Literature about modern information warfare?

File: 230 KB, 750x1244, 4chan.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

Anonymous Sun Jun 21 23:50:04 2020 No.15667279 [DELETED]

Literature about modern information warfare?

>>	Anonymous Sun Jun 21 23:52:40 2020 No.15667290 Yeah it was pretty clear something subversive was going on with this board. The amount of political posting and chapocels was enough to make a pretty good conclusion, never mind that.

Anonymous Sun Jun 21 23:55:10 2020 No.15667300
File: 3 KB, 119x125, sb.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>15667290
The entire "/lit/ was always a left-wing board" thing was a fucking meme. /lit/, the board that's had threads on De Maistre and Evola for years? /lit/, the board that's made a god out of Ted Kaczynski, who's a fucking ecofascist? /lit/, the most religious board on all of 4chan, that loves to talk about Christianity? That board is supposed to be "left-wing"? /lit/ has never been left-wing.

Anonymous Sun Jun 21 23:58:01 2020 No.15667313

>>15667300
i don't necessarily disagree with you but many "leftists" have a lot in common with right wing thinkers even those who were outright fascist (schmitt, heidegger) because both groups reject or at least critique the ideals of the liberal democracy and modernity.
Ecologists are the most wel known example of it.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jun 21 23:58:16 2020 No.15667314 >>15667279 Not /lit/ related. Back to >>>/pol/.

Anonymous Sun Jun 21 23:59:52 2020 No.15667324

>>15667314
the bizzare thing is that the title is completely literature related, but you are right, the image is totally not.

I don't know how jannies are supposed to handle these sorts of things, since there is so much bait in the images, but the posts themselves are not really breaking any rules.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jun 22 00:01:35 2020 No.15667333 >>15667324 What about the image is not related to the topic?

>>	Anonymous Mon Jun 22 00:01:37 2020 No.15667334 >>15667324 Jannies dont give a fuck on this board apparently in general.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jun 22 00:02:28 2020 No.15667338 >>15667334 images don't matter but if you post an image of butterfag you get banned

>>	Anonymous Mon Jun 22 00:03:24 2020 No.15667342 >>15667338 I mean thats just vile so its fair

>>	Anonymous Mon Jun 22 01:43:28 2020 No.15667834 >>15667324 Aren't you a reading bored? Just ignore the images while reading the text.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jun 22 01:44:42 2020 No.15667845 >>15667279 Haroro J. Ingram has written articles about ISIS's use of information warfare.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jun 22 02:09:02 2020 No.15667957 File: 43 KB, 1857x342, butterfly.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>15667338 What about this one?

Anonymous Mon Jun 22 02:13:22 2020 No.15667972

>>15667314
>Back to >>>/pol/.
You know, This use to be a sparingly used term only a few weeks ago for full on poltard spergs, and the only people using it now seem to be chapo falseflagers.

>>15667300
"/lit/ was always a left-wing board" thing was a pre-chapo invasion thing amoung our native psued left which i still vastly prefer over tourist larper left.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jun 22 02:14:47 2020 No.15667978 >>15667324 >>15667314 Also, If you guys were here for more than 2 weeks you know that saying >Books for _____ is seemingly a legitament way to talk about anything at all on /lit/.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jun 22 02:27:45 2020 No.15668016 >>15667279 Ok, but... modern information warfare is actually an interesting topic, so why don't we just make the most of this thread and talk about that? Just ignore the left-right baiting?

>>	Anonymous Mon Jun 22 02:29:27 2020 No.15668021 >>15667300 Ted K is far left, asshat.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jun 22 02:30:35 2020 No.15668030 >>15667957 Was in that thread. Devolved into a bunch of facesitting toons. 2020 /lit/.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jun 22 02:31:50 2020 No.15668037 >>15667333 The death threat perhaps? The general batshit insanity on full display having nothing whatever to do with literature?

>>	Anonymous Mon Jun 22 02:32:14 2020 No.15668039 File: 551 KB, 2142x782, Redditcynski.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>15668021 This. r*ddit lefties love him.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jun 22 02:32:32 2020 No.15668041 >>15668021 you big dumbdumb

>>	Anonymous Mon Jun 22 02:33:22 2020 No.15668046 >>15668021 cringe

>>	Anonymous Mon Jun 22 02:34:01 2020 No.15668047 >>15668021 >>15668039 Read Uncle Ted's work and stop being a fucking retard spouting shit you don't know online.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jun 22 02:34:02 2020 No.15668048 >>15668037 Funny how faggots only seem to show up on threads complaining that /lit/ is getting raided. Meanwhile hundreds of off topic bait threads a day and jannies don't do fuck all about it.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jun 22 02:34:18 2020 No.15668049 >>15668021 >Whoever i like is far left because left just means thing i agree with

>>	Anonymous Mon Jun 22 02:35:01 2020 No.15668055 >>15667300 > the most religious board on all of 4chan, that loves to talk about Christianity? Blacks and Latinos are the most Christian demographics in America.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jun 22 02:35:21 2020 No.15668057 >>15667290 >>15667972 >muh chapo Most leftists have no idea what your talking about. Stop wasting your life on social media and read a book for a change, mouthbreather.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jun 22 02:36:24 2020 No.15668059 >>15668016 OP just wanted a bait thread and as long as you put "books" somewhere in your OP people respond and threads stay for ages

>>	Anonymous Mon Jun 22 02:37:20 2020 No.15668064 >>15668047 Ted K is a hardcore leftist eco-terrorist who thinks technology itself is bad -- coincidently, the one thing white people have contributed to the world. Read between the lines.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jun 22 02:38:02 2020 No.15668066 Does this board even have mods? I unironically can't remember the last time I've seen a genuine literature thread get >50 replies.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jun 22 02:38:40 2020 No.15668067 >>15668049 >projecting your own agreement with serial murderers onto other people who just provide facts Wew

>>	Anonymous Mon Jun 22 02:38:57 2020 No.15668069 >>15667290 /leftypol/ and its associates have been trying to take over /lit/ for years it's really pathetic if you think about it

