novel of the decade

[Anonymous No.14326969]

[Anonymous No.14326971]

>>14326969
This is a memoir, not a novel.

[Anonymous No.14326972]

[Anonymous No.14326978]

>>14326971
>/lit/ in charge of knowing how modern fiction works

[Anonymous No.14327279]

>>14326971
>cover literally says 'a novel'

[Anonymous No.14327319]

>>14326969

[Anonymous No.14327350]

what's up with boring ass millennials writing dull autobiographies and dressing it up as fiction?

[Anonymous No.14327365]

>>14327319
this guy knows what's up

[Anonymous No.14327392]

>>14327365
Support your local poetesses and prosettes

[Anonymous No.14327432]

>>14327350

[Anonymous No.14327449]

>>14327432
sucks that she didn't OD

[Anonymous No.14327464]

>>14327432
>[something]
I like the way she doesn't understand how sets work. Imagine being the poor sucker who had to proof read this at the publishing house.

[Anonymous No.14327512]

>>14327449
Woah, there! Let's not heckin trivialize suffering of women

[Anonymous No.14327521]

>>14326969
This vs. Taipei, which is a better novel?

[Anonymous No.14327546]

>>14327521
Liveblog is an autofiction project that I'm not sure coheres as a novel. It was not composed in the way a novel might be. Its still the more interesting of the two, but it's perhaps more empty because the novel wasn't the goal. Instead, the author sought a kind of therapeutic exercise via writing that incidentally wrote liveblog.

[Anonymous No.14327552]

>>14327521
Taipei was already kitsch but at least Tao Lin did it first. Megan Boyle is not only kitsch, she's not only a kitsch derivative OF something that's already kitsch, she's a kitsch derivative of something that's already kitsch that was written by the guy she was fucking, who incidentally is the only reason she ever got noticed by anyone.

[Anonymous No.14327563]

>>14326969
I hope Megan gets pregnant soon. She'd make a cute literary mommy.

[Anonymous No.14327566]

>>14327521
the best way to read liveblog is not to power through it over a weekend but to sort of read it in the same pace it was being written. let it rest and breathe between sessions. the effect is astonishing, the way little peculiarities pile up. it has the most 'real' depiction of a doomed relationship i've ever read
fucking great book. >>14327552 is a retarded child

[Anonymous No.14327576]

>>14327566
Remember not to post when you're menstruating.

[Anonymous No.14327587]

Megan Boyle and Katie Loves Classic Books should toe wrestle for charity

[Anonymous No.14327591]

>>14327576
Literally get published, foliolet

[Anonymous No.14327593]

>>14327563
She really shouldnt cuz she's like 38 but yeah she'd be a sweet mom

[Anonymous No.14327598]

>>14327591
Being published by the man who is fucking you is not an accomplishment. It's an embarrassment.

>>14327593
Just because she's 38 doesn't mean she can't still be an EPIC QUIRKY XANNIES ADDICT :-P!!! LOOOL #BESTLIFE #420 #IRONIC

[Anonymous No.14327615]

>>14327598
I mean she got clean and liveblog wasn't published by Tao Lin. Have you read it? She goes thru some real shit in that book, not quirky at all.

She did get a head start with him but she's shown to be way more interesting and endearing that Tao, who's a conspiracy theorist rapist dickhead.

[Anonymous No.14327620]

>>14327598
>>14327593
>>14327576
>>14327552
ITT: Megan's salinated ex-boyfriends
How many of you guys are there?

[Anonymous No.14327623]

>>14327615
>She did get a head start with him
That's how this nepotistic joke industry works. 95% of the work is the initial foot in the door, which she literally got by sucking the cum out of a chinaman's dick. Very dignified.

>a conspiracy theorist rapist dickhead.
Finally your true colors show, roastie. Go get "raped" by your boyfriend when he says "come onnnnn, I really wanna fuck" and you "felt like you couldn't say no." Then get actually raped.

[Anonymous No.14327627]

>>14327576
so this is the power of female alcoholism

[Anonymous No.14327638]

>>14327521

Taipei is much better

[Anonymous No.14327645]

>>14327623
Thanks for evidencing how you've never been held tenderly by anyone.

