/lit/ - Literature

[Anonymous No.16404538]

What are some good right wing books?

[Anonymous No.16404543]

>>16404538
There are none.

[Anonymous No.16404550]

Mein Kampf

[Anonymous No.16404554]

None, because right wingers are notorious retards

[Anonymous No.16404599]

most classic literature is right wing by modern standards

[Anonymous No.16404609]

>>16404599
>hates jews
>worships a rabbi
Why are christcucks such retards?

[Anonymous No.16404612]

>>16404538
Any right-wing book is by definition a good book.

[Anonymous No.16404627]

Harry Potter

[Anonymous No.16404638]

>>16404599
>Dostoevsky held negative views of the Ottoman Turks, dedicating multiple pages to them in his "Writer's Diary", professing the need to have no pity for Turks at war and no regrets in killing Turks and depopulating Istanbul of the Turkish population and shipping it off to Asia

[Anonymous No.16404642]

>>16404538
>>16404612
LMAO. Absolute retards.

[Anonymous No.16404655]

>>16404538
Morals and Dogma by Albert Pike.
The philosophy contained in this book is arguably the most influential in human history. This is the philosophy of 14 US presidents, including George Washington; it's the philosophy of Ben Franklin, of Mark Twain and Mozart. I'm sure you can guess by now the organization he belonged to. Don't believe those who would demonize them - these were noble men. They shaped the Western World.

[Anonymous No.16404658]

>>16404642
>Siege
>He thinks White people can be conservative
ohnonono

[Anonymous No.16404667]

>>16404538
If you read any philosophy this year, OP, choose this.
>>16404655

[Anonymous No.16404692]

>>16404599
This.
>>16404538
Just throw a stone anywhere in the Western Canon before the 1970s, and unless they are expliclity Marx, Engels or Lenin they are probably either
A.) Rightist, Conservatives, or reactionaries by their own time's standards
B.)Rightist, Conservatives, or reactionaries by our own time's standards

Hell, even people like Adorno and Marx had some very politically incorrect and "white" things to say. See Adorno on Jazz, or Marx on various ethnicities. Or Stalin on Homosexuals etc.

[Anonymous No.16404703]

Giovanni Gentile is also good. His book Genesis and Structure of Society is available on archive.org, which you can rent for 1hr and convert into e-book format if you know how. He has another book on b-ok.org, The Mind as a Pure Act. Most of his other books are untranslated.

[Anonymous No.16405001]

I made this. Thoughts?

[Anonymous No.16405017]

political agenda books all suck

[Anonymous No.16405055]

>>16405001
>wealth of nations on left
>harry potter on right
I chuckled

[Anonymous No.16405062]

>>16405001
kek

[Anonymous No.16405065]

>>16404692
Barely any of the people in your image were Nazis. Junger was a monarchist, Evola hated German Fascism, Strauss was Jewish, and George hated Hitler. I don't know about the rest though, but I don't imagine they were Nazis.

[Anonymous No.16405072]

>>16405055
Smith was left wing:
>If one puts his views in context and does some careful reading of his work, it becomes apparent that Smith despised landlords and large corporations. He was also an egalitarian at heart. He thought that free market Capitalism would free people from oppressive hierarchies like landlords because, at his time, the threshold of the industrial revolution, free market Capitalism would allow most people to be self employed as artisans or farmers, free from the oppressive hierarchies of workplaces that include bosses.

>He would be utterly disgusted with modern capitalism.

[Anonymous No.16405083]

>>16404538
A few come to mind...
The Illiad
The Odyssey
The Aeneid
The Republic
Aristotle's Ethics
Beowulf
The Prince
Brothers Karamazov
For Whom The Bell Tolls
The Grapes of Wrath
Tales of King Arthur
The Lord of the Rings
Leviathan
The Sailor Who Fell from Grace with the Sea
Don Quixote
The Art of War
Heart of Darkness
Fear and Trembling
Paradise Lost
The Bible
Plutarch's Lives
The Anabasis of Alexander
Napoleon the Great
Caesar, Life of a Colossus
The Divine Comedy
Most of, if not all of the Western Canon

[Anonymous No.16405091]

>>16405083
>For Whom The Bell Tolls
did you even read it

[Anonymous No.16405096]

>>16405072
>If one puts his views in context and does some careful reading of his work

Yikes.

[Anonymous No.16405103]

>>16405083
>the bible
>don quioxte
>Brothers K
>The Republic

All far left. what is this list?

[Anonymous No.16405108]

>>16405103
>>16405091
He's just listing books

[Anonymous No.16405109]

>>16404599
Capitalism is bad when jews do it?

[Anonymous No.16405110]

>>16405083
>most of, if not all of the western canon
yeah you fucking WISH burger

[Anonymous No.16405111]

>>16405103
>The Republic is far left
Socrates’s ideal state is literally a fascist’s wet dream
>t. Fascist

[Anonymous No.16405117]

>>16405111
Even PewDiePie remarked that Plato's utopia is like Communism

[Anonymous No.16405121]

>>16405111
Fascism isn't right wing either

[Anonymous No.16405123]

>>16404538
I would say none, but I do think Le Maistre is worth a look.

>>16404638
Pro-Turk sentiment is right-wing.

>>16404692
>>16405083
Not subscribing to contemporary pieties doesn't make something right-wing

[Anonymous No.16405132]

>>16405083
weak bait

[Anonymous No.16405140]

>>16405117
>Pewdiepie

[Anonymous No.16405148]

>>16405132
then why did so many fall for it?

