[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 36 KB, 655x527, 02f.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15161464 No.15161464 [Reply] [Original]

which is better

>> No.15161505
File: 33 KB, 600x612, 469.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15161505

>>15161464
>said he, "the quote"

>> No.15161525

Quoth the man, "quote."

>> No.15161533

>>15161464
>saith the man
>the man saith
>the man declareth
>declareth the man

>> No.15162834

nothing

>> No.15162849

>>15161464
They have different metrical qualities. Use both of them as necessary to achieve the desired rhythmic effect.

For example:

>Said he, "You did not think I'd fail, when I have come this far?"

Vs

>He said, "I will not fail, not now, not after all this time."

The two MEAN the same thing, but they SOUND different. This is a thing you will have to pay attention to.

>> No.15162981

>so he says to me he says he says he says to me he says "quote"
>and so this other guy says he says he says he says to me "quote"

>> No.15163090

>>15161464
Mark Twain said to use Distinct character voices instead of having to mention who said what

>> No.15163101

>>15163090
Eco does this but I sometimes have to back up to the beginning of the dialogue to figure out who is saying what

>> No.15163100

>>15161464
They spoke thus

>> No.15163117

>>15163090
Even IF you do this, it's sometimes helpful to clarify just who's talking, especially if there's a lot of chaos in the scene you are describing and if there are a lot of people talking at once.

>> No.15163139
File: 29 KB, 474x605, IB2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15163139

>>15161464
>"the quote" was said by him
is infinitely superior, if by the dialogue in your story the reader can't tell who's speaking by the end of the quote, then your dialogue is bad.