Tho I do agree. The publishing industry (and kinda all industries) really rely a lot on who you know and where you are. Pure talent isn't gonna get you nowhere. I don't think it's something to be condemned. If you got the power, use it.

[Anonymous No.14327651]

>>14327638
I think they're different books. Taipei is a pseudo bildungsroman with some great passages and a few poignant observations about modern life. Liveblog is just a document of a person's decaying mental state, edited to fit the novel. I don't think they're comparable as works of art, even if I do enjoy both of them.

[Anonymous No.14327680]

>>14327464
You literally can't be critical about any of it because every single flaw can be attributed to being part of the aesthetic

[Anonymous No.14327686]

>>14327645
>if you got the pussy, use it
not the retard you're arguing with but you sound equally as horrible a person as him

[Anonymous No.14327693]

>>14327686
If you don't like her writing that's fine yknow. Doesn't mean you gotta be a sexist dick about it.

[Anonymous No.14327704]

>>14327645
>Thanks for evidencing how you've never been held tenderly by anyone.
Don't post variations on "you're a virgin if you think something socially unacceptable lmao." It instantly reveals you're a woman. I'm gay, so it's not very effective on me in particular.

Try this out. Any time you feel threatened or emotional because someone disagreed with the way you feel, and you've typed up a 4chan response rebuking them, pause before posting it. Read the response. Ask yourself: Does this response boil down to "I bet you can't get access to a vagina"? If so, it's uninteresting, and worse, it's revealing to everybody else in the thread that you're a woman and therefore a tourist.

>If you got the power, use it.
>Translation: Corruption is common, therefore it is inevitable, therefore one should engage in it.
Your second statement doesn't follow from your first, and your third statement doesn't follow from either your second or your first.

Again, try to resist being a woman for a day. Think through what you're saying, and ask yourself whether each of your conclusions follows from its respective argument. Consider cultivating principled behavior even when it's not "popular" or socially "normal" to be principled. Principles are their own reward, even when they don't bring material benefits or popularity. This sort of thinking is natural for a man, but a woman could theoretically cultivate it. Maybe if Megan Boyle had cultivated it, she wouldn't have accepted being the proxy-famous groupie of a man in exchange for letting him use her sexually.

>>14327693
Sexism is a meaningless descriptor.

[Anonymous No.14327706]

>>14327693
i don't read or buy megan boyle books because i'm not a retard. i have no opinion on her books except the few excerpts i've seen posted on lit and the live read she broadcast over a couple days many moons ago. it's bad.

like i said, not the person you were arguing with. you know you proved his point right. about women being talentless fuck-to-get-ahead deplorable beings with no discernable talent

[Anonymous No.14327713]

proved, and approved, I should say

[Anonymous No.14327719]

>>14327704
I'm a dude.

>>14327706
What makes you so angry?

[Anonymous No.14327725]

>>14327719
>I'm a dude.

That's fine, the point is to learn to act like one. Stop being so emotional and get a sense of humor.

[Anonymous No.14327731]

>>14327725
What's funny about hating women?

[Anonymous No.14327744]

>>14327719
>What makes you so angry?
i'm not angry. at all. why are you trying to police my tone after you've clearly lost an argument you limpdick fuckface. just admit you guzzle textured protein from bottles and fuck off with your gender-based apology for bad art you cumguzzling "dude."

>>14327725
this gay man is extremely based, learn to reason like him and maybe you won't embarrass yourself in public so much anymore

[Anonymous No.14327750]

>>14327744
You seem real mad for some reason.

Do you say this type of shit in real life like you do here?

[Anonymous No.14327762]

>>14327750
>do you do this in real life??? I can only think in terms of real life normalfag socializing, so it's intuitively jarring to me to imagine that you could say such things! Surely you would become less popular?? Aren't you afraid of being less popular, like me??? Isn't that your primary concern and default state of consciousness, like it is for me??

The inside of a woman's mind is actually horrifying to me

[Anonymous No.14327775]

>>14327762
But do you though? Social acceptance isn't an ill. It's literally what we're wired to do as humans. Do you think you would get ostracized if you shared these thoughts with others?

I'm not a woman, but why is it horrifying?

[Anonymous No.14327781]

>>14327750
>You seem real mad for some reason. Do you say this type of shit in real life like you do here?