>>	Anonymous Mon Jun 22 02:39:00 2020 No.15668070 >>15668064 Ted K is not leftist at all, he's critiqued both the left and the right in his works and is a post-partisan primitivist. Again, stop being a retard and read his works before you comment on them.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jun 22 02:40:48 2020 No.15668079 >>15668059 I like the subject of information warfare but it's been like a fucking month and it's about time we start addressing this shit. From the cockspam to the fucking endless off subject shit.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jun 22 02:41:33 2020 No.15668085 >>15667300 >/lit/, the most religious board on all of 4chan /lit/ is the least Christian discussion forum in human history. Just look at the pic in the OP.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jun 22 02:42:36 2020 No.15668091 >>15668085 t. new guy

>>	Anonymous Mon Jun 22 02:43:29 2020 No.15668096 >>15668070 Wrong. He critiqued the neolib self-flagellating PMC contingent, just as every leftist does. Woke capital is not a form of 'leftism'.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jun 22 02:43:45 2020 No.15668098 >>15668091 >t. unironic newfag from reddit

>>	Anonymous Mon Jun 22 02:44:41 2020 No.15668100 >>15668091 You're clearly the newfag here, zoomer.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jun 22 02:45:15 2020 No.15668105 >>15668096 >Woke capital is not a form of 'leftism'. /pol/ begs to differ.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jun 22 02:45:21 2020 No.15668106 >>15668096 Then Conservatism isn't part of the right either. Regardless, I don't see at all how you could think that Ted is a leftist. Why do you think that 'ultra'-traditionalism has anything at all to do with leftist ideas?

>>	Anonymous Mon Jun 22 02:45:50 2020 No.15668110 >>15668057 Its a catch all term asswipe for lefty neolib tourists, wether from a Contrapoint Discord or whatever.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jun 22 02:47:04 2020 No.15668115 File: 2.14 MB, 400x166, 8317595257.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>15668098 >>15668091 t. penis penis fart shit piss So tired of this shit I just want my fucking /lit/ back

>>	Anonymous Mon Jun 22 02:47:19 2020 No.15668116 >>15668110 >Left >Neolib Pick one.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jun 22 02:48:30 2020 No.15668123 >>15668106 Go up to Mitch McConnell and ask him if the unabomber is a 'traditional conservative'. Post response here.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jun 22 02:49:40 2020 No.15668127 File: 38 KB, 413x395, 1592514119012.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>15668123 >Mitch McConnell

>>	Anonymous Mon Jun 22 02:50:33 2020 No.15668132 File: 17 KB, 204x239, 1322327702771.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>15668115 /lit/ was never good you would know this if you weren't fresh off the boat from reddit just like >>15668098 and >>15668100

>>	Anonymous Mon Jun 22 02:51:48 2020 No.15668138 File: 178 KB, 330x319, 2ec34.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>15668123 >Mitch McConnell

>>	Anonymous Mon Jun 22 02:52:54 2020 No.15668140 File: 1.01 MB, 1500x3242, lit top 100 (2018).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>15668132 >/lit/ was never goo-

Anonymous Mon Jun 22 02:53:36 2020 No.15668143
File: 36 KB, 900x506, 1592456251306.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>15668132
>/lit/ was never good
Never thought I'd get to see the same fucking thing happen so many times to so many boards.

/board/ was never good. The eternal cry of the newfag. Spewed everywhere they roam. Forever.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jun 22 02:53:40 2020 No.15668145 >>15668123 Did I not just say that Conservatism isn't right winged, the same way you said neo-liberalism isn't right winged?

>>	Anonymous Mon Jun 22 02:53:52 2020 No.15668146 >>15668021 wrong >>15667279 based op btfoing marxoids

>>	Anonymous Mon Jun 22 02:54:51 2020 No.15668149 >>15668146 Cope.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jun 22 02:55:02 2020 No.15668150 >>15668132 Just because I know that /lit/ has always been left doesn't mean I don't think /lit/ was always shit. It has evolved from DFW shittiness to other forms of shittiness, but it has never been a colony of the mouthbreathers at /pol/. Go back.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jun 22 02:55:52 2020 No.15668154 >>15668143 In the case of /tv/, it's actually true.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jun 22 02:56:19 2020 No.15668156 >>15668145 Not that poster but holy fuck this is stupid petty shit. >muh left wing muh right wing blah blah neocon blah blah chicom libtard libtard cuckservative It's all the same shit and if you were a day above fucking 15 you'd have noticed by now.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jun 22 02:56:23 2020 No.15668157 >>15668145 But neoliberalism is rightwing. Not following you.

Anonymous Mon Jun 22 02:56:38 2020 No.15668158

>>15668116
Oh, fuck off you snide ass hat. Its left in self description with neolib sympathies. Your little "Factorino" is semantic bull that litterally every self proclaimed 14 year old Leftist says parroting Jreg or some other basic entry level bitch.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jun 22 02:57:23 2020 No.15668163 >>15668150 >but it has never been a colony of the mouthbreathers at /pol/. Explain the past four years, then.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jun 22 02:57:51 2020 No.15668166 >>15668127 >>15668138 >real conservatism has never been tried

Anonymous Mon Jun 22 02:58:38 2020 No.15668169

>>15668154
/tv/ didn't have used to have fucking cunny threads. It's always "/board/ was never good" almost makes you think it's a single person, but deep down you know it's thousands upon thousands of morons, all patting themselves on the back over their oh so witty remarks.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jun 22 02:59:40 2020 No.15668177 File: 27 KB, 450x372, 1592252280405.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>15668166 >Mitch McConnell

>>	Anonymous Mon Jun 22 02:59:42 2020 No.15668178 >>15668158 You're talking pure gibberish. Have you been drinking?

