/lit/ - Literature

[Anonymous No.15480014]

https://youtu.be/eHkto6HSaNo?t=251

Now I know why /lit/ hates Jordan Peterson

[Anonymous No.15480085]

>>15480014
Come on /lit/ watch it. I want to see you Schopenhauer incel lovers seethe into oblivion

[Anonymous No.15480096]

>>15480085
The incels are right tho.

[Anonymous No.15480106]

Your looks determine how your personality is perceived.

[Anonymous No.15480116]

>>15480096
>muh statistics

[Anonymous No.15480119]

Sexual value is a pretty much objective thing and is determined by your genes. The clearest proof of this is the difference in attraction between different races.

[Anonymous No.15480129]

[Anonymous No.15480134]

Where's the lie? Thirsty men who hate women are the same people to whom sex sells.

[Anonymous No.15480144]

I love these schizophrenic collections random charts that end with a 4chan screencap. They're how I get all my knowledge.

[Anonymous No.15480154]

>of course only superficial people use online dating..
False. Online dating is already the most popular way for couples to meet. Its popularity is only going to rise. Online dating is representative of general trends in dating.

[Anonymous No.15480162]

>>15480096
Based women. Equality is a cuckold concept. Life for men is a ram fight.

[Anonymous No.15480166]

>>15480154
Online dating is great! I dont know why people hate it lol

Its like having a buffet to choose

[Anonymous No.15480181]

>>15480162
Nothing you said contradicts the incel worldview. You are confirming it.
>>15480166
For Chad, yes. The average male will be miserable on the online dating apps.
The point is that the excuse that online dating is not representative of the reality of dating, that only slutty women go on dating apps is NOT TRUE. Dating apps are the most popular way for couples to meet.

[Anonymous No.15480185]

>>15480119
>latino women

[Anonymous No.15480210]

[Anonymous No.15480219]

It has not always been like this.

[Anonymous No.15480226]

Why promiscuity, in general, is not good.

[Anonymous No.15480229]

>>15480166
>Its like having a buffet to choose
That´s precisely the problem.

[Anonymous No.15480240]

>>15480154
Source for the graph:
https://www.pnas.org/content/116/36/17753
Abstract:
We present new data from a nationally representative 2017 survey of American adults. For heterosexual couples in the U.S., meeting online has become the most popular way couples meet, eclipsing meeting through friends for the first time around 2013. Moreover, among the couples who meet online, the proportion who have met through the mediation of third persons has declined over time. We find that Internet meeting is displacing the roles that family and friends once played in bringing couples together.

[Anonymous No.15480247]

Being nice is detrimental to the life quality of men.

[Anonymous No.15480313]

>>15480181
>incel terminology
>chad terminology

Not gonna make it

[Anonymous No.15480333]

>>15480247
>cuckolds get cucked
really makes you think

[Anonymous No.15480335]

Stop wasting your time on women. Focus on what's important.

[Anonymous No.15480336]

>>15480096
>>15480106
>>15480119
>>15480129
>>15480154
>>15480181
>>15480210
>>15480219
>>15480226
>>15480247

If yall faggots knew the amount of ugly ass people I know that actually dated at least 7/10 girls, you'd throw all your fucking statistics out the window. Yes ugly people have to try harder, but your dependency on those statistics just hinders you even more useless

[Anonymous No.15480337]

>>15480181
The thing is, Tinder is spectacle. Literally, except if you are Quasimodo, all you have to do is to literally do your own social engineering. That's hiring a professional photographer, buying ultra fasionable clothes, have the mandatory undercut haircut. Take pictures of you in "cool" social events, like a party with many hype people. Also, the classic picutre of you in a tanktop, holding a cool dog. If you do this whole masquerade, yes, even if you are not Chad, you might have some success.
Of course, if you take a picture of you in your bathroom, and input that your hobbies are videogames, it won't work.
That's why i don't like online dating, because it is some weird spectacle.

