Feminist literature thread?

[Anonymous No.15858815]

No Chuds allowed.

[Anonymous No.15858826]

Anyone with a beginner's chart or something? I don't know where to start

[Anonymous No.15858834]

>>15858826
Leftypol made a marxist feminism chart. I dont currently have it but I hope someone does because its pretty cool.

[Anonymous No.15858847]

[Anonymous No.15858869]

>>15858815
I was at the dump last week and someone had dropped off several boxes of feminist literature. That's exactly where it belongs.

[Anonymous No.15858896]

>>15858869
And then everyone clapped

[Anonymous No.15858917]

>>15858896
>boxes of shit tier books at the dump is outside the realm of possibility
kys, retard

[Anonymous No.15858920]

*tink tink tink* *ahem* women are good and equal to men in many respects. hating women is foolish and pointless. thank you.

[Anonymous No.15858924]

The Manipulated Man by Esther Vilar

[Anonymous No.15858929]

>>15858815
Harry Potter.

[Anonymous No.15858931]

>How do I make philosophy about MYSELF

Quintessential female

[Anonymous No.15858940]

>>15858920
You see, this doesn’t really work because that isnt a controversial or contrarian statement. If the frog were at a black tie party and said that, he might get a few stares but otherwise nobody would give a damn.

[Anonymous No.15858943]

>>15858920
tink tink tink ahem women a stupid
thank you

[Anonymous No.15859035]

>>15858940
it's unfortunately a controversial statement on 4chan

[Anonymous No.15859038]

>>15858920
Ok, I will have sex with you now

[Anonymous No.15859095]

>>15858917
^outside your realm of reality^ hahahah shut up

[Anonymous No.15859104]

>>15859035
>unfortunately

[Anonymous No.15859105]

>>15858834

[Anonymous No.15859165]

>>15858826
There's a short Oxford introduction to feminism, which I think could be more accessible than a chart with 30 books. Also you could say fuck it and just go right to Sexual Politics which is very accessible as well, just make sure you're familiar with the marxist concept of ideology first (vaguely familiar, look up a definition on the internet, not a whole book). You don't need to read the novel Millett based her book on, either. The passages she quotes are the ones you actually need.

Also fuck TERFs.

[Anonymous No.15859219]

Le chud xD

[Anonymous No.15860484]

>>15859165
>not a terf
Cringe

[Anonymous No.15860531]

>>15858815
>unironically using chud
I know this is bait, but cmon man.

[Anonymous No.15860554]

>>15858815
>Chuds
I've begun to drift away from the left because of this stupid word.

[Anonymous No.15860589]

>>15858815
>>15858826
Pic, plus some intersectionality for you:
Sojourner Truth - Ain't I a Woman? 1851
Angela Davis - Women, Race and Class.1981
Ayaan Hirsi Ali - Infidel 2007

[Anonymous No.15861942]

>>15860484
Sure thing, fatty.

[Anonymous No.15862002]

>>15858834
Could someone spoil me and give me a suggestion for a starter feminist book that isn't too committed to other ideologies (e.g. marxism)?

[Anonymous No.15862034]

>>15858815
Why no chads allowed?

[Anonymous No.15862039]

>>15860589
>non-tumblr
>all by Semites
lol

>>15859105
Feminism is in reality just Jewish women taking their anger at Jewish society's treatment of women and taking it out on gentiles because they can't actually change Jewish society.

[Anonymous No.15862049]

>>15862002
The Oxford introduction to feminism

[Anonymous No.15862144]

>>15858826
protip:don't

[Anonymous No.15862179]

>>15862049
good idea. Thanks queen

>>15862039
what makes you think jewish women can change gentile society, retard?

[Anonymous No.15862193]

TERF reporting

[Anonymous No.15862285]

>>15862179
>what makes you think jewish women can change gentile society
The fact that they have, for starters.

[Anonymous No.15862289]

>>15862193
KEK we found our Queen Rowling.

