/lit/ - Literature

[Anonymous No.15002387]

How can we slow language change.

[Anonymous No.15002393]

>>15002387
why would you want to, you pussy?

[Anonymous No.15002403]

>>15002387
Jacklyn is 100% unemployed. this uwu shit will never catch on as the general population wants to start stabbing when they hear it.

[Anonymous No.15002406]

>imperialism
>Japan
what did I miss?

[Anonymous No.15002413]

>>15002387
invent as many new slurs as possible

[Anonymous No.15002434]

>>15002387
kill everyone

[Anonymous No.15002448]

>>15002387
Who is this Xirple?

[Anonymous No.15002451]

>>15002387
we jail women, minorities, and them

[Anonymous No.15002497]

>you did an imperialism
what does it mean by this?

[Anonymous No.15002562]

Not to defend this worthless no-soul product of the masses, but I'd say this is an extreme example of enallage. It's a trope. She simply doesn't have a clue on how to use it: you need internal life to be a good rhetorician and poet.

[Anonymous No.15002587]

>>15002387
Why does her tweet arises such a strong hatred in my heart?

[Anonymous No.15002590]

>>15002587
you are esl AND incel.

[Anonymous No.15002627]

>>15002387
Excluding the white fragility, japs do everything else on a daily basis.

[Anonymous No.15002630]

>>15002387
This is only a stylistic defect, she is making a serious point in trivial language

[Anonymous No.15002735]

>>15002630
no she's not

[Anonymous No.15002762]

>This makes it abundantly clear you don't even understand the intersectional nature of the multiplicity of your offenses
>pseuds trying to sound intellectual through usage of latinisms

When will this meme finally end?

[Anonymous No.15002774]

>>15002762
considering romance derived vocabulary has been associated with education and class for hundreds of years, probably not any time soon.

[Anonymous No.15002777]

>>15002587
Because you say >her when you know it really isn't

[Anonymous No.15002790]

>>15002627
Jap fragility. The biggest fragility is nigger fragility desu.

[Anonymous No.15002799]

>>15002774
Yeah, I can recognize that, but I find people like in OP's pic unbearable in their lack of ability to find a right balance in their vocabulary, instead just resorting to 'latin and big words = smart and better argument'. At least that's the impression I've gotten over the years

[Anonymous No.15002898]

>>15002799
i agree it reads like a teenager clumsily replacing words they'd ordinarily use with "big-words" whose nuances they don't entirely grasp

[Anonymous No.15002905]

>>15002387
Language change is inevitable, but the academic core of language definition will always remain intact and no amount of retarded twitter speak will change that

[Anonymous No.15002921]

>>15002387
What was the original post saying about Marie Kondo?

[Anonymous No.15002927]

>>15002905
How can you say that when academia is under an onslaught of women and niggers?

[Anonymous No.15002931]

>>15002762
>tfw multiplicity is actually an interesting and complicated word but retards with more hair dye than personality are draining it of all substance
No wonder Deleuze threw himself out a fucking window

[Anonymous No.15002932]

>>15002905
>but the academic core of language definition will always remain intact and no amount of retarded twitter speak will change that
lol wrong. if this were the case western intellectuals would be writing papers in classical latin to this day. even in the renaissance they only revived classical latin as a meme once they dusted off roman literature and realized their local dialects of what they THOUGHT was latin had been vulgarized beyond recognition.

[Anonymous No.15002947]

>>15002413
great post. itt we invent new slurs
chekkie - from blue checkmark
erino - from that suffix redditors add to every word
wholesome - nuff said
yiker - from yikes
oofer - from oof

[Anonymous No.15002965]

>>15002947
cringerino: you.

[Anonymous No.15002970]

>>15002947
baste

[Anonymous No.15002971]

>>15002587
Because you are just like her. Tightly bound by idiotic beliefs.

[Anonymous No.15002974]

>>15002965
sometimes i write intentionally bad middlebrow posts to collect replies

[Anonymous No.15002980]

>>15002974
yiker

[Anonymous No.15002984]

>>15002387
>You did a racism.
OK, nigger.

[Anonymous No.15002987]

>>15002971
>her

[Anonymous No.15003003]

>>15002984
not just a racism, a heckin' racism

[Anonymous No.15003009]

>>15003003
you did just done do a big yiker.

[Anonymous No.15003020]

>>15002387
Honestly Ehrenreich is worth fifty of any of these dumb little Twitter people. They can talk to her when they accomplish some piece of writing as meaningful for the world on the same scale as she has, which they never will, so this is just transparent screaming from the imps in circle 7

[Anonymous No.15003026]

>>15002931
>he still thinks Deleuze killed himself
good goy

[Anonymous No.15003043]

>>15003026
Deleuze wrote extensively about (against) anti-semitism. Why would they off him when he was such a great ally?