I almost never say this type of stuff here. I like frenposting. I like it when /lit/ is a happy family of shit talkers with interesting takes. But something about the intellectually barren way you go from bad argument to tone policing to "buh why you so meeaaan" is just rage inducing. You're either a woman lying about being a man or you're a fucking dope with zero brain cells and a bad case of male guilt. You can stop replying to me now, you clearly have nothing worth saying.

[Anonymous No.14327791]

can the edgelords please stop shitting up this thread with your pathological takes on the female mind. thanks

[Anonymous No.14327795]

>>14327791
>pathological

There's that popularity contest thinking again, roastie

[Anonymous No.14327796]

>>14327781
Fren posting sounds like a way of normalizing being a bigot, so I'm not keen on it. And I only reply this way because you are not arguing with me. You're hurling insults at me. So why would I argue with someone who does not want to argue?

[Anonymous No.14327799]

>>14327795
no. it's simply an unacceptable way of conducting yourself, both on the internet and irl. you seem to have difficulty understanding this. maybe /r9k/ is more your speed

[Anonymous No.14327804]

why should i read a whole book by a woman if women can't even write a good post in this very thread?

[Anonymous No.14327819]

>>14327804
You don't have to read it if you don't want to.

[Anonymous No.14327846]

>>14327796
>Fren posting sounds like a way of normalizing being a bigot
so you really are a tourist. frenposting means posting cute frogs and supporting your fellow litizens in their struggles and answering their literature related questions with good effort posts.
>inb4 frog memes ARE bigotry

>>14327791
but that's literally what this thread is about, anon. the bland, inane stream-of-mush that is the female mind in novel form.

[Anonymous No.14327856]

>>14327846
From what I read it includes posting shit Bout being a nazi and general hateful shit. Fuck that.

And I gotta ask again, what's makes you dislike women so much? Why is the female mind mush? By virtue of womanhood?

[Anonymous No.14327897]

>>14327856
i don't dislike women, anon. i dislike megan boyle and the woman itt who approves of boyle's sexy fast track to publication while also decrying criticism of this hack's work as misogyny. anyway i'm out. boyle's defenders itt refuse to see her work critically, so there's no point in me speaking to them. good night.

[Anonymous No.14327902]

>inb4 yay we beat him woman power! we're breaking down the barriers! we're making a positive change against hate!
no. you're not. your hare brained sham arguments are making things worse.

[Anonymous No.14327914]

>>14327902
based schizo poster

[Anonymous No.14328768]

>>14326969
Meganposting brings out some interesting reactions

[Anonymous No.14328830]

>>14327897
>who approves of boyle's sexy fast track to publication while also decrying criticism of this hack's work as misogyny
Now we know you're having a fun, Anon. No one asserted these things, even accidentally. Who really knows how her book was published? None of us. Let's not make ourselves fervently open to dumb thoughts, yes?

[Anonymous No.14328861]

>>14327902
Brainwashed how?

>>14327897
Hey, sorry, fell asleep. You haven't given me any argument as to why her work is bad. All you've done is blame your idea of it being bad on her being a woman without providing actual criticism of the text.

[Anonymous No.14328892]

>>14328861
>without providing actual criticism of the text.

I haven't read the text. I think that's pretty OBVIOUS, dumb-o.

[Anonymous No.14328903]

>>14327464
Hahahaha please use that small lump between your ears.

[Anonymous No.14328912]

>>14327856
Can you please go away? You sound incredibly lazy and medically dull, having to lookup "frenposting" because you cannot receive the contextual comfiness that it references, and then being so one-dimensional in your perception, it's nearly screamed, "What do you offer even this thread let alone the broader community, online and real world?" Are you an exceptional popcorn popper or recycler? Can you Juliene? There's somewheres for you but perhaps it's not here. Wherever you wind up, try better to actually contribute something more than the negative suck of your lampreal lipped performance ITT. A useful thought experiment within your cognitive reach may be to imagine a party with only you there, or to imagine the quantity of your cloned persons that would sufficiently gum up the social milieu because the transactional patterns will have all been prionized by the conversational grey goo you sling. Nothing interesting can persist around a type such as you, no original thought, no careful observation. Why they might run afoul of you, and then where'd we be?

