>>16117833
>There’s no such thing as a state
May as well say there's no such thing as local autonomous assemblies. Group belief makes it real. Try telling a cop that there's no state. Hell, by your reasoning you can say words themselves are a fiction (well, considering you want to do away with written laws...). Yet here we are communicating via text.
>On top of that, the US is an oligarchy. The wealthy pick who we can vote on. Both candidates are in their pockets. Nothing else is allowed.
The US actually does have a history of some third parties gaining prominence. They were ultimately re-absorbed, but only by having their issues and concerns addressed.
> Leaving the lazy greedy bastards behind frees up a lot of time
It does, and I hope to see a world where the common person get's more of their life back. However, that doesn't mean we're all going to become philosopher kings. Suggesting everyone become an expert at governing is like suggesting everyone learn to farm their own food, tailor their own clothes, be their own mechanic, be their own doctor, etc. And yes, all of these ARE issues that governing touches on. I believe most people would prefer to be able to spend some time every few years to pick someone they can trust to represent them, so that the commoner can go back to enjoying whatever pursuit he pleases.
Finally, the wealthy are not a single group. Even if oligarchy were provably unavoidable, commoners can still pit one oligarch against another. That's how Trump got elected.