Saving /lit/

[Anonymous No.15974274]

This board has gone to fucking shit over the last 6 months. It was never perfect but you could actually find decent discussion here can't say that any more. There too many tourists, zoomers and newfags stinking up the place. At this rate everybody that actually reads will fuck off. I propose we fix things by using /ic/s model. It is by far the most ordered board on this website. We should have a beginner general where we can tell retards to go before they stink up the place asking on "how to read better or where to start" the Buddhists and shankaras already create their own generals good for them. We need a way to control the poltards they can make their own fascist philosophy general. Instead of 5 Nietzsche threads a day just make a fuxking general. Itll promote better discussion and order things a bit.

[Anonymous No.15974293]

>>15974274
>implying any of the newfags are here to do anything but shitpost and push everyone else away

[Anonymous No.15974295]

i second this, lest we end up as /mu/(which was always a bit crappy mind you, but not the twittercolony it is today)

[Anonymous No.15974308]

>>15974295
>tfw /mu/ Fagtano fanboy mods ban people for muh racism

[Anonymous No.15974311]

Make a mod and i'll delete the shit without banning the users
Fuck the tripfag jany

[Anonymous No.15974314]

Honestly /sffg/ used to be the worst threads on /lit/ and now they're the best, simply because that's the only place people actually still talk about literature. Also, there needs to be a crackdown on threads that are just thinly veiled discussion threads of other topics, be they women, politics, economics, etc. The board should be about literature, not "What are some books to redpill me on women?" that will just devolve within 10 posts into a shitfest, and most decidedly not literature-related.

[Anonymous No.15974315]

no let's talk about the literary merit of this ps2 game i played when i was 15.

[Anonymous No.15974320]

Let us start by making a list of all the recurring bullshit threads that don't promote discussion that pop up everyday and convert them into generals to contain the faggotry.
/pol/tards are a huge issue we need a general for them
Newcomers asking for help is an issue
Too many fucking depression waah I'm sad I want to kill myself recommend a book threads. Depressing or suicidal literature/absurdism could gave a general
Let's contain the retardation please it's becoming too much to deal with.

[Anonymous No.15974327]

There's too many fucking religion threads. I say this as somebody who LIKES discussion religion on /lit/, there's way too many of them. It's gotten out of hand, more of them need to be deleted.

Also can we ban the fucking "shower thoughts" threads? The ones where it's obvious some fucking idiot was smoking weed or sitting in the shower, and he got some "brilliant thought" that he just HAD to share with all of us?

[Anonymous No.15974331]

>>15974274
inb4 the thread gets purnned.
Jannys and mods hate this kind of thread. All they do is shill and share scat pics on their discord. They love the tripfags and the newfags because they see them as new people to shill their shitty writing to. The board will die. Sad.

[Anonymous No.15974340]

>>15974331
and the excuse they use
>FOR FREE

[Anonymous No.15974348]

Also until this fucking board is fixed I recommend we have a saving /lit/ general because fuck me if I'm letting one of the only last places on the internet where you can discuss literature and philosophy and not deal with pseudo intellectual New York faggots, jews and niggers be overtaken by zoomers

[Anonymous No.15974349]

FUCK ANIME POSTERS
FUCK FROGPOSTERS
FUCK SOJACK POSTERS
I HATE NIGGERS BUT I POST THAT IN/pol/ AND NOT HERE

[Anonymous No.15974354]

>>15974320
>/pol/tards are a huge issue
>board is flooded with chapofags and nobody points this out
Wow, what a surprise.

[Anonymous No.15974359]

>>15974348
Last thread about this (like two weeks ago) was btfo'd by mods.

[Anonymous No.15974361]

>>15974348
This. Keep these threads up until things turn around.

[Anonymous No.15974363]

>>15974348
you’re part of the problem pal

[Anonymous No.15974364]

No, we don't need that. Also if you want to make a general about something, just make it and we'll see if it will work.

[Anonymous No.15974365]

>>15974354
Both the commies and nazis need to be contained. I used /pol/tard as a term for political philosohy in general

[Anonymous No.15974371]

>>15974354
>>15974320
don't devolve the thread to what we are trying to stop, faggots.

[Anonymous No.15974375]

>>15974354
They're BOTH faggots. Fuck both of them. I hate anyone associated with politics at this point.

