The Ineffable is not even emptiness, not all things, not one thing, not generic everything, not the first or last, not inbetween, not within or around, neither above or below, we cannot even say that it is or isn't, or that any of this is actually true.
“Then if the one has no participation in time whatsoever, it neither has become nor became nor was in the past, it has neither become nor is it becoming nor is it in the present, and it will neither become nor be made to become nor will it be in the future.” “Very true.”
“Can it then partake of being in any other way than in the past, present, or future?”
“It cannot.”
“Then the one has no share in being at all.”
“Apparently not.”
“Then the one is not at all.”
”Evidently not.”
”Then it has no being even so as to be one, for if it were one, it would be and would partake of being; but apparently one neither is nor is one, if this argument is to be trusted.” “That seems to be true.”
“But can that which does not exist have anything pertaining or belonging to it?”
“Of course not.”
“Then the one has no name, nor is there any description or knowledge or perception or opinion of it.” “Evidently not.”
“And it is neither named nor described nor thought of nor known, nor does any existing thing perceive it.”