[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 66 KB, 266x228, 1565547296311.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16002930 No.16002930 [Reply] [Original]

Why would anyone want to go with Kaufmann or Norman or Hollingdale translations when Oscar Levy, Ludovici, Common translations are excellent in themselves and the translators were non-pozzed right wingers?
For purposes of this thread: Redditors and other assorted lefty scum - please kys.

>> No.16002997

>nietzsche
>non-redditors
please faggot

>> No.16003849

>Il ne lit pas les traductions par Klossowski
hon hon hon

>> No.16004109

>>16002930
Hollingdale has the best prose renderings as far as style goes; those you mentioned over-render frequently to the point of paraphrastics. Kaufman is a marginal improvement on the English versions in circulation a century ago, but offer nothing over Hollingdale aside note apparatus and cheap omnibus editions. Any non-Hollingdale translators from the Cambridge editions are all solid; newer ones from Hackett (some overlap with aforementioned) also quite decent.

>> No.16004273

>>16004109
Thoughts on the Stanford translations (mostly Del Caro) of the Colli-Montinari editions?

>> No.16004429

>>16002930
Give examples of passages they translated better than Kaufmann or Hollingdale.

>> No.16004479

Kaufmann has a leftist bias

>> No.16004551

>>16002930
>>16004479
You far right mouthbreathers never demonstrate this. You just say "hurr durr Kaufmann is liberal jew, read based fashy Ludovici instead". If it were true you would be able to compare a passage from Kaufmann to the equivalent in Ludovici and explain why the Ludovici passage is better. I have never seen anyone do this.

>> No.16004595

>>16004551
Just read his footnotes. He does mental gymnastics in order to make it seem like Nietzsche's thought was the furthest thing from Nazi ideology.

>> No.16004621

>>16004551
Read for youself. Not going to spoonfeed

>> No.16004636
File: 163 KB, 262x380, file.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16004636

>>16004551
You can tell by physiognomy alone. Compare this goblin to

>> No.16004640

Just learn German bro.

>> No.16004644
File: 653 KB, 660x912, file.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16004644

>>16004636
This