[Anonymous No.15974379]

>>15974365
Yeah contain everything that isn't total fiction. While we're at it ban everything I don't like and make the board about everything I like.

[Anonymous No.15974387]

>>15974379
you're missing the point, you nigger faggot.

[Anonymous No.15974396]

>>15974371
>devolve the thread
>implying this thread wasn't pointless and shit in the first place
An actual thread died for this.

[Anonymous No.15974400]

>>15974396
post face

[Anonymous No.15974403]

>>15974387
Trying too hard newfag.

[Anonymous No.15974406]

>>15974354
only literal nazis and the odd ”esoteric fascist” (lmao) would complain about this

[Anonymous No.15974408]

This board would have so much more literature discussion if everyone put half the effort into reporting posts about pop-culture, podcasts, youtubers and meta shit that they do into losing their shit every time a subject tangentially related to politics comes up.

The /pol/ shit is never going to go away; never. Even if we had active jannies who didn’t take hotpocket breaks all day there’s always going to be topical nonfiction books.
You can however stop /tv/ from keeping three threads at a time in the catalogue about Joe Rogan.

[Anonymous No.15974414]

>>15974400

[Anonymous No.15974420]

Start moving shit threads to /bant/

[Anonymous No.15974421]

>>15974348
Generals are fucking terrible; without exception and is literally just a lame way to copy the subreddit model
Generals should result in a permaban

[Anonymous No.15974423]

>>15974274
Just wait till summer is over.

[Anonymous No.15974424]

>>15974406
>um, sweaty, you're like a litcherull nazi

[Anonymous No.15974428]

>>15974308
i called some rapper a nigger and was banned for 2 weeks, gives you an idea of that place

[Anonymous No.15974433]

>>15974415
>>15974415
>>15974415

[Anonymous No.15974434]

>>15974428
reddit mods doing what they do best, tripfagging and dilating

[Anonymous No.15974435]

>>15974408
lol this board would have more lit discussion if people actually read instead of browsing this board 24/7. The short story general was last time anyone made an effort to move lit in the right direction but it was quickly discontinued because lit is currently filled with college students taking shitposting breaks between their study sessions.

[Anonymous No.15974438]

What /lit/ desperately needs (other than decent moderation, which will never happen) is for autistic retards to step up and make their containment generals. It's a real pity that a majority of threads follows a shitpost template where the average post length is genuinely not even half a sentence. It doesn't exactly motivate you to sincerely interact with people or effortpost since all you'll get for it is mockery, one-liners, and basedjaks. The quality of communication on 4chan genuinely has never been as bad as it currently is and it's pure irony when shitposters tell others to go back. Where? 4chan is barely better than reddit at this point.

[Anonymous No.15974440]

>>15974423
I'm pretty sure 4chan doesn't actually get that much more traffic in the summer. I remember Moot talking about this years ago, so perhaps it has changed now.

[Anonymous No.15974442]

>>15974406
>literal nazis

[Anonymous No.15974446]

>>15974423
Wasn’t there an eternal summer a few years ago? The COVID crisis has created a summer on steroids. I think things will quiet down eventually, but 4chan definitely got a population boost. They need to assimilate.

[Anonymous No.15974448]

>>15974428
Old /mu/ was the complete opposite. Sad. Fagthony Fagtano really fucked that place hard.

[Anonymous No.15974456]

>>15974320
We don't need generals, we need a brief spate of vicious, asshole mod work. Delete every pol thread. Delete every Marx, or Ted, or JK Rowling text. Just arbitrarily declare that political philosophy and Harry Potter are no longer lit. Then kill some of the r9k stuff and you're done.

I am very happy to see some defensible threads deleted for no reason if it's part of a campaign which also removes this shit.

In the best of all possible worlds, I would be banned for this post.

[Anonymous No.15974462]

>>15974440
I try not to shit up the place, but I come here a lot more in the summer. I’m sure others do as well

[Anonymous No.15974464]

>>15974456
>MOOOODDS MOOOOODS
extremely gay

[Anonymous No.15974466]

>>15974428
Ok so now I've got
/b/ - no ban
/pol/ - no ban
/sci/ - 3 day ban
/lit/ - three day ban
/mu/ - two week ban
Anyone wanna expand this?

[Anonymous No.15974477]

The thing is that we need stronger moderation to attract quality posters because if we were already we will be discussing literature instead of complaining daily about the state of the board. We are not that much better.

