debating skills

[Anonymous No.14543084]

which books do I need to read in order to be as good at debating as contra

she keeps btfoing everyone on the right without breaking a sweat

[Anonymous No.14543088]

I always got a right leaning vibe from her, if we exclude the tranny stuff.

[Anonymous No.14543096]

>how do i become as good at debating as the person who never actually won a debate with anybody

[Anonymous No.14543098]

>>14543084
It comes with practice, but fucking right wingers in their poop shoots is easy if they aren't economists

[Anonymous No.14543105]

>>14543088
It’s the humor.

[Anonymous No.14543109]

>>14543088
Lol, right wingers always say this when they encounter intelligent leftists.

[Anonymous No.14543110]

GIGANTIC, POWERFUL, VEINY, THROBBING FOREARMS!!!!!!!! HUGE, MASSIVE, POWERFUL FOREARMS TO SMASH ALL WHO OPPOSE YOU!!! LOOK AT THESE THICK MASCULINE HANDS, AS IF HEWN FROM SLABS OF SOLID GRANITE, IMAGINE THE STEEL BUCKLING AND YIELDING UNDER THEIR MIGHT. WHO SHALL OPPOSE YOU WHEN YOU ARE THE TRANNY WITH THE MOST POWERFUL, MASSIVE HANDS, THE BURLIEST, THICKEST MUSCLES? WHEN YOUR INCH-THICK VEINS COURSE WITH THE BLOOD OF TEN MEN, A LEAN MEAN HYDRAULIC SYSTEM BUILT FOR CRUSHING STEEL RODS AND YOUTUBE DEBATE OPPONENTS

[Anonymous No.14543152]

>>14543088
What are you talking about?
Trannies are an inherently right wing phenomenon. They are the fleshy embodiment of our cultural comodification of gender/sex. They constantly pay rent to have an appearance that allows them to play a role in society. Now that secondary sexual characteristics are now purchasable, your social (and sexual) options are further commodified. Economic power the the basis of their existence regardless of what kind of political drool exits their top hole.

[Anonymous No.14543164]

>>14543109
contra isnt intelligent or funny he's astroturfed trash that's literally being propped up by massive evil corporation google.

[Anonymous No.14543168]

>>14543096
>>14543110
I coomed to him pretending to btfo blair white in a post-hoc video blaming the debate on everybody else and conjuring alcoholism and self-loathing as a pejorative accusation/cope against “right wing“ trannies as if pathetic dysfunction isn‘t just regular trannyism

[Anonymous No.14543192]

trannyism is just pederasty-lite

[Anonymous No.14543199]

If you actually break down his/hers arguments, there really isnt anything there. Go watch its video on race and then greentext the argument laid out in the vid.

[Anonymous No.14543207]

>she

[Anonymous No.14543214]

>>14543110
Those Chad tier clavicles

[Anonymous No.14543219]

>>14543152
What kind of moronic take is this?
>trans people buy these things
So what?

[Anonymous No.14543220]

>>14543084
Debates are a sport more than an intellectual pursuit. Arguments and counter-arguments and counter-counter-arguments are memorised. It's the battle arena of the sophist. Only discussions are interesting and can lead to something good.

[Anonymous No.14543221]

>>14543084

She was hotter as a boy

[Anonymous No.14543224]

>>14543084
google ben shapiro bro

[Anonymous No.14543259]

>she keeps btfoing everyone in the right
not that difficult when their arguments are
>>14543110
>>14543152
>>14543164
>>14543168
>>14543192
>>14543199
>>14543207

[Anonymous No.14543263]

>>14543219
How others treat you is a commodity available for purchase

[Anonymous No.14543287]

>>14543263
That can be said of literally anyone

[Anonymous No.14543420]

>>14543259
Its a fucking frog forum. Stop taking it so seriously.

[Anonymous No.14543425]

>>14543287
You can't say cis people are purchasing their way out of one variety of social expectations and into another

[Anonymous No.14543439]

>>14543084
She doesn't debate anyone and she doesn't really btfo anyone. She just states the obvious about how disingenuous modern conservatives are which may seem profound since everyone is focusing on how disingenuous neo liberals are.

[Anonymous No.14543547]

>>14543425
Everyones purchasing reflects their gender identity
Cis people dont purchase "their way out" of anything since they dont have to reacclimate as a different gender, not because theyre less receptive to purchasing or something

[Anonymous No.14543559]

>>14543084
give it up anon. you can't be helped.

[Anonymous No.14543595]

>DUDE MAGENTA LIGHTING
>DUDE I *OWN* MY DEGENERACY HOW'S THAT FEEL /POL/ HAHAHAHAXGGAXXG
>DUDE ENGLISH UPPER CLASS ACCENT DRAWLING IN CONDESCENSION
>LOOK AT MY DEGENERACY GIMMICK I'M A TRANNY/BASEDBOY/CRIPPLED RETARD/WOMAN/[X] AND I FUCKING ****OWN***** IT
>LOOK AT MY RESPECTIVE GIMMICKS MY VAGINA/NEOVAGINA/WIGS/DRESS/WHEELCHAIR/POOR PHYSIQUE/GYNO/BALDING PATE/SMALL PENIS/UGLY COUNTENANCE/INCREMENTS OF PROGRESSIVELY MORE ODIOUS FETISHES/MORBID OBESITY/SATANIC IMAGERY (TAKE ***THAT*** TRADITIONALLY RELIGIOUS ALT RIGHT FUCKTARD CHUCKLEFUCK BUMBLEFUCK RUCKLEDUCK [non sexist, transphobic or homophobic insult here] FOX NEWS WATCHING IDIOTS LMFAOOO)

hate hate hate hate hate

there's nothing I hate worse than these disgustingly pretentious youtube faggots and their grossly fucking stupid midwit fans and hangers on

MASS GRAVES MASS GRAVESMASS GRAVES MASS GRAVESMASS GRAVES MASS GRAVESMASS GRAVES MASS GRAVESMASS GRAVES MASS GRAVESMASS GRAVES MASS GRAVESMASS GRAVES MASS GRAVESMASS GRAVES MASS GRAVESMASS GRAVES MASS GRAVESMASS GRAVES MASS GRAVES

kill them fucking all PLEASE

[Anonymous No.14543732]

>>14543595
based beyond all forms of linguistic communication

[Anonymous No.14543956]

>>14543547
Its not that they are less receptive, it's that their gender identity can be divorced from purchase. The cis don't pay rent to be aknowledged

[Anonymous No.14543983]

>>14543595
>MASS GRAVES MASS GRAVESMASS GRAVES MASS GRAVESMASS GRAVES MASS GRAVESMASS GRAVES MASS GRAVESMASS GRAVES MASS GRAVESMASS GRAVES MASS GRAVESMASS GRAVES MASS GRAVESMASS GRAVES MASS GRAVESMASS GRAVES MASS GRAVESMASS GRAVES MASS GRAVES
beautiful
i wish i could nominate this post for some kind of award, it speaks to me right from the heart

[Anonymous No.14544018]

>>14543084
Can you fuck off with your retarted e-celeb bait? Nobody will remember any of these people in a decade.

[Anonymous No.14544127]

>>14543259
Fuck off Contra LMAO!