[Anonymous No.14329021]

>>14328892
Then how do you know you wouldn't like it?

>>14328912
That's a lot of words for just asking me to leave, which I'm not really feeling like it.

[Anonymous No.14329035]

Why read Liveblog? To some, "because someone wrote it," would be sufficient, but if you need a more compelling idea, Liveblog is an amber on which a great deal of Americana clings. If you want to see a grotesque realistic portrait of the early twenty first century American upper middle class, you can approach Liveblog as an autofictional "Appointment in Samarra," a tale of doom and self-destruction interwoven in the social and mental lives of its characters. Megan did attempt to kill herself some short time after finishing Liveblog. The project's experiment hadn't quite repaired everything, or else it saturated her with a different type of ill. The older person's view of Liveblog is to regard Megan as quite lucky she did not die, which may be one of the more powerful themes of Liveblog, divine fortune having a thing now for drunks, children and notably asexual American redheaded authorettes who hopefully have a long literary career before her.
I also receive the character of Megan Boyle as a kind of crossover fandom that intersects with Infinite Jest, Megan's creativity having been well documented in one particularly funny Youtube video where she stitched ogether of DFW grimaces, smiles, pauses and other social paraphernelia almost exactly like she was building one of the powerful video casettes of Infinite Jest, or else very much engaged in one of the holiest of tasks to DFW, the making of television. And then for her to spiral into years upon years of Infinite Jest worthy drug binges, I can't help but wonder if I am better to think of Megan Boyle as another endnote to the Infinite Jest universe.

[Anonymous No.14329083]

[Anonymous No.14329088]

>Megan Boyle will never go out of her way to make you laugh because you're friends

[Anonymous No.14329095]

[Anonymous No.14329383]

people defending ”frenposting” has no business insulting the intelligence of others, whether they be posters or authors

[Anonymous No.14329419]

>>14329383
Farcically off topic, you dissimulative ponce.

[Anonymous No.14329451]

>>14328861
You haven't given me any argument as to why her work is bad.

It's stated here: >>14327706 It's bad. It's criminally badly written. It's boring, a snoozefest, an inane ramble about the whiny boring life of a first world degenerate, and not even an interesting one. Why are you so obtuse? It's literally a shit book. Devoid of literary merit. Meaning: NOT. LITERATURE.

[Anonymous No.14330082]

>>14326969
that isn't my novel.

[Anonymous No.14330554]

>>14327775
because anon is clearly such a rugged individualist who stands out from the crowd and operates on a level inconceivable to the merely human he has to post about it on the internet

[Anonymous No.14330589]

>>14330554

[Anonymous No.14330618]

I read like 130 pages and I don't know if I can ever finish it. But I have enjoyed it for what it is.

[Anonymous No.14330720]

>>14329088
she's a real person you freak.

[Anonymous No.14330739]

Hi Megan, if you're reading this I want u to know that I love watching your videos and I hope u make some more soon!! <3 <3 <3

[Anonymous No.14330741]

>>14329451
Thanks for pointing to it, I didn't bother because this thread is so full of vitriol it seemed exhausting.

Also, I find so many people like you. What literature is an isn't is so subjective its honestly kind of absurd, and it is equally absurd when someone equates what they like or dislike with being or with not being literature. You can dislike it, that's fine, and I see why you would dislike it, but what defines literary merit is a question that has no answer, therefore making the matter what literature is or isn't somewhat irrelevant.

Again: YOU MAY DISLIKE LIVEBLOG. you're allowed to. It's okay. But the argument of it not being literature, or it being bad because a woman wrote it, or whatever other hairbrained, misogynistic, bogus reasoning has been tossed in this thread does not hold up as an argument. It just shows ignorance and a lamentable misunderstanding that arguing means insulting and disparaging other opinions as wrong besides your own.