[Anonymous No.15862307]

>>15861942
>not a terf
Cringe

[Anonymous No.15862332]

*tink tink tink*
yes hello i myself have a little speech as well
*pulls out a handful of notecards*
itll be hard to follow up that last one but
*fumbles the notecards across the ground*
ah well no matter I have most of it memorized
*ahem*
yes so
*coughs*
FUCK TRANNIES FUCK TERFS FUCK JANNIES FUCK JEWS

[Anonymous No.15862346]

feminism is honestly a joke. i can see the merit of first wave feminism.
second wave feminism was just an excuse for women to excuse their hooerish behaviors. they knew, deep down, that being a hooer is bad, but they cant stop hooering around. theyre like the fatty who knows he shouldnt eat pizza but eats it anyway, and then starts smashing weight scales like he's been oppressed. youre a hooer. no ones oppressing you. you brought it on yourself.
third wave feminism is such a complete joke nothing more needs to be said.

[Anonymous No.15862359]

>>15862346
>sanger creates planned parenthood so women can engage in literal eugeniccs for the betterment of mankind
>explicitly reifies the point of women
>...
>feminists just let some jewish whackadoo take over planned parenthood
>shifts entirely to abortion as a means of stripping women of an actual purpose and combating racism
>turns them into shitty discount men so that they can be used as cheap labor in factories
im honestly baffled that there arent more women upset about this

[Anonymous No.15862493]

>>15862049
where can I find this?

[Anonymous No.15862564]

>>15862332
>all these males desperate for a crumb of attention providing free bumping for the thread

[Anonymous No.15862573]

>>15862564
>implying I don't know what a sage is

[Anonymous No.15862578]

>>15858815
Suck my ass you fucking bitch

[Anonymous No.15862602]

>>15858815
Go back Chapo tranny

[Anonymous No.15862619]

>>15862346
Give me a single reason why women deserved the right to vote, what has actually improved since they got it? We have lower birth rates, more welfare, more censorship and political correctness and we constantly sacrifice our freedom for illusion of safety

[Anonymous No.15862641]

>>15862573
Extremely based my friend. And noticeably redpilled! Now why does feminism trigger you so much?

[Anonymous No.15862750]

>>15862346
>>15862359
All feminists are LARPers. Women are in the historically unprecedented situation, of all civilizations, of having full rights and the means to protect them. But do you see them forming women militias? Where are the groups training riflewomen to protect them from when men decide women's rights were a mistake? Nowhere, because women aren't serious. Feminism is just a larp.

>>15862039
Yes yes, we've all seen the Wikipedia page of feminists by religion.

[Anonymous No.15862760]

>>15862346
>second wave feminism was just an excuse for women to excuse their hooerish behaviors.
“sex positive” feminism mostly is third wave. Read second wave writers, and radical feminists for feminism that isn’t an empty ideology.

[Anonymous No.15862793]

>>15858931
based

[Anonymous No.15862795]

>>15862750
Feminism is just a luxury in developed first world countries, as soon as times get rough feminism will magically disappear

[Anonymous No.15862800]

>>15859105
is this true

[Anonymous No.15862815]

>>15858826
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Feminist_philosophy
This page gives a good overview, I think. I personally recommend starting with the most influential second wave works: The Second Sex, The Feminine Mystique, The Dialectic of Sex, etc.

[Anonymous No.15862832]

>>15862346
>hooer
whats hooer

[Anonymous No.15862851]

>>15862039
the most important femiist, simone de beauvoir, is not jewish

[Anonymous No.15862867]

>>15858931
As opposed to ancient Greek philosophy which was about how Greek philosophers are superior to everyone else?

[Anonymous No.15862877]

>>15862815
>The Second Sex, The Feminine Mystique, The Dialectic of Sex,
but these are just lesser works of male philosophers. de beauvoir copyig sartre, feminine mystique sounds like erotica, and, really, dialectic of sex? is this more misrepresentation of german idealism

[Anonymous No.15862896]

>>15862867
>heard 'philosopher king' from some meme she read on twitter
>compares feminist philosophy to greek philosophy
Why are holes allowed to post on a literature board?

[Anonymous No.15862905]

>>15862039
Except you're wrong on both counts. Israel is more feminist than the rest of the Middle East and comparable to the West (in some respect there is even more equality, especially when it comes to conscription and romantic relationships).
And historically feminism in Europe starts in the 16th century among educated bourgeois and aristocratic women. It was mostly a non-Jews thing up until the 19th century included, easily.
The most prominent male feminists in that (Poulain de la Barre, Condorcet, Fourier, Montesquieu) were not Jewish either.