>>	Anonymous Mon Jun 22 03:00:11 2020 No.15668181 >>15668156 I know it's all the same shit, that's why I'm a National Socialist. Stop being a retard, he's the one that brought neo-liberalism up first >>15668157 >neoliberalism is rightwing Oh, you're just baiting.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jun 22 03:01:21 2020 No.15668186 >>15668178 No, im just tired of the same three nothing responses from your general demography of posters.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jun 22 03:01:39 2020 No.15668188 >>15668169 >/tv/ didn't have used to have fucking cunny threads. just how new are you? they have been going on since at least 2011

>>	Anonymous Mon Jun 22 03:01:47 2020 No.15668190 >>15668177 Not an argument. You are reduced to posting frog images. Sad.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jun 22 03:03:10 2020 No.15668197 >>15668181 Wow you really are a newfag. Go back to /pol/, zoomer. This may be a blue board but it's for adults.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jun 22 03:04:06 2020 No.15668202 >>15668188 Been here since 2016, newfriend.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jun 22 03:05:11 2020 No.15668206 >>15668188 Felt like a little later than 2011 but I've been posting since around late 05 more 06. Missed a big chunk from 2013 to 2017. Was tired of seeing boards go to shit.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jun 22 03:05:40 2020 No.15668208 >>15668158 Imagine being such a retard that you think leftists are neoliberals lmao go get checked mate, it could be serious

>>	Anonymous Mon Jun 22 03:05:42 2020 No.15668209 >>15668197 >Wow you really are a newfag > Go back to /pol/ >zoomer >This may be a blue board but it's for adults. Not a single fucking phrase did not ooze faggotry.

Anonymous Mon Jun 22 03:05:47 2020 No.15668210
File: 644 KB, 1146x1600, 1266267063061.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>15668132
This is partly true, but it wasn't at this low.
The most popular threads have always been about religion, race and why are girls dumb. That's a given. We could get as many twittercap threads as /tv/, so let's hope it doesn't get to that.

And while threads about literature have never been exactly popular, at least people tried to discuss or namedrop shit. When was the last time this board has seen a discussion on Dostoevsky? Now the "literary" threads always fall under some retarded low iq meme from other boards like "recommend books for climbing the stairs" or "I just finished X, what did I think", and the constant stream of adolescent tourists who don't care to lurk and just want to troll/be spoonfed.

It's sad because it's a slow board already.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jun 22 03:06:43 2020 No.15668214 File: 4 KB, 243x104, 72846.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>15668188 this faggot >>15668202 isn't me

>>	Anonymous Mon Jun 22 03:07:25 2020 No.15668219 >>15668197 You're retarded. Go back to your containment website.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jun 22 03:08:11 2020 No.15668225 >>15667300 lit worshipped DFW long before those wackos. DFW is peak left-liberal doomer

>>	Anonymous Mon Jun 22 03:09:04 2020 No.15668229 >>15668209 Is this the point in the thread where you start posting about 'cucks' and 'big black cocks' and 'trannies'? The intellectual rigor of the polcel is always a wonder to behold.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jun 22 03:10:31 2020 No.15668235 >>15668219 Get off /lit/. You're out of your element here.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jun 22 03:11:21 2020 No.15668237 >>15668166 Stop embarrassing yourself

Anonymous Mon Jun 22 03:11:42 2020 No.15668240

>>15668208
Thats the kind of brain dead attitude i am talking about. You are following some kind of letter of the law instead of spirit. Anyways i said lefty who sees tthemselves as leftists. Like it our not, neoliberals in the Jimmy Kimble fashion would call themselves left leaning regardless if they conform to your definition or not. Im sorry you think I am retarded for seeing nuance in words, and you are a galaxy brain because you are the authority of a stagnat and indefiable verbal meaning.

Anonymous Mon Jun 22 03:12:06 2020 No.15668244

>>15668235
>>15668229
Did you really think the best way to go about this was to first say I'm a child and from /pol/ after calling me a bunch of buzzwords, then start posting about big black cocks, cucks, and trannies, implying that I would start doing that? Do you not see the irony here?

>>	Anonymous Mon Jun 22 03:12:36 2020 No.15668247 /lit/ - Literature

Anonymous Mon Jun 22 03:15:30 2020 No.15668267

>>15668229
No. Can you please stop strawmaning. I was simply pointing out that your phraseology was nothing but posing buzzwords that sound like someone trying way too hard to fit in. If you would like me to use a separate, less evocative, word than faggoty I will.

Anonymous Mon Jun 22 03:16:01 2020 No.15668269

>>15668237
The leader of the right in this country -- your leader -- is Mitch McConnell. He delivers all those wonderful tax breaks to the oligarchs, I mean "job creators", that you worship. He gets all those rightwing judges through congress, so they can further erode labor regulations and environmental protections. He is the embodiment of everything the right believes in, and he gets things done.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jun 22 03:17:37 2020 No.15668280 >>15668240 "Jimmy Kimble"? What the hell are you blathering about?

>>	Anonymous Mon Jun 22 03:19:46 2020 No.15668287 >>15668267 Like all rightwingers, you have zero capacity for rational argumentation. All you can do is call people names over and over again. That may work on /pol/ but not among those with an IQ above room temperature.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jun 22 03:20:34 2020 No.15668294 >>15667279 Based. Leftist on this board are so fucking cringe and low IQ its unbelievable.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jun 22 03:21:19 2020 No.15668297 >>15668280 oh, the guys name is Jimmy Kimmel. Sorry, I guess i dont tune in enough to get his name right.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jun 22 03:21:47 2020 No.15668301 File: 11 KB, 250x250, 1592457626070.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>15668287 Dude you're the one started calling the guy names honestly.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jun 22 03:24:01 2020 No.15668315 >>15667279 Cringe. Rightoids on this board are so fucking cringe and low IQ it's unbelievable.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jun 22 03:24:09 2020 No.15668317 >>15668297 I don't get it. Is he some sort of leftwing political theorist?

>>	Anonymous Mon Jun 22 03:24:11 2020 No.15668318 >>15668069 They already did it to the education system in the west. Why stop there?

>>	Anonymous Mon Jun 22 03:25:52 2020 No.15668329 >>15667279 Understanding Media by Mcluhan Also anything about/on rhetoric. Demosthenes seems like a good start but I havent gotten to him yet.

Anonymous Mon Jun 22 03:25:59 2020 No.15668331

>>15668287
Dude, i used faggoty as a descriptive word for cringy. dont have to be ubset. That is kind of the lingo here, which you would now if you actually browsed lit regularly. If it bothers you so much, fine. replace my use of faggoty with "trite" or "vapid".

