/lit/ - Literature

[Anonymous No.16405520]

Holy shit, reading up on this guy and what a terrible human being.

[Anonymous No.16405566]

>>16405520
The french are very hit or miss; a good rule of thumb is to not read them at all.

[Anonymous No.16405578]

[Anonymous No.16405597]

>>16405520
well, don't leave us hanging anon

[Anonymous No.16405603]

>>16405520
>literally admitted he went into academia and made up his semantically void word-salad of a "philosophy" just to make young literary twinks want to fuck him
Just think of all the damage done to academic discourse because this fag wanted to get his butthole stuffed.

[Anonymous No.16405607]

>>16405603
cringe but based

[Anonymous No.16405611]

>>16405566
Based

[Anonymous No.16405657]

>>16405520
foucault makes both conservacucks and progressives seethe, based

[Anonymous No.16405689]

>>16405657
Progressives permaseethe at this point

[Anonymous No.16405773]

sources I need books

[Anonymous No.16405796]

I dont believe in God, but i always thought there was something almost divine about him dying of AIDS

[Anonymous No.16405799]

>>16405578
So the masked philosopher was speaking from experience!

[Anonymous No.16405803]

>>16405796
>gay died of aids when there was no information about it !!!! LE poetic justice!!!!!

[Anonymous No.16405804]

>>16405603
>>16405578
No homo, but I can't deny that this is based.

[Anonymous No.16405808]

>>16405803
Exactly

[Anonymous No.16405832]

>>16405578
>tfw foucault's asshole was just as capacious as his brain.

[Anonymous No.16405847]

>>16405803

[Anonymous No.16405887]

>>16405578
>But in the end, when you look at this a little more closely, what strikes me is that all these get-ups [of mustachioed gays, leathermen, etc.], all these brazen displays of masculinity, absolutely do not coincide with a revaluation of the male as male. For, on the contrary, out of sight and under the cover of this brazen masculinity, what emerges are types of masochistic sexual relations or masochistic assertiveness in which there is no valorization of the male as male. Absolutely none. On the contrary, these uses of the body could be defined as desexualized, as devirilized, like fist fucking or other extraordinary fabrications of pleasures, which Americans reach with the help of certain drugs or instruments.
>[...] In short, they use the signs of masculinity but not at all to return to something that would be of the order of phallocratism or machismo, but rather to invent themselves, to allow themselves to make their masculine body a place for the production of extraordinarily polymorphous pleasures, detached from the valorizations of sex and particularly the male sex.
From the interview "The Gay Science"

[Anonymous No.16405911]

>>16405578
>>16405887
based french degenarate vs seething anglo moralcucks itt

[Anonymous No.16405940]

>>16405578
You know, knowing the lemmings these hedonists have have given birth to through their ideology, I dont even think that image is far fetched from the truth.

I will never be for this filth no matter ho many speakers they blare it from.

[Anonymous No.16406253]

>>16405603
Gays can get fucked without going to the trouble of writing. If he said he did it for money I might find it more plausible.

[Anonymous No.16406455]

>>16405520
what about being viciously gay and obsessed with torture makes you a terrible human being? both of those are terrible in a sense, but the simple truths he had the balls to state redeemed him more than repentance would have. His perhaps sick fantasies came to reality on no unwitting or unwilling being that we are aware of.

[Anonymous No.16406784]

>>16406253
If you look it up, he told a story about how he never cared about academics until a boy he had a fagcrush on in his class started having trouble, so Foucault started reading to be able to tutor him and therefore get close to and creep on him. His entire career was predicated from the first on faglust.

[Anonymous No.16406801]

>>16405520
Is this the /dəˈluːz/ guy?

[Anonymous No.16406923]

>>16406784
All sorts of people, perhaps even some you admire, got started on a given path for reasons you'd find distasteful---It doesn't mean that's why they persisted.

[Anonymous No.16407012]

>>16405603
kinda based for a filthy fucking degenerate
>>16405803
yep thats right?

[Anonymous No.16408618]

>>16405520
>People should be likeable and nice and change my diapers for me

[Anonymous No.16408664]

>>16408618
>I want to learn about the science of knowledge itself from an insane man

[Anonymous No.16408667]

>>16406923
basado logicposter

[Anonymous No.16408856]

>>16408664
Only those that come from the Outside speak the truth.

[Anonymous No.16409363]

>>16406455
he was a pedo, anon

[Anonymous No.16409370]

If AIDs didn't exist yet under his pseudo-hyperstitional logic how did he die of it

[Anonymous No.16410544]

>>16409363
what the fuck? Are you seriously trying to use that kind of logic on 4chan?

[Anonymous No.16411118]

>>16405578
So not only does it spread physical viruses but gay sex also spreads post-modern mind viruses?
I dislike homosexuals.

[Anonymous No.16411446]

>>16405603
So in other words he’s the only honest philosopher?

[Anonymous No.16411493]

>>16405578
Virgin reader vs Chad fister