[Anonymous No.14544145]

>>14543956
Yes we do, women especially
Fashionable clothes, personal care products like hair spray or beard oil, even some hobbies are purchases made for this purpose. You may interpret these purchases as simply wanting to feel or look "good", divorced from gender, but whatever constitutes "looking good" is still heavily reliant on gender identity. For example, i wouldnt buy clippers to shave my head if it werent better for men to have a shaved head than a costanza horseshoe
When men and women are worried about looking good and trans men and women are concerned about passing, its the same motivation, its just harder to see cis identity as an active choice because it seems so natural

[Anonymous No.14544157]

>>14543152
that's not right wing at all

[Anonymous No.14544168]

>>14543152
>Trannies are an inherently right wing phenomenon
Imagine being this deluded

[Anonymous No.14544172]

>>14544145
he only meant beautiful people sweetie, keep trying though, one day.

[Anonymous No.14544185]

>>14543595
schmood
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LfIdFcWUQxI

[Anonymous No.14544205]

>>14543168
>him
Based

[Anonymous No.14544236]

>>14544145
Those are different things my friend, buying clothes and grooming to look more attractive is very different than purchasing HRT to be treated like another sex. If a cis women don't buy razors to shave their legs they still look female and are recognised and treated as such, but if I don't buy HRT I turn into a man. A desire to not look like an 'ugly' [insert gender] is very different than paying rent to not look like [insert gender]. Even if what you're arguing was correct (a conflation of attractiveness, gender, and physical sex) you're arguing for a socially conformed rent seeking, a support of which is conservative/right leaning.

[Anonymous No.14544240]

Predict when is he going to suicide. I give him 10 years tops.

[Anonymous No.14544243]

>>14543084
god i want to wrap my lips around her cock and feel her cum shoot down my throat while she grabs my hair and slaps me for being a piece of shit reactionary

[Anonymous No.14544248]

>>14543084
No idea who this is but I guarantee they're a tranny and I don't listen to people who let sexuality control their entire life

[Anonymous No.14544250]

>what book do I need to be good at _________
/lit/ needs to read Mishima and realize you'll only get good at something if you practice. Books are for knowledge, not action.

[Anonymous No.14544254]

>>14543595
Most based post I've seen this decade

[Anonymous No.14544394]

>>14544172
I fail to see how the two arent both just buying products to better fit a gender identity, trans women just need more extreme means
Of course cis women have it easier, since not shaving legs or face doesnt make people, using traditional conventions, think of them as male, but you're incorrect if people dont consider them less female or less feminine
I also contest this whole "paying rent" framework. There are certainly social roles and gender norms that many feel they need to meet (and these norms are definitely exploited and commoditized, particularly for women), but it isn't really a case for gender identity supporting capitalism, more so just an example of how this system manifests in a capitalist economy

[Anonymous No.14544418]

>>14544394
>what are expanding markets
>what is economy of desire

[Anonymous No.14544606]

>>14544418
Again, its really just gender roles playing out in capitalism, not trans people intentionally promoting capitalism
A conspicuous percent of lgbtq people are far left as well, more than would be explained by the lefts social progressiveness

[Anonymous No.14544626]

>>14544606
Again, I never said it was intentional. Nor did I say we can't be left in our thought, I am merely acknowledging the reality that my actions embody the progression of the market commodification through all aspects of humanity

[Anonymous No.14544670]

>>14544626
But participating in capitalism doesnt mean condoning it, and DEFINITELY doesnt make you part of a right wing phenomenon
It just means you live under capitalism

[Anonymous No.14544685]

>>14543425
um, ever seen pretty woman bud

[Anonymous No.14544694]

>tfw left-wingers watch some tranny on youtube and think this BTFOs the right wing

Not literature by the way.

[Anonymous No.14544731]

>>14544670
It doesn't mean you can donate but it does mean you're part of a right-wing phenomenon. I don't condone outsourcing but I do purchase products from underpaid foreign workers and by doing so I promote outsourcing a right-wing phenomenon.

[Anonymous No.14544967]

>>14543110
it makes me kinda sad knowing that contra would actually hate seeing this picture, since they're very concerned about passing and all

[Anonymous No.14544987]

>>14543595
pathetic

[Anonymous No.14544992]

Debates come down to rhetoric.

If you can convince the audience, you've won, even if your points are factually wrong.

[Anonymous No.14545011]

>>14543084
>debating
imagine spending time on the most useless hobby

[Anonymous No.14545039]

>>14544967
I guarantee she's seen it many times
She's kind of brushed it off in videos, but transitioning while making videos arguing against internet fascists is such a lightningrod for virulent hate i can't even imagine

[Anonymous No.14545059]

>>14543084
Contra is a sophist, you don't want to be able to debate like him.

[Anonymous No.14545068]

>>14544992
Literally not true. That's just the dumbshit zoomer interpretation.

[Anonymous No.14545079]

>>14545059
>sophist
>uses the socratic method

Literally the diametric opposite.

[Anonymous No.14545128]

>>14543595

Why am I laughing so hard wtf

[Anonymous No.14545202]

>>14544243
me too. are there any photos of her feet or anything floating around?

[Anonymous No.14545231]

>>14543595
Literally seething

[Anonymous No.14545232]

>>14545202
why are trannies always big dudes? im a relatively small guy, been trying to gain weight and muscle my whole life, i often get mistaken for a girl, etc.

and i see these behemoth trannies online, 5'10+ 140lbs+ huge frames, big masculine hands, strong well defined jaws, beautiful bicep insertions, long legs, toned torso. it's just not fair, it feels like a personal insult. if i had a fame like this i'd pack on 30lbs of muscle and rule the world.

[Anonymous No.14545238]

>>14543084
What? Doesn't contra literally just create strawmen and then knock them down?

[Anonymous No.14545242]

>>14545232
There is a definite correlation between ultra high T and autogynephilia, I mean among the ranks of famous MtF trannies you have an Olympic athlete, high-ranking SEAL, jet pilots etc

[Anonymous No.14545251]

>>14543595
This is based beyond comprehension

[Anonymous No.14545265]

>>14543084
>destroys the entire left wing

[Anonymous No.14545268]

>>14543595
/thread

[Anonymous No.14545278]

>>14543595
>this passion
>this sincerity

[Anonymous No.14545284]

Capitalism is not what divides left and right you dumb fart sniffing commies. This is literally just some shit that YOU made up and are trying to force on the rest of us.

[Anonymous No.14545296]

>>14545284
Based

[Anonymous No.14545308]

>>14543084
Just know about the topic you're talking about. That's more than most people can do.

[Anonymous No.14545318]

>>14544694
She's got a phd in philosophy

[Anonymous No.14545326]

>>14545318
nuh uh

[Anonymous No.14545340]

>>14543595
>MASS GRAVES MASS GRAVESMASS GRAVES MASS GRAVESMASS GRAVES MASS GRAVESMASS GRAVES MASS GRAVESMASS GRAVES MASS GRAVESMASS GRAVES MASS GRAVESMASS GRAVES MASS GRAVESMASS GRAVES MASS GRAVESMASS GRAVES MASS GRAVESMASS GRAVES MASS GRAVES
Powerful post

[Anonymous No.14545341]

>>14545318
Pretty sure he's a drop out.

