/lit/ - Literature

[Anonymous No.16059103]

Give some National Socialist literature recommendations frens.

[Anonymous No.16059123]

>>16059103
This board is pozzed beyond belief

[Anonymous No.16059141]

let me guess /poltard/. You haven't read any other books and are only interested in reaffirming your ideology because you have nothing else going for you in life.

[Anonymous No.16059149]

>>16059141
Actually fren im readin dis bewk and i wanted to read about prussian conservative schools during the weimar period. Specifically i would like to find texts from the bigly monarchists of the period

[Anonymous No.16059485]

>>16059103
National "socialism" is full on capitalism. Hitler privatized previously nationalized insustries and was fully supported by big business. He was friends with fucking Ford.
Why are you a capitalist anon?

[Anonymous No.16059500]

>>16059123
that guy really should not wear a tshirt with a splatter design

[Anonymous No.16059587]

>>16059103
shingkei no kyojin manga and after reading it and you get blackpilled on the materialist worldview go straight to the mystery of the grail by evola and embrace the primordial tradition and transcendence

[Anonymous No.16059597]

[Anonymous No.16059641]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EO8EadQNIXU

https://www.animelyrics.com/anime/shingeki/jiyuunotsubasa.htm

[Anonymous No.16059683]

>>16059103
Daniel Deronda by George Eliot

[Anonymous No.16059736]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M_OauHnAFc8

[Anonymous No.16059749]

>>16059485
No response yet, hope OP realizes natsoc is just a defence mechanism of capitalism while in crisis.

[Anonymous No.16059763]

>>16059749
>defending yourself from kleptomaniac transexuals and nigger death squads is unreasonable

[Anonymous No.16059765]

>>16059500
Not like he knows what he's wearing

[Anonymous No.16059778]

>>16059763
it's unreasonable when you're defending the economic system that allowed them to exist in the first place
take the third positionist pill

[Anonymous No.16059779]

>>16059485
Hitler controlled the private industries as well as public ones. He had undisputed power and could tell a company to do whatever he wanted it to. He used this power to enforce a good living for all German people, Hitler was a socialist.

[Anonymous No.16059793]

>>16059778
Recs for this pill?

[Anonymous No.16059803]

>>16059485
>Hitler privatized previously nationalized insustries and was fully supported by big business
I like how you conveniently leave out the part where he didn't just do it out of the goodness of his heart for rich people and the bones he threw to corporations came at a pretty heavy price that included complete loyalty to the nation and confessions involving a tonne of regulations that inhibited their profits including but not limited to them being forced into union negotiations which alone led to several wins for average people

it feels like just about every piece of anti-natsoc propaganda is some half-truth cooked up in order to present the regime in a worse light. this one and "MUH NAZIS DESTROYED UNIONS" is the perfect example

[Anonymous No.16059821]

>>16059803
Ok so if he was a socialist why didn't he just have the state control the economy rather than capitalists who were loyal to him

[Anonymous No.16059867]

>>16059821
The privatization all happened pretty early on to his rule. He was working with what he had trying to save Germany's terrible economy at the time, and his strategy worked great as history shows. I'm sure if he ruled in an era of peace and prosperity he would be more aggressive on socialization of business.

[Anonymous No.16059878]

>>16059821
because merging every single industry into a state controlled behemoth is fucking retarded when you can have independent private corporations that are held in line by regulations, unless you prefer a completely excessive bureaucracy where one government fuck up completely and utterly decimates supply chains and distribution and everyone starves to death

[Anonymous No.16059889]

>>16059103
This is a comfy book, fren...
Actually balanced and fair for a change!

[Anonymous No.16059892]

[Anonymous No.16059904]

>It is a common trait of human nature to often judge the validity of an argument less by what is said than by who is saying it. Casting doubt on the personal integrity of an opponent can be more influential than rational discussion to refute his doctrines. In Adolf Hitler, Germany had a wartime leader whose concept of an authoritarian, socialist state represented a serious challenge to democratic opinion. Indignant that anyone could harbour such views in so enlightened an age, and especially that he could promote them so effectively, contemporary historians provide a myriad of theories for his dissent. Thus we read that Hitler’s obsession with black magic and astrology impelled him to start the war, he was mentally deranged due to inbreeding in the family, he was embarrassed by his Jewish ancestry, he was homosexual, he had a dysfunctional childhood, he became frustrated by failing as an artist, he was born with underdeveloped testicles and so forth.
It would be more useful for the authors of such legends to question for example why, after the victorious Allies established democratic governments throughout Europe in 1919, this state form became practically extinct there in 20 years. Russia, Italy, Hungary, Poland, Lithuania, Austria, Germany, Greece, Spain, Slovakia, and soon thereafter France adopted authoritarian regimes. Several of these countries closed ranks with Germany. Hitler gave viable, popular political form to a growing anti-liberal tendency on the continent. Volunteers from over 30 nations enlisted to fight in the German armed forces during World War II. Only by the sword did the Western democracies and their Soviet ally bring them to heel. Surely the motives of such men merit investigation. Simply dismissing the leader who harnessed and directed these dynamic human resources as a demented megalomaniac is no explanation.

