Kaczynski was based.

[Anonymous No.15234423]

Holy shit has anyone actually read this book?
Im only 3 chapters in and he has already obliterated the modern leftist movement with a semi-Nietzschean critique of the leftists inferiority complex. How can lefties even cope with the existence of this man?
"Modern leftish philosophers tend to dismiss reason,
science, objective reality and to insist that everything is
culturally relative. It is true that one can ask serious questions about the foundations of scientific knowledge and
about how, if at all, the concept of objective reality can
be defined. But it is obvious that modern leftish philosophers are not simply cool-headed logicians systematically
analyzing the foundations of knowledge. They are deeply
involved emotionally in their attack on truth and reality.
They attack these concepts because of their own psychological needs. For one thing, their attack is an outlet for
hostility, and, to the extent that it is successful, it satisfies the drive for power. More importantly, the leftist hates
science and rationality because they classify certain beliefs
as true (i.e., successful, superior) and other beliefs as false
(i.e., failed, inferior). The leftist’s feelings of inferiority
run so deep that he cannot tolerate any classification of
some things as successful or superior and other things as
failed or inferior. This also underlies the rejection by many
leftists of the concept of mental illness and of the utility of
IQ tests. Leftists are antagonistic to genetic explanations
of human abilities or behavior because such explanations
tend to make some persons appear superior or inferior to
others. Leftists prefer to give society the credit or blame
for an individual’s ability or lack of it. Thus if a person is
“inferior” it is not his fault, but society’s, because he has
not been brought up properly"

[Anonymous No.15234606]

>>15234423
yeah, his works are the bomb

[Anonymous No.15234785]

>>15234606
Heh

>>15234423
Its almost exactly as he predicted, even with his terror campaign, despite the arguments he makes and their relevance and applicability the fact is most people just have not read them, as he is drowned in a sea of non-stop "philosophy" etc. books and writings both IRL and on the internet.
No matter how right he is or was, he failed at spreading his message and the fact that even his is lost is a testament to how swamped we are with nonsense and drivel as a society.
Only solution, OP, is to spread his word yourself, if someone is expressing similar views or you think is open-minded enough not to just deny it on the grounds of
>Ew no, the Unabomber
Then recommend them the essay.

[Anonymous No.15234809]

what do you mean by leftist?

[Anonymous No.15234819]

>>15234423
Overrated. He makes little argument for his claims. Read Ellul or Heidegger instead.

[Anonymous No.15234824]

>>15234819
I like Heidegger too. Im not sure why they would be mutually exclusive

[Anonymous No.15234867]

since technological slavery is a collection of his works, would this be included in it? such a based quote.

[Anonymous No.15234878]

Why did you think he was memed here? Of course it's good.

[Anonymous No.15234948]

>>15234867
Yes, it's the first one of the collection.

[Anonymous No.15235021]

you have to be 18 to post here

[Anonymous No.15235035]

>>15235021
lol so edgy bro

[Anonymous No.15235043]

>>15235021
holy BASED

[Anonymous No.15235444]

>>15234423
Kaczynski is mostly right about everything, but it's retarded to think that technology is going to slow down or even go away completely. I can see some of his followers starting some LARP community in the woods where they worship a statue of Varg Vikernes, but that's about it.

[Anonymous No.15235513]

>>15235444
Tbh i would gladly join that community

[Anonymous No.15235540]

>>15235444
Yeah I dont actually agree with Ted on that. Accelerationism is the only future, I just hope that it leads to the collapse of society and a new dark ages, and not some Transhumanist Nihilism singularity helltopia

[Anonymous No.15235567]

>>15235540
>not some Transhumanist Nihilism singularity helltopia
it's going to be this

[Anonymous No.15235590]

>>15235567
BUT, there are people, including myself whom will fight to the death to collapse society, and even if we fail then we will die trying, and death with a purpose is far better than transhuman immortality with nihilism

[Anonymous No.15235601]

>>15235567
>>15235590
I believe land and moldbug think the transhuman utopia is the less likely option, and we are more likely to collapse and enter a dark ages and/or go extinct

[Anonymous No.15235854]

>>15234423
Pretty simple. It applies only to American (and americanized) leftists and Americans are vile creatures in general. Another case of novomundianism is saying that "Modern leftish philosophers tend to dismiss reason, science, objective reality" when there´s plenty of rightwingers who dismiss reason, science and materialism. Then there´s the thing that "science" doesn´t have the normative category of "inferiour/superiour". Science can tell you that men are stronger than women, but it won´t tell you if it´s "good" or "bad".