[Anonymous No.15480368]

>>15480335
That's a pretty risky life strategy though. Obviously to accomplish something like Newton you basically have to dedicate your whole life to one specific topic, but if you fail your name and bloodline will perish without a trace. A much better strategy is to live a well balanced life with a family, a hobby, some friends and a job.

[Anonymous No.15480370]

>>15480368
pussy

[Anonymous No.15480389]

>>15480014
Why is his voice so high?

[Anonymous No.15480391]

>>15480116
>bro just throw out the closest thing you have to an objective measurement of reality or else you're "le basedface"
Why is /lit/ so anti-intellectual?

[Anonymous No.15480392]

>>15480336
>faggots
It's just me posting those. Sure, there are exceptions. An exception doesn't invalidate the overwhelming trend. Statistics are statistics. I'm just posting facts. It's important to understand the reality of the dating market. Sometimes the effort is really just not worth it.
Also, I'd be interested in learning more about the "ugly ass" people you know. How old are they? How old are their dates? Are they rich? Why do you think they are successful in finding dates? How long have their relationships lasted?
Have you heard of the "alpha fux, beta bux" theory?
>>15480337
You bring up a good point. It would be interesting to know how male's attractiveness changes with better photography. I suspect it will have a bit of a positive effect but not too big. if you don't exceed the boundary where it would be considered catfishing, your face is still your face. There's not much you can do about it.
>>15480368
>A much better strategy is to live a well balanced life with a family, a hobby, some friends and a job.
If that's possible for you I would definitely agree. But I think it comes down to evaluating the odds. The whole society has radically changed. Just because your ancestors had the luxury of having a balanced life with a family, doesn't mean you will have too. You need to think about things critically and rationally evaluate whether or not the reward is worth the effort. Surely you don't think that buying lottery tickets is a reasonable way to achieve wealth. That means you accept that some things are too improbable to strive for. The question is how probable they are.

[Anonymous No.15480418]

An interesting response to the common phrase "you are not entitled to sex" that gets thrown around.

[Anonymous No.15480423]

>>15480392
>How old are they? How old are their dates? Are they rich? Why do you think they are successful in finding dates? How long have their relationships lasted?
>Have you heard of the "alpha fux, beta bux" theory?

Before I answer, I just want to say that your obsession with statistics is the reason incels over-analyse everything and dont get any dates because dating is not about analysing, but feeling

they are 23, their dates are about max 2 years older and 2 years younger, middle-class, They are successful because they are laid back and don't take things personally and are extremely horny so they are always talking to girls, some are just hooking up while other are still dating them. Even I never heard of the bux theory lol

[Anonymous No.15480465]

>>15480418
I swear incels could get laid if they redirected their time spent writing unread unpaid essays to trying to get women.

[Anonymous No.15480476]

>>15480391
Statistics are extremely misleading.
If the average grain of sand is x size, you could turn a whole desert over searching for it and never find your average grain of sand.

[Anonymouse No.15480482]

>>15480423
you’re not being logical brother. he already analyzed it. only 0.0004% chance of success. its a fact. why are you arguing with the data? he is right. he’s smart can’t you tell? so smart that he got filtered by women

[Anonymous No.15480486]

>1.8% of women get no message
what kind of woman do you have to be to be in that situation? so shockingly ugly, or so crazy looking that it stops being sexy and just threatening?

[Anonymouse No.15480497]

>>15480465
i agree they could get laid but not by spending a lot of time trying to get women. they need to stop being pathetic first. trying to pickup girls while you’re pathetic will just mostly be unneeded rejection. its all pretty simp to do. normal guys don’t have to dedicate a lot of time to these pursuits, they should just happen naturally

[Anonymous No.15480531]

>>15480482
Kek

[Anonymous No.15480539]

>>15480497
>>15480465
they will eventually, if they keep it together in other aspects of their lives. get a career, make money, get assets, and they'll be sought after in their 40s by women their age. these women will have a different checklist and they'll overlook whatever turn off they had in their 20s. the quality of these women may be subpar, but if they're still needy i guess its better than nothing.