[Anonymous No.16059944]

>There is considerable difference in the socialism of Hitler and that of Marxist doctrine. Die SA explained that the objective of a socialist state is “not the greatest possible good fortune of the individual or a particular party, but the welfare of the whole community." Marx’s purely economic socialism “stands against private property... and private ownership." Marx saw socialism as international, unifying the world’s working class people who were social pariahs in their own country. He therefore considered nationalism, advocating the interests and independence of one’s own nation, incompatible with socialist ideals. Die SA argued that since socialism really stands for collective welfare, “Marxist socialism divides the people and in this way buries any prerequisite for achieving genuine socialist goals."
>Hitler saw nationalism as a patriotic motive to place the good of one’s country before personal ambition. Socialism was a political, social and economic system that demanded the same subordination of self-interest for the benefit of the community. As Hitler said in 1927, “Socialism and nationalism are the great fighters for one’s own kind, are the hardest fighters in the struggle for survival on this earth. Therefore they are no longer battle cries against one another..."
>"Marxism makes the distinction of haves and have-nots. It demands the destruction of the former in order to bring all property into possession of the public. National Socialism places the concept of the national community in the foreground. . . . The collective welfare of a people is not achieved through superficially equal distribution of all possessions, but by accepting the principle that before the interests of the individual stand those of the nation."

[Anonymous No.16059949]

>>16059821
Because he wasn't a Marxist

[Anonymous No.16059965]

Reminder that Leftypol has made multiple threads discussing how to raid /lit/
https://bunkerchan.. DOT xyz/leftypol/res/749397.html
https://bunkerchan DOT xyz/leftypol/res/720042.html
They will not rest until this board is turned into /pol/.

Reminder that Leftypol has made multiple threads discussing how to raid /lit/
https://bunkerchan.. DOT xyz/leftypol/res/749397.html
https://bunkerchan DOT xyz/leftypol/res/720042.html
They will not rest until this board is turned into /pol/.

Reminder that Leftypol has made multiple threads discussing how to raid /lit/
https://bunkerchan.. DOT xyz/leftypol/res/749397.html
https://bunkerchan DOT xyz/leftypol/res/720042.html
They will not rest until this board is turned into /pol/.

[Anonymous No.16059981]

>>16059949
Socialism is abolition of private property, literally every socialist, even non Marxists agree with this. Hitler obviously didn't so he wasn't a socialist.

[Anonymous No.16060025]

>>16059965
Hoyl fugg we really live rent free over there. Don't these people have jo- oh yeah.

[Anonymous No.16060033]

Nazis aren't frens

[Anonymous No.16060046]

>>16060033
Not to you, faggot.

[Anonymous No.16060056]

>>16060025
I don't know why these niggers won't just stay on /pol/ where they belong. As if a bunch of autists who do nothing but read books and shitpost are going to help with the """revolution""".

[Anonymous No.16060061]

>>16060056
We literally have threads about organizing and parties on the front page, why do you think reading and action are mutually exclusive?

[What is /his/ opinion of him? No.16060067]

>>16059965
Why fucking, /lit/ of all places, we just read fucking books.

[Anonymous No.16060075]

>>16060061
>we
You really do need to fuck off back to /leftypol/ or /pol/ you fucking board wrecking faggots.

[Anonymous No.16060095]

>Communism is the ideology of hope and of joy.
This is literally from that trannypol thread by allah

[Anonymous No.16060107]

>>16059965
>Remember that us communists are better, more superior, in the end we are the future, and eventually these degenerate reactionaries will be resigned only to the past. It is our duty as shitposters in rightoid spaces to prove our own superiority, and feed our egos on their weaknesses.
Sweet mother of cope. No wonder this board has taken a shit.

[Anonymous No.16060112]

>>16060095
>>16060107
Yes.