[Anonymous No.14330822]

>>14330741
nigger

[Anonymous No.14330828]

>>14330822
You actually made chortle, thank you, random racist anon

[Anonymous No.14330839]

>>14326969
>female author
hahaha hee hoo ha hee hoo ha hee hoo haa hee haa hoo haa

[Anonymous No.14330920]

>>14329451
I don't know Megan, but to see a writer assailed so witlessly is to jostle the tottering denimed posterior of a stinking anachronism before the florrid ovals of an already quite irate creature. Who are you? What are you? Why did you bring your pollution here? In the abstract ITT we have the artist, Megan, her creation here with us now, a chest to open, pieces of eight to flitter and fidget. And we have the stakeless shifty shit-flingers, always curiously in abundance in these parts, almost in defiance of the imageboard's "organic" pretext, its "more real" aspect, or more specifically the idea that the imageboard's openness permits a broader expression of humanity, a more interesting conversation. And yet we find instead only predictably you doing this: Shitting upon someone who stuck to a process, however humble, however bounced about by drugs and dicks, she still found her time to write, to compose, to incant the muses and do the work.
And is it any more tawdry that sex plays some role in the worlds turnings, especially a woman's? It's not simply some private vibratory exercise amongst consenting neoliberals. Sex centers a depth of mystical experiences and combines people much without their individual inputs. You are suddenly there and to resist is to defile the already bared shoulders of the shimmying sylph lost to natures that men will never ever understand. But you can get something more lucid out of reading one of these cybernetic sex and drug psycho-ettes who kept a studious log. I think there is a great texture of humanity there and it speaks to the power of process and discipline. Megan did not require the other elements cultivated by other writers; her confidence or determination or whatever it was, it carried her text to the editing, to the binding and publishing.
It is not to say it is a glittering sledge to the face, nor a great work or even a good book. But such silly superlatives are generally wastes of human energy, distractions into the meta-aspect of the subject, it's marketability requiring you designate its ranking, counting the tick marks or checking your rubric for quality. I think truth and beauty are elusive and made of spiritual elements, which you can discern in many places if you are so tuned. To read Liveblog so fully requires you to grasp that Megan may have perished, that her life hung in the balance of her daily writing, and then especially the symbolism of the pallidly bookish ginger American princess who decides that rather than do anything else, she was going to kill herself. If you do not tremble with the doomed portent so vaingloriously bled and vomited and shat upon those pages, you must be interested in something much more cool like Martian "space travel," or climate activism. If you are the mortuary type, you can find in Liveblog a rich autopsy for the civilizational remnants of the American project.

[Anonymous No.14330927]

This thread is an interesting testimony of how 4chan's autoimmune system defends itself against normie invaders.

[Anonymous No.14330929]

>>14330920
Perhaps its also a study of affluenzan pathologies and that's why in these times Liveblog triggers the Precariat. And so maybe Liveblog isn't your thing. Your imagination's ceiling can't get there, to the carefree liberated young lady floating on cat hair and ammonia and pharmaceuticals and street drugs and much fewer romantic encounters than one would expect, which may be the ultimate waste. Megan in her heyday was much more tummy-forward in her mediagenicities, her obliques notably violining into sportily blurting stonefruited hips plumped atop those taut sprinter shapes, if too pretty for sport, they were orders for the artist, a gift for the aesthete, a confounding illusion transient and mortal, yet so real and gross and silly and dumb. And perhaps Megan is not brilliant. She sounds pretty crispy in her interviews. I could most definitely not hang with her even at my most hedonistic and invincible. But why again are we precluding any sympathetic reception? There is in Megan a rebirth, a reconciliation, a OG late nineties early-oughts party girl hurtled into a distant caustic atmosphere and forced to re-cobble together her entire life by way of her rock bottom's cratered island's remaining tropical flora and abundant littoral kelp, even, as we hope an ascent to the volcanic range in search of her next possession, her next devotion.

[Anonymous No.14330940]

>>14330927
cringe

[Anonymous No.14330949]

>>14330920
>>14330929
uh, hello? based department?

[Anonymous No.14330989]

>>14330741
You’re her, aren’t you?

[Anonymous No.14330997]

>>14330720

[Anonymous No.14331028]

>>14330997
You know what's weird about girls like this, who get a lot of attention for something ephemeral in their twenties, is that they get stuck identifying with whatever version of themselves they were at the time that it happened. Even if it fades fairly quickly and they really ought to move on. It's just too much fun for a young girl to be bathed in attention for being a quirky hip young thing, it comes too naturally for them to lazily inhabit that persona if they're given the opportunity to do so. It ruins them the same way that being raised to be emperor ruins a Caligula.