[Anonymous No.15480550]

>>15480423
With the subsequent questions, I want to be clear that I'm not trying to invalidate your anecdote. I am just personally curious.
Are they white? Are they tall? Do they dress well? How rich are they? How long do their relationships last?
>dating is not about analysing, but feeling
That's a bit of a truism. Of course you can't analyze everything. Of course there is some aspect to dating that you can't think about rationally. The sentiment that before declaring yourself an incel, you should do your best and honestly try to find a date is one I can definitely get behind by. The odds of finding a girlfriend are much higher than those of winning the lotter. There are a lot of potential things about you that could make you an exception.
People just need to know that it's OK to be an incel. Sometimes it's actually not your fault and there's nothing you can do about it. The society and the dating market has radically changed and we cannot expect the same things we did fifty years ago.
We cannot go on ignoring the problem when there is actual scientific data that demonstrates the problem. "Have sex, incel" just won't do it.

[Anonymous No.15480570]

>>15480539
>and they'll be sought after in their 40s by women their age
You are describing the common alpha bux, beta buxx strategy used by low value men.
The problem is that the woman will be high body count women. Used goods.
Refer to:
>>15480226
These marriages rarely end well. These sort of marriages are the reason why MGTOW exists.

[Anonymous No.15480586]

>>15480550
>People just need to know that it's OK to be an incel.

NO ITS FUCKING NOT. JESUS FUCKING CHRIST STOP ALLOWING THIS OF MENTALITY

YOU WILL BE EXCLUDED FROM SOCIETY AND ROT AWAY. THIS WILL BE YOUR FATE, LIFE ISN'T JUST

[Anonymous No.15480607]

>>15480550
>Are they white? Are they tall? Do they dress well? How rich are they? How long do their relationships last?

I ain't even a girl and you're making my pussy dry, please stop it dude

They are white, about 1,7-1,85m, they are middle class like I said, I already said some are just hook ups and some are still dating 1+years

[Anonymous No.15480612]

>>15480166
vile degenerate.

[Anonymous No.15480631]

>>15480085
Please don't denigrate Schopenhauer by associating him with incels.

[Anonymous No.15480641]

>>15480570

[Anonymous No.15480647]

>>15480612
Seethe

[Anonymous No.15480650]

>>15480014
Because he's a pseud?

[Anonymous No.15480651]

>>15480570
>You are describing the common alpha bux, beta buxx strategy used by low value men.
>The problem is that the woman will be high body count women. Used goods.
Yes.. I suppose they are low value men. On the sexual market, women are the judges of that. And yes, used goods, but that's all they can get at this point.

[Anonymous No.15480657]

>>15480586
>YOU WILL BE EXCLUDED FROM SOCIETY AND ROT AWAY
Nah. You're excluded if you're jobless or mentally ill, not just because you're celibate.

[Anonymous No.15480675]

>>15480106
Your personality determines how your looks are perceived

[Anonymous No.15480683]

>>15480675
Wrong.

[Anonymous No.15480698]

>>15480657
>Nah. You're excluded if you're jobless or mentally ill, not just because you're celibate.

Oh my dear boy, this posts tells me you're so young. Please maintain your innocence

[Anonymous No.15480702]

>>15480085
Schopie didn't blamed women for the shitshow. your reply screams that you haven't read his work.

[Anonymous No.15480704]

>>15480226
based anon.
So many have fallen for the "sexual revolution" progressive bullshit, that will leave them with broken meaningless lives.

[Anonymous No.15480708]

>>15480014
I dislike him because he chooses to ignore the jewish question

[Anonymous No.15480720]

>>15480418
Any examples of male incel acts of violence against females? I'm not from the states, but all I heard about were random school shootings and politically/racially charged mass murders.

[Anonymous No.15480733]

>>15480708
me too.
in fact he INTENTIONALLY downplays it.
Good video that exposes him here
>https://youtu.be/csg_V8mJxrE

I almost NEVER come to /lit/
Usually on /pol/
Are most people here based also?

