This is how Kant actually looked like according to our most advanced image mapping algorithms

[Anonymous No.15435915]

Say something nice about him

[Anonymous No.15435924]

>>15435915
He looks normal to me. I don't see the problem.

[Anonymous No.15435928]

This kind of thread is so fucking hilariously retarded.

I don't give a fuck what a philosopher looks like, I care about their ideas.

[Anonymous No.15435934]

>>15435928
Since men are being feminized in this day and age, soon we'll have tabloid magazines of philosophers in swimsuits.

[Anonymous No.15435941]

(((Kant)))

[Anonymous No.15435940]

>>15435915
Really i thought he'd look like this

[Anonymous No.15435960]

>>15435940
Looks like my aspergic Nordicist puerto rican roomate.

[Anonymous No.15435990]

>>15435941
No no, [[[Kant]]]

[Anonymous No.15436000]

>>15435928

[Anonymous No.15436167]

>>15435934
https://youtu.be/bay7Wh8D-HM
We can only dream

[Anonymous No.15436180]

we have the same exact hairline except i'm 28

[Anonymous No.15436181]

>>15436000
I'm ':3'

[Anonymous No.15436191]

>>15436167
I hate Derrida.

[Anonymous No.15436210]

He was a turbomanlet cripple

[Anonymous No.15436236]

>>15435915
Pretty good looking, ngl. has a bit of a big head, but still pretty decent.

[Anonymous No.15436435]

>>15436236
He looks better than the paintings.

[Anonymous No.15436447]

Handsome

[Anonymous No.15436458]

>>15436435

It does. why does it seem like they illustrated people uglier than they were? I know they had the ability to idealise. maybe its was a low quality version, or it was the style of the day.

[Anonymous No.15436478]

Look at the size of that dome

[Anonymous No.15436543]

There is a choice presented of where one might stake their values. Either call Kant a manlet goblin, which he surely was, and dismiss him, or acknowledge he was one of the profoundest thinkers who ever lived. Those would who slander this blessed dwarf and his superior genius with snide remarks about his diminutive form bestialize themselves. The system of values used to besmirch this tiny, tiny little man are the primitive values of violence and sex, Chad and Stacey, so yes, laugh, knowing how easy it would be to push over and bully one of the smartest men who ever lived. When Chad and Stacey stand over you and laugh, maybe you will relate to him in his little-bodied frailty, but you will never relate to him in his big-brained genius which pointed the way to truth and to which you sneered, too much of an arrogant buffoon to heed this wisest of gnomes.

[Anonymous No.15436563]

>>15435915
>>15435940
I thought he'd look like this

[Anonymous No.15436569]

>>15436543
Dwarfs are based.

[Anonymous No.15436586]

>>15435915
kind of looks like a less handsome version of william dafoe

[Anonymous No.15436617]

>>15436543
So you think transcendental idealism is true? Also his analysis of the categories?

[Anonymous No.15436624]

Still looks like a hobgoblin. Imagine him thrusting that hooked beak deep into your brown eye

[Anonymous No.15436625]

Maybe some day the algorithms will get better. I mean, the dinosaurs look like birds now so perhaps Kant will look like a Chad in a decade.

[Anonymous No.15436634]

>>15435928
>I don't give a fuck what a philosopher looks like, I care about their ideas.

[Anonymous No.15436648]

>>15435915
Absolute master race chad

[Anonymous No.15436693]

This guy is the greatest philosopher of all time, but he was a literal incel.
>Never had sex
>Said sex was morally wrong
>The extent of ecstasy in his life was reading Hume

[Anonymous No.15436703]

>>15436693
>said sex was morally wrong

sounds like volcel talk to me

[Anonymous No.15437118]

>>15435941
>He came from a devout Pietistic Lutheran family but I'm going to put le ebin Jew brackets around his name to imply he was le Jew! Aren't I so silly! Te he he!
Kill yourself

[Anonymous No.15437135]

>>15437118
He wasn't but changed his name later to Immanuel after learning a bit of Hebrew. I believe that Kant had eventually some sort of contact with the local rabbis of Konigsberg back in the day.

[Anonymous No.15437138]

>>15435941
Kant's categorical imperative seems pretty anti-Jew to me. Also, he was pretty serious about the virtue of honesty if I am remembering correctly.

[Anonymous No.15437147]

>>15437135
He probably changed it because he liked Swedenborg a lot though I think he changed his mind later in his life. I doubt he changed it due to contact with rabbis.

[Anonymous No.15437400]

>>15435990
>[[[Kant]]]
What?

[Anonymous No.15437420]

>>15436617
Not him but transcendental idealism is definitely true, though his categories need more work.

[Anonymous No.15437440]

>>15437400
Dude’s trying call him Jewish. Brackets are for Germans

[Anonymous No.15437618]

>>15435915
Was he an incel or a volcel?

[Anonymous No.15437625]

>>15435928
holy cringe

[Anonymous No.15437640]

>>15437625
>A’ight, I’m’a out muhself as an outsider here
Go back, off-boarder.

[Anonymous No.15437687]

Reminder that pic related IS NOT Kant.
this is a painting of Friedrich Heinrich Jacobi.
Kant was an ugly goblin man, as all of his portraits show.

[Anonymous No.15437691]

>>15436236
Yeah but he was a 5ft 0. He was a manlet even in those days.

[Anonymous No.15437714]

>>15436236
Yeah but how TALL was he?

[Anonymous No.15437721]

>>15436634
>>15437625
Uhhh wow...

>>15437640
Seriously kind of embarrassing you'd actually be giving a fuck about whatever Kant looks like. So sick of the el goblino threads. :3

[Anonymous No.15437726]

>>15437420
What's your opinion of the criticism from speculative realists of transcendental idealism's "correlationism"?

[Anonymous No.15437727]

>>15437687
This Friedrich Heinrich Jacobi?

[Anonymous No.15437745]

>>15437727
a goblin too

[Anonymous No.15437762]

>>15435960
Has your roommate read Stoddard?

[Anonymous No.15437800]

>>15437762
not posting the based cover...