[Anonymous No.15003047]

Holy shit you just spiked my blood pressure

[Anonymous No.15003062]

>>15003020
Yet she's dumber than them, she apologised.

[Anonymous No.15003075]

>>15002931
Deleuze's notion of "multiplicity" is just an over complicated version of the exact same thing as what retards with hair dye mean when they say "multiplicity." No wonder, then, that there is so much overlap between the beliefs of the two groups. A multiplicity of faggotry.

[Anonymous No.15003094]

>>15002387
that that girl destroyed the bigot fucking boomer, very based

[Anonymous No.15003105]

>>15003043
To defeat the Jew,
One must become the Jew

[Anonymous No.15003108]

>>15002921
IIRC She called her Nipsy Kondo and something about her being a soulless wall-biter. .

[Anonymous No.15003111]

>>15003075
>No wonder, then, that there is so much overlap between the beliefs of the two groups.
Wrong. Deleuze literally hated schizophrenics and wanted nothing to do with them.

[Anonymous No.15003130]

>>15003111
I heard he sucked feminine penis all day every day to cope with being such a loser.

[Anonymous No.15003139]

>account is now private
fucks sake i wanted to read the replies

[Anonymous No.15003144]

>>15002387
That has to be an ironic tweet

[Anonymous No.15003194]

>>15003111
>Deleuze literally hated schizophrenics and wanted nothing to do with them.
No he didn't. He was unduly complimentary of their lived experience.

[Anonymous No.15003234]

>>15003194
Prove it. Everything I've read about his personal life suggest he wanted nothing to do with the anti-psychiatry clinic that Guattari was running during their collaborations together, precisely because that would involve being around schizophrenic people. His writings on schizophrenia as a concept or process have nothing to do with what he thought of schizophrenics as people.

[Anonymous No.15003266]

>>15003234
>His writings on schizophrenia as a concept or process have nothing to do with what he thought of schizophrenics as people.
He references the experiences of specific schizophrenics, anon.

[Anonymous No.15003281]

>>15002413
No, you end up like those cretins on the left who use insults like "fucknugget" or "shitclown" cause they can't use the standard no-no words.
Try as you might, nothing beats nigger faggot

[Anonymous No.15003288]

>>15002974
Oofer

[Anonymous No.15003304]

>>15003266
see the stanford encyclopedia of phil:
>It’s important at the start to realize that Deleuze and Guattari do not advocate schizophrenia as a “lifestyle” or as the model for a political program. The schizophrenic, as a clinical entity, is the result of the interruption or the blocking of the process of desiring-production, its having been taken out of nature and society and restricted to the body of an individual where it spins in the void rather than make the connections that constitute reality... [ ] The schizophrenic is a sick person in need of help, but schizophrenia is an avenue into the unconscious, the unconscious not of an individual, but the “transcendental unconscious,” an unconscious that is social, historical, and natural all at once.
That Deleuze was an unremarkable person compared to his writings is well-documented. Guattari was the one willing to get his hands dirty and attempted to implement their ideas in (anti)psychiatric practise, while Deleuze was incredibly uneasy around schizophrenics and confined himself to intellectual speculation on the subject. You are still wrongly conflating the author with his writing. I am speaking about the man himself.

[Anonymous No.15003457]

>>15003304
>but schizophrenia is an avenue into the unconscious, the unconscious not of an individual, but the “transcendental unconscious,” an unconscious that is social, historical, and natural all at once.
This is an implicit validation of schizophrenia, regardless of what the encyclopedia may feel Deleuze advocates or does not advocate.
>don't conflate the writer with what he thinks about lived experience and sets down on the page
lol

[Anonymous No.15003467]

>>15002974
yiking ooferino

[Anonymous No.15003471]

>>15003457
>This is an implicit validation of schizophrenia
No it isn't. Again, you're conflating the schizophreneticising process of capitalism with the schizophrenic individual (who is a victim of blocking the process of desiring-production, and not someone to be admired or looked up to). I think you should maybe read something a little less challenging than Deleuze my friend, since most of it seems to be sailing clean over your head.

[Anonymous No.15003474]

>>15003304
>I am speaking about the man himself.
quick question: who gives a flying fuck about that?

[Anonymous No.15003486]

>>15002974
You did a cringe.

[Anonymous No.15003498]

>>15003474
Because my original point was about the man himself, you moron. If you didn't care about that, then why have you even bothered replying?

[Anonymous No.15003597]

>>15003471
>Again, you're conflating the schizophreneticising process of capitalism with the schizophrenic individual (who is a victim of blocking the process of desiring-production, and not someone to be admired or looked up to).
You're misunderstanding what I am saying. Deleuze refers to the patient, the real schizophrenic, by their name and proceeds to talk about their experience as liberating procedure. Regardless of whether or not he intended for this to be purely symbolic, this is an implicit validation of the condition of schizophrenia.
>I think you should maybe read something a little less challenging than Deleuze my friend, since most of it seems to be sailing clean over your head.
Your anger at being challenged betrays your pseud nature.