TL;DR: Stop reasoning with memes and learn2history. American Jewish women come very late in the history of feminism.

[Anonymous No.15862925]

>>15862905
>It was mostly a non-Jews thing up until the 19th century included, easily.
Ah so feminism made no progress until Jews came to rescue white women in white societies in the 20th century

[Anonymous No.15862945]

>>15858847
ok, ladies gonna kick this off, haha

[Anonymous No.15862968]

>>15862867
Philosopher in that sense just means someone who thinks critically.

[Anonymous No.15863024]

>>15862193
>Bought a flag, thus monetarily supporting trans rights
> just to burn it on camera

Rent free

[Anonymous No.15863148]

>>15858815
>my hole

[Anonymous No.15863154]

>>15862795
Unless the ladies gear up. If you're worried about a woman sniping you, speaking out about removing suffrage might not be you're first choice.

[Anonymous No.15863170]

>>15862925
Looking at wikipedia, it says jewish feminism can be traced back to the 70s. The first Jewish feminist I can think of is Shulamith Firestone, born in 1945.

I won't go over the huge influence of feminist women in French salon at the dawn of the French revolution, which changed Western ideas on maternity and female education.
I'll just note a few things: by 1935 essentially all of Western Europe (except France and to some extent Spain), a good deal of the Balkans, Scandinavia, and various South American and Asian countries had legalized voting for women. By 1970 all countries except about fifteen, most of them in the Middle East and Africa, had followed suit. Most of them also allowed political candidacies for women.

At that point women had started seriously becoming part of the workforce (not that they didn't work before, but it often wasn't standard salary-paid work). The Second Sex, the definitive of second-wave feminism, was published in 1949. In the preface Beauvoir wrote that she considered most of the objectives of feminism to have been achieved.

So really Jewish feminist hopped on the bandwagon when most of the work was already done.

At best you could say they spearheaded third wave feminism, which had only started to be influential in the past 20-30 years or so (and has contributed little in terms of concrete change).

[Anonymous No.15863179]

>>15863170
*the definitive summary

[Anonymous No.15863201]

>>15863170
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Feminists_by_religion
educate yourself

[Anonymous No.15863313]

>>15863170
The cope is hilarious. First says 19th century then the 70s. Whore are you lecturing us on history while you're learning it from Wikipedia right now

[Anonymous No.15863561]

>>15858847
I can't resist anymore. I have to know what numbers I was meant to receive as of this very post.

[Anonymous No.15863566]

>>15863313
nice fallacy, lil phallus

[Anonymous No.15863582]

>>15863566
nice hole

[Anonymous No.15863608]

>>15863313
I was saying easily until the 19th century included, so I actually overestimated the influence of Jewish feminism. I don't know much about it because, surprise, it doesn't feature much in the general history of feminism. None of what I said is false, but feel free to prove otherwise. I also provided arguments besides the wikipedia article.

>Whore
Nice, something of value in your post at last

>while you're learning it from Wikipedia right now
I'm using the very source that was mentioned itt to see how the argument (or rather the insinuation) holds up, and as I suspected, it doesn't. If you want to discuss things above Wikipedia level, stop using wikipedia screenshots. Laugh as you please, you're the most amateurish of us here, and that's saying a lot.

Do yourself a favor, read Beauvoir and Badinter.

[Anonymous No.15863656]

>>15863582
yeah, the world originates from there

[Anonymous No.15863732]

>>15863608
your posts are disgusting pseud posts. there are plenty of Jewish feminists in >>15863201 who are active in the 19th c yet your repulsive brain writes blocks of self masturbatory text about how you don't know anything about Jewish feminists but you still nonetheless continue to waste my time with your double digit iq posts. please kill yourself you'll never be anything more than a pseudointellectual

[Anonymous No.15863894]

>>15863024
>Multi billion dollar support
>10 dollar symbolic burning spread on the internet.

[Anonymous No.15864071]

>>15863656
based, good luck with your future creampies.

[Anonymous No.15864146]

>>15860589
I don't even have to look them up to know most of their ethnicity.