>>	Anonymous Mon Jun 22 03:26:09 2020 No.15668332 >>15668294 Cringe. >>15668315 Based.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jun 22 03:27:03 2020 No.15668337 >>15668331 Still no actual argument.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jun 22 03:27:55 2020 No.15668340 >>15668317 leftist in terms of american (and subsequently, somewhat, but not necissarily western) casual left-right conceptualization of culture and politics.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jun 22 03:29:18 2020 No.15668346 File: 410 KB, 1440x955, 2xd5c6.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>15667279 >looking through the posts in this thread

>>	Anonymous Mon Jun 22 03:30:21 2020 No.15668350 >>15668340 So you're against "lefty" neolibs coming to /lit/? Well, as a communist, me too. They're as much cancer as /pol/fags.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jun 22 03:30:27 2020 No.15668353 >>15668340 The only "Jimmy Kimmel" I found was some sort of late night tv host. Totally lost as to where you're going here.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jun 22 03:30:37 2020 No.15668354 >>15668337 My argument against what? my point was the statement here >>15668197 was verbal diarrhea of absolute nothing and copypasta buzzwords.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jun 22 03:31:51 2020 No.15668358 >>15668350 There was like a handful of /pol/fags not that long ago but they didn't cause as much of a shitshow as whoever fucking showed up a month ago.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jun 22 03:34:08 2020 No.15668365 >>15668358 Walk it off, pantywaist.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jun 22 03:35:32 2020 No.15668375 >>15668365 drown in liquid shit

Anonymous Mon Jun 22 03:36:36 2020 No.15668380

>>15668350
Ok then, we can agree. like I said this is an argument of semantics. though as someone who has studied a bit of linguistics, both leftisms have correlatory elements.

>>15668353
Im talking about that kind of person would also call themselves a leftist even if you disagree. Its illustrative of the flexibility of the term as a linguistic artifact.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jun 22 03:38:15 2020 No.15668388 >>15668365 Forced /lit/ comment >>15668375 natural /lit/ comment

Anonymous Mon Jun 22 03:45:52 2020 No.15668414

>>15668380
I'm not a linguist, but I don't think any of these 'woke' media types would self-identity as "leftists". They present themselves as 'centrists' or 'liberals' who oppose racism, sexism, bigotry, etc. In reality, of course, these people are simply shills for capital. They put a friendly, 'inclusive' face on an economic regime in which wealthy capitalists are increasingly enriched at the expense of ordinary working people. All these prominent corporate media 'personalities' are multi-millionaires whose main motivation is not being cancelled.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jun 22 03:49:50 2020 No.15668433 >>15667279 >/lit/ >left I don't give a fuck about this petty skirmish between burgers, but /lit/ was never a lefty board.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jun 22 03:52:05 2020 No.15668439 >>15668433 Yeah, that deleuzoguattarian phase? Not leftist at all.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jun 22 03:54:15 2020 No.15668446 >>15668433 Literature is inherently leftist. Rightwingers reject the value of education, learning and the arts, preferring to feed off the unrefined vulgarian output of the 'free-market' system applied to culture.

Anonymous Mon Jun 22 03:55:53 2020 No.15668458

>>15668414
Again, thats why i specified left having a nuance of meanings to it. for example "Cultural left" as a vague general term. Regardless of underlying causal agents the self identification of left in some way makes one left in that context. Its a hegelian development of truth in that repects.

but besides simple perspectivism, if we were to assume a spectral viewpointfrom one pole to another (reductionistic i know, but illustrative nonetheless) The "liberal" (Though i would call them neolibrsl simply to differentiate from the general catagorization of "classical liberal" who more focuses on passive liberaty rather than active uplifting of supossedly downtroden groups) is more sympathetic with "economic leftism" than american rights as long as it does not topple capital.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jun 22 03:57:42 2020 No.15668466 >>15668446 Thats gay reductionist polemicism with an arbitrary left-right devide. Lit at its best is nether and simply is a development of qualitative contextual developments.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jun 22 04:01:14 2020 No.15668488 Socialist authors >Pynchon >Tolstoi >Bolaño >Cortázar >Camus >Orwell >Huxley >García Márquez >Zola >Hemingway >&c. Right-wing authors >???

>>	Anonymous Mon Jun 22 04:02:16 2020 No.15668492 >>15668488 And this was only literature. Philosophy?, I'd be the whole night writing the socialist section.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jun 22 04:05:20 2020 No.15668504 >>15668488 Wait, is right wing just anything that is not socialist now? So if someone is a national socialist would you absorb them as left? Im just trying to ground the premise of your claims here.

Anonymous Mon Jun 22 04:05:27 2020 No.15668506

>>15668458
You might say there is an anti-conservative left and an anti-capitalist left, and both sides hate each other's guts with a passion. Lol. Likewise there is an anti-socialist right and an anti-liberal right. That's a massive simplification of course, and in reality everyone holds their own unique mixture of stances.

Anonymous Mon Jun 22 04:08:30 2020 No.15668519

>>15668504
The term "national socialist" is kind of ill-defined. I don't think any leftist would be on board with throwing people into death camps on the basis of ethnicity or skin color, unless that skin color was pin-striped. Standard ethnocentrism we can work with.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jun 22 04:09:17 2020 No.15668524 >>15668504 Where did I imply a dichotomy you schizo

>>	Anonymous Mon Jun 22 04:14:27 2020 No.15668545 >>15667279 Not literature. Saged and reported.

Anonymous Mon Jun 22 04:39:39 2020 No.15668641

>>15668524
Something
>A
>B
>C

Something Else
>???

Just seems like an odd format if you are trying to get something across if it wasnt meant to be a dichotomy or oposition.
>>15668519
Didnt necissarily mean in a nazi way, but plato was a Hellenic nationalist and a good amount of other historical figures. or people who are socialy concervative but economicaly socialist.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jun 22 04:47:08 2020 No.15668670 >>15667279 Is Guenon posting a psyop?