[Anonymous No.15480754]

>>15480720
>Any examples of male incel acts of violence against females?
Most sex offenders are extremely low value males, i.e. incels.

[Anonymous No.15480775]

he's a drug addict hypocrite. his own rules don't apply to his own life: only his depression and bad habits are chemical

[Anonymous No.15480833]

>>15480775
t. Brainlet

[Anonymous No.15480991]

>>15480708
>>15480733
what exactly is the jewish question? is it "how come jews are in power"? or there particular jewish actors that raise questions? is "the jewish question" just code for "hey bro are you anti-semetic at well wink wink"

[Anonymous No.15481000]

>>15480991
>hey bro are you anti-semetic at well wink wink
It's essentially this. Neo-nazi white incels use the phrase "jewish question" to doghwhistle to each other about their hateful ideology.

[Anonymous No.15481050]

>>15481000
>It's essentially this
100% WRONG.

The jewish question is about asking WHY so many industires are totally dominated by jews, when they are a tiny fraction of the population.

But further, it is about then asking if their disproportionate power And how jews have used their influence over time. is a good thing, or is it damaging to our society/democracy.

[Anonymous No.15481061]

>>15481050
>why are joos
They are people and valid. Shut the fuck up, nazi.

[Anonymous No.15481063]

>>15481050
>WHY so many industires are totally dominated by jews, when they are a tiny fraction of the population.
Because they have the highest average IQ of any ethnic group, and have strong in-group favoritism.
You could've literally just asked a jew and they would tell you this.

[Anonymous No.15481074]

>>15481063
thats been debunked.

[Anonymous No.15481082]

>>15481074

[Anonymous No.15481088]

>>15481082

[Anonymous No.15481090]

>>15481050
>WHY so many industires are totally dominated by jews, when they are a tiny fraction of the population.
so it's "how come jews are in power" then.
i have an answer for this. jews have been historically denied access to nobility, because they were jews and europe was christian, and religions don't get along well. this caused a disproportionate amount of jews to end up in the merchant class. successful christian families could climb up the nobility ladder which was superior, but successful jewish families could only go for the merchant route. after the french revolution the nobility were no longer the rulling class, and the top class were the merchant, and later banker and industrailist class. the disproportionate bias towards mercantile explains why they suddenly went from being an extremely weak minority for most of history to an extremely strong group at the exact same time money became stronger than nobility.

[Anonymous No.15481102]

>>15481063
>Because they have the highest average IQ
Stfu, you fucking kike.
>have strong in-group favoritism.
To a destructive point. They literally have a swarm intelligence.

[Anonymous No.15481110]

>>15481088
This. The way Jews practice nepotism overrides meritocracy.
>>15481061
Shut the fuck up, kike.

[Anonymous No.15481127]

what a shame of a board. the potential this board has to have discussions surround literature is there, but obviously that is not what most people seem to want.

[Anonymous No.15481132]

>>15481127
literature isn't that interesting, we all know it

[Anonymous No.15481136]

>>15481074
>this is supposed to be an argument
the absolute state of /pol/'s spirit of envy.

>>15481110
everyone practices nepotism. there is no way for jews to practice special jewish nepotism, because nepotism is already maxed out for everyone. if tomorrow there was a new way to nepotism even harder, a new game mechanic that could be exploited, then everyone would be on top of it in an instant. this is how the world works. i'm giving you advise against my own interests. i like it when you retards are easy to defeat in an argument, but this is too much even for me. drop the nepotism point. it's profoundly childish. you reveal an embarrassing amount of worldly inexperience when you admit you don't know how the world works at such a basic level.

[Anonymous No.15481143]

>>15481074
Didnt read (infographics are gay) but this is a lot of fash cope trying to claim jews are inferior yet simultaneously control all whites. It's never going to be a coherent worldview.

[Anonymous No.15481145]

>>15481127
It's ok, anon. On /fit/ are people who don't actually lift, on /sci/ are people who are not in science or math, on /o/ are people who do not own a car, on /g/ are people who only consume tech rather than produce it, on /r9k/ are normalfaggots, on /b/ are people who don't jerk off, on /k/ are people who don't have a gun and on /lit/, guess what, are people who don't read books.
Feel free to add boards.

