/lit/ - Literature

[Anonymous No.16141278]

Did you miss me you wankers?

[Anonymous No.16141281]

>>16141278
Yeah sorta.

[Anonymous No.16141286]

Step out a little more

[Anonymous No.16141332]

We still have buddhist threads every day, what do you mean

[Anonymous No.16141339]

>>16141278
will you fight the animefags with us?

[Anonymous No.16141363]

>>16141286
take the shot and see what happens hylic
>>16141339
the animefags will be dealt with swiftly and brutally

[Anonymous No.16141367]

Guenon changed my life

[Anonymous No.16141402]

>>16141367
you are blessed to have been touched by the great Guenon

[Anonymous No.16141404]

>>16141363
I feel blessed by your presence

[Anonymous No.16141413]

>>16141404
brother, we bless each other by sharing in this transcendent moment. The hylics are beneath us as we raise to the centre of the soul

[Anonymous No.16141436]

I just brushed my teeth

[Anonymous No.16141448]

>>16141436
I am happy for you brother

[Anonymous No.16141459]

>>16141413
What do you think of Plato my man?

Guenon is now our hero, we hated when we needed him most, and only now have we realised our mistakes. Praise the great Guenon.

[Anonymous No.16141482]

>>16141459
Πλάτων is a hero who saw the truth.
I am glad the truth of Guenon has made itself apparent in his absence.

[Anonymous No.16141486]

Based thread

[Anonymous No.16141489]

Based.

[Anonymous No.16141530]

Cringe thread

[Anonymous No.16141635]

Queernon

[Anonymous No.16141640]

Based thread brothers

[Anonymous No.16141657]

Welcome back Guenonposter, I look forward to a new age in Guenonposting

[Anonymous No.16141659]

>>16141657
This, welcome back Guenonanons

[Anonymous No.16141662]

Retroactively based

[Anonymous No.16141669]

Based thread

[Anonymous No.16141687]

Yep, I’m thinking this is based

[Anonymous No.16141699]

Give me the brd on this Guenon guy

[Anonymous No.16141710]

>>16141699
>René Guénon defies classification. . . . Were he anything less than a consummate master of lucid argument and forceful expression, his work would certainly be unknown to all but a small, private circle of admirers.”
—Gai Eaton, author of The Richest Vein

>“Guénon established the language of sacred metaphysics with a rigor, a breadth, and an intrinsic certainty such that he compels recognition as a standard of comparison for the twentieth century.”
—Jean Borella, author of Guénonian Esoterism and Christian Mystery

>“To a materialistic society enthralled with the phenomenal universe exclusively, Guénon, taking the Vedanta as point of departure, revealed a metaphysical and cosmological teaching both macrocosmic and microcosmic about the hierarchized degrees of being or states of existence, starting with the Absolute . . . and terminating with our sphere of gross manifestation.”
—Whitall N. Perry, editor of A Treasury of Traditional Wisdom

>“René Guénon was the chief influence in the formation of my own intellectual outlook (quite apart from the question of Orthodox Christianity). . . . It was René Guénon who taught me to seek and love the truth above all else, and to be unsatisfied with anything else.”
—Fr. Seraphim Rose, author of The Soul After Death

>“His mixture of arcane learning, metaphysics, and scathing cultural commentary is a continent in itself, untouched by the polluted tides of modernity. . . . Guénon’s work will not save the world—it is too late for that—but it leaves no reader unchanged.”
—Jocelyn Godwin, author of Mystery Religions in the Ancient World

>“René Guénon is one of the few writers of our time whose work is really of importance. . . . He stands for the primacy of pure metaphysics over all other forms of knowledge, and presents himself as the exponent of a major tradition of thought, predominantly Eastern, but shared in the Middle Ages by the . . . West.”
—Walter Shewring, translator of Homer’s Odyssey

[Anonymous No.16141715]

>>16141710
>“In a world increasingly rife with heresy and pseudo-religion, Guénon had to remind twentieth century man of the need for orthodoxy, which presupposes firstly a Divine Revelation and secondly a Tradition that has handed down with fidelity what Heaven has revealed. He thus restores to orthodoxy its true meaning, rectitude of opinion which compels the intelligent man not only to reject heresy but also to recognize the validity of faiths other than his own if they also are based on the same two principles, Revelation and Tradition.”
—Martin Lings, author of Ancient Beliefs and Modern Superstitions

>“If during the last century or so there has been even some slight revival of awareness in the Western world of what is meant by metaphysics and metaphysical tradition, the credit for it must go above all to Guénon. At a time when the confusion into which modern Western thought had fallen was such that it threatened to obliterate the few remaining traces of genuine spiritual knowledge from the minds and hearts of his contemporaries, Guénon, virtually single-handed, took it upon himself to reaffirm the values and principles which, he recognized, constitute the only sound basis for the living of a human life with dignity and purpose or for the formation of a civilization worthy of the name.”
—Philip Sherrard, author of Christianity: Lineaments of a Sacred Tradition

>“Apart from his amazing flair for expounding pure metaphysical doctrine and his critical acuteness when dealing with the errors of the modern world, Guénon displayed a remarkable insight into things of a cosmological order. . . . He all along stressed the need, side by side with a theoretical grasp of any given doctrine, for its concrete—one can also say its ontological—realization failing which one cannot properly speak of knowledge.”
—Marco Pallis, author of A Buddhist Spectrum

>“Guénon’s mission was two-fold: to reveal the metaphysical roots of the ‘crisis of the modern world’ and to explain the ideas behind the authentic and esoteric teachings that still [remain] alive.”
—Harry Oldmeadow, author of Traditionalism: Religion in the Light of the Perennial Philosophy

[Anonymous No.16141777]

Proactively refuted by Heraclitus and Whitehead

[Anonymous No.16141950]

>>16141777
Who were both retroactively refuted by Parmenides