[Anonymous No.14331036]

>>14330920
>>14330929
imagine expecting anyone to read this. got to bed megan

[Anonymous No.14331042]

>>14331036
>caring about readers
dumbest people on the planet, desu. this guy's a reader for sure: >>14331028

[Anonymous No.14331100]

>>14331042
>implying i read that post either

[Anonymous No.14331128]

How do we ban women and lefties from 4chan? Quit pozzing up the board

[Anonymous No.14331136]

>>14331128
shut up nerd

[Anonymous No.14331151]

>>14331136
I can stand up and piss literally wherever I want, when i want. This is why you'll always be inferior

[Anonymous No.14331165]

>>14331151
>>14331128
oh my... h-he's BASED

[Anonymous No.14331217]

I wish I could buy mexican candles with megan as the icon

[Anonymous No.14331342]

>>14330741
i'm the person you're arguing with. and i'm here to tell you: you've missed the point. you're swinging at a strawman. my vitriol is not a reflection on women, or boyle, or anything except your retarded brains continuing to move your witless hands over a keyboard.

my dislike for live blog or boyle is really mild in comparison. it's not literature, but it doesn't deserve my scorn. you do.

>>14330920
nice purple prose numbnuts.
>Megan did not require the other elements cultivated by other writers
Yes she does. That's literally my complaint, and her mind-numbing actuarial prose published largely because of whatever minor fame she got by banging some trendy author is evidence. Why do you make me hate you like this? Don't you see I'm just a man? Like any simple peace-loving man I want to be happy. But you exist here in this thread posting this garbage at me. tldr reee

[Anonymous No.14331360]

>>14331342
would you shut the fuck up

[Anonymous No.14331374]

>>14331360
happily, based stfuposter

[Anonymous No.14331536]

Good defense, Megheadz! It's heartening to see you all rally against the /lit/erati charlatans in defense of autofiction, cute girls and American literature.

[Anonymous No.14331541]

>>14326969
>white girl writes shitty blog posts and makes money off of it
and people say white privilege doesn't exist...

[Anonymous No.14331558]

>>14331541
hmm, it's possible Megan Boyle is white, but how would one explain her conspicuously semitic feet?

[Anonymous No.14331660]

>>14326969
Even synthetic intelligence is enamored by her

[Anonymous No.14331748]

>>14331558
she's clearly irish, so non-white

[Anonymous No.14331760]

Is there an audiobook

[Anonymous No.14331856]

>>14331760
https://youtu.be/0THlbFLc-Qk?t=5088

you've been warned

[Anonymous No.14331880]

>>14326969
It's even more interesting when you read it as a non-american

[Anonymous No.14331888]

why isnt it on libgen

[Anonymous No.14331908]

>>14331856
10/10 audio quality

[Anonymous No.14331966]

whats with this bitch snaggle tooth huh?

[Anonymous No.14332043]

>>14327762
lmao

[Anonymous No.14332079]

>>14331660
What would it entail, what would it all mean if you were said to "Megan" something or someone or Meg a location or passing thought? Or to be a Meganist hostess to humans or felines or dermatophagic mites? Can you assert yourself or strike upon a retort or arrive at an insight Meganistically? Is there a Meganism, an Orthodox and esoteric school? Can you Meg your way through a dilemma, a social scene, an organization? Would you be more or less persuaded if someone observed a strict Meganly style or Meganated their pacing? Are Meganophiles and Meganophobes to find any common ground? Would that shared negotiable space be Megantory? Can over-Megging ever abate while Up-Megging proceeds unin-Meganed? Megalore and Megalo-prefixes may apply their Meganisms only to giantess interpretations, Mega-Megan also a medium, and a stable metric for exchange per million, each and every Megan so measured and celebrated. And if we need Meganific applications on a slighter scale we may seek the micro-Meganter or the medically potent adreno-Meganal extractions, are endo-Meganoidal system binding chemistries.