[Anonymous No.15481154]

>>15481145
on /x/ are people who are actually delusional though

[Anonymous No.15481162]

>>15481145
it's just a shame man, I don't know of any other websites to go to that has a similar image-board style, with the same sporadic thread making that stays on topic. Any time there is a thread of slight quality on this board, it unfortunately leads me to go on here each day, hoping for something of interest.

[Anonymous No.15481177]

>>15481090
Yes, merchants combined with usury (banking), is a good technical answer on how Jews became wealthy. Some quite unethical industries, like flooding china with opium (((Sassoon family)))

This wealth was then used to take over the press, and buy influence in politics.
They have also taken over academia also likely through buying positions of influence.
Once in power, opportunistically putting jews first, regardless of merit.
It's been a 100 years of this basically.
To the point where we are at now.

And what they have done with this power and influence has been totally destructive IMO.

>>15481143
statistical facts actually.

[Anonymous No.15481181]

>>15481154
/x/ was the greatest board on this website back when i browsed it. superior quality schizoposts and an overall atmosphere of high effort true believers wanting to be heard.

[Anonymous No.15481186]

>>15480014
Can he actually speak now?

[Anonymous No.15481189]

>>15481177
>usury (banking)
cope. this is how capitalism is played. jews are just (some of) the winners.

[Anonymous No.15481205]

>>15481177
so i answered the jewish question without conspiracy theories. lmao, this is weak. did /pol/ really get you to eat their ideology with this bait?

[Anonymous No.15481215]

>>15481162
Unironically, you would be much better off creating a book-club in real life and get people involved with whom you can connect.
Another idea would be to host a website and advertise it on the Internet. 4Chan is not a reliable way to engage in meaningful conversations.

[Anonymous No.15481229]

>>15481061
Retard

[Anonymous No.15481234]

>>15481074
That's absurd, Jews' strength is their ability to monopolize the higher caste's traits and talents into their tight-knit ethnoreligion. They do have higher IQs than almost every other group, and all their scientific contributions speaks loud of this fact.

[Anonymous No.15481261]

>>15481189
creating money from nothing and charging interest (usury) on top is leads to endless inflation and economic crashes, and literal debt slavery.
Only a kike would think thats a good thing.

>>15481205
you answered part of the technical how they became welathy.
but ignore its ramifications,
which are what make it the issue of our time.

Society is effectively run right now by a tiny minority that consider themselves "gods chosen" and the rest of us Goyim cattle,
The wars
The fake news
The degeneracy
The the cultural subversion
The curruption & nepotism.
Crimes too long to list.

[Anonymous No.15481305]

>>15481234
>They do have higher IQs than almost every other group
not based on acording to the data >>15481082 >>15481088
They are over represented at all the ivy league schools based on academic merit.
And UNDER PERFORM in terms of academic performance.
>TL;DR
Jews were given positions they didnt earn, didnt do very well, and are thus NOT a standard deviation smarter than Europeans.

Also even IF they were a standard deviation smarter on average. Due to being such a small population size, there would still be 10x more white europeans in the world with same IQ levels (due to population size and percentages under the bell curve)

So no, their IQ is NOT a valid explanation for the over representation of jews.
Its to do with corruption, wealth, and nepotism.

[Anonymous No.15481310]

>>15481305

[Anonymous No.15481314]

>>15480641
bros...

[Anonymous No.15481331]

I made this thread to make incels seethe, not to discuss kikes

[Anonymous No.15481350]

Why can't /pol/niggers accept that Jews are the good guys, the protagonists?

[Anonymous No.15481352]

>>15481234
>their scientific contributions speaks loud of this fact.
As already mentioned, jews have taken over academia. >>15481088
They act as literal gate keepers of the PhD process.
Research also requires funding, jews preference jews again.
So you end up with a circle jerk of jews, advancing & awarding Jews over more meritorious candidates.
Creating the impression jews are some super smart race, single handedly advancing science.

