ITT: Philosophers you used to respect but outgrew and realized they were dumb

[Anonymous No.15111362]

[Anonymous No.15111405]

His morals or transcendental epistemology?

[Anonymous No.15111413]

>>15111405
both but especially the former

[Anonymous No.15111414]

>>15111362
nietzsche. and he was actually low IQ as his marks in mathematics at pforta witness. wilamowitz btw mocked him for that.

[Anonymous No.15111424]

>>15111414
>t.smoothbrain

[Anonymous No.15111433]

>>15111424
nietzsche might have been a poet, or rather a prophet. one thing he never was is an intelligent man.

[Anonymous No.15111459]

>>15111362
>reads nietzsche once

[Anonymous No.15111462]

>man hab 2 take contwol of sef
>man mus b sefish
>man hab 2 b individual
>lov es bizznes deel
>u mus b objective correct!
>altruism BAD

i dont know why i was obsessed with """"""objectivism""""""" for so long. only thing that sticks is knowing throughout history altruism has been used to convince masses to do retarded things. rand just made the woman's philosophy into words.

[Anonymous No.15111466]

>>15111413
What are you into now?

[Anonymous No.15111478]

>>15111466
marx and hegel but especially the former. i also like levinas, i think he is almost like a better version of kant's moral philosophy

[Anonymous No.15111502]

>>15111362
This privileged dickhead.

[Anonymous No.15112472]

>>15111462
she isn't a philosopher fuck off

[Anonymous No.15112491]

i want to believe u parmenides. i really do hen.

[Anonymous No.15112604]

>>15112472
she is, just a bad one

[Anonymous No.15112613]

>>15111362
>>15111405
>>15111413
What specifically about his philosophy do you take issue with? He's a hard one to "outgrow". Most of western philosophy has spent the last couple centuries trying to overcome him.

[Anonymous No.15112621]

>>15111433

shut up

[Anonymous No.15112631]

>>15111502
He's right tho.

[Anonymous No.15112640]

>>15111462
Anthem was a fantastic book, on par with 1984, Brave New World, and The Giver

I didnt read any of her other books

[Anonymous No.15112718]

>>15112613
basically i agree with hegel's critiques of him, as well as some others
>moral philosophy rests on an empty formalism; anything and its negation can be shown to be immoral
>epistemology built on cartesian subjectivism which results in seeing society as a sum of atomized individuals entering external relations with one another
>above point makes kant unable to account for the importance of community resulting in stuff like nozick
>the thing-in-itself is a logically incoherent concept since if we can't say anything about it, how do we even know about it
>psychologism
>liberal political philosophy that flows from his moral philosophy
>liberal egalitarianism which is the basis of his moral philosophy leads to treating everyone the same purely in one way which is the fact that they are a person, that's it; does not account for inequality otherwise like in terms of income or relation to the means of production, and this serves capitalism well on top of being and extension of the empty formalism of the categorical imperative

[Anonymous No.15112831]

>>15111433
You're not smarter than nietzsche, anon, sorry

[Anonymous No.15112896]

>>15112831
every math or physics professor at the nearest respectable uni would be, so it's not exactly very unlikely. sorry that your daydreaming fantasies of grandeur and your raging ad-hominems don't count as intelligence.

[Anonymous No.15112911]

Jesus, Nietzsche, Plato, Aristotle, most of them really.

[Anonymous No.15112969]

>>15112896
You're not living in reality.

[Anonymous No.15112971]

>>15112831
my marks in maths are far better than his.

[Anonymous No.15113016]

>>15112971
I have higher marks in math than you and Nietzsche is smarter than both of us.

[Anonymous No.15113343]

>>15113016
i doubt it, you sound like a retard.

[Anonymous No.15113353]

Marx

[Anonymous No.15113533]

Honestly expected about 30 juden petersteins ITT, thank fuck none of you are brain-dead enough to believe in him to begin with

[Anonymous No.15113548]

>>15113353
you probably didn't understand him

[Anonymous No.15113587]

>>15113548
What makes you think that YOU did?

[Anonymous No.15113596]

>>15113533
Rent free.

[Anonymous No.15113613]

>>15112718
>his epistemology is wrong because it makes me sad
brilliant, very mature refutation

[Anonymous No.15113618]

>>15111413
Yah, well every dumb fuck with no background thinks the categorical imperative is stupid, so it’s not exactly a big deal. If you have a legitimate reason for it that’s another story.

[Anonymous No.15113629]

>>15111433
Lol, look at all the seething this caused. are neitzchelets this insecure? I’m a Kantian, but I don’t mind if you shit on Kant.

[Anonymous No.15114083]

>>15112472
Autism.
The thread is about growth and thinkers like Ayn Rand are pushed on easily manipulated young people. Same as many of the leftist critical theorists. Most of it is garbage for manipulation purposes.

[Anonymous No.15114152]

>>15113618
>hegel is a dumbfuck with no background

[Anonymous No.15114158]

[Anonymous No.15114159]

>>15113613
thanks but it isn't mine, it's hegel's and marx's

[Anonymous No.15114169]

>>15114152
Yes.

[Anonymous No.15114912]

>>15111459
Shitting on rigorous a priori metaphysics will always boil down to reads nietzsche once

[Anonymous No.15114969]

>>15113533
Cringe

[Anonymous No.15114970]

>>15112718
>does not account for inequality otherwise like in terms of income or relation to the means of production, and this serves capitalism well
So your issues with Kant can be boiled down to a marxist critique? yikes.

[Anonymous No.15115352]

Nietzsche

>hurr durr the Abyss #Fuck the pope,

[Anonymous No.15115364]

Deleuze

[Anonymous No.15115378]

>>15114159
damn they sound like a couple of faggots

[Anonymous No.15115442]

>>15111362
This nigger

[Anonymous No.15116739]

>>15111362
I

[Anonymous No.15116753]

my dad