[Anonymous No.14545349]

>>14545265
Actually this. These madlads can only be supressed by globohomo corportaions, they cannot be refuted.

[Anonymous No.14545369]

>>14545265
You know, Alt Hype definitely annoys me at times because he wades into topics he's clearly clueless on with the same cocksure attitude as when he's working with stats... he's especially weak on philosophy and his history always sounds like he crammed on a topic to make a video BUTTT

all that being said he eviscerated Contra in that vid. Like no stone left unturned, "stop he's already dead" level of dunking. Made all Contra's dumb tranny set pieces and smart-ass quips just seem kinda sad

[Anonymous No.14545388]

>>14545284
Then what does?
Hint: liberals arent leftists

[Anonymous No.14545398]

>>14545265
Only ever seen his rebuttal of shaun's bell curve vid after an anon posted it here
Was really pathetic

[Anonymous No.14545426]

>>14545341
nah, she's talked about working on academia before

[Anonymous No.14545461]

>>14545426
She was a phd student but never finished it

[Anonymous No.14545472]

>>14545388
HINT: They fucking are
Go look at any dictionary, ask any person on the street.
Literally the only people who think leftist = communist are dumb faggots on /lit/

[Anonymous No.14545486]

>>14543084
Holy fuck she's so hot.

[Anonymous No.14545487]

>>14545426
Counterpoints makes a big deal out of the PhD thing but it sounds like he wasn't even ABD, he just dropped out of the first or second year of coursework.

Which doesn't mean anything, I'm getting a PhD in Philosophy and I'm the last person to pull rank about this gay-ass shit, but I'm just saying for the record.

[Anonymous No.14545489]

>>14543595
Moving. Powerful. Brave.

[Anonymous No.14545499]

>>14544185
oh shit

[Anonymous No.14545507]

>>14543152
fantastic fucking post

[Anonymous No.14545518]

>>14545388
Civilization.

[Anonymous No.14545529]

>>14543152
Is being able to buy things = right wing?

[Anonymous No.14545539]

>>14543152
It's also gay conversion therapy, marketed more successfully this time around.

Androgyny's cool, but putting on a dress and paying a subscription to a pharmaceutical company to be a walking stereotype? What the fuck is that?

[Anonymous No.14545548]

>>14545369
just watched it
>he
>marxoid
>pretends cluster analysis is "99% correct" when it is shown not to be on the screen
>pulls up a fucking socialism death toll, blames it on "race denial"
>the people who beat hitler were white nationalists!
>denies race's role in colonialism
>praises colonial powers for "giving up their empires"
>praises european empires for ENDING slavery
am i expected to take this seriously?

[Anonymous No.14545550]

>>14545529
drinking water that isn't from a river is right wing and capitalist and libcucks can't accept it

[Anonymous No.14545554]

>>14545529
not him, but i think it'd be more accurate to say that the trannies themselves aren't right wing, but they are definitely products of a completely commodified society, a right-wing phenomenon broadly speaking. an identity that literally cannot exist in the absence of major pharmaceutical companies and rigid, easily parseable gender roles.
his "pay rent to have an appearance that allows them to play a role in society" hit it pretty nicely.

[Anonymous No.14545576]

>>14543595
God bless you anon, though you're sanity is broken, you have become based, destroyer of trannies

[Anonymous No.14545597]

>>14545548
do you actually live with black people near you?

[Anonymous No.14545613]

>>14545554
>an identity that literally cannot exist in the absence of major pharmaceutical companies and rigid, easily parseable gender roles
i might be nitpicking, but the identity exists regardless of access to hormone therapy
also, medicine and pharmaceuticals are not essentially right-wing nor capitalist, and parseable gender roles arent, either
the phrase "pay rent to have an appearance that allows them to play a role in society" applies no more to trans people and hormone therapy than it does to cis people and clothes, self-care products, haircuts and shaving, and arguably even gym memberships

[Anonymous No.14545616]

ITT: seething horny incels <---

[Anonymous No.14545618]

>>14545529
His premise is that capitalism = right wing
Which isn't true.

[Anonymous No.14545621]

>>14545597
yes, i live in chicago
funnily enough, my city has a fucked up history of racial segregation so very few black people actually live in my neighborhood

[Anonymous No.14545624]

>>14543084
Hahaha why is that dude wearing lipstick haha

[Anonymous No.14545628]

>>14545548
>He questions my assumptions
wow great refutation.

[Anonymous No.14545631]

>>14545554
>definitely products of a completely commodified society
that is a basic leftist point

[Anonymous No.14545633]

>>14545621
so no. shocking.

why don't you move into a black neighborhood anon? and give up your privileged address to a person of color.

[Anonymous No.14545634]

There isn't a single book recommendation ITT.

[Anonymous No.14545637]

>>14545621
>i live in chicago

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9YTO6wus8s0

[Anonymous No.14545638]

>>14545628
i think you misunderstood
the only thing i said there that would be an assumption of mine that he is challenging is the bullshit about colonialism and slavery
would you like to "challenge my assumptions" there?

[Anonymous No.14545639]

>>14545613
i disagree. the contemporary trans thing is completely contingent on access to artificial hormones.
right. that's the point he's making. that being trans is as left-wing and transgressive as a girl being really into makeup tutorials and a guy being really into sports cars.

[Anonymous No.14545641]

>>14545618
His premise seems to be
If you can't escape capitalism, then you're right wing

[Anonymous No.14545651]

>>14545641
oh noooo im a victim of my own weakness and comfortability! oh noooooooooooooo! noooo!

[Anonymous No.14545652]

>>14543084
What happened to Milo???

Milo vs. Contra when???

[Anonymous No.14545659]

>>14545633
>so no
i only said my neighborhood. i interact with and am around black people in everyday life
regardless, i completely resent the argument youre using that black people are so self-evidently inferior that being near them means you become racist. as if being so closed-minded that you cant sympathize with people who look different from you is not indicative of personal troubles, but the inferioirity of an entire race
>>14545637
upvoted for tired old low hanging fruit

[Anonymous No.14545665]

>>14545638
>He says thing
I can't even

[Anonymous No.14545668]

>>14545202
Shes fine. Look at that tuck.

[Anonymous No.14545670]

>>14545641
what if ben shapiro can't escape capitalism? what if he's just a victim of the bigger system? i guess he's basically politically neutral.

[Anonymous No.14545675]

>>14545651
Well that's a response that does not address the argument at all. It's also quite gay.

[Anonymous No.14545681]

>>14545631
i think this whole exchange proves that left and right are shit categories. capitalism is both right-wing and leftist, apparently.

[Anonymous No.14545682]

>>14545659
>black people are so self-evidently inferior
i actually respect their murderous violence and think they are superior because of it - the last of mankind trying to resist this technocratic oppression of comfort and leisure. it's interesting that you would assume the opposite thing though, is that a bit of projection? the criminal is the last honest man in an unlawful world.

[Anonymous No.14545688]

>>14545472
sorry but no
you fail politics

[Anonymous No.14545692]

>>14545670
>the bigger system
?
Are you insinuating capitalism is a jewish thing? You people can drop the oblique references and innuendo. This is an anonymous board; you don't need to maintain cover.