[Anonymous No.15974482]

>>15974456
>Delete every Marx, or Ted, or JK Rowling text. Just arbitrarily declare that political philosophy and Harry Potter are no longer lit.
If you want to chat about something more profound, make a thread for it.

[Anonymous No.15974483]

This board needs more mods and jannies. Things are going downhill fast.

[Anonymous No.15974485]

>>15974464
Animefags like you are unbearable.
You just want a safespace for attention

[Anonymous No.15974492]

the reactionary fetishization of ”old books” did a lot of damage to this board desu

[Anonymous No.15974494]

>>15974485
OP created a whole thread begging to make /a/ his safe space.

[Anonymous No.15974495]

>>15974456
Yeah honestly a good thread getting deleted every once in a while isn’t really that bad as long as they’re not banning anyone.
Generals are just meandering posts without purpose and are probably gonna wind up basically surrending more slots in the catalogue to /pol/ and whatever else
If I want to discuss a genre or something; i don’t want to necessarily have to read three days of back and forth between the same two faggots

[Anonymous No.15974497]

ban butterfly

[Anonymous No.15974498]

>>15974485
>Animefags like you
gay cartoons

[Anonymous No.15974506]

why does every board turn to shit right as I start to get interested in it?!

[Anonymous No.15974513]

>>15974483
>more mods and jannies
Jannies are fags who abuse their power. Look at /int/ or /mu/ or /his/ or /vr/.

[Anonymous No.15974519]

>>15974477
I don’t think any forum, ever on the internet has suddenly attracted more or better users because moderation suddenly came into play. You sound like a redditor.
Deleting shit is fine if it’s off topic but /lit/ isn’t suddenly gonna become some respectable place and if it did it would basically just be reddit

[Anonymous No.15974524]

>>15974506
I think every board on this site has been in a perpetual state of turning to shit since the early ‘10s

[Anonymous No.15974531]

>>15974524
This is the truth.

[Anonymous No.15974539]

>>15974524
They were never good to begin with.

[Anonymous No.15974545]

>>15974274
I came here a week ago from Reddit, and I found it the best literature sub I have ever seen anywhere, and if these are bad days of this sub I can only imagine how blessed the good days would have been.

[Anonymous No.15974547]

>>15974274
Great idea, /ic/ is one of my favorite boards for it's organized nature. I think it's design will fit /lit/ as well.

[Anonymous No.15974548]

>>15974539
Maybe the real 4chan is the friends we made along the way?

[Anonymous No.15974551]

>>15974539
This is also the truth.

[Anonymous No.15974554]

>>15974539
>/board/ was never good
Absolute newfag.

[Anonymous No.15974568]

>>15974539
lies. lit was terrific when it started out

gamergate turned the entire internet into a big gay trench war

[Anonymous No.15974580]

>>15974545
>sub
fix yourself or go back

[Anonymous No.15974587]

>>15974545
Why do redditors never connect the dots that the high point of a board always stops when they show up?

[Anonymous No.15974595]

>>15974568
It was already shit in 2004.

[Anonymous No.15974599]

>>15974497
Janitor

[Anonymous No.15974604]

>>15974492
Word.

[Anonymous No.15974607]

>>15974513
this. less jannies is ALWAYS better. you guys don't understand how bad things could be if tyrant mods were here handing out bans left and right. /lit/ would just become /r/books. learn to hide threads. it takes 1 second to do and will save you a lot of time sifting through threads.

[Anonymous No.15974608]

>>15974587
I've seen a growing number of tripfags that used reddit and decided to come here because they noticed how shit it truly is. Now they want another reddit.

[Anonymous No.15974613]

>>15974274
>we should have a sticky

Great job newfag

[Anonymous No.15974618]

>>15974519
Yeah yeah we are all sad your favourite subreddit got ruined by a powermod but that's exactly what this place needs

[Anonymous No.15974621]

>>15974554
You're just delusional, your nostalgia clouds your juidgement.

[Anonymous No.15974627]

>>15974587
I've seen a growing number of tripfags that used to go on reddit and find /lit/ to be a wonderful place. They just want their reddit back.