Anonymous Mon Jun 22 05:18:26 2020 No.15668763
File: 3.56 MB, 4032x3024, IMG_20200620_150604.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

To answer OPs question. The book 'mindf*ck' by Christopher wylie accurately documents what went on at Cambridge Analytica, a private psychological warfare company. They are in the news for Facebook, but they spread disinformation here as well. Worked for Steve Bannon and the trump empire, ruined 4chan forever radicalising /Pol/ enough to leave their containment board.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jun 22 05:29:12 2020 No.15668802 >>15667300 N E W the religious phenomena is recent and just another fucking meme like the guenon shit

>>	Anonymous Mon Jun 22 05:30:24 2020 No.15668805 >>15667300 Put down the Ted K and pick up the Linkola.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jun 22 06:33:36 2020 No.15669043 >>15668225 DFW posting was an invasion of the board too.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jun 22 06:47:03 2020 No.15669110 >>15667300 All of this has become trendy since 2016, anon

>>	Anonymous Mon Jun 22 08:08:22 2020 No.15669441 File: 192 KB, 700x450, hannibal.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>15668269 i stand with you brother

>>	Anonymous Mon Jun 22 08:16:46 2020 No.15669472 >>15668805 Linkola was an apolitical misanthropic extreme environmentalist you clown He never said anything racist or rightwing, his only concern was saving ecology. At the end of his life he even supported Greta.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jun 22 08:19:21 2020 No.15669480 >>15667300 Oh my sweet summer child, /leftypol/ literally born out of /pol/+/lit/ posters.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jun 22 08:20:04 2020 No.15669483 i for one cannot wait until islam takes over the world and wipes the left-right dichotomy off the face of the earth

>>	Anonymous Mon Jun 22 08:21:18 2020 No.15669487 >>15667300 Newfag b8

Anonymous Mon Jun 22 08:42:56 2020 No.15669581

>>15668504
>So if someone is a national socialist would you absorb them as left
No, because that's bad PR. Same reason socialists argue so fervently against acknowledging fascism as an anti-capitalist movement - they don't want to be associated with a 'bad' ideology.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jun 22 09:21:53 2020 No.15669774 >>15667279 Guy Debord's Society of the Spectacle is the blackest of pills on the subject you will ever find

Anonymous Mon Jun 22 09:30:10 2020 No.15669807

>>15668350
>as a communist,
lmao
>>15668433
>/lit/ was never a lefty board
This. You are a newfag if you insist otherwise.
>>15668439
>Yeah, that deleuzoguattarian phase? Not leftist at all.
Correct. DG is not "leftist".
>>15668506
>You might say there is an anti-conservative left and an anti-capitalist left,
They both lead to the same place.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jun 22 09:40:56 2020 No.15669855 >>15669774 >muh situationism >muh commodity fetishism >muh social alienation lame and gay

>>	Anonymous Mon Jun 22 09:51:59 2020 No.15669932 >>15667290 Was? Every second thread here is about politics often not even disguised

Anonymous Mon Jun 22 09:55:43 2020 No.15669963

>>15667313
>Ecologists are the most well known example
ತ_ʖತ
dude ecology has almost nothing to do with the ideologies that appropriate it, especially the right wing ones who basically just impose their autism on a vague concern for the environment and justify it with some mongrel hybrid of poorly understood natural selection and a natural hierarchy and that is completely absent in the world ecologists study. Literally all mythology. At most you have competition but the right wingers ironically can't even get population dynamics right. Leftists at least attempt to be ecological but they completely fail to arrive at a thoroughly ecological philosophy, just a hermeneutic approach to ecological buzzwords.
Fuck off, I hate right wingers so fucking much. I can't even argue with leftists here because I'm afraid it will give you space to fester.

Anonymous Mon Jun 22 09:58:42 2020 No.15669991

>>15667314
>>15668057
>>15668055
>>15668085
>>15668150

That just means you are a newfag libtard and you shouldnt be here at all. 4chan is /pol/ and always was and no amount of crying from you 'fresh off the boat from reddit niggers' will ever change that. This place is not for you, but you cant deal with that can you, you people cant stop trying to turn every place in the world into your retarded echochambers. Heh good luck with that kid

>>15668064
Lmao rarely have i read someone take a shit on leftidts more than the words ted k. You jave no idea what you are tolkien about idiot.

>>15668294
This.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jun 22 10:05:19 2020 No.15670038 >>15668488 >??? They only need one; Shakespeare.

Anonymous Mon Jun 22 12:46:58 2020 No.15671139

Why does /pol/ go into conniptions about /leftypol/ "infiltrating" them every time somebody posts a dissenting opinion when /leftypol/ has like half a dozen users?
/lit/ has regularly discussed both extreme left and extreme right authors for its entire existence because it's always been attracted to fringe whackjobs, who tend to be the most passionate and write the most inspired takedowns of society. It really isn't very complicated.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jun 22 12:50:21 2020 No.15671169 >>15667279 imagine thinking "leftypol" has more logistical power than the CIA, NSA, russia, china etc... lmao

>>	Anonymous Mon Jun 22 12:54:26 2020 No.15671206 >>15669472 which is based. politics is just sports for people who cant fuck.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jun 22 13:06:56 2020 No.15671315 >>15668064 Ted doesn't think technology is inherently bad. You don't know much about him; stop pretending.

Anonymous Mon Jun 22 14:10:01 2020 No.15671875

>>15671139
>/lit/ has regularly discussed both extreme left and extreme right authors for its entire existence
These newfags aren't discussing ANY authors you fucking retard. They cropped up on the board and started posting weird out of place agitprop.

Anonymous Mon Jun 22 14:25:12 2020 No.15672023

>>15671875
This is true but not if you are trying to justify the leftypol invasion narrative.
There are far more /pol/fags pasting off topic agitprop than sjwians, and post of the bad leftist posts I see are responding to pol and it's incessant bait threads. Let's be real, this isn't a "both sides" problem. It's very clear that we can get the leftiods to fall in line and be good little cucks if we can flame the /pol/tards out. Focusing on their shit personalities and not getting into politics with them.
If you want to have a place to discuss literature, /pol/ needs to go away and you should actively work to that end regardless of your position. I wouldn't mind having intellegent /lit/ right wingers, but it seems like they care more about having their hot takes validated by retards than telling those retards to fuck off, like they know they should.

