[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 6 KB, 225x225, heh...png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15048485 No.15048485 [Reply] [Original]

Not the other way around. The further you move away from reality the more delusional you get. The more you assume the more of a stupid faggot you are. So you stringed together thoughts that are internally coherent. Who fucking cares? It didn't bring you any tangible happiness. That cunt Kant spent 80 years fantasizing and doing mental exercisises that brought him nothing, never left his hometown, never got married, never found happiness. Go out shoot some hoop, bucko. You want a philosophical system to guide you? Take the tradpill. It helped countless generations before you be happy and reproduce, it'll be more than enough for you.

>> No.15048510

this is phil 101

>> No.15048528
File: 221 KB, 1280x1024, 1280px-Bonsai_display_with_Seiju_elm,_miniature_hosta_and_hanging_scroll,_12_July_2009.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15048528

>>15048485
wow, thanks for letting us know what literally everyone already knows. Nobody goes to philosophy class thinking "wow, I'm going to be so popular with the ladies after I recite to them word-by-word Schopenhauer's essays."

Fuck outta here, sage, and fuck you.

>> No.15048530

>>15048485
>implying philosophy necessarily moves away from reality
yes i did bite

>> No.15048533

>>15048510
Maybe, but why does Kantian onanism remain the core of philosophy -01?

>> No.15048559

>>15048528
You go to phil in search oh some higher "truth". If you already found it, what's the point of pursuing it further? Do you continue searching the house corners when you've found your keys?

>> No.15048568

>>15048533
>Kantianism remains the core of philosophy
that's a true that has been repeated multiple times but i'm not sure what it really means
this is my openion:
a) postkantian philosophers literally don't gave a shit about Kant ( fichte, schelling, hegel, you name it)
b) neokantianism died with Cassirer in Davos
c) if the core of philosophy would be the more comprehensive system of philosophy, then we would be talking about hegel
d) most anglo philosophers just take the epistemologic aspect of Kant
c) philosophy is and has alway been a regional enterprise, i haven o idea what your departament of philosophy thinks about Kant

>> No.15048595
File: 280 KB, 1473x1061, 1559993657255.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15048595

>>15048485
ACKSHUALLY, by criticising philosophy you are partaking in philosophy itself

>> No.15048958

>>15048485
>Take the tradpill.

No philosophical system can guide your life. Period. What you need to do is learn from your experience and base your philosophy on that. I like stoicism a lot, but it's not fit for me, so I grab what is in line with my thoughts and use. Not the other way around.

>> No.15048967

Quit spamming threads you fucking loser.