[Anonymous No.14332166]

just read the post on the amazon page. seems super reddit minus le epin drug use XD
if someone actually likes this thing post a few pages you thought were good

[Anonymous No.14332560]

>>14332166
some good boomer gore

>At one point he said something about how mom is emotional but he feels flat all the time. Without looking away, I said 'you seem sad to me.' He nodded slowly, shrugged and pressed his lips together. I wanted to do something to help. Looked around his apartment and thought about how he has thought about places for all his things to go and has arranged them on purpose. Like an area of slightly different Harley Davidson and Beatles gift-y things given to him by the same people, little statues and toys in a line on a mantle, unopened snack boxes in a line and back-ups of the snacks in the pantry, copies of CDs and self help books and manila folders stacked carefully in neat piles, affirmations and phone numbers on post-its stuck in unusual places, a large variety of pens, an expensive-looking TV which I think he bought because he thinks mom likes TV and we used to watch movies as a family, when we lived in the same house. He sometimes refers to it as 'the entertainment center' and talks about how good the sound is. On a bookcase in his bedroom, too large to fit on the shelves is a professionally colored-in, formerly black and white photo of him smiling in a Navy uniform in 1957 or 1958, I think, between two boquets of fake flowers all touching the ceiling, which feels especially sad to me -- not in a pitiful way -- in a way that makes me want to make his life better for him and wish that things could've been better.

>I asked him about the TV. He showed me how to use all the remotes and said 'one of these doesn't work, so I don't know if you want to try one of them or both so just so you know: it's one of these remotes. Uh. It's one the comcast cable remotes we have here, here on the table, see -- and here's another one for the TV. That one works pretty well. So it's not that one, it's one or the other of these two comcast remotes, here on the table, one of them doesn't -- I don't know what's wrong with it -- but one remote here doesn't work'. I said 'thank you for letting me know I'm sure I'll figure it out.' He said 'I'm sure you will, you're so smart,' saying 'You're so smart in a way that sounded like you're so smart and I'm so stupid' like he had started thinking things like this a long time ago, that his saying you're so smart' to me had nothing to do with me outside of my saying something that reminded him of other things other people have said that have caused him to think he's stupid.

[Anonymous No.14332577]

>>14332560
ok, not bad, post a few more

[Anonymous No.14332624]

>>14332560
thats literally a deeper conversation than anything i've ever had with my father and its literally trivial bullshit. fuck bros

[Anonymous No.14332704]

>>14327464
>implying anyone proofread this
Also, describe the average person who would carry this bag.

[Anonymous No.14332722]

>>14332166

>Food was taking too long at the steakhouse and I didn't think anyone at the table would notice, so I walked to the pizza place. Ordered a small slice. The guys behind the counter spoke another language and were laughing and play-fighting, all of them were in the process of eating huge slices. Sometimes one of them would say how much they loved the pizza, in English, and everyone would laugh and hit each other. Brotherly hitting. I wanted a bigger slice, like theirs.

>Passed an ageless looking man singing like how people sing in musicals. Enunciating the words and with vibrato. He looked like he was thinking 'I'm giving the world a message right now and they don't want to hear it but I'm better for it but I should still be careful because the world is evil and it wants to hurt me.' Tried to make eye contact with him but he wouldn't. Thought he would get akick out of my boxes, like, I was a stagehand or something, carrying boxes backstage to make his show work for him. When he passed me he was singing 'we could've had one season'

>Watched commercials feeling like 'this is my duty, I will watch them and consider what they're saying, they were made to show me about a product, the people who made it like the product, someone wants us to know.' Fell asleep on couch.

>Can smell dad's jacket from chair-leaning position to type. He's never going to get that he's okay and that I love him and think he is a good man who is doing the best he can. His TV is made by a brand called 'life's good' with a little happy face emoticon that loads before the stations. When we were talking about remotes, dad said he had only watched TV four or five times since moving here. I think it's been over a year. He calls it the 'entertainment center.'

[Anonymous No.14332734]

>>14331028
Zooey Deschanel is the ultimate embodiment of this.