Ted himself is a Nietzschean case as well, his resentiment towards technology. His will is to negate the present situation, rather than carve a new one. He doesn´t desire power, he doesn´t desire to be succesful, he just wants to abolish present condition, because he deems it immoral. Those who desire power will embrace technology because it allows them to acquire power, those tired of life will desire simple life without technology.

[Anonymous No.15235859]

>>15235854
>Ted himself is a Nietzschean case as well, his resentiment towards technology. His will is to negate the present situation, rather than carve a new one. He doesn´t desire power, he doesn´t desire to be succesful, he just wants to abolish present condition, because he deems it immoral. Those who desire power will embrace technology because it allows them to acquire power, those tired of life will desire simple life without technology.
Gay understanding of nietzsche, incapacity to understand what the will to power is

[Anonymous No.15235889]

>>15235859
Whatever everyone interprets nietzsche his way. Point is Ted is just as resentment-driven as those leftists of his.

[Anonymous No.15235917]

>>15235021
Now THAT is epic! You absolutely BTFO'D OP. Have some gold stranger

[Anonymous No.15235918]

>>15235590
"Transhuman immortality" is the only thing worth fighting for. Human existence in is current state is misery, and it was even worse in the distant past you AnPrim types so long for. But of course, you all envision yourselves as the alpha warlords rather than a poor peasant or some spear-fodder who died from an infection at age 22...

[Anonymous No.15236338]

The think we need right now is a solid critique against people like Cockshott and Srnicek. That's the key.

[Anonymous No.15236376]

>>15234423
this is true.

[Anonymous No.15236384]

>>15234423

[Anonymous No.15236387]

>>15234423
>was
he is still alive so it should be "is based"

[Anonymous No.15236830]

>>15235567

http://www.xenosystems.net/hyper-racism/

>The problem with ordinary racism is its utter incomprehension of the near future. Not only will capabilities for genomic manipulation dissolve biological identity into techno-commercial processes of yet-incomprehensible radicality, but also … other things.

>Neo-eugenic genomic manipulation capabilities, which will also be unevenly distributed by socio-economic status, will certainly intensify the trend to speciation, rather than ameliorating it. On the sweetness-and-light side, racists and anti-racists can be expected to eventually bond in a defensive fraternity, when they recognize that traditionally-differentiated human populations are being torn asunder on an axis of variation that dwarfs all of their established concerns.

In summary, if we allow space colonization and technological development to proceed without challenge:

>multi-racial neo-liberal ubermensch inherit the future diverging from the untermensch eventually becoming a race of trans-human alien grays

Elon has it right, the future of everything depends on the white man beating the judeo-chicomm bugs to space. We are in a space race to determine the future space RACE.

[Anonymous No.15237085]

>>15236830
>Elon has it right, the future of everything depends on the white man beating the judeo-chicomm bugs to space. We are in a space race to determine the future space RACE.
How does this follow from what you said? What does a space race have to do with genomic manipulation and the end of traditional race? I'm just trying to understand.

[Anonymous No.15237286]

>>15234423
>>15236384
You are a faggot. Stop posting, Alex of Fitch and Madison publishers.

[Anonymous No.15237294]

>>15237085

>http://www.xenosystems.net/hyper-racism/

Gregory Cochran suggests that space colonization will inevitably function as a highly-selective genetic filter, unless extreme political intervention is taken to prevent this:

>One generally assumes that space colonists, assuming that there ever are any, will be picked individuals, somewhat like existing astronauts – the best out of hordes of applicants. They’ll be smarter than average, healthier than average, saner than average – and not by just a little. […] Since all these traits are significantly heritable, some highly so, we have to expect that their descendants will be different – different above the neck. They’d likely be, on average, smarter than any existing ethnic group. If a Lunar colony really took off, early colonists might account for a disproportionate fraction of the population (just as Puritans do in the US), and the Loonies might continue to have inordinate amounts of the right stuff indefinitely.

>The most prominent model of such a filter is found in the theory of assortative mating. Strictly speaking, the racial-preservationist culture advocated by ordinary racism is an example of assortative mating, with a criterion of genetic proximity filtering potential matches. This is not why the idea has such currency. It is assortative mating on the basis of socio-economic status that has lifted it to prominence, both because it seems unquestionably to be happening, and because the implications of its happening are extreme. (Crucially, socio-economic status is a strong proxy for IQ.)