[Anonymous No.14545694]

>>14545659
yeah living in chicago doesn't make one see blacks as inferior at all lmfao

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3MbCtiu4w-g
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CjD213lxt3E
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aqT08Ld_LW4
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EAGREL8_sOQ

fuck you disingenuous faggot

[Anonymous No.14545695]

>>14545548
>>the people who beat hitler were white nationalists!
they were
>>praises european empires for ENDING slavery
they did
>praises colonial powers for "giving up their empires"
they did

[Anonymous No.14545700]

>>14545548
It took me a minute to realize your first bullet point was literally you calling me out for not using Contra's preferred pronouns lol. And what's with this 4chan thing of putting retarded strawman bullet point summaries in greentext like you've refuted something?

Go ahead and regale me with stories of how Allied soldiers hoped to turn their countries over to brown people someday, or how Europe is somehow responsible for the remaining slavery in the world today, I'm all ears

The Contra video was like a Newsweek-tier tour of every race denial fallacy since the 80s, it's indefensibly bad

[Anonymous No.14545703]

>>14545681
All it proves is that commies are delusionally trying to redefine categories to suit their own feelings.
Both left and right contain capitalist and anti capitalist ideology, that does not somehow mean that left and right mean nothing.

[Anonymous No.14545705]

>>14545694
shut the fuck up as if you know more about the place i was born and raised because of some fucking youtube outrage videos
>>14545682
trolling isnt helping anyone here. at least argue in good faith

[Anonymous No.14545709]

>>14545705
this is every day on the CTA you niggerloving retard, i am not even racist but at least i can admit these people are badly fucked and criticize them for it

you're the one repeatedly arguing in bad faith you chapo tourist punch-pulling faggot who still wants to be an internet cool kid, stop failing to fit in and kill yourself. skip the next DSA meeting and just do it

[Anonymous No.14545711]

>>14545682
lmao, the assumption that they're crusading against the system and not just playing into the system the incorrect way. i'm CRYING senpai, you're me at 16.
>>14545692
what? i'm saying that the previous argument stated that tranny shit isn't right-wing, because their right-wing traits are just inevitable products of their participation in capitalist society. they're not capitalist agents, they're victims of capitalism. this argument can be applied to every person in a capitalist society, including sincere right-wingers, so it's a bad argument. "the bigger system" here refers to capitalism, stop being so online.
>>14545703
whatever, it would've been better for that guy to say tranny stuff is only here thanks to capitalism.

[Anonymous No.14545719]

>>14545681
The to sides deal with it differently. This thread is not a serious discussion.

The basic difference is the left sees this as a problem and the right pretty much defends, ignores, or apologizes for the consequences of capitalism, including commodification.

The right is affected by alienation/commodification as we all are, but how they propose to solve the problems they create are different. Capitalism is off limits. Instead, lets unload the weaker elements of society and play hide and seek with our antisemitism.

[Anonymous No.14545720]

>>14543595
Quite possibly the most based post i have ever witnessed on 4 Chan(nel)

[Anonymous No.14545726]

>>14545719
>right pretty much defends, ignores, or apologizes for the consequences of capitalism, including commodification
only people i see defending this particular strain of commodification (identity-pills) are lefties tho

[Anonymous No.14545734]

>>14545681
False, baby with bathwater

>>14545703
>left and right contain capitalist and anti capitalist ideology
True, and what does the anti-capitalist right propose to do?

[Anonymous No.14545736]

>>14543595
Thank you anon. Very powerful.

[Anonymous No.14545737]

>>14545695
>they did end slavery and gave up empires
my point was obviously that framing it that way is hopelessly reductive at best and racist lying at worst
he uses that to gloss over the deep racial justification for colonial genocide and slavery and literal centuries of racial injustice to follow
>they were white nationalist too
yes, but he used that to try to argue that it was okay just because they beat a "worse" version of racial pseudoscience, which it doesnt and them being white nationalists is still worth condemning
>>14545700
i was calling out alternative hypothesis actually, but i suppose it applies to you too
>how Allied soldiers hoped to turn their countries over to brown people someday
i dont suppose they did and considering that nothing of the sort is happening at all makes me wonder why you even said this
>or how Europe is somehow responsible for the remaining slavery in the world today
ive never heard anyone argue this ever. the only case i can imagine someone holding this position is if it is in a region destabalized directly from european slavery or colonization

[Anonymous No.14545744]

>>14545734
Overturn or restrict capitalism.

[Anonymous No.14545748]

>>14545705
>at least argue in good faith
you first.

[Anonymous No.14545754]

>>14545726
>commodification (identity-pills)
If you look at the consequences of commodification and how it dominates and totally shapes our lives, and you think "I don't like trannies" then, yes, you are a right winger.

That's my point; capitalism is off limits. Lets pick on the queers because their the real problem.

[Anonymous No.14545756]

>>14545734
"baby with bathwater"
I haven't read anything in this thread, I just saw this phrase and immediately thought of Jordan Peterson.

[Anonymous No.14545758]

>>14545232
>5'10
>140
>big
How small are you kek

[Anonymous No.14545764]

>>14545758
im 5'2 and 100lbs why?

[Anonymous No.14545770]

>>14545744
How exactly? By voting Republican and trolling?

>>14545756
I can't tell what you were thinking

[Anonymous No.14545773]

>>14545737
>yes, but he used that to try to argue that it was okay
He does not
He uses this to argue against the framing of "race realists" as nazis, as their ideology beat the Nazis.
>my point was obviously that framing it that way is hopelessly reductive at best and racist lying at worst
>he uses that to gloss over the deep racial justification for colonial genocide and slavery and literal centuries of racial injustice to follow
Nuh uh
He uses it to defend white nations from the viewpoint that there are sins that need to be paid for by showing the positive effects of their influence. He does not deny nor downplay slavery, as shown by the fact that he uses the occidental empires' ending of slavery as a strong good.
>i dont suppose they did and considering that nothing of the sort is happening at all makes me wonder why you even said this
America will be majority brown by the end of the century if predictions hold.
>ive never heard anyone argue this ever.
Good

[Anonymous No.14545774]

>>14543595
I'm in tears

[Anonymous No.14545776]

>>14545748
do you suspect me of not believing what i'm saying? if so, tell me where or what i said
>>14545709
>this is every day on the cta
very interesting, didnt know you rode every day, next time you do say hi
>im not racist but
i dont have any point to add, but this was a hilariously conspicous "but"
>at least i can admit these people are badly fucked and criticize them for it
i never claimed any of the people you cherrypicked are above criticism and they arent.
however, when you say "these people" are badly fucked up and deserve criticism in the same sentence as calling me a "niggerloving retard" im led to believe that simple criticism of their behavior isnt what you want

[Anonymous No.14545783]

>miles and miles and miles and miles of text devoted to the argument that blacks are not inferior
is this not simply proof in itself?

[Anonymous No.14545787]

>>14545754
>>14545770
Who the fuck do you think you're talking to?
Its obvious that you do not understand the right and have never even tried to understand it either.