[Anonymous No.16060114]

[Anonymous No.16060121]

>>16060095
in away i would say it kind of is, but more specifically, its about hopefulness to fault where it becomes completely divorced from reality where they are so poisoned by idealism that their system is literally impossible to actually implement in real life as it exists within the fantasy

[Anonymous No.16060123]

>>16059965
>Communists should always try to paint and retain an image that communism represents virtue, hope, community and peace while fascism represents senseless violence, degeneracy and inadequacy. Also this carries in to meatspace and communists should present themselves as superior there too.
OHNONONO

[Anonymous No.16060127]

>>16060114
It would have been better if it said 'muh dick'

[Anonymous No.16060135]

Jojo's Bizarre Adventure: Battle Tendency.

[Anonymous No.16060144]

>>16060123
>>16060107
My favorite post there is from another thread
>I just copy paste from the internet
>P-please someone call me based
HAHAHAHA

[Anonymous No.16060147]

>>16059965
>IME most of them have a very warped value system wherein preying on other human beings forms the core of their self esteem and desires. There are many who would prefer a poor and anti-egalitarian society, where they are free to hurt others to a wealthy and egalitarian one, where their cruelty would not be tolerated.
Others however will respond primarily to displays of power and dominance. They see "the left" and minorities as weak and ineffectual. Others still may simply be misled about communism, and find that we align with their class interests. Both of these groups of people may be reached by aforementioned tactics.
This from the folx that mash and burn immigrant businesses and assault randos in the streets.
J U S T

[Anonymous No.16060151]

>>16060114
>>16060127
This.

[Anonymous No.16060152]

>>16059965
My sides. And there niggers saying /leftypol/ was muh boogeyman

[Anonymous No.16060155]

>>16060144
By gob...

[Anonymous No.16060159]

>>16060135
Based teenager.

[Anonymous No.16060172]

>>16059965
I JUST WANT TO READ BOOKS YOU FUCKING LEFTY-POL NIGGERS STOP TELLING LIES ABOUT US OVER YOUR PARTISAN FAGGOTRY!! REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!!!!!!!!!!!! YOU WOULDN'T KNOW TRUE MORALITY IF IT SLAPPED YOU ON THE FACE!!!

[Anonymous No.16060189]

>>16060147
Anyone who pretends to be a model of humanity and goodness is either one, or a sociopath trying to fool you. Communists are the latter variety

[Anonymous No.16060194]

They are convincing themselves that they are helping.
>genuine polbabies get shut down pretty hard on lit because they can't name any right wing authors and derail the thread until they are banned but these are just trolls i think and do not represent the litizen aristocracy
Tranny niggers need to fuck off and die.

[Anonymous No.16060200]

>>16060152
You can see them on /his/ slowly killing that board along with /pol/ niggers. I think half the nazi meme threads are actually made by leftypol, all the comments are just leftpol crying about "muh racism" with a singular post about jews.

[Anonymous No.16060208]

>>16060194
I've never seen a thread wherein this has happened, almost every thread they shit into they get beaten with "le facts and logic" pretty quickly as well are swarmed by relatable memes to any normal person. Do you think they tell them this to give them more confidence when coming here???

t. /lit/izen aristocracy and master debater.

[Anonymous No.16060219]

>>16059965
leftypol is such a gay fucking place
it's almost as homosexual as reddit, if it were not about the discussion of fringe political ideas

[Anonymous No.16060233]

>>16060208
Yeah dude they need to feel like part of a collective moral force I guess. Super gay and feminine. Lmao I spit on the tranni.

[Anonymous No.16061215]

>>16059965
Based schizo

[Anonymous No.16061220]

>>16060233
They are generally weak and uninspired people. They must feed off the right so long as it exists, whereas we ourselves create, memes and whatnot.

[Anonymous No.16061239]

>>16060233
They are generally weak and uninspired people. They must feed off the right so long as it exists, whereas we ourselves create, memes and whatnot. They don't know that to do any of this you need a heroic mentality, among other things.

[Anonymous No.16061678]

>>16059981
Hitler was more socialist than capitalist though, to the extent that he too hated the so-called bourgeois class and hated things like consumerism and individualism.

[Anonymous No.16061874]

>>16060067
They want to project an image of intellectual (and moral) superiority. It's extremely cringe.

[Anonymous No.16061911]

>>16060046
silence, friendless

[Anonymous No.16061977]

>>16059749
Gee maybe i didnt respond because i had to go to sleep because i have to go to work soon. Not all of us are commie neets

[Anonymous No.16062772]