[Anonymous No.16405154]

>>16405083
>Thr Grapes of Wrath

[Anonymous No.16405156]

>>16405065
Oh my sweet summer child, every single person with a Wikipedia page was actually a Nazi

[Anonymous No.16405172]

>>16405083
>The Grapes of Wrath

[Anonymous No.16405209]

This chart has decent right libertarian theory

[Anonymous No.16405308]

>>16405209
useless. right-wingers don't read anything if it's not written by their yt role models

[Anonymous No.16405331]

>>16405209
>libertarians
>right wingers

[Anonymous No.16405335]

>>16405083
>The Grapes of Wrath
milky-milky is tighty-righty?

[Anonymous No.16405343]

>>16405065
"literal Nazis" is just a cheeky metaphor for "they weren't progressives, neoliberals or neocons"

[Anonymous No.16405351]

>>16405123
re-taking and purging Constantinople seems pretty right wing to me

[Anonymous No.16405654]

>>16404538
Just read the Traditionalists.

[Anonymous No.16405722]

>>16404538
First off, right-left dichotomy is a fuck, but here are the tidbits of "right movements" both older anti-enlightenment and the advent of the modernist right
counter-enlightenment;
>Burke, Reflections On The Revolution In France
>Pobedonostsev, Reflections Of A Russian Statesman
conservative revolution;
>Junger
>Schmitt
De Maistre is meh, and anyone else from the conservative revolution is not really worth the time imo.

[Anonymous No.16405747]

>>16405722
>lists Burke
>"De Maistre is meh"
At least name Metternich then.

[Anonymous No.16405765]

the left and right wing is meaningless. it's all on the compass, made to frustrate any attempt for change. i want to break free from the war between ideologies. be beyond the compass. there must be a secret form of governing waiting in the void. perhaps a better way than governing.

[Anonymous No.16405783]

>>16404538

[Anonymous No.16405798]

>>16405747
>Metternich
Never read, is he well articulated?
>>16405123
>Pro-Turk sentiment is right-wing
Found it, somebody get the raid
>>16404538
Just wait until the biopolitics kick in. You don't really need philosophy beyond the fact that you should be having as many white babies as possible.

[Anonymous No.16405802]

>>16405001
cringy attempt to be funny. What exactly is "left-wing" about Dorian gray? Because he was homosexual? Dorian Gray's message was reactionary in the end you midwit.

[Anonymous No.16405814]

>>16405117
Plato's Republic is Nationlist Socialist.

[Anonymous No.16405838]

>>16405802
>Foucault's Pendulum
>Reactionary right
What fucking retard made this? I doubt they read half of these books

[Anonymous No.16405848]

>>16404538
State of Fear

[Anonymous No.16405854]

>>16404538
Here's the perfect Reactionary /lit/ chart OP.

[Anonymous No.16405862]

>>16405765
boox4disfeel

[Anonymous No.16405869]

>>16405765
>>16405862
Come home, Eurasian men.

[Anonymous No.16405877]

>>16405798
I haven't read him much myself yet, actually. He's been on my reading list ever since some friends suggested I give him a shot. Evola also used to recommend Metternich to youth that would approach him for guidance. Speaking of which, you might like Evola - he had a very critical take towards biopolitics. Ride the Tiger has a chapter on family life that might be of interest.

[Anonymous No.16405904]

>>16405869
Dugin is too schizo for his own good, unfortunately. If he stopped being weird he'd make for a good political philosopher.

[Anonymous No.16405938]

>>16405877
I'll check him out. I've never read Evola because I detest occultism, and I think of him as a bitter substitute for Junger, who I have much more respect for. Any other good biopolitical recs though?

[Anonymous No.16406011]

>>16405938
Unfortunately no, I'm anti-materialist so I don't engage much with biopolitics. As to Evola and occultism, it's complicated. He writes polemics against occultists, theosophists and such, but he also does his own thing with spirituality, religion and tradition. I've found no better description for him other than "Traditionalist". Ideas like "spirit" play not only conceptual and metaphorical, but also literal part in his worldview, but that only makes his worldview more compelling IMO. He can sell qualitative hierarchy in a way few others can.

[Anonymous No.16406072]

Just read Siege

[Anonymous No.16406081]

>>16405209
I'm happy that libertarianism is generally agreed by all ideologies to be fucking retarded. Literal fascism is preferable to the cowboy free market mcdonalds state.

[Anonymous No.16406084]

>>16405854
why is he holding his sword by its blade?

[Anonymous No.16406091]

>>16405308
fuck off kike.
>>16406081
we love our libertarians, anon.

[Anonymous No.16406100]

>>16406084
It's in a sheath, look at the tip of the sword.

[Anonymous No.16406104]

>>16404538

[Anonymous No.16406142]

>>16405854
kinda curious as to what that french revolution book is like

[Anonymous No.16406194]

>>16405103
Bible left. Lol have you read it

[Anonymous No.16406200]

>>16404538
you need to be older than 14 to post here

[Anonymous No.16406206]

[Anonymous No.16406259]

>>16405331
>implying that austro-libertarianism is not the furthest right wing ideology

[Anonymous No.16406274]

>>16406259
Property - left wing or "right wing" - is the most boring shit in the world desu

[Anonymous No.16406346]

>>16406206
based

[Anonymous No.16407879]

>>16405117
"Like what communists think their utopia would be like"
there's a very important distinction in meaning depending on how you phrase it