And I wont even go into all the high profile jews have claimed credit for things that wasnt their own work.

[Anonymous No.15481359]

>>15481331
he is a KIKE,
and he covers up the JQ
So its all relative.

[Anonymous No.15481367]

volcel reporting in
enjoy wasting your energy on either crying about not getting laid or cooming to whores while I ascend to the Platonic realm of ideas

[Anonymous No.15481377]

>>15481261
did the jewish question now change into "why are jews willing to climb the power ladder?" or is it still "why are jews in power?"

it seems trivial to me that everyone is willing to climb the power ladder, and only the "able" part is interesting. your view of power and life in society seems childish to me, but i don't know if there's anything i could say to convince you. i don't think you're lived much of a life.

if we grant that everyone loves power and nobody is innocent (i.e. if we are not literal children) then "why are jews willing and able to climb the power ladder", is just "why are jews in power?" again, which i already answered by giving my account of why and how jews happened to be in a position to quickly climb up the capitalism ladder by making reference to their historical situation which put them in the right place at the right time. i don't know what really happened in history, but if there are no implausible features to my story, and if there's nothing else to be explained, then it is not an incomplete explanation. feel free to believe in your racial spirits, but you can't claim the "jewish question" is your reason anymore, by my lights.

[Anonymous No.15481385]

>>15481367
Volcel is even worse than incel. At least incels have not yet admitted defeat lmao

[Anonymous No.15481403]

>>15480014
he was punished by God for not addressing the JQ and being a merchant of poisoned wisdom.

[Anonymous No.15481467]

>>15481377
>did the jewish question now change
No i said from the start there were mulitple parts to it.
First is realising jews are over represented.
Next, how did this happen.
Finially, and most importantly, what is its impact on society.

>but you can't claim the "jewish question" is your reason
The question ISN'T for me...
I've already answered.
The question is a red pill for society.
For the Hundreds of millions (Billions) that dont know they a tiny minority of jews are running their countries, manipulating them into wars.
Basically a whole aray of things that are against our interests.

>if we grant that everyone loves power
European people have been proven to have the highest levels of empathy.
We care about having a fair just society.
Jews time and time again operate with no regard to the ethics, or morals, or the well being of the people.
Profit seems to be their only care.
Maybe they also care for fellow jews.
But when 99.8% of the world ISNT jewish, that becomes a problem.
Wars for israel, creating millions of deaths and refugees, for zionist geo-political agendas is a HUGE problem.

[Anonymous No.15481475]

what the fuck are those statistics gonna do? Don't use them to affirm your self-pity. If you're against casual sex, don't search for it, it's nothing more than mutual masturbation. Nobody is going to hate you for not playing the game, virgin shaming is a spook and you're only a subject to it if you're still wallowing about them bitches on the internet instead of going to a prostitute like they did in the past. You can't just bring on social change by posting blackpill charts on 4chan, go into politics or sociology or something.

Also consider the correlation between the charts and the advent of internet addiction, internet pornography and video games which lower the social drive and skills of unattractive young men.

[Anonymous No.15481505]

>>15481385
the virgin SIMP on his lifelong quest for pussy

vs.

the chad hellenic admirer of adolescent boys, sating his lust with the purely visual aesthetic bliss without falling prey to the sin of flesh

[Anonymous No.15481542]

>>15481467
ok, three parts. over representation, how it happened, and what's the impact on society.

1. so the whole universe knows by now that jews are over represented in positions of power. over or under representation is meaningless in itself. trivially, lovers of strawberry flavor ice cream will be over and under represented in all sorts of interesting ways. this is just how properties work. if an object has a special feature, it will change how way the object is. if a person has a certain feature, it will change how their life unfolds. jewishness is obviously a property of some people. it is a real thing, and has cause-effect powers in the world, just like every single property without exception.

