Ted Talks: the Sexes

[Anonymous No.15293468]

The system wants to deconstruct masculinity and femininity because it no longer has any for either. Both sexes have been incorporates into the system as drones while reproduction has been outsourced to the third world.

[Anonymous No.15293511]

>>15293468
Incorrect. there is no "deconstruction" of femininity because femininity is itself the deconstructive (feminising) force of (masculine) society. There is only one vector to society, and that is sissification.

[Anonymous No.15293522]

>>15293511
lmao brilliant

[Anonymous No.15293554]

>>15293511
Explain the gym transgender phenomenon? We're morphing into genderless drones.

[Anonymous No.15293682]

>>15293554
>gym transgender phenomenon
the fuck is that?

We're morphing into genderless drones because that is what femininity does– when marx said that "everything solid melts into air" he wasn't talking about capital, he was talking about pussy (which at this stage is irretrievable from the inherent functioning of capital). Pussy dissolves the rigid oppositions between terms (masculine/feminine, subject/object, self/other, etc.) until everything is equally a gelatinous grey mass.

[Anonymous No.15293839]

>>15293511
>There is only one vector to society, and that is sissification
HOLY... BASED

[Anonymous No.15293954]

>>15293682
But women want manly men and if it weren’t for the Gay Best Friend trope they’d burn all the queers themselves.

[Anonymous No.15294079]

>>15293682
Sorry. I meant "ftm". Fucking autocorrect!

[Anonymous No.15294134]

>>15293954
>women want manly men
women want virile seed. If they can get it through IVF/sperm donation, men become entirely obsolete. That's why the polarity has shifted towards hypergamy– women have all the power, so they are able to be choosy. But it won't be long until they don't even want the chads, they won't settle anything less than the latest dicking machine from Dyson that is better than you at every conceivable sex act.

>>15294079
They're arguably not 'deconstructing' femininity, what they're doing is invalidating the distinction biological definition of what it means to be a man. Women can be whatever the fuck they want to be because they are shapeshifters. But whatever form they choose to adopt (that is, if it isn't the standard female) will inevitably be to the detriment to the general identity they have adopted.

[Anonymous No.15294150]

>>15293511

>"deconstruction" of femininity because femininity is itself the deconstructive
>Symbolical/archetypical representations are the same thing as the things they represent

I want to die

[Anonymous No.15294226]

>>15293511
>one vector to
immersion ruined

[Anonymous No.15295401]

>>15293511
The process goes both ways. Women are masculine and men feminine. The middleground will be a transhuman, non binary asexual which we are approaching through this (drones). I am neither conservative nor progressive in my stance. This accelaration will be painful to live through but it might usher in utopia in the more distant future. My egocentric view is that it has to be stopped because I will suffer under this. But beyond my lifetime it might be for the better. Just like WW1 and WW2 ultimately healed some of humanities growing pains, I still wouldnt want to live through it.

[Anonymous No.15296223]

>>15294134
>women want virile seed. If they can get it through IVF/sperm donation, men become entirely obsolete. That's why the polarity has shifted towards hypergamy– women have all the power, so they are able to be choosy. But it won't be long until they don't even want the chads, they won't settle anything less than the latest dicking machine from Dyson that is better than you at every conceivable sex act.
They already have both of these available and have had them for several decades and it hasn't changed the fact that women want boyfriends and husbands

[Anonymous No.15296235]

>>15293954
wtf i love twilight now.

[Anonymous No.15296260]

>>15293468
it's not accurate to say reproduction has been outsourced to the third world. rather, reproduction has become scientifically mechanized and is now meaningless.