[Anonymous No.15237319]

>>15234423
Wow, in 5 years this board has gone from squabbling meme-core pseuds to a bunch of pea brained narcissists, who will heap praise on any mental midget's manifest so long as it advocates violence and lies out side the constraints of traditional morality.

At least this one is an improvement on certain other hare brained manifestos that trended here.

Hope all you hacks know that this made a comeback because of a netflix documentary

[Anonymous No.15237346]

>>15234809
If you're asking Ted, I don't think he posts here.

[Anonymous No.15237369]

>>15234785
w2c jacket?

[Anonymous No.15237487]

>>15237085
Not that Anon

The development of another race for space Conquest is a must, Humanity 2.0 directed (and owned) by a Pharaohnic corporation

Space travel aren't for our children

[Anonymous No.15237527]

>>15234878
>>15235035
>>15235043
>>15235917
>>15236376
echo-chamber faggotry and LARPing all around
>>15234785
>>15234819
>>15235854
acceptable posts

[Anonymous No.15237530]

>>15237294
Implying their Lord's gonna let mating

Monsanto had some ideas to share

[Anonymous No.15237566]

>>15237286
who?

[Anonymous No.15237578]

>>15237369
Sportsman's Warehouse

[Anonymous No.15237580]

>>15237319
>meme-core pseud
>mental midget
>hare brained manifesto

imagine being this stupid and ignorant.

seethe.

[Anonymous No.15237582]

>>15237566
The guy who runs Fitch and Madison Publishers, who put out Anti-Tech Revolution and the new reprint of Technological slavery, keeps on making Ted K threads non-stop all day, every day.

[Anonymous No.15237602]

>>15237582
honestly i have no idea what you're talking about. i got these posters from a discord chat

[Anonymous No.15237619]

>>15235444
>it's retarded to think that technology is going to slow down or even go away completely.
not really. If we consume to much of a scarce resource (eg oil), the industrial society will be vulnerable.

[Anonymous No.15237655]

>>15237527
how do I upvote this?

[Anonymous No.15237665]

>>15235854
the reasoning is all silly here.
>Science can tell you that men are stronger than women
this is exactly what kaczynski is talking about. it's not a question of whether this is good or bad, it's a question of how the leftist psychology interprets this--whether as good or bad. And the leftist interprets this as bad due to his feelings of inferiority and disrupted power process.

>there´s plenty of rightwingers who dismiss reason, science and materialism

sure. but that doesn't affect the validity of the argument. Kaczynski is simply focusing on leftism because leftism is a uniquely dangerous obstacle to the formation of revolution against the techno-system, and so it get's a greater emphasis. It makes no sense to say something isn't true because it also occurs in other areas.

>negate the present situation, rather than carve a new one.
>abolish present condition, because he deems it immoral.

This is all wrong--and silly. You're applying your own subjective interpretation of motive, while ignoring all the arguments presented by Kaczynski. Kaczynski has argued that it is IMPOSSIBLE to "carve" a new society, and it is impossible to plan, predict or control the development of society long-term. This is a matter of facts and logic, which you find convenient to ignore I guess.

[Anonymous No.15237679]

>>15235035
>>15235043
>>15236338
>the think weed ne right now is a solid critique against people like Cockshott and Srnicek. That's the key.

[Anonymous No.15237684]

>>15237619
this. i love watching despairing pessimists and losers stew in their festering pools of hopeless shit.

[Anonymous No.15237685]

>>15237580
You are the apotheosis of lazy virtue signalling.

Arguments make you vulnerable to criticism, so why not just post <10 words of memes that everybody here already agrees with?

[Anonymous No.15237694]

>>15237602
Nice try, Alex.

[Anonymous No.15237707]

>>15237685
ohhhh! taking the high road are we??!

You yourself haven't given any arguments, only ad hominems. Excuse me if i have the same kind of lazy fun you are for a bit.

[Anonymous No.15237775]

>"Dude I love Kaczynski is so based!!
>*uses a computer*

Lmao

[Anonymous No.15237790]

>>15235540
>Transhumanist Nihilism singularity helltopia
That's exactly why they released the virus. You are witnessing the beginning right now.

[Anonymous No.15237804]

>>15237582
Good. It's unironically the most important issue facing humanity.

[Anonymous No.15237809]

Do other people think of Ted as cynic philosopher?

