Best anarchist /lit/ ?

[Anonymous No.16265940]

Having trouble finding material on it, I know of Chomsky's work, but can't find much on its attempts and revolutions like Catalonia , Ukraine or the Manchuria Koreans

[Anonymous No.16265954]

>>16265940
This is a literary fiction board

[Anonymous No.16266292]

Farewell to Catalonia - Orwell

[Anonymous No.16266304]

idk havent read any. but going off the usual list that is always called upon i guess Kropotkin.

[Anonymous No.16266418]

>>16265940
grow up, get a state.

[Anonymous No.16266843]

i haven’t read a lot of anarchist writing, but malatesta is good

[Anonymous No.16267477]

>Enquiry Concerning Political Justice - Godwin
>What is Property - Proudhon
>The Ego and It's Own - Stirner
>God and the State - Bakunin
>Statism and Anarchy - Bakunin
>The Conquest of Bread - Kropotkin
>Anarchism and other Essays - Goldman
>Anarchism - Malatesta
>From Bakunin to Lavan - Newman
>Post-Scarcity Anarchism - Bookchin
>Watch "No God's no Masters" documentary on YouTube.
Though I know what and why Anarcho-capitalists argue, embarrassingly I have read any specific work by one. Basically just read Austrian school thinkers and extrapolate. Maybe another anon can fill that in.
Also, unironically ask Butterfly.

[Anonymous No.16267519]

>>16265940
Mikhail Bakunin

[Anonymous No.16267577]

>>16265940
'Anarcho-Syndicalism: Theory and Practice' by Rudolf Rocker

Also, these: >>16267477

[Anonymous No.16268127]

bump

[Anonymous No.16269742]

>>16265940
No Gods, No Masters by Daniel Guérin

[Anonymous No.16269822]

>>16265940
Google Murray Bookchin

[Anonymous No.16270210]

>>16267477
>>16267577
>>16269822
Checked

[Anonymous No.16270376]

Anarcho-fascism

[Anonymous No.16270545]

Against the Day by Thomas Pynchon

[Anonymous No.16270661]

Leviathan by Hobbes

[Anonymous No.16271424]

>>16265940
>>16267477
>>16267577
Adding ABC of Anarchism by Rocker, A Lifelong Anarchist by Lucy Parsons (selected works) and Anarchism and the Black Revolution by Lorenzo Kom'boa Ervin.

For a historical work on the Spanish Civil War, I recommend Lessons of the Spanish Revolution by Vernon Richards. I haven't read any on Ukraine or Manchuria yet but as someone fond of Malatesta, I can recommend Making Sense of Anarchism by David Turcato and Italian Anarchism 1864 - 1892 by Nunzio Pernicone.

Feel free to ignore Chomsky.

[Anonymous No.16271466]

>Kropotkin, Bakunin, Proudhon, Goldman, Berkman, Malatesta, Bookchin, Zerzan, Black, Rocker, Graeber, Godwin, Morris, Tolstoy, Woodcock, Ward, Gelderloos

Any and all of these authors are the starting points for understanding and learning about Anarchism

[Anonymous No.16271490]

Bumpin'. Also can anyone please provide an explanation for why Violet is so damn perfect?

[Anonymous No.16271745]

>>16265940
>Having trouble finding material on it

There is a wikipedia page filled with Anarchist books, the anarchist library also has thousands of anarchists books and papers for free

https://theanarchistlibrary.org/special/index

[Anonymous No.16271762]

Hope this helps

[Anonymous No.16271827]

>>16265940
>interest in anarchy
>no rothbard
why haven't you taken the rothbard pill yet, OP?

Anatomy of the State for the win

[Anonymous No.16271892]

>>16271424
Sorry, ABC of Anarchism is Berkman, not Rocker.

[Anonymous No.16272003]

>>16271827
Anarcho-Capitalism is not anarchism.

[Anonymous No.16272259]

>>16265940
Just wear panties and programmer socks, and shove a dildo up your ass. The result is the same.

[Anonymous No.16272433]

>>16272259
>t. I've never read any leftist literature and get my political oppinions from Youtubers

[Anonymous No.16273340]

>>16272003
If anarcho communism is so is anarcho capitalism

[Anonymous No.16273367]

Hoppe is good too

[Anonymous No.16273374]

>>16272433
Lmao.
Cope

[Anonymous No.16273375]

>>16272259
Immense pleasure?

[Anonymous No.16273431]

>>16273367
Cringe.

[Anonymous No.16273479]

>>16273431
deal with it

[Anonymous No.16273501]

Kropotkin. He did more than any anarchist or "libertarian communist" to ground the concept in a sound theoretical basis. His ideas were informed by his work as a naturalist, hence the concept of mutual aide, which anticipated the now widespread biological concept of symbiosis. Like all ideological movements you can trace a clear downward trend in the quality of anarchist thought from one of its high points into the modern day.

[Anonymous No.16274263]

Bump.

[Anonymous No.16274276]

>>16265940
how dare you post my wife Violet

[Anonymous No.16274292]

>>16265940
A lot of the people listed still believe in "morality" and the concept of "Man" and let those control their actions. Only Stirner's works tear down spooks for good.

[Anonymous No.16274485]

How important is Rousseau to anarchist thought?

[Anonymous No.16274578]

>>16274485
Not terribly. You should still read him though, easily the least objectionable of the social contract trio

[Anonymous No.16274629]

>>16274578
I was more thinking second discourse than social contract.

[Anonymous No.16275340]

>>16274629
I don't remember any anarchist I've read any reference it. Maybe primitivists would be into it? I just remember thinking his fetishization of natives was weird.

[Anonymous No.16275360]

>>16265954
Any literature pretending that anarchy will work well is fiction, so it fits

[Anonymous No.16276200]

>>16273340
No, it isn't. Anarchism started as anarcho-communism. Anarchism is the abolition of hierarchy not just state. That's why every branch of anarchism, (anarcho-syndicalism, mutualism, egoism) are all anti capitalist. Anarcho-capitalists are in favour of hierarchy. It's anti-state, but not anarchy.