[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 20 KB, 330x413, a3a45697e82cffcc69a2cdffebf6521e84-23-thomas-pynchon.rvertical.w330.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16127179 No.16127179 [Reply] [Original]

What's his best book?

>> No.16127190

who's Hi?

>> No.16127201

>>16127179
Mason & Dixon

>> No.16127257

>>16127201
I want to read another pynchon boom should i read Mason & Dixon or V. first?

>> No.16127351

>>16127257
V.

>> No.16127358

>>16127351
Thanks anon

>> No.16127821

>>16127179
Mason & Dixon.

>> No.16128117

This is a Mason & Dixon board anon. Read it or weep.

>> No.16128285

>>16127190
buddy

>> No.16128294

>>16127179
vineland

>> No.16128325
File: 1.04 MB, 650x975, 1595473436628.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16128325

>>16127179
M & D

>> No.16128400

>>16127179
The Twilight series.

>> No.16128437
File: 81 KB, 1059x681, 1.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16128437

>>16127201
>>16127821
>>16128117
>>16128325

From The Cambridge History of American Literature (Prose) 1940-1990.

>> No.16128442

>>16128400
I recently learned that Stephanie Meyer is a bit of a milf. Much more attractive than The Pynch I must say.

>> No.16128459
File: 841 KB, 1968x3000, CB73C6F2-9E05-45ED-8A14-F146392292EE.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16128459

>>16128442
this bitch all gums

>> No.16128468
File: 10 KB, 214x235, smugstirn.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16128468

>>16128459
>implying you wouldn't

>> No.16128474

>>16128459
I'd cums on dem gums

>>16128437
While I enjoyed Sot-Weed Factor quite a lot, Mason & Dixon is a different beast. Is it just because they're both set in colonial America and are written by postmodern authors? Seems very surface level.

>> No.16128780

>>16128437
okay

>> No.16128790

>>16128437
>Pynchon's brilliance degenerates into silliness and sentimentality

lmao gottem

>> No.16128812

Against the day

>> No.16128817

>>16128812
why do you lie on the internet?

>> No.16128881

>>16128474
>>16128780
>>16128790

this particular article is written by woman. she even drops *white male* quite often. does anyone here reads these books?

>> No.16129654

GR > M&D > V. > AtD > CoL49 > IV >BE > cuckland

>> No.16129696

>>16129654
Why don't you like Vineland anon?

>> No.16130153

>>16129696
The lady ninjas subplot was pretty good but Frenesi and Zoyd were crap characters with no definition, same for the daughter, coming off of reading GR the prose was bland and at times outright sloppy and the theme of the downfall/tragedy of the 60s was far better articulated in IV

>> No.16130162

>>16130153
>Reading Pynchon for the characters

NGMI. Also there's more characterization in a single line of dialogue than there is in most novels

>> No.16130264

>>16130162
Slothrop, Oedipa, Mason and Doc were fantastic characters, there wasn't a character worth a damn in Vineland and the surrounding narrative wasn't enough to support the book a la AtD

>> No.16130314

>>16130264
sure

>> No.16130441

I remember there was an anon who was obsessed with Pynchon and the occult references he made throughout his work. Does anyone have his posts?

>> No.16130478

>>16130314
Seethe more
:>)

>> No.16130506

>>16130478
rude desu

>> No.16130778

>>16130478
whats your Pynchon ranking

>> No.16132290

>>16127179
it has to be gravity's rainbow. HAS to be, right? and then after that there can be your subjective favorite.
but come on, it might not be the most pleasant of his to read, but gravity's rainbow is one of the few famous novels that really sincerely lives up to its reputation

>> No.16133727

>>16127179
Best from a technical standpoint, Mason & Dixon.
Best from a most enjoyable standpoint, tie between V and Against the Day.
Best from a groundbreaking/influential standpoint, obviously Gravity's Rainbow.
Best from a marketability standpoint, Inherent Vice.

Best from my standpoint would be V or Gravity's Rainbow depending on my mood.

>> No.16133736

>>16127351
Fuck no.

>> No.16133743

>>16128812
Most boring? Sure

>> No.16133760

>IV
>V.
>Vi...

>> No.16134861

>>16133736
He asked what he should read next between those two. His post implied that he had read at least one Pynchon book though I don't know which one(s). I think it's better to have read V. before reading M&D (or GR for that matter)

>> No.16134974

The one he wrote under a pseudonym

>> No.16135773

>>16133760
>V
>GR (V-2), ends in california
>V(ineland)
>IV (Roman numeral for 4)
Haven't read vineland or iv yet but I think they are conected

>> No.16135812

>>16128437
In Pynchon's case, the "change in taste" to history and nonfiction wasn't a change at all. He's been writing historical fiction since his first novel.

>> No.16136277

>>16134974
Which one was that

>> No.16136300

>>16135812
You're using a very broad definition of historical fiction

>> No.16136303

>>16136277
Unqualified Reservations

>> No.16136322

>>16136303
It's an ahistorical fiction about a group of native americans that don't qualify to make a reservation. They try many times over many generations to establish one but fail every time. It contains themes of shamanism, deep time, and carpetbaggery. Some of the names of the natives are really funny

>> No.16136667

>>16130441
I'd be interested to see those posts if anyone's got em

>> No.16136721

>>16128437
What an embarrassingly wrong take.

>> No.16137316

>>16130441
Pynchon is a spook

>> No.16137385

>>16127179
Gravity's Rainbow reaches higher highs imo but Mason & Dixon is better throughout. I really love both of them and they're both completely different in tone and theme, it's amazing the guy wrote one masterpiece and then managed to do it again.

>> No.16137403

>>16135812
To be fair, one got the feeling with his historical sections in V, at least some of them, were probably short stories rewritten to work within the context of the novel. One of the earliest historical chapters in V is a rework of his short story, Under the Rose in Slow Learner

>> No.16137411
File: 78 KB, 1200x1057, external-content.duckduckgo.com.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16137411

>>16127201
Patrician. Pic not related.

>> No.16137642

>>16137385
only took him 30 years to write M&D

>> No.16138201

>>16137385
His ability to sustain that faux-historical patois for like 700 pages is really amazing.