[Anonymous No.15237811]

>>15234423
>book
it's barely even an essay and it's written at a middle school level, only retards think this is good

[Anonymous No.15237820]

>>15234423
>Amerishart
>can't tell the difference between liberals and leftists
Every fucking time.

[Anonymous No.15237830]

>>15237707
I'll start with the lazily formatted excerpt in OP

>Modern leftish philosophers tend to dismiss reason, science, objective reality and to insist that everything is culturally relative.

Literally a freshman year misunderstanding of Foucalt that could only come from someone who has not read a single work of postmodern philosophy.

No serious philosopher has EVER said that "everything is culturally relative and therefore nothing can be good or bad," because there's never yet been a serious philosopher who was simultaneously an emotionally troubled high schooler.

Literally every following sentence could be replied the same.

This is the problem with the entire text: You're supposed to start with "supposition," and then move on to "evidence," which, when discussing "leftist" philosophers, ought to involve names and at the very least out-of-context quotes a la Stephen Hicks.

The unabomber was an anti-social and narcissistic mathematician who spent too much time worrying about "the gays" effects on society instead of the MIC. Wonder why he has such a strong following on a site for mean-spirited social rejects...

[Anonymous No.15237867]

>>15237804
It's probably turning people away from reading him.

[Anonymous No.15238031]

>>15237867
Not really. I've purchased most books that were memed on here because I am an idiot.

[Anonymous No.15238053]

>>15238031
You publish those books. You're Fitch and Madison.

[Super Friendly Bro Anon No.15238057]

>>15238031
Made me smile. Self awareness is step 1 to self betterment, anon - but remember, it's only step 1 ;)

[Anonymous No.15238095]

>>15237867
???

[Anonymous No.15238267]

>>15237527
NOD AN ARGUMEN

[Anonymous No.15238310]

>>15238095
you are cringey

[Anonymous No.15238393]

>>15234809
Oh fuck off you mouth breathing gay faggot

[Anonymous No.15238451]

>>15237665
>this is exactly what kaczynski is talking about.
No, he worded it as if science would lay down the normatives. But ignore that, it´s irrelevant nitpicking from my side.

>but that doesn't affect the validity of the argument. Kaczynski is simply focusing on leftism because leftism is a uniquely dangerous obstacle to the formation of revolution against the techno-system, and so it get's a greater emphasis.
The argument wasn´t presented. Merely the description so it´s fair to attack the description for presenting itself as universal when it´s clearly US-centric.

>You're applying your own subjective interpretation of motive, while ignoring all the arguments presented by Kaczynski
That´s the purpose behind making a genealogy of morals. I was poking fun at OP claiming "semi-Nietzschean critique" while ignoring that Ted was just as much driven by resentment as those leftists.

[Anonymous No.15238468]

>>15234785
What do you mean he failed to spread his message? He is well known as fuck. He has the name recognition of lebron james.

[Anonymous No.15238552]

>>15238057
Thanks Bro. I'm working on it.

[Anonymous No.15238565]

Humans can't even run the earth as a spaceship properly. What makes anyone think humans will ever be able to colonize space in any meaningful way?

[Anonymous No.15238623]

>>15235918
Holy based

[Anonymous No.15239257]

>>15238623
SCIENCE IS SO BASED!

[Anonymous No.15239414]

>>15237867
Nope, actually got me to read his books. Glad it did.

[Anonymous No.15239422]

>>15238053
lol

[Anonymous No.15239481]

>>15235021
kek based

[Anonymous No.15239491]

>>15237679

[Anonymous No.15239526]

>>15234423

This is hilariously bad For one this isn't Nietzchean. It's hard to think of a thinker more critical of the notion of objective truth/morality/reality and the goals of science than Nietzsche. At one point in Beyond Good and Evil he even questions the notion of a unified self expressing skepticism about Descartes famous phrase "I think therefore I am." Also anyone who generalizes about 'the left' as though leftist thinkers are a monolith is delusional & has clearly never read any leftist thinkers. There are a wide range of differing views among leftist thinkers, as there are on the right.

[Anonymous No.15239791]

>>15234785
>>15237369
>>15237578
Checked there. Jacket wasn't on there I think

[Anonymous No.15239897]

>>15234423
Believing in his retarded generalizations.

[Anonymous No.15240014]

>>15234423
He is so fucking based, i just read the Leftist Psychology, going to 3rd chapter now.