[Anonymous No.14545790]

>>14545754
that's not what i'm saying, you disingenuous cunt of a person. i'm saying that the consequences of commodification include tranny shit, and by bolstering aforementioned astroturfed pharmaceutical marketing campaign, you're bolstering the commodification of society, shit-for-brains.
what YOU're saying is that we can't point out the more degrading, dehumanizing consequences of technocapital's long march because TV said it was bad right-wingy talk. nonce. you're why marxism is dead.
and it's they're, not their, dummy.

your identity comes in a bottle that you buy from a pharmacy, and that's a good thing, and if you disagree, you're just confusing the issue! i'm against capitalism, but i will defend all of its abuses until the end of time!

[Anonymous No.14545793]

>>14545548
>>pretends cluster analysis is "99% correct" when it is shown not to be on the screen
Links are in the description
>>pulls up a fucking socialism death toll, blames it on "race denial"
Yes, so?
No he didn't, just that socialists are retarded for talking about genocides of others when it is so easily thrown back at them

[Anonymous No.14545795]

>>14545776
>conSPICous
>niggerloving retard

dude stop with the burro whistles.

[Anonymous No.14545796]

>>14545202
I got you

[Anonymous No.14545798]

>>14543084
unironically practice on a board like /pol/, usually the difference between politicians is they spend more time learning to speak

[Anonymous No.14545801]

>>14545737
>nothing of the sort is happening

It's 4, 5 years max before Texas flips blue from Hispanic migration and you don't have a fucking democracy anymore

Real rich of you to talk about good faith

[Anonymous No.14545807]

>>14545796
>those size 12s

stoop im coooooooooooooooooooo

[Anonymous No.14545813]

[Anonymous No.14545819]

>>14545801
Isn't it funny how the left lied through their teeth and the boomers cared only about retirement so America is now headed toward a long, slow decline?

[Anonymous No.14545828]

>>14545796
>tfw even the highest ospices of intellect cannot escape from the rapacious talons of consumerist-pseudo-culture de-ifying relevance and meaning from all life
Neat product! Can’t wait to buy/not ask questions/wait for next new product

[Anonymous No.14545831]

>>14545787
Care to post something with substance?

[Anonymous No.14545839]

>>14545819
country's still mortgaging its future. it's funny that millennials dunk on boomers for not caring about the next generation, but we're no better. if anything, we're fucking the forthcoming generations much harder.
>>14545828
no, you don't GET it. i've categorized him as a transgressive person in my own head, so nothing he does can be just the same as what oprah winfrey does.

[Anonymous No.14545841]

>>14545828
>the right using lefty arguments just to reeee

oo oo lemme try
>you live in america
>therefore you support the american leader

[Anonymous No.14545842]

She's so beautiful.

[Anonymous No.14545845]

>>14545841
we've established that being anti-capitalist isn't necessarily right-wing, keep up with the conversation.

[Anonymous No.14545846]

>>14545700
>It took me a minute to realize your first bullet point was literally you calling me out for not using Contra's preferred pronouns lol.
Are you alt-hype lol? Your videos for the past month have bored me to tears because you've said the same things like 100 times. Make more videos on contemporary politics or history, or talk about that Free Soil movement from way back. You peaked with Jared Diamond. Still... the only YouTuber I consistently watch.

[Anonymous No.14545854]

And the award for Most Based Post of 2020 goes to...


>>14543595 ! Congratulations!

[Anonymous No.14545855]

>>14545846
>because you've said the same things like 100 times
Because the left doesn't learn from their mistakes on race and IQ

[Anonymous No.14545856]

I know that practically all faggots are left-wing and that we've got plenty of those around here, but do heterosexual leftist also act gay or what?

[Anonymous No.14545858]

>>14543595
>kill them fucking all PLEASE
>PLEASE

[Anonymous No.14545862]

>>14545709
>>14545709
I give this lightweight 2 years tops

[Anonymous No.14545864]

>>14545839
The struggle required to "fix" America would cost too much and the media would not allow it.

[Anonymous No.14545865]

>>14545855
their religion prevents them from doing so, anon.

[Anonymous No.14545867]

>>14545700
>retarded strawman
Not always strawmen, but sometimes they are
Also nuke the brainlet Nick Fuentes from orbit Mr. Hype

[Anonymous No.14545868]

reminder that this dude started out as an unironic atheist commentator on yt, and will block anyone that brings it up

[Anonymous No.14545871]

>>14545839
>this dude in a dress is more than Oprah Winfrey for tech savvy zoomers
Holy shit anon tell me another one

>>14545841
>left/right dichotomy
O dang, I see it’s too late for you...

[Anonymous No.14545873]

>>14545868
further proof that the venn diagram of incels and trans people is more or less a circle

[Anonymous No.14545883]

>>14545871
i was clearly being sarcastic, you fucking spaz. or maybe you are too, i dunno at this point.

[Anonymous No.14545884]

>>14545858
>dies from hungrily ingesting chemicals in obedience to societally lauded mental illness
Lol?

[Anonymous No.14545888]

>>14545773
here is a transcript of him talking about colonialism and slavery
>he then proceeds to make just some really irresponsible claims. for example, the claim that 'colonialism and slavery were justified by racism'. of course this is just retconning. Europe was just doing what all states have done, which is to expand and conquer as much as they can get away with
>the only thing unique about the european empires was how they took over most of the world and then decided to give up their empires without them being taken away from them militarily or from collapsing internally. conquering and enslaving was the norm for all of human existence
>what was unique about europe was not that they did it but that europe eventually ended it
given the context, it is absolutely clear that when he offers the argument that "everyone was doing it", he is trying to put european actions above others, as you said, but also to downplay the negatives as not atypical to european expansion. in doing so completely IGNORING the countless racial justifications and motivations that are inseparable from it
>America will be majority brown by the end of the century if predictions hold
first, "if predictions hold" is an important condition
also, since i guess we're talking about america specifically, i presume the "brown" youre referring to is latinos and blacks. turns out at the time these white nationalist soldiers were fighting for their white ethnostate america was already not a white ethnostate (although blacks were arguably below citizenship at the time). also latinos who, as a race, are a mixture of indigenous and white colonial blood. in the very figure i criticized, amerindians get clustered as white, as do south asians (indians, bangladeshi, pakistani) and "other"
so according to this genetic clustering, its actually white people migrating from latin america, congrats!
>>14545793
i address your first point above
>he doesnt blame socialism death toll on race denial
and i quote: "look, theyre bigger, theyre more recent, and unlike nazism the kind of bizarro, blank slate marxoid thinking that led to these atrocities are actually more inline with whats popular in universities than the dreaded race realists"

[Anonymous No.14545890]

>>14543595
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_oFyI5vlkec

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dm8KpltgMFM

[Anonymous No.14545891]

>>14545871
>>14545883
i was the oprah one

[Anonymous No.14545893]

>>14545883
!!!!
The ultra-rare only-pretending-to-be-retarded shiny jigglypuff?!?!

anon I don’t give a fuck, we aren’t friends lol

[Anonymous No.14545895]

>>14545884
And yet you're still the one who is upset enough to post?

[Anonymous No.14545899]

>>14545893
i give a fuck, the loss of a healthy sense of irony and verbal chicanery around here has made things too fucking stuffy!