[Anonymous No.15974628]

>>15974607
This. How to fix lit in three easy steps:
1. Hide bad threads
2. Effortpost in good threads
3. Read everyday

[Anonymous No.15974640]

>>15974607
>deteling posts
>baning users
There is a difference between a powertrip and enforcing the rules

[Anonymous No.15974642]

>>15974274
>. We should have a beginner general where we can tell retards to go before they stink up the place asking on "how to read better or where to start"
We shouldn't, if you don't like a thread, don't enter it.

[Anonymous No.15974648]

>>15974621
>/board/ was never good
>eternal cry of the newfag across every board

[Anonymous No.15974659]

>>15974640
>thinks jannies enforce rules instead of just banning posts they don't like

[Anonymous No.15974660]

>>15974628
The hard truth but we also could do more to not reward offtopic posters with replies.
/tv/ started posting here their sneed, bbc and bane memes but they aren't posting in literature threads so i don't mind them

[Anonymous No.15974663]

>we need a way to control the /pol/tards
>lets create a general so they can flourish and multiply
Are you fucking retarded, Moot gave /pol/tards their own fucking board to try to contain them and look what happened it turned the whole site into a giant shithole.

[Anonymous No.15974668]

>>15974607
and what if a gaggle of poltards turn my thread into yet another fight about wammin/fags/minorities/”degeneracy”/”cultural marxism” etc?

[Anonymous No.15974675]

>>15974659
I said it as an ideal situation

[Anonymous No.15974676]

>>15974648
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wIuw_Ut3unA
4chan was never good.

[Anonymous No.15974677]

>>15974433
/tg/ often has a story-writing thread yet somehow /lit/ rarely does, just something that this reminded me

[Anonymous No.15974681]

>>15974676
actual cope

[Anonymous No.15974684]

vote me for janny. here's my plan
>3 day ban for blogposting that's not directly related to literature
>1 week ban for any "books about [controversial/political/nonsensical subject]?" threads etc.
>2 week ban for any thread with a coomer OP pic
>3 week ban for e-celebposting (only strict e-celebs, so not Land or Taleb)

this is all cumulative

[Anonymous No.15974688]

>>15974681
>cope
>calls people newfags

[Anonymous No.15974694]

>>15974663
pol should be removed and pol-adjacent posting punished harshly. sure they’d spam/flood the site in blind impotent rage for a few weeks but eventually they give up. always do. it works

[Anonymous No.15974700]

>>15974675

>>15974513
>>15974308
>>15974428

[Anonymous No.15974705]

>>15974684
I'd vote for you if jannys were not faggots.

[Anonymous No.15974715]

>>15974684
Proof that all jannies are controlfreak faggots

[Anonymous No.15974721]

>>15974274
>wahhh /lit/ sucks
then fix it, faggot. start some threads. do a bit of effortposting here and there

[Anonymous No.15974723]

>>15974688
It's warranted if you post an actual cope.

[Anonymous No.15974726]

>>15974694
Go to reddit, it literally fits your worldview.

[Anonymous No.15974729]

[Anonymous No.15974744]

Just like how my post will drown here, so will a certain question or statement drown in a general thread. The board just needs to slow down and stop posting things that aren't related to literature (like daily Alfred Janny threads now).

[Anonymous No.15974745]

>>15974715
I'm not a janny though

[Anonymous No.15974747]

>>15974726
this. Don't turn this place into another banhammer shitfuck.

[Anonymous No.15974750]

>>15974684
>>1 week ban for any "books about [controversial/political/nonsensical subject]?" threads etc.
Thats so dumb lol, almost every nonfiction book is topical in some way
You’re not describing getting rid of /pol/ you’re just trying to keep the real world out

[Anonymous No.15974753]

>>15974274
If you plan on saving /lit/, this discord levels of chatting and shitposting is certainly not helping.

[Anonymous No.15974756]

>>15974745
You WANT to be. And this is the frame of mind, everyone who wants to be a janny has. There's a reason they do it for free.

[Anonymous No.15974763]

>NOOO YOU CANT JUST BE A CONTROL FREAK FAGGOT YOU HAVE TO LET ME BLOGPOST DAILY AND NEVER DISCUSSING LITERATURE BECAUSE IM NOT INTERESTED IN READING AND I JUST LIKE 4CHANNEL AS IT IS BECAUSE I GOT BANNED FROM LEDDIT

[Anonymous No.15974771]

>>15974750
No that is entirely warranted. Swing the axe down on those sorts of threads, where people just post fucking Twitter screenshots about political issues or current events and use the fig leaf of books to have a stealth /pol/ thread. One week almost isn't enough, I think those sorts of threads should get you a monthlong ban.