[Anonymous No.15864375]

>>15862493
It's on bookzz. Sorry for the late reply, Queen. Let me get a link for you.

https://b-ok.lat/book/732378/4fafa2
>>15862179

[Anonymous No.15864621]

ALL WOMEN ARE WHORES

FUCK WOMEN

I HATE WOMEN

[Anonymous No.15864745]

>>15859105
They turned rebellion against their own oppressive, primitive patriarchal ethnic identity into a global ideology because they couldn't tolerate the idea that their parochial ethnic group was uniquely backward relative to Northern Europe.

[Anonymous No.15864765]

>>15858815
What's a chud?
Also, all feminist theory is grounded in penis envy.

[Anonymous No.15864786]

>>15864765
And before you respond, remind yourself that the cornerstone of feminist theory is "Patriarchy".
So any attempt to dismantle/supplant the great evil of Patriarchy is essentially penis envy (desire of man's power, lifestyle, masculinity and "freedom").

[Anonymous No.15864798]

>>15864765
Probably female chads that are too based for feminism.

[Anonymous No.15864863]

>>15858815
>chuds
opinion discarded, thank you for trying though

[Anonymous No.15865116]

>>15858834

[Anonymous No.15865630]

>>15862795
Lmao what? Most third world countries have exactly the same sex, gender, racial class-like issues. The only problem is that most third-world countries are also either in some sort of civil war or a dictatorship so obviously the movements never become popular.

[Anonymous No.15865781]

i don't understand feminist literature. Like, either you're for gender equality or you're a retard who doesn't read anyway. Why would you bother wasting your time reading this shit with such an obvious conclusion? Same goes with books about how racism is bad.

[Anonymous No.15866060]

>Ctrl+F Irigaray: 0/0
Sad!

[Anonymous No.15866063]

>>15865630
>Lmao what?
die

[Anonymous No.15866080]

>>15866060
Thanks for the rec fren >>15866076

[Anonymous No.15866110]

>>15858847
let's see

[Anonymous No.15866145]

>>15859105
>Wikipedia

[Anonymous No.15866473]

>>15858815
Harry Potter

[Anonymous No.15866481]

>>15862851
And my best friend is a nigger. So I'm not racist

[Anonymous No.15867001]

>>15858815
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D3UwZEn3AuI

[Anonymous No.15867079]

>>15867001
I don't know if these are trannies or crossdressers or homos or whatever they are but if they were born male, for me they're proof that gender doesn't always match sex and these individuals were meant to be born women because no man can act like that, think like that, have these opinions, discuss about these things, etc. it's very fundamentally feminine (PBUH Horia)

[Anonymous No.15867951]

>>15865630
Yes that's what they were saying. Feminism is a luxury most societies can't afford. Apparently not even developed western ones.

[Anonymous No.15867968]

>>15867079
>for me they're proof that gender doesn't always match sex and these individuals were meant to be born women because no man can act like that
Or proof that individual should have been committed to an institution.

[Anonymous No.15868613]

>>15860589
Thanks anon, I'll be sure to read a couple of these.

[Anonymous No.15868652]

None of the feminists posted in this thread even have a PhD in Philosophy, let alone a master's in Math and a master's in Chemistry.

Fucking pathetic. At least find one with merit.

[Anonymous No.15868797]

>>15862619
Why should men be allowed to vote? Most people are retarded, male or female

[Anonymous No.15869038]

>>15858920
Baste

[Anonymous No.15870293]

>>15868613
Perhaps Second Sex and Infidel if you just read two

[Anonymous No.15870513]

>>15868797
Because if you don't let men vote, they will kill you.

[Wise Man Bunga No.15870523]

>>15863024
>monetarily supporting trans rights by buying a plastic flag on Amazon
>burning it on camera made you mad enough to respond
I'd say it was worth it. Probably brought the burner quite some pleasure, too

[Anonymous No.15871820]

Women's literature is like toilet paper: It's soft, white and meant to be flushed down the toilet.

[Anonymous No.15872815]

>>15858920
most men will never take women seriously because of pic related, ultimately every man from loser to chad intuitively understands that women are basically mercurial snakes who worship power and any words they might spout are subservient to this impulse. everything they say is therefore tainted by bad faith, which is why men do not respect them, and so many cultures have associated femininity with treachery, darkness, yin energy, etc. it's tragic but evolution made them this way. i enjoy reading feminist literature for the sometimes insightful hot takes, but if you actually take women seriously as any sort of moral architects, wew fucking lad.

*ting ting*

also fuck niggers.