[Anonymous No.14545902]

>>14545888
>bizarro, blank slate marxoid thinking that led to these atrocities are actually more inline with whats popular in universities
This is not race denial he's talking about here, just socialist thought
>turns out at the time these white nationalist soldiers were fighting for their white ethnostate america was already not a white ethnostate
They sure wanted it to be i.e. segregation, pro-white immigration policies, et cetera
At the very least they were white supremacist

[Anonymous No.14545906]

>>14545895
>telling someone that X behavior will kill them is being upset
I am sure you have plenty of pain and I feel bad about that but people can’t help you if you won’t get your head out of your ass

[Anonymous No.14545907]

>>14545754
>>14545790
care to respond, radlib? it's been a half an hour.

[Anonymous No.14545908]

>>14543084
Considering she was a Philosophy PhD dropout, I think she had a good grasp on arguments.

I sub to her, but I don't agree with every thing she has put out there. For example, she tried to give fatties a free pass for their fatness.

[Anonymous No.14545909]

>>14545908
what was the pro-fat argument?

[Anonymous No.14545914]

>>14545845
>contra is a commodity
>she should really stfu

anticapitalist right itt is being used as an in attack contra on a point she and anyone who pays attention would probably agree with. you have no points to make other than "contra bad"

[Anonymous No.14545920]

>>14545813
am i gay for being attracted to this

[Anonymous No.14545921]

>>14545914
no, what that means is that the anticapitalist right itt is has a point and that contrapoints and his parasocial paypigs are hypocrites.

[Anonymous No.14545924]

>>14545920
no because shes a woman

[Anonymous No.14545928]

>>14545908
That doesn't mean shit. Anybody can get into a Philosophy PhD program. He clearly wasn't in a prestigious or exclusive one, he was probably in a fake one that requires you to pay your own way. Those are basically diploma mills for the gullible.

[« Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ » !!oI3er5KKetj No.14545930]

>>14545920
Or bisexual more likely.

[Anonymous No.14545934]

>>14545920
You’re just mislead by someone sophisticated enough to understand how male visual reception works (which is not really that sophisticated)
Tl;dr no
>>14545924
HAHAHAAHAHAAAAHAHAAA

[Anonymous No.14545935]

>>14545930
away with you.

[Anonymous No.14545937]

>>14545688
>provides no arguments
>I win!!!
Ok retard

[Anonymous No.14545938]

>>14545920
you are a man attracted to a man, yes you are a homosexual

[Anonymous No.14545941]

>>14545790
>i'm against capitalism, but i will defend all of its abuses until the end of time!
I didn't respond because we found agreement. Thank you for defending trannies.

[Anonymous No.14545943]

>>14545920
No.

[Anonymous No.14545945]

>>14545921
do you also think socialists are hypocrites for owning iphones and going to grocery stores?
>>14545928
this whole post is just unfounded cope

[« Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ » !!oI3er5KKetj No.14545946]

>>14545935

[Anonymous No.14545952]

>>14545930

[Anonymous No.14545957]

>tfw you have your weekly moment of "jesus fucking christ I live in the epoch where men are becoming self-mutilating transvestite sex perverts showing their cocks to kids in public and everyone is so infantilized and braindead and cut off from reality that they think this is some kind of left-wing political movement" too-awakeness to how fucking bad everything is

[Anonymous No.14545960]

>>14545920
you're gay for asking, for even having to ask. by opening this thread and looking at that image, you're a gay man.
>>14545941
you unironically agree with that statement? you some kind of unhinged maniac?
>>14545945
yes, they are hypocrites. especially if the socialists are the ones making stupid-big profits from iphone-owning and grocery store going-to.

[Anonymous No.14545967]

>>14545945
>do you also think socialists are hypocrites for owning iphones and going to grocery stores?

Why would you even ask this as a rhetorical question expecting anything other than a perfectly unrhetorical yes?

[Anonymous No.14545968]

>>14545957
Fuck

[Anonymous No.14545975]

>>14545921
If you were truly interested in changing capitalism that post might mean something other than "contra bad"

>tfw even the highest ospices of intellect cannot escape from the rapacious talons of consumerist-pseudo-culture
i agree, but shes closer than you are

[Anonymous No.14545978]

>>14545957
dude just watch comfy mid 90s movies and keep 70 days worth of food in your closet. it'll blow over when china nukes us.

[Anonymous No.14545979]

>>14545967
>>14545960
how are they supposed to make phone calls then?

[Anonymous No.14545984]

>>14545960
No, but if you do, you should have no problem with trannies

[Anonymous No.14545986]

>>14545957
i feel you.
reading a book about the rise of singapore and everything that took, and it just makes me realize that this isn't a serious country.
>>14545975
>i've pinned you as a rabid capitalist, since you're a strawman that i've invented! you love capitalism! so your argument is wrong! i-in fact, it's not even an argument at all!
>>14545979
they don't. write letters like an actual fucking rebel.

[Anonymous No.14545989]

>>14545986
ok but how do they eat without grocery stores

[Anonymous No.14545991]

>>14545945
>do you also think socialists are hypocrites for owning iphones and going to grocery stores?

Notice how this jew mixed a true hypocrisy
>socialists owning iphones
with hyperbole
>socialists going to grocery stores
1/10 you gotta do better than that.

[Anonymous No.14545994]

>>14545984
there's been something going on here, and it's really fucking freaky. nobody can parse irony or sarcasm, or any kind of subtext.
that line was a parody of you and your argument. that's what you believe, and that's why you defend the five year-old sacred cow of gender pill distribution. get it?
>>14545989
farms. eating cum, whatever works.

[Anonymous No.14545995]

>>14545991
i didnt use it as a dishonest arguing tactic since i actually think owning an iphone is not hypocritical for an anti-capitalist

[Anonymous No.14545998]

>>14545888
Lol I would call you out for trips but I used to post on MPC where 888 is code for wall-of-text drivel and it's fitting here

Quoting Ryan on colonialism just throws into relief how obviously persuasive his points are and how obtuse yours are - you never proved that racial motives for expansion were unique to the european empires just like you never proved that their VOLUNTARY RENUNCIATION of those empires wasn't unique.

And really, hats off, kudos on the next-level deflection re: the browning of America. They're actually white immigrants guys, cluster analysis BTFO! Why do you people always pivot to these gotcha points whenever you might have to admit that Hart-Cellar led to irreversible, large-scale demographic change? Like we know you don't think the census data is an alt-right conspiracy theory so what is it?

[Anonymous No.14545999]

>>14545995
you're wrong, then. go fly a kite, wrong-y.

[Anonymous No.14546008]

>>14543084
>she

[Anonymous No.14546011]

>>14545986
Well, you're not interested in talking about HOW the right is anticapitalist outside of >>14545828

Which leads me to believe >>14545914

[Anonymous No.14546013]

>>14546011
what's the topic of this thread? scroll up to the top for me and read it. look at the picture. who's in that picture?

