[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 18 KB, 262x360, kierkegaard.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14793978 No.14793978 [Reply] [Original]

Does he have the best prose of any philosopher?

>> No.14793995
File: 48 KB, 474x528, 88043162d9ac154c5f4d18863bd9080702b36a7ba40567cd8cf935146d863ebd.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14793995

>>14793978
Herd u talkin sum shiet, Kierkegaard.

>> No.14794220

>>14793978
No. It's just poetic and vaguely biblical.
Good Prose should effortlessly and enjoyable plop the form of its meaning into your brain.

>> No.14794249

>>14794220
>plop the form of its meaning into your brain
So the impression I’m getting from your prose is that good prose should take a shit inside your head. You might wanna take your own advice, buddy

>> No.14794279

>>14794249
He already has shit for brains so don't worry

>> No.14794296
File: 173 KB, 527x675, William_James_b1842c.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14794296

>>14793978
Pic related has my vote.

>> No.14794313

>>14794296
This or Plato, varieties of religious experience is beautiful, hard to imagine that it was originally spoken when it reads so well

>> No.14794348

>>14793978
What's amazing is that his prose is fucking terrible, and he's literally only popular in America. Like you can get a bachelors in philosophy in Denmark and encounter him all of twice.

>> No.14794394

Bergson and Nietzsche also give him a run for his money
>>14794348
Ahh thats probably true of most modern philosophers though. You can probably get a bachelors degree of philosophy without touching Heidegger or Wittgenstein either

>> No.14794731

>>14793978

yes

>> No.14795135

>>14793978
>thinks trash pseudo- Hegelian sophistry is good prose.
rethink your position.
Cioran out strips everyone by a country mile.

>> No.14795413

>>14795135
>pseudo-Hegelian
>hated Hegel
?

>> No.14795443

>>14794394
For me Nietzsche was more of a poet\absolute propaganda force of nature

>> No.14795456

>>14794313
>>14794296
I would recommend reading Japan:an attempt at interpretation. The author has a similar prose style and take on things and wrote from around the same time.

>> No.14795461
File: 240 KB, 873x873, Sartre.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14795461

>>14795443
For prose, you know our boi

>> No.14796029
File: 26 KB, 592x512, 1570570060132.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14796029

>>14795456
Thanks mate, i'll check it out.

>> No.14796101

>>14794296
English has many candidates - Bacon, Hobbes, Locke, Hume, Mill, etc.

>> No.14796106

>>14795461
The man was on so much speed he keeps repeating himself

>> No.14796112

>>14795413
Come on guy, you know that half the hegelians hated hegel.

>> No.14796115
File: 4 KB, 162x54, kierkegaard_eyes.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14796115

>>14793978
I say this as an utter, complete, hopeless Kierkegaard fanboy with several thousands of pages of his writings on my bookshelf--Nietzsche is a far superior prose stylist. Honestly, Nietzsche's prose is on par with any writer's; he's really good. Big K is obviously the greatest philosopher, but I wouldn't even say his prose is one of his strengths.

>> No.14796117

>>14795461
Pseud trash

>> No.14796118

>>14796029
Hope you enjoy it, I actually wrote an independent paper on it for a class. Im not particularly interested In japan, but the form of discourse was mesmerizing and was a very satisfying application of early 20th century sociology and well as religious understanding. Funnilly enough, it actually has one of the better short form explanations of high buhdist metaphysics in it. But the rest of it was a delight too. He has a real alice in wonderland serendipity tone to it.

>> No.14796321

>>14794220
not really.
interptetation skills required.
batteries not included.

>> No.14797014
File: 128 KB, 888x888, 1579662972693.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14797014

Kant

>> No.14797018

>>14796115
>greatest philosopher

I love Kierkegaard but come on

>> No.14797040

>>14796118
Not him, but to what extent does it still apply today? How biased is he?

>> No.14798161

>>14797018
name one better

>> No.14798209

Schopenhauer

>> No.14798368

>>14798161
Kant

>> No.14798459

>>14793978
>14793978
Nope Deleuze does

>> No.14798464
File: 221 KB, 540x622, bro.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14798464

>>14798368

>> No.14798465
File: 1.95 MB, 1364x764, Kant-deaf-fuhrer.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14798465

>>14798368
This

>> No.14798593
File: 279 KB, 1200x1412, 1200px-Kant_gemaelde_1[1].jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14798593

>>14798465
daily reminder

>> No.14799212

>>14796101
>Mill
>good writing
damn anglo bugmen

>> No.14799237

>>14798459
Guattari does

>> No.14799281

>>14795461
Really he's hit or miss. I rather enjoyed Words, and his War Journals are very good.

>> No.14799288
File: 12 KB, 128x123, 640827252946370561.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14799288

Join the based /x/ schizocord

https://discord.gg/v8mqzwc

>> No.14799289
File: 467 KB, 821x834, external-content.duckduckgo.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14799289

This includes both his short stories and philosophical essays.

>> No.14799299

>>14793978
Probably Schopenhauer, or as another anon's already said, Bergson.

>> No.14799374

>>14793978
On which criterion? Beauty or clarity?

>> No.14799381

>>14795135
Cioran's pretty good

>> No.14799398
File: 2.14 MB, 1920x2353, Painting_of_David_Hume.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14799398

>>14793978
A lot of people find him dull but Hume gets my vote for his unmatched clarity and near-perfect command of English.

>> No.14799423

>>14796101
Browne, Burton

>> No.14799490

>>14798465
lmao remember that time Hamann btfo the first critique before it was even published

>> No.14799660
File: 58 KB, 302x348, Screenshot from 2020-02-27 13-53-25.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14799660

>>14793978

>> No.14799693

>>14799423
Brilliant prose artists, but not philosophers in the standard sense.

>> No.14800894

>>14798161
Camus

>> No.14801020

>>14794220
yeah, fuck the labour of the negative
BASED REDDITOR

>> No.14801043

>>14794220
Then almost all philosophers have terrible prose since it's their art to tirelessly draw out what could be summarized in a few sentences to pages length and convoluted with the most academic and or bourgeois/pretentious style wording and character.

>> No.14801121

>>14795135
>pseudo-Hegelian
do you know nothing about Kierk or what