2.i think your explanation is basically supernatural magic evilness. i have a better explanation of how this happened, that seems quite plausible, and perfectly natural. also, i thought that the jewish question is supposed to imply an argument that goes "there's no way jews could be this over represented for no reason, so there must be something wrong with them, and this justifies anti-semitism as a rational belief about jews".
3. what is the "question" about the impact on society? is "the jewish question" about particular jewish actors that raise questions with their suspicious activities? give me the redpill but don't dump info please. i want to know what's the most plausible, suspicious thing about the jews. the kind of stuff that doesn't require conspiratorial thinking to stretch the facts.

[Anonymous No.15481556]

>>15480096
>>15480106
Based, thank you misogyny king. Ignore the fags.

[Anonymous No.15481564]

>>15481475
>virgin shaming is a spook
There definitely are women who do not want to date a 25+ year old virgin because he obviously should have made his first romantic/sexual experiences long time ago. Active virgin shaming may not exist but there is a prejudice against later-in-life male virgins which can hinder their success, only to further frustrate them.

[Anonymous No.15481575]

>>15480335
wasnt he gay

[Anonymous No.15481611]

>>15481542
i want to reply, but im so tired. ive been up all night now.
I respect that you are at least open minded enough to ask questions, and have a resonable discussion.

[Anonymous No.15481614]

>>15481575
No, he wasn't. Whatever gave you that impression?

[Anonymous No.15481615]

>>15481467
last reply hit character limit. on the bit about power
>European people have been proven to have the highest levels of empathy.
this is obviously bullshit. not because i think there is no study that shows some measure of empathy is higher for european people(although i would like to know if one exists), but because the idea that there's any significant connection between what someone does in real life, and how well they do on some test that measures neuronal activity or whatever psychometric questionnarie that can be used to evaluate empathy, is laughable to me. whatever influence "europeanness" may have on empathy is completely dwarfed by the absolute fact of life that STRANGERS DO NOT GIVE A FUCK ABOUT YOU. there are cold hard facts about how society is structured, like needing money to buy food, not being allowed to steal or enter people's house etc. that forcibly erase your personality preferences and make you behave in the ways that you need to behave in order to function as a human being.

[Anonymous No.15481692]

>>15480226

Unhappy whores, just use them as cumboxes, and then marry a woman with actual values.

[Anonymous No.15481724]

>>15481615
To add to this, isn't empathy a European value? It seems like it would be a useless value in a metaphysical worldview not grounded in individualism. Judging other cultures by our own "objective" values is peak Eurocentrism. I don't imagine Europeans would do too well in Chinesr or Indian sociological studies.

[Anonymous No.15481739]

>>15481467
>European people have been proven to have the highest levels of empathy.
Maybe this is true for Europeans but not Americans.

[Anonymous No.15481760]

This is the worst thread on lit, and that's saying something.

[Anonymous No.15481796]

>>15481724
"empathy" seems is way too broad to be thought of as a value. i can't even think of a species of mammal that lacks empathy as a value. empathy is just taken for granted to the point it becomes invisible i think. it's like vision. if you make eye contact with someone, you just assume that they see you and that they know you see them, there's a working understanding that you've recognized each other. empathy is like that.

[Anonymous No.15481861]

>>15481000
Judaism is a baby torture cult, whose members can't live in a country that protects babies from Rabbis.

[Anonymous No.15481901]

>>15481556
What facts?

[Anonymous No.15481997]

>>15481760
suck my dic

[Anonymous No.15482286]

>>15481475
>virgin shaming is a spook
lol no

[Anonymous No.15483440]

>>15481575
it isn't confirmed, but yes most probably he was or at least had weird sexual tendencies

[Anonymous No.15483512]