[Anonymous No.14546027]

>>14545998
>you never proved that racial motives for expansion were unique to the european empires just like you never proved that their VOLUNTARY RENUNCIATION of those empires wasn't unique
good thing i never argued either of those points
also, capitalizing voluntary renunciation strikes me as implying european empires chose to forfeit land, which isnt really the case most of the time as civil unrest and desires for freedom were commonplace in colonies. not to mention that many independent nations gained independence through armed conflict such as, oh, i dunno... the united states
youll have to forgive me for toying around with the demographics point, because the idea of the "browning" of a country or any demographic shift being a bad thing is so blatently founded on an assumption of white supremacy that its not really something worth taking seriously

[Anonymous No.14546029]

>>14545995
Iphones are a prime example of using planned obsolescence to sell new products and are manufactured in non-union sweatshops under hard conditions.

[Anonymous No.14546038]

>>14546029
nah, man. it's totally valid to prop up every single strand and fiber of a corporate power structure and also oppose it and also not be a hypocrite, don't be a nazi. (being sarcastic, everyone. this is an ironic post.)

[Anonymous No.14546045]

>>14545994
oh, got it.

still
>you're bolstering the commodification of society
i guess so. pick your battles. priorities. proportionality. to me economic and social justice is more important than trannies. the differences between left and right, amirite?

basically this >>14545754

[Anonymous No.14546047]

>>14546029
combined with the non-competition of the phone industry they become a near perfect symbol of the pitfalls of capitalism
which makes it deliciously ironic that ant-capitalists still need to buy them if they want to be a legitimate member of society
steve jobs must be laughing in his gilded grave

[Anonymous No.14546061]

>>14546013
Yes, this is a lets stroke ourselves and dump on Contra thread.

[Anonymous No.14546066]

>>14546045
>yeah, i'm supporting the system i oppose, but whatever man. my brain's set against itself, because i'm too fucked by capital to actually mount a defense against it. it's cool.
coward, phony, liberal. you wouldn't know economic or social justice if it sat on your face.

>>14546061
and it's an anticapitalist method of dumping on this e-celebrity. why's that bad? would you prefer a capitalist way of dumping on this person? would you like it if i did it with a hat on?

[Anonymous No.14546084]

>>14546061
are you one of the patreon paypigs? don't lie, you'll be cheating yourself as much as me.

[Anonymous No.14546090]

>>14543084
Nice bait. Contra is the definition of a propagandist.

[Anonymous No.14546094]

>>14545754
>Lets pick on the queers because their the real problem
This isn't debating this is propaganda. Nobody pushed this narrative, you just created it in totally in your head. People take issue with the LGBT political movement for its various outcome results (e.g. subtly pushing pedophilia, open deviancy, etc). Like Contra, you argue in terribly bad faith and are more interested in hearing yourself talk. Contra is an amazingly hilarious figure to me, because he relies on an entirely falsely constructed narrative and flashy graphics to assert himself. This is just very low tier propaganda, but I am unsurprised he has gathered a dumb herd to parrot his empty talking points.

[Anonymous No.14546100]

>>14546066
>social justice
Cult materialist religion. Go start a commune and leave the rest of humanity alone.

[Anonymous No.14546106]

>>14546027
>civil unrest and desires for freedom were commonplace in colonies

Decolonization had at least as much to do with political pressure from the international community, changing attitudes and supranational governing bodies which were more or less nonexistent prior to midcentury

Also you totally did say that Ryan was trying to "downplay the negatives (i.e. rayciss motives) as not atypical to European expansion" but they objectively weren't

On the demographics I'm arguing on something much closer to value-neutral grounds by simply pointing out that you can break a democracy with immigration and the people we're importing vote blue 80:20. There's no foundation of white supremacy necessary (why is it always about ferreting out the dark heart of whiteness for you people), just a sense of the frailty of civic institutions. Surely you'd be for - if not a reduction in scale of immigration - a more balanced political distribution of immigrants?

[Anonymous No.14546107]

>>14546100
exactly what i'm saying. it's fucking deluded.

[Anonymous No.14546111]

>>14546106
They are a cult and argue based on "mystical" lines. White = evil as a start, so any talking point that does not immediately demonize whites is already heresy. The whole facade of their ideology is rooted in nihilism anyway, they live among the ruins and don't want to admit it so they attach themselves to these materialist religious dogmas thinking this will add some meaning to the void they're creating for everyone.

[Anonymous No.14546127]

>>14546106
state religion needs its analog for original sin, so "whiteness" is a thing.

[Anonymous No.14546142]

>>14545855
>Because the left doesn't learn from their mistakes on race and IQ
Because they're retarded and indoctrinated. How many Christians were converted to atheism during the middle Ages? And what did that accomplish for them death? Nobody wants to be a martyr and end their careers for nothing. It's also the right too, how many Ben Shapiro "Well put Hitler in a different households" are there?

[Anonymous No.14546146]

>>14546142
>Well put Hitler in a different household
But this is correct

[Anonymous No.14546152]

>>14546146
It's ironic that the most stereotypical Jew in Ben Shapiro that disgusts most people would say that, and somehow you agree lol.

[Anonymous No.14546161]

>>14546152
If Hitler were raised under different conditions, different things would have happened. Not entirely different perhaps. Maybe the Third Reich would have been worse and meaner to Jews. Who knows?

[Anonymous No.14546179]

>>14546161
Oh okay, yes, but Ben Shapiro's argument was about the conformity of the universe (i.e. all crime is due to parents not instilling Ben's conservative values and there's no possibility of humans naturally developing "transgressive" thoughts if they are raised properly) not the infinite potential of possibilities.

[Anonymous No.14546197]

>>14546179
>right wing
>tabula rasa believer
interesting

[Anonymous No.14546209]

>>14546197
was john locke a leftist? ben shapiro's a liberal, perfectly consistent.

[Anonymous No.14546211]

>>14546209
>was john locke a leftist
for his time yes

[Anonymous No.14546215]

>>14546211
i didn't say "was john locke a leftist for his time," you silly goose.

[Anonymous No.14546225]

>>14545813
Yuck

[Anonymous No.14546239]

>>14546215
>was john locke a leftist for his time
the difference?

[Anonymous No.14546261]

>>14546239
the question "was john locke a leftist?" was a rhetorical question, the answer being no. he was a liberal philosopher. ben shapiro is a liberal. ben shapiro having liberal views, the views of john locke, is consistent. that was the point of my post.

[Anonymous No.14546267]

>>14546225
What is about these autogynephile trannies? He CANNOT pose for a single picture without making the "I'd fuck me" sexy face, it's so affected and cringy and kinda just... sad

[Anonymous No.14546289]

>>14543088
probably his manly physique and penis

[Anonymous No.14546308]

>>14543595
wow.... what an expressive post. I love it.

[Anonymous No.14546312]

It doesn't debate. It just makes overproduced videos that win over people looking for reassurance in their beliefs.

Also
>claiming to be contra to the system when you 're from Northern Virginia and the child of a Georgetown professor, while having the same ideological positions as the everyone else that lives there
lol

[Anonymous No.14546320]

>>14546312
Kek, fuck intellectuals.

[Anonymous No.14546322]

bump

[Anonymous No.14546341]

>>14543084
Someone describe contrapoints physical appearance to me in their best prose, I need some inspiration.