Anonymous Mon Jun 22 14:49:04 2020 No.15672248

>>15672023
I think it came in a few different waves. There used to be a bunch of /pol/tards but at this moment there's a lot more /leftypol/ faggots that don't want to assimilate. You're right, this isn't a both sides problem, because when leftoids take over a space, they refuse to assimilate to the group and try to change the focus completely. You're very obviously one of these faggots because the overwhelming amount of authors discussed here over the years have been "conservative", with a few modern or contemporary marxists here and there (which I actually find refreshing). Just fucking lurk before you start posting for fucks sake.

Anonymous Mon Jun 22 14:57:00 2020 No.15672318
File: 86 KB, 600x902, psychwarfare.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/10105969-psychological-warfare

This was the US army's guide for years, Linebarger was a psychologist involved in propaganda against the Germans before becoming a sci-fi writer post war.
Perhaps not completely relevent to the modern digital age, it will at least discuss the basics of propaganda, i.e. black vs white propaganda

Anonymous Mon Jun 22 15:05:41 2020 No.15672371

>>15672248
No you're fucking stupid. Leftiods aren't making the bait threads just look at the catalog and I don't even care about politics. You are very obviously living in an ideology so shut the fuck up. Right wingers are objectively worse posters and all they do is make bait threads and talk about the same dozen books. I do not read or care about political literature, which I doubt many of these faggots even read. it's the bait threads, half of the 'lefty' bait threads were very obviously started by conservatives from /b/.
Lefties will go away if you stop baiting them.
No trolling or racism outside of /b/ you fucking pedo

>>	Anonymous Mon Jun 22 15:08:21 2020 No.15672390 >>15671875 They aren't coming from /leftypol/, they're coming from /pol/, and have been since 2016. It's not my fault you're too new to recognize bait, nigger.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jun 22 15:09:59 2020 No.15672403 >>15672371 Nice spergout homo. /pol/tards are making bait threads yes. /leftypol/ on the other hand is derailing perfectly good threads and that's where I start having a fucking problem with it.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jun 22 15:14:50 2020 No.15672430 >>15672403 What the fuck are you talking about? Did you see some screenshot of a discord where three trannies cackled about how they're totally taking over 4chan and run over here assuming they're succeeding if they say they are?

Anonymous Mon Jun 22 15:15:20 2020 No.15672437

>>15672403
Leftypol is not a thing, threads being derailed with politics has nothing to do with the ideology that derails it. it is the bait threads in the catalog that make this place amicable to illiterate trolls, without them, teenagers would not have a foot in the board to derail threads.
I haven't even begun to spreg out very obviously

>>	Anonymous Mon Jun 22 15:16:30 2020 No.15672445 >>15672430 No I've literally been on perfectly normal threads that get totally sidelined by faggots coming in talking out of place normie leftist talking points.

Anonymous Mon Jun 22 15:21:31 2020 No.15672471

>>15672445
It's called "trolling." It's when people pretend to be retarded so that you get upset and give them (You)s. It does not mean there is a gigantic conspiracy from people who have never been on 4chan to subvert it. A long time ago, long before you ever got here, the average poster was familiar enough with imageboards to recognize it and not cry.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jun 22 15:23:34 2020 No.15672490 >>15667957 Lmao. Link to the thread?

>>	Anonymous Mon Jun 22 15:26:43 2020 No.15672515 >>15672471 I don't even fucking bother with them. Everyone else does. And you'd have to be fucking blind or retarded non to notice a massive change in the board recently.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jun 22 15:41:38 2020 No.15672617 >>15669991 >4chan is /pol/ Yep, times change. /pol/ could not be contained. It was 1000x worse than /mlp/ in spreading its cancer everywhere

Anonymous Mon Jun 22 15:42:28 2020 No.15672623

>>15672515
This. A bait pol thread can turn into something interesting. But newfag lefties with basic bitch quips are literally vomit inducing. And you can tell its them just from the out of the loop oddly forced copypasta phrases. I have nothing against native leftists here, we had good threads about Foucolt or whatever and polshit actually felt like shitposting or had an interesting or at least humorous perspective. And the completely unselfaware poltards were flushed out quick.

Nu-leftists are aids polemicists without even the decency to be absurdist or amusing with their shittakes.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jun 22 15:43:49 2020 No.15672628 Also most of the bait threads are /pol/ crossposts >the /pol/cel cries as he stabs you in the back

>>	Anonymous Mon Jun 22 15:43:49 2020 No.15672629 >>15672623 They also tend to come on at certain hours, very american.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jun 22 15:46:19 2020 No.15672642 >>15672629 I've noticed this too. West coast american timezone for sure. I get to miss them for the most part.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jun 22 15:50:00 2020 No.15672679 File: 152 KB, 1200x1620, 1517754237344.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>15668021

>>	Anonymous Mon Jun 22 15:52:21 2020 No.15672690 >>15672642 Probably. Im east coast and noticed same. Makes sense given the thpe of people who usually congregate in the west.

Anonymous Mon Jun 22 15:59:37 2020 No.15672754

>>15672023
This post is the exact sort of praxis at all costs spam that has ruined lit for me for the past few years. It's literally discouraging reasoned discussion in favor of endless have sex posting so that the some forever fleeting goal of a purely leftist lit may be reached and yet you're trying to frame it in words you picked up from r/rchan as a soulless attempt appeal to your warped perception of the average poster.
>just spam any vaguely right wing thread into oblivion guys I'm not a basic twitter leftist because I said the word cuck btw I totally care about board quality

Anonymous Mon Jun 22 16:15:36 2020 No.15672875

>>15672023
All you /leftypol/ redditfags want is for all the reasoning to stop so we can turn in to another leftist circlejerk.
>justify the leftypol invasion narrative
the pinko faggots have left plenty of evidence that they raid /lit/ after they realized /pol/ is fucking impossible to deal with.
I'd rather have endless hot takes from stormfronters than one month of pinko pox shitbags endlessly sucking each other off and dodging arguments.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jun 22 16:17:21 2020 No.15672891 File: 438 KB, 794x601, LOL.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] > there are unironic leftypol commies thinking they can proselytize /lit/ How deluded can these people be. Go back hahahahha

Anonymous Mon Jun 22 16:27:17 2020 No.15672975

>>15672875
/leftypol/ moves slower than any board on 4chan, their front page has threads from April still up. There are like ten people there. They couldn't invade /po/, let alone all of 4chan.
You're yelling at imaginary bogeymen because people rightfully tell you to fuck off and post your fourteenth daily "books for tfw niggers are rioting" on /pol/ instead of here. The goal is not to have some reddit hugbox, the goal is to talk about books. Evola and Spengler and Pound threads stay up because they are about literature.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jun 22 16:30:03 2020 No.15672997 >>15668021 Maybe you should actually read him you inbecile

>>	Anonymous Mon Jun 22 16:31:06 2020 No.15673006 >>15668096 I’m sorry but it is

Anonymous Mon Jun 22 16:34:40 2020 No.15673034

>>15668064
I don't have to read between the lines when I can just read the actual lines retard.