[Anonymous No.15974773]

fpbp

There are never five Nietzche threads just because five people who didn't use the search function all wanted to talk about Nietzche. It is because there is one legitimate thread, one guy who got angry in an argument there and made his next post a thread of its own, and then three people who are not reading any of it, simply posting Nietzche quotes alongside the /pol/ subjects they are far more interested in discussing but on a literature board to feel smart/turf.

Do not recommend generals simply for how bad other options seem. Sort the same people in a different way, and they will be the same people. Generals will improve little. The difference between us an /ic/ is that writing attracts a different kind of pretentious poser, and that's all. We have generals like /crit/ in which people who find crit disagree with will lash out and fill the thread with deliberately bad work and thinly veiled references to other people. It is akin to dressing up as Bigfoot to prove his existence to others. It is not just shiggy diggy but scooby doo; a knowing fabrication of evidence. The only solution is personal vigilance. I have seen many of their chatrooms. It is always a room created under the pretext of avoiding cringe, only for everyone to instead repost their favorite cringe from the very /crit/ threads they claim to be avoiding. Simply be vigilant and allow them to filter out into the privacy they so desire.

[Anonymous No.15974780]

>>15974700
Don't care about your experiences with other boards, i just use this one.

[Anonymous No.15974782]

>GUYS WE GOTTA KICK THE NAZIS OFF /LIT/! WHY CAN'T THIS PLACE JUST BE REDDIT?

[Anonymous No.15974789]

>>15974771
Lmao It’s not a “stealth /pol/“ thread, it’s actually pretty obvious when it’s not a real topic
You can’t ban White Fragility though its the hottest nonfiction book in the country and the thread actually works as containment for the issue

[Anonymous No.15974797]

>>15974274
My 2 cents as a 2 years newfag:
>good
Discussions /lit/ related
Discussions on religion
Inside jokes (meme trilogy/Guénon (pbuh)/fuck dune/etc.)
>bad
politics threads (white fragility/tranny rights)
jezebels and muh sex spam
low quality thread made on purpouse (like today's "who's the Mozart/Beethoven of literature")
_
I love this place, I had some cool and intelligent discussions here and it unironically improved my life a bit (read a shitton of books, changed my pov on some things). There's cool projets going on like the Borges'Babel library translation to english, I hope real /lit/izens keep up and never leave this place.
>pic related a quality post from some days ago.

[Anonymous No.15974807]

>>15974789
This is what all jannies do retard. More jannies more power tripping faggots.

[Anonymous No.15974813]

>>15974274
The board's dead.
>>15974782
Faggots that can't handle the word "nigger" took over the place.

[Anonymous No.15974818]

>>15974789
Ignore this post
>>15974807
Meant to reply to >>15974780

[Anonymous No.15974824]

The real problem is that if you make a real thread to discuss literature it will, at best, get a couple replies.

Maybe the real problem was (you) all along.

[Anonymous No.15974835]

wish people stopped pretending that poltardery is some ”inherent essence of 4chan” shit

[Anonymous No.15974842]

>>15974835
Because it is faggot. All the pre 2010 oldfags scattered from /b/ to /pol/ when 9gag showed up.

[Anonymous No.15974845]

>>15974618
I know using the word reddit is always an insult but if you hated board culture I don’t understand why you wouldn’t just go There. Or else go comment on goodreads.
Lax moderation has always been the reason to come to 4channel.
Yeah, White Fragility gets it’s daily thread, but it’s a containment thread mostly and when theres a hugely popular bestseller a literature board needs to allow a certain amount of discussion. Even if you would prefer the real world not crowd out the blogposts in whatever general you’re advocating for.

And yeah, blatant /pol/ shit is annoying, but so are threads about booktubers, podcasts and youtube vids. At least most of the stuff related to poltics has a body of written work around it to discuss.

[Anonymous No.15974855]

>>15974835
newfags afraid of the word nigger try to act like they know something about 4chan.

[Anonymous No.15974869]

>>15974750
there's a difference between having a genuine political discussion related to ideas in literature and the archetypal "books about young men who have relationships with big-breasted milky mommies?" or "books about how races with lower IQs are bad for society?"
this is legitimate >>15972318
this is tolerable >>15968624
this is political bait >>15973814
notice how the first has the least replies and the third the most.