[Anonymous No.14546413]

>>14546341
there's this guy at work. a bit of an odd bird but nice enough, big adam's apple and nerd neck and spindly spider's fingers. he talks to you about game of thrones and the joe rogan show sometimes.

this man has a habit. every night, he rubs his clammy hands and types on his computer's keyboard: "little lexi belle bouncing on a big veiny one," "gianna michaels assaulting a black man with her big ass." and he busts nuts all over his belly watching these harlots hard at work, too much makeup all smeared and big boobs and cummy chins in streaming 480p, live for his private home-office enjoyment.

and the same way an owner starts to look like his dog, he's starting to look like one of these ladies from the computer screen. is it just you? is that eyeshadow he's wearing? it's subtle at first, but after a while, it's unmistakable. garish makeup, hotsy totsy outfits, ah, that's what it is: a porn-star's parody of womanhood. an eerie neon red light that just kind of appears as he tells you about how great the joker was. and you're fixed. you cannot look away.

it's not a personal judgement, i just get a strong guy-from-IT vibe off of this youtube person.

[Anonymous No.14546420]

>>14543084

[Anonymous No.14546587]

>>14544250
So those books that contain exercises or puzzles, like a crossword puzzle book, are for knowledge, it's not practice or action?

[Anonymous No.14546683]

can someone explain to me wat breadtube is and why is it gay

[Anonymous No.14546703]

>>14546683
They're a group of youtubers who fit into the group of leftists who are communists, but kinda not really, they use a lot of communist talking points and lingo but usually its just to give themselves an intellectual and radical air, in reality nothing they say is in any way dangerous or challenging to the powers that be.
And well they're all either tranny, gay, pansexual or nonbinary
So there ya go.

[Anonymous No.14546732]

>>14546703
but why the bread?
I always knew grainbrains were a menace

[Anonymous No.14546737]

>>14546732
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Conquest_of_Bread

[Anonymous No.14546760]

>>14543595
very based, the eternal e-celeb must be dispatched with the rest

[Anonymous No.14546815]

>>14543595

[Anonymous No.14546959]

>>14543164
>contra isn't intelligent
he literally almost finished his philosophy PhD, dropped out because tranny mental illness

[Anonymous No.14546996]

>>14546959
>implies PhD has something to do with intelligence

[Anonymous No.14547102]

>>14546959
>he literally almost finished his philosophy PhD
you have no idea lmao

[Anonymous No.14547116]

>>14543595
dare I say, ... based

[Anonymous No.14547125]

>>14546959
>philosophy
So he's retarded.

[Anonymous No.14547183]

>>14543595
Hello? Based Department?

[Anonymous No.14547249]

>>14543595
seethe, the trannies are taking over. too late.

[Anonymous No.14547313]

>>14545238
She literally doesn’t. Makes the argument of the opponent pretty strong actually

[Anonymous No.14547370]

>>14545265
This is just MrAmazing but for right-wingers
Next!

[Anonymous No.14547398]

reminder that nobody in the real world cares about stupid faggotry like kropotkin, queer theory and other intellectual aids for mentally ill rich kids.
you are a crossdressing retard and no normal person takes you seriously, let alone your out of touch larp ideologies.

[Anonymous No.14547426]

To be somehow persuaded by someone like contrapoints to abandon your beliefs in favor of a spineless pseudo-socialistic doctrine is something I will never be able to grasp. Are people really that gullible to whatever bullshit is fed to them, that the least persuasive person in the world sounds like a prophet in front of them?

[Anonymous No.14547434]

>hey guys what if gender is some completely subjective, unidentifiable essence which floats from the ether and gets imprinted onto each new person is born

[Anonymous No.14547438]

>>14543084
This off topic tranny shit has been up almlst a day....

[Anonymous No.14547450]

>>14547313
Nothing more inellectually honest than playing out fake discourse because you're afraid to platform your competition.

[Anonymous No.14547481]

Who's more annoying Contra or Philosophytube?

[Anonymous No.14547488]

>>14547481
Both

[Anonymous No.14547602]

>>14547125
You're on the wrong board
How about you go back?

[Anonymous No.14547626]

>>14547426
They usually just aren't so deep into the alt right that they shut out any differing worldviews

[Anonymous No.14547677]

>>14545957
>tfw you're a paranoid schizo, with delusions and everyone else is crazy.

[Anonymous No.14547741]

>>14546959
Go listen to the podcast dr death and tell me again how a PhD=intelligence

[Anonymous No.14548077]

>>14543152
Based. I don't think the Hitler Youth will get your point.

[Anonymous No.14548090]

>>14545529
No, it's Capitalism wing. You people don't understand that you are both the left wing of the Capital aka progressist, and the right wing of the Capital, aka Far right. It's not THAT complicated to understand.

[Anonymous No.14548118]

>>14543084
what is this creature?

[Anonymous No.14548195]

>>14546996
>>14547102
>>14547125
>IQ is a reliable measure of intellect
>BUT A PHD IN PHILOSOPHY IS NOT
are righttards actually this righttarded?

[Anonymous No.14548448]

>>14543259
dilate

[Anonymous No.14548476]

>>14545945
iPhones are a luxury good, and their main appeal is as a fucking brand. You're not a hypocrite for being a leftist and having a phone, you're a hypocrite for claiming to be leftist and having a fucking iPhone. It's like how as a commie you're allowed to drink fucking coffee, but not fucking Starbucks coffee

[Anonymous No.14548493]

>>14545945
>do you also think socialists are hypocrites for owning iphones and going to grocery stores?
Grocery shopping? No. iPhones? Yes. Complaining about the system while reaping and enjoying its most high end goods is hypocritical.

[Anonymous No.14548497]

Unironically watch Destiny’s debate videos, most people he talks to get their teeth stomped in

[Anonymous No.14548547]

>>14546027
Since you're a coward and stopped debating me I just want to point out that you finally admitted you don't believe there is any degree of demographic change that can be considered categorically bad

Like a full on reshuffling of world populations would be completely morally neutral to you as long as the migrants consented

I wish you were still posting so I could find out how one comes to see the world in such a deranged way

[Anonymous No.14548571]

>>14545945
Problem with apple profucts is that since they are luxury products, they make a huge profit.
In Marxist economy, profit is a scam. It's unpaid labor. Apple products don't even sell their products to make enough profit to renew their Capital, but make huge profit, way more important than profits necessary to renew and increase the production. It's due to the fact that people fetichize the brand and apple products, in some irrational way.
As i Marxist, i cannot really avoid to buy groceries. I theorically could, by growing my own vegetables, but this need some land and time many people don't have due to primititive accumulation and wage labor. However, what i can do and do, is avoiding luxury products. Luxury goods are the last thing, along with planned obsolescence and price fixing, that artificially maintain Capitalism. Because people are voluntarily paying their items more than necessary thus making the company a huge profit. It artificially delays the TRPF.

[Anonymous No.14548635]

>>14543259
lmao
never going to pass so fucking deal with it abomination.

[Anonymous No.14548875]

>>14548635
>>14548448
Im a cis man
Now you may proceed to call me a onions boy, go ahead

[Anonymous No.14549882]

>>14548476
Ha. I'm not a communist, but I refuse to go to Starbucks for Communist-like reasons. Communists I know are frauds.