cross-country skiing
Archery
Soccer
Hockey
Football
Cricket
Baseball
Tennis
Volleyball
Basketball
Environmental stewardship
Multiculturalism (It didn't work, but it was a kind-hearted idea)
United Nations peace-keeping (whatever you think of the UN, UN Peace-keeping is very important)
Photography (art and journalistic)
Ballet
Western architecture
Western cuisine
Fashion
the vast majority of:
physics
chemistry
mathematics
biology
material science
medical science
applied science
engineering
business
economics
finance
outer space science, exploration, and research
oceanography
animal rights
humanism
news media
legal system
the printed word (books, maps, etc)