[Anonymous No.15974880]

>>15974842
>>15974855
/pol/ is nothing like pre-2010 4chan. Most of /b/ back in the day was hardcore libertarian, /pol/ is a bunch of unironic fascists. Not the same thing at all.

[Anonymous No.15974883]

>>15974780
Yeah I’m sure the exact shit that ruined /sp/ and other boards won’t apply at all here.
You zoomers should go to /b/ or someplace and ask about /sp/ and how strict moderation killed one of the most active boards inside a week

[Anonymous No.15974896]

>>15974880
I’m not whining about /pol/ but I will acknowledge that on /b/ circa like 2011 most of the racial stuff was just lighthearted and not nearly as serious

[Anonymous No.15974898]

At the very least, this thread has inspired me to do more bumping. I'm making it a goal of mine, from here on out, to search the bottom of the catalog for real literature threads and bump them all, multiple times a day. I'm going to do my part.

[Anonymous No.15974912]

>>15974869
the board is to blame to be honest.
The third (along with the suburbs thread) is tolerable for me because it sparks discussion but not because it's a twitter screenshot.
Every place needs an offtopic post once in a while because ... people just have opinions and will find a way to express them

[Anonymous No.15974914]

Fuck this shit this place is tucked. I'll come here once every week or so but limit my time here. I'm going to go read fuck all of you. When I come back I'm going to make an effort thread about what I read and hopefully retarfs don't stink it up

[Anonymous No.15974935]

>>15974880
>implying libertarians don't get fed up
Literally every libertarian from pre 2010 that wasn't a boomer is some sort of hardcore authoritarian/monarchist type because they realized it was really fucking gay to get trod on while bitching out "don't tread on me".

[Anonymous No.15974949]

>>15974869
Tbh that third one is a legitimate issue and there’s several books I could recommend on the topic. It’s definetely not the racebait shit I assumed it would be when I clicked the link.
I think it’s actually a good example of how janny on a haretrigger could stifle good discussion.

[Anonymous No.15974959]

The only threads on this board should be organized group readings/discussions on a specific book which last for a week or two weeks. Any other thread irrelevant to reading/discussing literature gets culled.

[Anonymous No.15974961]

>>15974898
kill yourself
anime posts are so formulaic.
one or two replies:
>Is X...?, if so, then why is Y...?
you niggers post for the sake of posting, if you could post more than 5 threads you will do it and you will fill the board with google questions

[Anonymous No.15975003]

>>15974961
Except his post doesn't even contain a question, just a deceleration to do better instead of HUHHHH ANIME HOW COULD THIS BE HERE ON THIS SPECIFIC SITE I'M ONLY HERE FOR WESTERN PEPES NOT ANIME

[Anonymous No.15975031]

>>15975003
it's a psychological trait. they can't even post without an anime picture.
Fuck those niggers

[Anonymous No.15975039]

i think the biggest problem is that there are but a handful of 2010-2012 posters left, and they’ve been replaced with poltards and frogtwitter orbiters who simply have nothing of interest to say; to them ”reading books” is just a trait you put in your social media profile. oh wow dude you read dosto junger hamsun and mishima, based

as gay as it seemed then lit was infinitely more interesting around peak alt lit and tao lin. there just seemed to be more possibilities with the internet. probably one of those moments in time where something appeared for a brief moment before the world closed its ranks once again

[Anonymous No.15975042]

>>15975031
There's nothing wrong with anime reaction images, friend.

[Anonymous No.15975058]

>>15974845
Only anon in this thread making sense.
If ur requesting for more strict and gay moderation pls just migrate to reddit. You'll love that place

[Anonymous No.15975065]

>>15975042
agree but don't make threads just to post said images

[Anonymous No.15975074]

How about you start contributing to threads. I've made countless threads about actual literature but they never get more than 6 replies
FAGGOTS

[Anonymous No.15975080]

>>15974782

[Anonymous No.15975094]

>>15974466
i've said it on /vp/ and /his/ and i don't think i've ever been banned for it

[Anonymous No.15975096]

>>15974274
Whoa, look, this thread ended up like the one thing OP was complaining about!

[Anonymous No.15975099]

>>15974896
>i-im just saying nigger ironically
You have to go back.

[Anonymous No.15975106]

This thread was moved to >>>/qa/3327900