[Anonymous No.15003636]

>>15002387
that tweet really represents a really cringey minority. Nobody in real life thinks that shit is anything but stupid. In general I think the language of memes and text speak is kind of cool

[Anonymous No.15003645]

>>15003062
I don't think that makes her dumb, she just hasn't realized that the only people who take the BIPOC/non-cishet/white patriarchy w/e woke in general folx srsly are themselves and a few self flagellating whites in hr departments.

[Anonymous No.15003684]

>>15003471
based

[Anonymous No.15003697]

>>15003597
>Deleuze refers to the patient, the real schizophrenic, by their name and proceeds to talk about their experience as liberating procedure
So cite the quote. Prove me wrong with evidence. This is the second time I've asked you to do so. What are you so afraid of by being specific?

[Anonymous No.15003753]

>>15003697
>A schizophrenic out for a walk is a better model than a neurotic lying on the analyst’s couch. A breath of fresh air, a relationship with the outside world. Lenz’s stroll, for example, as reconstructed by Buchner. This walk outdoors is different from the moments when Lenz finds himself closeted with his pastor, who forces him to situate himself socially, in relationship to the God of established religion, in relationship to his father, to his mother. While taking a stroll outdoors, on the other hand, he is in the mountains, amid falling snowflakes, with other gods or without any gods at all, without a family, without a father or a mother, with nature. “What does my father want? Can he offer me more than that? Impossible. Leave me in peace.” Everything is a machine. Celestial machines, the stars or rainbows in the sky, alpine machines — all of them connected to those of his body. The continual whirr of machines. “He thought that it must be a feeling of endless bliss to be in contact with the profound life of every form, to have a soul for rocks, metals, water, and plants, to take into himself, as in a dream, every element of nature, like flowers that breathe with the waxing and waning of the moon.”
Lenz was a real individual, a real schizophrenic. What makes this passage particularly obscene, regardless of whether or not Deleuze "meant" it literally, which is questionable in itself, is that schizophrenics are in fact almost always deeply agoraphobic. Regardless of whether the passage is intended as pure analogy or not, it has no truth value.

[Anonymous No.15003778]

lmao sounds like it's talking to a dog

[Anonymous No.15003987]

>>15002387
Ehrenreich is one of their allies and a good writer, why do they always eat their own?

[Anonymous No.15004097]

>>15003753
But the key point here is not the schizophrenic himself, but the difference between being stationary and being mobile, or being inside (closted/repressed) and outside (freeing up desiring-production). And further, this is an excerpt from one of his collaborative projects with Guattari, so if Lenz is real, it is likely one of guattari's patients who Deleuze never had any interaction with. I see nothing here that would indicate Deleuze's appreciation of the schizophrenic person, merely the process that liberates the schizo from oedipalisation.

[Anonymous No.15004180]

https://youtu.be/5rz1TcLVFzY

[Anonymous No.15004230]

>>15003281
the words the left uses aren't proper slurs though, they aren't offensive to anyone. I just want as many ways to say nigger and faggot as possible

[Anonymous No.15004664]

>>15002451
Jails are expensive. We put them in camps and starve them.

[Anonymous No.15004679]

>>15002387
Jacklyn is clearly shitting on the people who she identifies with
I don't understand the layers of irony anymore everything is just completely flipped

[Anonymous No.15004862]

>>15003075
>but Deleuze was based and right wing bro!

[Anonymous No.15004885]

>>15002947
Yikeserino

[Anonymous No.15004897]

All the redpilled big brains need to return to Latin as the Lingua Franca. Let the filthy rabble talk in their peasant tounge, we will conduct our business in the language of Cicero

[Anonymous No.15004904]

>>15002627
The twitter populace is completely unaware of how racists all other countries actually are

[Anonymous No.15004914]

>>15002387
>the intersectional nature of the multiplicity of your offenses.
That's not even meaningful. The related nature of her various offenses? No shit, Sherlock

[Anonymous No.15004959]

>>15004897
This, but unironically.

[Anonymous No.15004969]

>>15004097
>merely the process that liberates
Which he describes as an inherently "schizophrenic" process. If you cannot see that that is tantamount to idealisation, you are blind.

[Anonymous No.15005115]

>>15004969
>Which he describes as an inherently "schizophrenic" process
yes, see >>15003471. I have already addressed this point. the process and person should not be conflated. A "schizo" is a man in a cage; a schizo going for a walk is no longer a schizo because he is plugged into so many machines that there is no longer an "I" or "self" to speak of.

>that is tantamount to idealisation
I don't want inferences, I want tangible evidence. You can't just say "this is idealisation because this is how I read it and if you don't agree with me, you are wrong". That's just bad intellectual practise.