[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 753 KB, 700x845, 1563388560550.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16168568 No.16168568 [Reply] [Original]

I've been enjoying my reading of kant lately. Wrestling with his ideas is great fun. My question is, where does metaphysics go after Kant?

>> No.16168592

hegel

>> No.16168599

my diary desu

>> No.16168796
File: 31 KB, 400x400, Toilet-Plumbing-Diagram.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16168796

>>16168568
>where does metaphysics go after Kant?
Pic related

>> No.16168898

>>16168568
Nick land

>> No.16169152

>>16168568
>where does metaphysics go after Kant?
Schopenhauer.

>> No.16169161

Plotinus, Iamblichus and Proclus

>> No.16169168

>>16168568
Mainly Hegel and Schopenhauer

>> No.16169180

>>16168568
It ends with Kant. If you want to see developement is kwntian metaphysics, check the neo-kantian philosophers. People mentioning Idealists like Schopenhauer and Hegel clearly don't understand Kant

>> No.16169206

to shit

>> No.16169392

>>16168568
Thankfully analytics just ignored him and went forward with Aristotlean/Humean/Leibnizean metaphysics as a base.

>> No.16169444

>>16168568
kant killed philosophy

>> No.16169458

Schopenhauer.
Don't bother with the german sophists (Hegel, Schelling ect)

>> No.16169818

>>16168568
Guenon (pbuh)

>> No.16170258
File: 1.65 MB, 2142x2163, kantfichte.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16170258

Fichte