>6. Almost everyone will agree that we live in a deeply troubled society. One of the most widespread manifestations of the craziness of our world is leftism, so a discussion of the psychology of leftism can serve as an introduction to the discussion of the problems of modern society in general.
>The two psychological tendencies that underlie modern leftism we call “feelings of inferiority” and “oversocialization.” Feelings of inferiority are characteristic of modern leftism as a whole, while oversocialization is characteristic only of a certain segment of modern leftism; but this segment is highly influential.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jun 22 16:36:53 2020 No.15673058 >>15672975 Hop on in 8 or 9 hours.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jun 22 16:37:29 2020 No.15673061 >>15668140 lit was and still is good if you're in the right threads talking to the right anons. Lit is currently and will always be garbage in bait threads and wherever seething brainlets raid

>>	Anonymous Mon Jun 22 16:38:58 2020 No.15673077 >>15668143 the oldfag's curse

>>	Anonymous Mon Jun 22 16:40:25 2020 No.15673087 >>15668186 wow, unintelligible... Had a few too man drinks?

>>	Anonymous Mon Jun 22 16:41:34 2020 No.15673099 >>15672975 I think it’s mainly r/chapo fags but places like bunkerchan have more than just a few active posters

>>	Anonymous Mon Jun 22 16:41:38 2020 No.15673101 >>15672975 Most people use /leftypol/ for something larger than the mere other chan board. And there's more active communities called /leftypol/.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jun 22 16:43:06 2020 No.15673116 >>15668247 any good books recs for information warfare? I'm thinking of starting a thread and hoping to get a few cool books I hadn't heard about.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jun 22 16:43:43 2020 No.15673126 >>15673058 Hop on a bayonet, faggot

>>	Anonymous Mon Jun 22 16:46:52 2020 No.15673159 >>15673099 Bunkerchan is the place I checked because two-times-four-chan is dead, and their front page is mostly composed of threads weeks or months old. They're probably the size of our /out/ or /trv/ at best.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jun 22 16:47:13 2020 No.15673163 >>15669480 classic sardonic post to hide the seethe.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jun 22 16:48:53 2020 No.15673176 I feel the past few weeks we've had more off topic threads than even /tv/ I mean we've always had a few politics threads but never this many

>>	Anonymous Mon Jun 22 16:49:47 2020 No.15673185 >>15672754 this summed it up really well, solid post anon

>>	Anonymous Mon Jun 22 16:50:34 2020 No.15673188 >>15673101 This.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jun 22 16:50:38 2020 No.15673192 File: 119 KB, 780x518, The Information Trade.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>15667279 This came out shortly before the pandemic, I think, and is fucking great.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jun 22 16:51:03 2020 No.15673193 >>15673176 Its definetly concentrated brigading at some times

>>	Anonymous Mon Jun 22 16:56:16 2020 No.15673240 >/leftypol/ Lol there are what, like 150 people max on there?

Anonymous Mon Jun 22 17:01:37 2020 No.15673284

>Multiple functionally identical threads about the Turner Diaries per day
>Obvious right wing race bait threads
>Constant counter signaling threads
>Each political threads has one or two posters replying to everything with similar racial epithets "chaim", "schlomo"
>Any time /pol/ is mentioned even a little bit the first reply (usually very quick) is something about /leftypol/ being to blame
It seems someone's brigading, but I doubt it's leftypol

>>	Anonymous Mon Jun 22 17:04:59 2020 No.15673309 >>15673284 My personal take is that left wing agitpro is real and happens here, but due to our proximity with pol being on the same website we get more young people coming here to be 14 and edgy.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jun 22 17:06:38 2020 No.15673324 >>15673284 Lol, you say that like it isnt normal, you new here?

>>	Anonymous Mon Jun 22 17:11:11 2020 No.15673354 >>15673324 Everything he listed was not common until you 2016 immigrants squirmed over for the election. Just because you haven't been here long enough to know any different doesn't mean this is how it's always been.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jun 22 17:15:42 2020 No.15673393 >>15673354 that is exactly the sort of person I was alluding to in this post >>15673309 Even pol itself is so much shittier than it used to be

Anonymous Mon Jun 22 17:21:45 2020 No.15673438

>>15672875
No, you are just a cuck. I leave bait threads so utterly demolished, it's trolls so irrecoverably exploded, that naught one idiot is left to dare challenge me come time for the thread to die. It's likely that they are too ashamed to come back for some time.
You are a coward that simply isn't capable of handling shitposters like a sir, you just shirk away from every wojak posting child that insults you, or worse, you give them a meaningless reply like "cringe" without even thinking about putting effort into creating a good witticism to shame that noob. I do not suggest spamming anyone, lit is a creative board, and the replies you write should be creative. That is the sole problem /lit/ has, not that there are bait threads and cross posters, the problem is /lit/ won't put any effort into shitposting or trolling any more. You fucking cucks just superficially chit chat about books and complain about shit posters and "raids", like you are any better.
It's all up with the Nazis. You want to know a secret? You aren't being raided by "chapo" or "leftypol", the trolls that didn't cross me saw me having so much fun powning Nazis while emulating Chapo and leftiod mannerisms that they decided to join. good, they'll get what they deserve when every last Nazi, chud, and bigot has been defeated.
Is this bad for /lit/? I hope, you are lucky I'm just taking breaks at work or I would do the same to this thread.

