Albert Einstein’s Favorite Books

[Anonymous No.15779468]

5. “Analysis of Sensations” by Erns Mach
4. “Don Quixote” by Miguel de Cervantes
3. “Ethics” by Barush Spinoza
2. “A Treatise of Human" by David hume
1. Johann Goethe's Work

https://bigthink.com/culture-religion/albert-einstein-favorite-books

[Anonymous No.15779480]

>>15779468
based.

[Anonymous No.15779567]

>>15779468
Wasn't he also a really big fan of Dostoevsky?

[Anonymous No.15779573]

>>15779468
pleb taste

[Anonymous No.15779651]

>Also like The Brothers Karamazov and Isis Unveiled

Any read Isis Unveiled? Sounds interesting.

[Anonymous No.15779772]

I dont really care what some kike read ..

[Anonymous No.15779793]

>>15779468
His most favorite book is bible and Don Quixote.

https://www.christies.com/features/15-things-you-might-not-know-about-Albert-Einstein-9162-1.aspx

[Anonymous No.15780060]

>>15779793
Wasn't he an atheist?

[Anonymous No.15780093]

>>15780060
He was a Jew which isn't mutually exclusive with being an atheist. Although, he wasn't an atheist as well. He believed in a pantheistic conception of God that revealed itself in the truth of nature (therefor his love for Spinoza).

[Anonymous No.15780110]

>>15779772
>I dont really care what some kike read ..

Also, how can certain forms of antisemitism exist when Einstein is literally the modern equivalent for genius and many scientific developments are because of his mind only.

Adding to that, he the lived a honorable and moral life despite of being persecuted for his Judaism.

Not sure if I understand modern-antisemitism.

[Anonymous No.15780188]

>>15780110
He was no genius. First he plagiarized GR from goyim scientists, second he did not create any scientific development or invented anything, third GR is wrong and if you can't tell why you're a fool.

[Anonymous No.15780206]

>>15779468
Good for him. I don't care about his shit taste, even if he is a genius that revolutionized modern physics. It doesn't turn shit to gold.

[Anonymous No.15780219]

>>15780188
This post is just massive cope. I agree that Einstein's taste in books is overrated and he is basically a celebrity that gets all the credit for what a whole group of people (him included) did, but how can you unironically defend this autistic thesis without devolving into /pol/ack tier ad hominems against the fact that he was a Jew?

[Anonymous No.15780267]

>>15780188
>First he plagiarized GR
woah really?

[Anonymous No.15781115]

>>15780219
Did I say anything about him being a Jew? No. That is obvious given that he plagiarized "goyim" (what (((they))) call us aka cattle and inb4 "it means nations" no it doesn't as used by (((them)))) scientists. As for realizing GR is wrong, it takes not being a midwit follower of the cult of scientism. If you can't see through the bullshit of "spacetime" then you're a fucking idiot.

[Anonymous No.15781617]

>>15781115
>That is obvious given that he plagiarized "goyim"
[Citation needed]

>As for realizing GR is wrong, it takes not being a midwit follower of the cult of scientism.
Scientism has absolutely nothing to do with GR being wrong or right. One is an an extremely flawed view of the role of science which raises it to a religion and the other is a scientific model that had the proper theoretical and empirical backing to show it is a good model for the time bring until a better model is found.

GR is a model which assumes things which generally aren't true in classical/everyday mechanics (extremely high gravitational forces, objects traveling at near light speed). Of course you won't experience GR in everyday life and it would take you longer than the life of the universe in order for such differences to matter. Stop shitposting and read a book on physics and the philosophy of science, namely one by Paul Feyerabend or Thomas Kuhn since it's clear you know fucking nothing about either subject. I swear, /pol/ fucking rots people's brains and makes them think they are the new Einstein.

[Anonymous No.15781664]

Why'd he hate Bergson so much?

[Anonymous No.15781800]

>>15779468
>shilled for Stalin
>had Hume as one of his favorite books
What a contradiction

[Anonymous No.15781817]

>>15780110
>Einstein is literally the modern equivalent for genius
He's a very important scientist yes but he's only viewed that way because the media memed him into it.

>many scientific developments are because of his mind only.
True but you could say that about any major scientist really. Einstein "stood on the shoulders of giants" no less than Newton did.

[Anonymous No.15781967]

Heisenberg is greater than Einstein.

[Anonymous No.15781990]

>>15781664
Some people think Bergson believed feels>facts and that makes the dogmatic image of thought very angry.

[Anonymous No.15782474]

>>15779468
>>15779573
>>15779772
>>15780188
>>15781817
lmao you guys are coping so hard. /lit/ is just butthurt because einstein was both a better scientist and a better philospher than all of /lit/, and his mere existence triggers all the retards here who think pure philosophy and starting with the greeks is the way to go.

[Anonymous No.15782640]

>>15782474
>a better philospher
Oh really? Please tell me what major contribution he made to the philosophical conversation.

[Anonymous No.15783077]

>>15779468
Terrible article. Barely mentions Schopenhauer.

[Anonymous No.15783611]

>>15780110
Einstein has been refuted, he was no absolute genius as reddit likes think

[Anonymous No.15783648]

>>15779468
Who cares about what some scientist liked reading in his leisure time? Does have anything intersting to say about those works? No, and even he he had anything to say about them, I doubt it would be illuminating in any way since scientists rarely do. Einstein is overrated anyway. Fuck this old jew.

[Anonymous No.15783655]

>>15782474
Einstein wasn't a philosopher, pseud.