[Anonymous No.15240140]

>>15234423
Ted is truly THE great mind of our age

[Anonymous No.15240166]

Do you guys read the PDF or the printed version? I have a PDF file of Industrial Society & Its Future, but it's only 32 pages long (including the footnotes). When I look at amazon the printed version is over 100 pages

[Anonymous No.15240177]

>>15237319
The manifesto has always been an issue on this board. Also, I don't think most people here are interested in this manifesto because of violence, you idiot. You have absolutely no idea. Let people search for answers, if they really care, they will get their answers already.


But you probably just got stuck because you read a couple of books and can't figure it out.
Btw, fuck Netflix.
And I don't care either, I'm already through with the topic.
Just wanted to comment briefly you hack.

[Anonymous No.15240217]

>>15236830
>ELON MUSK
>NICK LAND
>ADD HYPER TO WORDS AND THE COSMOS IS DEFEATED
holy fuck. go back

[Anonymous No.15240232]

>>15236338
>Cockshott and Srnicek
literally who?

[Anonymous No.15240245]

>>15235021

your reddit gold, sir

[Anonymous No.15240262]

>>15237830
You have to go back

[Anonymous No.15240267]

>>15238451
Nihilism is a condition. The diagnostic is not the cure

[Anonymous No.15240774]

>>15234423
>was
???

[Anonymous No.15240896]

>>15234423
I've never actually read this, does anyone have a PDF? Also why is it that I can never find copies of manifestos anywhere?

[Anonymous No.15240903]

>>15240896
literally first page of google, friendo
https://www.josharcher.uk/tags/unabomber-manifesto-pdf/

[Anonymous No.15240910]

>>15240903
Okay, that's on me.
How about the Christchurch manifesto? Anyone have a link to that?

[Anonymous No.15240925]

>>15238393
>t. mouth breathing gay faggot

[Anonymous No.15241139]

>>15240896
The Washington Post was gracious enough to publish the man's first book for free back in 1995. Here is the link from their webpage:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/national/longterm/unabomber/manifesto.text.htm

[Anonymous No.15241144]

Ted was a leftist who hated fascists and reactionaries.

[Anonymous No.15241275]

>>15241144
Cool story bro

[Anonymous No.15241293]

>>15234819
>instead
*as well.

[Anonymous No.15241318]

>>15236830

[Anonymous No.15241377]

>>15234785
He has how many Hollywood productions, circumstances have made him vanilla, especially when you talk to Xers+ who actually lived through it. The parasocial impacts of tech are a worry, silicon valley doesn't get high off their own supply.

[Anonymous No.15241390]

>>15241275
>anarchists are right wing

[Anonymous No.15241462]

>>15241390
Anarchists are neither Left nor Right. That is, real Anarchists, not current year McAnarchists. Ted was and is very obviously not an Anarchist, but given that he cannot be placed on the Left-Right spectrum and neither can Anarchists, mongoloids just assume that Ted is an Anarchist. Specially mongs who have never bothered to read his works and get all of their political science from YT and /pol/.

[Anonymous No.15241482]

>>15241462
anarchism is inherently left wing moron
>Ted was and is very obviously not an Anarchist
retard

[Anonymous No.15241508]

>>15241482

Ok dude. Have it your way.

[Anonymous No.15241511]

>>15241482

>Anarchism is inherently left-wing

Ancaps are just about the only anarchists out there with an applicable and coherent ideology.

[Anonymous No.15241552]

>>15241508
i accept your concession
>>15241511
anarchists reject the concept of the state and capitalists require the state to enforce property law, anarchocapitalism is a contradiction in terms

[Anonymous No.15241585]

>>15241552
>d capitalists require the state to enforce property law,
you could enforce it with volunteer miltias. Not that anything about anarchism actually makes any sense lol

[Anonymous No.15241589]

>>15241585
>you could enforce it with volunteer miltias
enforce what nigger? law? you have no idea what you're talking about

[Anonymous No.15243195]

>>15241482
Ted is definitely not left. because anarchism as a political label has been swamped with leftists throughout most of it's history and is associated with the left doesn't mean that anarchy (lawlessness) is by definition a leftist thing.

