[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]

2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

File: 39 KB, 1080x1014, received_1943926565913667.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

14717509

Can you marry the objective with the subjective? Anonymous Thu Feb 13 09:54:58 2020 No.14717509 [Reply] [Original]

>>	Anonymous Thu Feb 13 09:57:37 2020 No.14717517 File: 263 KB, 750x846, 1568237464370.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>14717509

>>	Anonymous Thu Feb 13 09:58:09 2020 No.14717521 >>14717509 no they’ll just hatefuck

>>	Anonymous Thu Feb 13 09:59:01 2020 No.14717525 >>14717509 a subject can know objectively but the object cannot know subjectivity.

>>	Anonymous Thu Feb 13 10:00:01 2020 No.14717529 >>14717521 Lmao.

>>	Anonymous Thu Feb 13 10:01:37 2020 No.14717541 >>14717521 What would be their seed?

>>	Anonymous Thu Feb 13 10:03:08 2020 No.14717548 >>14717509 Yes, see >>14717192

>>	Anonymous Thu Feb 13 10:08:14 2020 No.14717571 >>14717525 Why can a subject know objectively?

>>	Anonymous Thu Feb 13 10:10:33 2020 No.14717582 How do you know you're the subject? There could easily be something (like God) that is the subject and I am the object. Help.

>>	Anonymous Thu Feb 13 10:11:47 2020 No.14717584 >>14717509 look at all art ever

>>	Anonymous Thu Feb 13 10:14:02 2020 No.14717591 >>14717584 That's a great point!

>>	Anonymous Thu Feb 13 10:15:14 2020 No.14717596 >>14717582 Subject in what sense?

>>	Anonymous Thu Feb 13 10:17:57 2020 No.14717613 >>14717517 Yeah Kant did, Hegel also did it but more fully.

>>	Anonymous Thu Feb 13 10:18:24 2020 No.14717616 File: 9 KB, 400x400, received_231195057572554.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>14717584 So let us consider this image. Is there one interpretation?

>>	Anonymous Thu Feb 13 10:18:53 2020 No.14717619 >>14717596 There's something that is seen and something that sees. This is the object and the subject. How does one know they are the one seeing? I could easily be an object to a transcendental subject and have zero subjectivity at all.

>>	Anonymous Thu Feb 13 10:25:04 2020 No.14717654 >>14717619 But can a thing be both? Or are they mutually exclusive?

>>	Anonymous Thu Feb 13 10:28:13 2020 No.14717666 File: 251 KB, 628x350, 1_ZUl9yg8H_EWpsKupv1LN-A.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] It's called the Absolute

>>	Anonymous Thu Feb 13 10:29:04 2020 No.14717672 >>14717654 Yes. The Touched Touching-itself Touching, as explained in Rogozinski's The Ego And The Flesh

>>	Anonymous Thu Feb 13 10:32:11 2020 No.14717690 “Subjectivity is truth.” The Big Søren K.

>>	Anonymous Thu Feb 13 10:35:40 2020 No.14717703 >>14717666 >>14717672 Those are interesting, thank you anons.

>>	Anonymous Thu Feb 13 10:36:57 2020 No.14717715 >>14717690 So Jesus is the subject then?

>>	Anonymous Thu Feb 13 10:37:16 2020 No.14717717 >>14717616 I think it's about the industrial revolution and its consecuences

>>	Anonymous Thu Feb 13 10:38:37 2020 No.14717723 >>14717690 So where is the objective there?

>>	Anonymous Thu Feb 13 10:40:17 2020 No.14717732 File: 14 KB, 471x534, received_487450695510630.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>14717717 Why? Also you didnt attempt to answer the other question there.

>>	Anonymous Thu Feb 13 10:47:52 2020 No.14717766 Nothing is truth, everything is permitted

>>	Anonymous Thu Feb 13 10:49:23 2020 No.14717775 >>14717766 Ok assassino, but that is a truth in itself and hence not nothing. How do you reconcile that?

>>	Anonymous Thu Feb 13 11:35:28 2020 No.14717999 File: 103 KB, 1280x720, EZIO!!!.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>14717766 >>14717775