>>15480096
Even if these are accurate, they don't reflect the reality incels are trying to portray.
1. Appearance matters much less for men than it does women, women are as interested in things like money, personality, dominance, social proof, etc. If anyone has a right to complain, it is femcels, of course ugly females have their own advantage and can probably score a man out of their league.
2. Studies gauging how females care about appearance cannot reflect the complex reality. A woman can say she'll only date a super handsome man, but in reality when the time comes she can change her mind. Getting to know someone also makes them look more attractive.
3. Females are sleeping more with a smaller percentage of men not just because of hypergamy, although that is probably a reason, but because a huge amount of men are simply checking out. They are raised in a feminist environment by single mothers and not taught how women are different than men, and thus can't relate to them and switch to porn and video games. This actually means it should be easier for an incel to get laid now than before because they can take conscious control and improve themselves, and they'll have way less competition.
4. You are forgetting the factor of sluts and dating apps. The way dating apps are designed is that they discriminate against the bottom tier of men, and advertise the top tier, and all the sluts will congregate and be more directed to sleep with the top sliver, where as in the past it was more divided because of physical limitations.

[Anonymous No.15483830]

>>15480476
>The average family has 2.5 kids
>It's impossible to have .5 kids
>Therefore statistics is all meaningless!

Jesus Christ. I can remember when /lit/ was the 'smart' board.

[Anonymous No.15483843]

>jordan peterson thread
>114 posts
>ctrl + f
>'apple', 'cider', 'vinegar' not found

[Anonymous No.15484007]

>>15480337
More or less correct.

>>15480181
If stats in pic are true that guy is fucking up big time and he probably has no personality or can’t hold a conversation.

[Anonymous No.15484017]

>>15481136
>everyone practices nepotism.
Not to the magnitude of Jews. They are over-the-top about it.

[Anonymous No.15484045]

>>15480683
>Bunch of whores, low esteem riddled rejects, wannabe chads, pleasure seeking corpses
>In charge of deciding who has personality or not

[Anonymous No.15484056]

>>15480476
What the fuck even is this post

[Anonymous No.15484081]

>>15480162
Sure, but civilization has always been about equitable distribution of the means of reproduction. Do you want to be a man, or a beast?

[Anonymous No.15484084]

>people literally using okcupid statistics as if they corrolate with the real world
jesus fucking christ

[Anonymous No.15484633]

>>15480129
holy fuck eggman tranny gets more swipes than I do ahaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

[Anonymous No.15484664]

>>15480335
>tfw my greatest regret in life is being a (man)whore in college
If you think you hate women from a distance wait until you get a chance to really interact with them. I haven't had sex with anything but prostitutes since I finished my degree. I'm mortified by the time and falsity I paid the female sex when I was younger, it's far more dignified to pay them money and to see their back come evening's close.

I understand it is pointless to suggest this, sex is such a primal and fundamental drive and of essence of in our western society in particular...but retain some skepticism to the plight of men, it is not necessarily a bad thing to be unsuccessful with women. In many cases I view it as a distinction of nobility, but don't squander that by pining away for a completely fungible collection of warm hole.

[Anonymous No.15484746]

>>15480733
>identity isn't real don't play identity politics
>jews rule you because you're smarter
Is this really the guy you fags keep spamming threads over?

[Anonymous No.15484749]

>>15484017
false

[Anonymous No.15485466]

>>15484633
Kek

[Anonymous No.15485473]

>>15484664
>it is not necessarily a bad thing to be unsuccessful with women. In many cases I view it as a distinction of nobility, but don't squander that by pining away for a completely fungible collection of warm hole.

Denial is one of the biggest copes anon. Also your post made me cringe into oblivion

[Anonymous No.15486081]

Does it matter? Women are garbage anyway. Maybe they were less garbage in the past but not today. The only problem I have with today society are the elite managers and owners and their stupid ideology of muh wymyn. That is what is doing a lot of damage to our life in general. Forget about women, they wont change in our lifetime. Its better to not coom at all but if you must then use your hand or pay a prostitute.

[Anonymous No.15486251]

Peterson’s advice ain’t what any of you should be taking on this - his wife was cucking his simp ass while he was writing love letters.

[Anonymous No.15486263]

>>15486081
Cope harder incel. God I fucking hate you low life scum

[Anonymous No.15486317]

>>15486263
coom harder muh COOOMIngs

[Anonymous No.15486829]

>>15486317
gay