[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 22 KB, 804x743, 1595866732199.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16033581 No.16033581 [Reply] [Original]

>"I like to read philosophy in my spare time"
>"Oh cool have you ever read Nietzsche?"
>"Who?"

>> No.16033592
File: 193 KB, 908x620, phil101guide.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16033592

Start with this

>> No.16033720
File: 52 KB, 713x611, laughing apu with cigarette.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16033720

>>16033592
>secondary

>> No.16033741

I think that's a good, sophisticated response. Fuck neetszche and most important fuck OP.

>> No.16033756

>>16033592
Why add the meditations?

>> No.16033760

What's a good book on history of philosophy?

>> No.16033762

>>16033581
>nietzsche
You an edgy 15 year old?

>> No.16033765

>>16033592
>every uni has that Nagel book in their curriculum instead of Plato

>> No.16033782

>>16033760
The Bryan Magee book. WITH the pictures.
>>16033581
OP, some people aren't ready for the nuclear redpill of Nietzsche. Let them enjoy Kant (or deride him as annoying) while they still can

>> No.16033784

>>16033581
This board makes me regret getting rid of my books

>> No.16033793
File: 9 KB, 122x185, yawn.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16033793

>>16033581
>>"Oh cool have you ever read Nietzsche?"

>> No.16033808

>>16033782
>Nietzsche
>Nuclear redpill
What are you smoking?

>> No.16033813
File: 151 KB, 523x858, 1589133954389.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16033813

>>16033581
>person tries to show off how cultured they are by saying how they like philosophers
>Ask for example
>they name a bunch of podcasts

>> No.16033822
File: 50 KB, 593x601, 1596193009364.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16033822

>>16033813
I'm cultured. Like fuckin' cottage cheese

>> No.16033916

>>16033813
>Why yes I do enjoy philosophy, have you heard of the philosopher TJ Kirk?

>> No.16034048
File: 50 KB, 396x396, 1589405077719.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16034048

>>16033581
>"I like to read philosophy in my spare time"
>"Oh cool have you read [anyone that isn't Nietzsche or Marcus Aurelius]?"
>"What?"

>> No.16034087

>>16034048
>h*gel

>> No.16034102

>>16033760
Bryan Magee's book. Don't read Russell, he's biased and a rat bastard.

>> No.16034166

>>16033756
The chart is a reddit trap. Notice Russell is in there too.

>> No.16034178

>>16034102
Hello plebbit.

>> No.16034182

>>16033581
Nietzsche wasn't a philosopher.

>> No.16034187

>>16034102
>>16034166
Russell is eternally based. Keep seething, brainlets.

>> No.16034189

>>16033581
If they said this, I'd have far higher hopes for them than someone who knows him

>> No.16034198

>>16033784
i don't understand people who do this. its like people who hate dogs. who the fuck are you? what were you thinking? do you think? are you even human?

>> No.16034208

>>16033581
Based. I also avoid Nietzche because he was an edgy atheist incel but I read more philosophy than everyone on /lit/

>> No.16034261

>>16034198
NOT THE HEKCKIN GOOD PUPPERINO!!!!!!!!!!!

>> No.16034265

>>16034048
based

>> No.16034269
File: 81 KB, 257x308, Screenshot 2020-08-03 at 09.50.33.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16034269

>>16034102
Which Magee book?

>> No.16034274

>>16034187
>>16034178
samefag retard

>> No.16034275
File: 93 KB, 827x1246, evalsophy.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16034275

>>16033581
Actually, read this. Most philosophy is bad, or about useless pseudoproblems, ideological, based on scientific ignorance or narrow viewpoints. You should evaluate philosophy based on results they produce in the real world. He criticises Nietzsche as well.

>> No.16034288

>>16034275
lol

>> No.16034290

>>16034275
>Proposes and illustrates a simple criterion for evaluating any philosophical doctrine: Does it help advance knowledge?
>Clearly written, and avoids the use of obscure technical terms
>Argues for an emergentist and non-reductionist view of materialism, as well as for a non-posivist version of scientism, and a systemic alternative to both individualism and holism.
Looks like we've got a bugman on our hands, boys!

>> No.16034296

>>16034269
Story of Philosophy

>> No.16034301

>>16034275
How can one person get filtered so hard by literally all philosophy in the world?

>> No.16034375
File: 437 KB, 682x801, Screenshot 2020-08-03 at 10.08.20.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16034375

>>16034296
Is this a coloring book

>> No.16034390

>>16034275
>based on scientific ignorance or narrow viewpoints
Absolutely FILTERED.

>> No.16034400
File: 8 KB, 224x225, ok nigga jellyfish.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16034400

>>16033581
sTarT wiTh thE gReEkS

>> No.16034450

>>16033581
Nietzsche is not philosophy though.

>> No.16034461

>>16034450
Basado

>> No.16035159

>>16033592
>no Copleston's History of Philosophy
>>16033760
Copleston's History of Philosophy is good, he has a Christian leaning into all of it but it usually doesn't muddy things up
>>16033793
based Karina poster

>> No.16035199
File: 9 KB, 172x258, problems of philosophy.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16035199

>>16033592
That Nagel book is not good. Read pict instead

>>16033760
The 4-vol history by Anthony Kenny is the best if you want something nice and long

>> No.16035220

>>16033592
>Russell's books should be bound in two colours, those dealing with mathematical logic in red – and all students of philosophy should read them; those dealing with ethics and politics in blue – and no one should be allowed to read them.

>> No.16035228
File: 56 KB, 1068x601, 1589400977494.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16035228

>>16035220
What's the source?

>> No.16035291
File: 30 KB, 931x524, 694940094001_6126571602001_6126574453001-vs.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16035291

>>16035220
perfect

>> No.16035300

>>16033760
Bryan Magee’s Story of Philosophy.

>> No.16035352

>>16034375
You don't wank at philosophy thoughts when their fathers give you intimidating looks?

>> No.16035372

>>16033592
If you can’t/are too lazy to read primary source philosophy and need it information laundered to be palatable you probably shouldn’t even bother.

>> No.16035378

>>16033760
Copleston

>> No.16035383

>>16033916
Good Lord

>> No.16035388

>>16034048
this

>>16033581
idk i feel any badic bitch usually asks if you read plato or nietzche, the honestly cringier ones tend to ask about nietzche.