[Anonymous No.15243238]

>>15239526
He is Nietzschean. The entire point of why he criticized leftism so much is because they’re the epitome of slave morality. Their entire ideology is a shell of its former self and is now sustained by a crippling inferiority complex. Leftists enjoy positions of oppression, so they’re completely useless in achieving genuine revolution, especially against technology

He should have gone into more detail about why and how leftism developed this way because it absolutely began as a revolutionary ideology. Now they’re all sociopathic self-loathing losers who love being victims and despise human nature for not recognizing their perceived inferiority. If transhumanism goes further than leftists will be at the forefront of it alongside liberals, they both hate nature and will do anything to use technology to validate their individuality (growth of transgenderism is already a sign)

[Anonymous No.15243357]

>>15239526
I would say, dear Anon, that if there is any justice in the universe, any people who hold any point of view have differing views among their fellows. The goal among us all should be to regard every point of view as having merit, and find our own interpretation of existence among this forest.

[Anonymous No.15244625]

>>15234423
So... Everything that isn't huntering-gathering is a surrogate activity??
We should only do the things that saciate our most base desires?
I was with him since I hate this society and having to work to someone else.
I also would like to live in the country at peace in a small community. But the thing is: I still love (for example) the arts and I still think it's an activity worth pursuing. He might be right about the state of society and it probably eventually will fall apart but the thing is he dismiss too much stuff worth pursuing. By his way of thinking the whole of humanity should be reduced to men-monkey, only fucking and eating all the time.
With that in mind, fuck this bomberman.

[Anonymous No.15244729]

No-nooo, you can't paint on the walls, this is a surrogate activity.
It's demeaning behavior, totally not a "REAL" kaczynski-approved activity.
Sincerely, I'm really surprised that this guy who clearly hates the arts
(among other things) gets so much traction in a literature board of all places. Don't you like music? Don't you like books, you fags?
How can you reconcile this guy's thoughts with your love for books?
But let me guess, you haven't really read him, huh?
Well memed lit/, you got me again.

[Anonymous No.15245063]

>>15243238
What's absurd is the leftists belief that they are the ecofriendly party. They think the world will end in 12 years while simentaneously believing someone like Kaczynki was a lunatic extremist. Environmentalism is one of the biggest double thinks. Greta Thunberg is a good idea example and representative of it. The leftist claims to be a victim of climate change and not one of the causes. The most accountable they are willing to be is laws on reusable straws.

[Anonymous No.15245146]

>>15235540
We have to increase societal and economic pressured to collapse society. Build mini EMPs and chop down cell towers

[Anonymous No.15245235]

>>15245063
Leftists, and most people for that matter, have no idea what it takes to make 'clean' energy. You have to use fossil fuels in order to extract and transport the rare earth metals that get manufactured with a significant portion of waste. Add to this that mining and extraction have always been ecological disasters (eg it takes 500000 gallons of water to extract 1 tonne of lithium) that poison local water and ruins local agriculture. In order to produce enough of this 'clean' energy to transition from fossil fuels we have to bring mining to unprecedented levels and we will still be burning oil the entire time.

[Anonymous No.15245246]

>>15245146
Disrupting 5G is a good place to start, but ultimately the goal should be to completely destroy the ability to wage war. To do that, you need to disrupt oil supply

[Anonymous No.15245636]

>>15245235
What about Hydroelectric Power Plants?

[Anonymous No.15245660]

>>15234423
>right diagnosis, wrong treatment

[Anonymous No.15245666]

>>15245636
We've dammed up all the areas that are worthwhile. Hydro is limited by geography.

[Anonymous No.15245675]

>>15245660
right treatment, wrong diagnosis

[Anonymous No.15245693]

>>15245666
>Hydro is limited by geography.
Bad lucky for you, anglo. Kek

[Anonymous No.15245712]

>>15245235
The entire notion of clean energy is obviously a meme. No energy source is clean on the scales required to power the modern world.

[Anonymous No.15245753]

>>15245712
Exactly. There will be time coming soon where the technological society will be vulnerable. It will either be from resource depletion or through global warming. That is the time for Ted's ideas to take flight.

[Anonymous No.15245758]

>>15241585
it's a prayer to the state equivalent of kali yuga

[Anonymous No.15246062]

>>15243238
high-IQ post

[Anonymous No.15246635]

>>15243238
>Leftists enjoy positions of oppression
To the point they have to import a new oppressed class, just so they don't have to evaluate their lives, and they can demand equality and reduction in overall quality of life.

[Anonymous No.15246815]

I only read the section on the mind of leftists and he seemed to nail it.

I don't condone what he did, end of the day innocent people were maimed and killed. A highly intelligent man and God knows what they did to his brain in those experiments