Anonymous Mon Jun 22 17:22:33 2020 No.15673443

>>15673393
I genuinely don't know how even people who agree with /pol/ can stand to post there anymore. Nobody knows what the fuck is going on and the majority of the people posting seem to be completely unable to express coherent thoughts, they just shout as loud as they can before the nauseating speed of the place buries the thread three minutes later. Most of the discourse is on screenshots from twitter or quotes from celebrities, and anyone who isn't mentally ill seems to be playacting from behind four or five layers of baiting and pretending to fall for bait.

Anonymous Mon Jun 22 17:28:10 2020 No.15673493
File: 18 KB, 432x403, 1527138780435.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>15673438
Like this. I don't know what the fuck kind of bizarre 8-dimensional holographic irony goggles are necessary to tell what the fuck the person who wrote and posted this is trying to actually assert with it, it's impossible to tell how many layers deep it goes, and after years and years and years of this it's just exhausting to look at.
I don't even think you know yourself what you believe anymore. The obfuscation runs so deep that there isn't any room for anything to still exist under it. You're gone. We're all gone.

Anonymous Mon Jun 22 17:28:24 2020 No.15673496

>>15673438
Cringe. You can just tell this guy isnt comfortable with the lingo and just sprinkles it here and there at random. Even when trying to effortpost it comes off as weak and formulaic and limp. I dont even care about your stance. Your discourse is simply not enjoyable.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jun 22 17:35:55 2020 No.15673567 >>15673496 No you are just a pleb that can't understand my genius. You can't even hit me with a decent invective, bad try.

>>	SAGE Mon Jun 22 17:36:38 2020 No.15673572 >>15673567 Ok.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jun 22 17:43:08 2020 No.15673608 >>15673438 You really need to have sex

>>	Anonymous Mon Jun 22 17:50:37 2020 No.15673669 >>15673572 That's right coward >>15673608 A man on a mission to become the greatest cringe poster has no time for love, and sex is gay compared to the joy of mogging every other cringeposter out of a thread.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jun 22 17:55:04 2020 No.15673712 >>15673669 No.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jun 22 18:02:00 2020 No.15673771 >>15673712 I think someone might be a little butt-hurt lol, your so mad, your seething, look at you, about to throw a fit, such a resentful cuck. You should have known not to challenge me, fool.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jun 22 18:08:17 2020 No.15673820 >>15673771 Sure.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jun 22 20:22:02 2020 No.15674952 If you think the lefty spam on this website is bad, you're going to have a stroke once you notice how badly we're being raided by rightards. Nonstop flow of stormfront refugees that made majority of boards unusable.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jun 22 20:43:07 2020 No.15675098 >>15674952 They won't notice it because they are the stormies

>>	Anonymous Mon Jun 22 21:49:43 2020 No.15675505 >"lit" is being raided by Wikipedia again (ರ ~ ರ)︵ ━

>>	Anonymous Tue Jun 23 00:31:36 2020 No.15676450 >>15669963 >ecology has almost nothing to do with the ideologies that appropriate it, especially the right wing ones Then how do you explain that ALL modern green movements descend from Heidegger?

>>	Anonymous Tue Jun 23 00:33:36 2020 No.15676463 >>15667300 I thought we were above the whole left/right dichotomy

>>	Anonymous Tue Jun 23 00:35:30 2020 No.15676481 >>15676463 Some of us are.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jun 23 00:36:05 2020 No.15676483 Kill yourself

>>	Anonymous Tue Jun 23 00:36:28 2020 No.15676486 >>15667324 >the title is completely literature related You fucking /pol/ brainlets Putting "Literature about" shit does not make it /lit/ It makes it /shit/ Fuck off and die you fucking illiterate shit-posting scumbags

>>	Anonymous Tue Jun 23 00:36:54 2020 No.15676489 >>15668105 And they should go back. The differences between "woke" capitalism, neocon, paleocon, and fascism are hair's breadths; the difference between these and anticapitalism is a chasm

>>	Anonymous Tue Jun 23 00:37:06 2020 No.15676490 File: 165 KB, 498x360, tenor.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] Remember when Moot threatened to delete /pol/ after he refounded it? Remember when he said he'd delete it all over again if it became /stormfront/ again? I remember.

Anonymous Tue Jun 23 03:07:33 2020 No.15677319

>>15676490
Remember when moot got his first taste of normiedom when he got cucked by some instagram thot and immediately sold out everything he had ever done prior to that and tried to drive away all the "bad for PR/advertising" posters so the site would be more desirable to potential buyers like gookmoot who has a history of shamelessly selling his users' data for profit?

>>	Anonymous Tue Jun 23 03:10:59 2020 No.15677327 >>15667290 lefty/pol/ having been spamming their shit on every board for months now

>>	Anonymous Tue Jun 23 03:16:38 2020 No.15677348 /lit/ is the most left board an we're being invaded by right-winger autists from pol

>>	Anonymous Tue Jun 23 03:21:46 2020 No.15677361 >>15668318 ah yes, first the education system, THEN WE CONQUER AN OLD TURKISH LADY KNITTING FORUM OF 4CHAN yes! we must conquer the 4chan, the highest step in societ

>>	Anonymous Tue Jun 23 03:23:06 2020 No.15677366 >>15668433 >I don't give a fuck about this petty skirmish between burgers, but /lit/ was never a lefty board. >but i don't give a fuck but here i am giving a fuck

>>	Anonymous Tue Jun 23 03:24:42 2020 No.15677371 >>15676486 you can do that ~thing~ for "low quality", you know, right?

Advanced search
Text to find
Subject [?]Search by post subject. Leave empty for any.
Username [?]Search for user name. Leave empty for any user name.
Tripcode [?]Search for tripcode. Leave empty for any.
Email [?]Search by email. Leave empty for any.
Filename [?]Search by image filename. Leave empty for any.
From Date [?]Enter what date to start searching from. Format is YYYY-MM-DD
To Date [?]Enter what date to start searching until. Format is YYYY-MM-DD
Image hash
Search in	All Posts OPs Only
Deleted posts	Show all posts Show only deleted posts Only show non-deleted posts
Internal posts	Show all posts Show only internal posts Show only archived posts
Order	New posts first Old posts first
Capcode	All Posts Only by Users Only by Mods Only by Admins Only by Developers
Results	Posts Threads
Action	[ Simple ]

/lit/ - Literature