[Anonymous No.14332787]

What would it entail, what would it all mean if you were said to "Megan" something or someone or Meg a location or passing thought? Or to be a Meganist hostess to humans or felines or dermatophagic mites? Can you assert yourself or strike upon a retort or arrive at an insight 'Meganistically?' Is there a Meganism, both an Orthodox and esoteric school? Can you Meg your way through a dilemma, a social scene, an organization? Would you be more or less persuaded if someone observed a strict Meganly style or Meganated their pacing? Are Meganophiles and Meganophobes to find any common ground? Would that shared negotiable space be Megantory? Can over-Megging ever abate while Up-Megging proceeds un-Meganged? Megalore and Megalo-prefixes may apply only to giantess interpretations, Mega-Megan being also a medium, much like how Megans numerologic roots, “Mega” a stable metric for exchange per million, each and every Megan so measured and celebrated. And if we need Meganific applications on a slighter scale we may seek the micro-Meganter or the medically potent adreno-Meganal extractions, are endo-Meganoidal system binding chemistries.
And if we need Meganific applications on a slighter scale we may seek the micro-Meganter or the medically potent adreno-Meganal extractions, or even those fascinating endo-Meganoidal system binding chemistries and Meganify and Meganard their namesaked psycho-sexual Meganography. Let's not forget the storied genetic patterns, MEGB1, MEGAN2013 and MEGGYBOY, drosophilan and roundworms and plasmids and some shortlived simian specimens all enjoying these Meganistic switches, their vectorings of genetic probes, markers and matrices.
Meganology begs the question: Is there the same luster to something beautiful but not Megantific? And how much greater is the maximum splendor denoted by Meganificence? Can one Meganorphically transform, via a Meganosis or sufficiently wiggly Megalia?
What does flexion along the Megandorsal plane look like? Or a Meganauptic leap? When your Meganocrine system is overworked, what to measure first but your Meganto-biliary performance? What are we to make of all Micro-Exon Genes? How long are we to deny their connection to the Meganian, to all things perceived through the Meganoptics? If one dwells in a Megalopoli, is the architecture Meganorian or Brute-Meg? Or is the dwelled in Megantory an anatomically exacting Meganscape? Are the androgenated aggregations of unvacuoled Meganscription etched upon her former lovers’ deepest most Megantized granules, inescapable, love scars from the the Megdusa, sunned auburn Megantcles, tickling your face, gracing your neck, flirtatious Megan-edged blades, shattering, fragmenting, ruining all priors.

[Anonymous No.14332815]

>>14332704
the cover looks dope desu. you have to grant them that much

[Anonymous No.14332849]

>>14327615
>Tao, who's a conspiracy theorist rapist dickhead.

oh no... not conspiracy theories!!!!!! what a faux pas!!!!!!!!!!!!

[Anonymous No.14332860]

>>14327615
>Tao, who's a conspiracy theorist rapist dickhead.

Link? Sounds interesting.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RdiVHtW1axs

[Anonymous No.14332951]

What would it entail, what would it all mean if you were said to "Megan" something or someone or Meg a location or passing thought? Or to be a Meganist hostess to humans or felines or dermatophagic mites? Can you assert yourself or strike upon a retort or arrive at an insight Meganistically? Is there a coherent Meganism, an Orthodox and esoteric school? Can you Meg your way through a dilemma, a social scene, an organization? Would you be more or less persuaded if someone observed a strict Meganly style or Meganated their pacing? Are Meganophiles and Meganophobes to find any common ground? Would that shared negotiable space be Megantory? Can over-Megging ever abate while Up-Megging proceeds un-Meganged? And then there’s the ominous Megalith-legged Megalores and Megalo-prefixed giantesses, Mega-Megans being not simply a pantheon, a menagerie of Megans but also a medium, a thing to mine in search of the Megananza. Much like how “Megan’s” numerologic roots sprouted from “Mega,” a globally stable metric for exchange per million, each and every Megan so measured and celebrated as being such a Mega expression of probability. And if we need Meganific applications on a slighter scale we may Meganellially seek the micro-Meganter or the medically potent adreno-Meganal extractions or even those storied endo-Meganoidal system binding chemistries.
Why not Meganify and Meganard those namesaked psycho-sexual mappings, invite a Meganician, pay them Megantarily.
And let's not forget the storied genetic patterns, MEGB1, MEGAN2013 and MEGGYBOY, drosophilan and roundworm and plasmid and some shortlived simians all enjoying these Meganistic switches, their Meganellated vectorings of genetic probes, markers and matrices. Meganology begs the question: Is there the same luster to something beautiful but not Megantific? And how much greater is the maximum splendor denoted by Meganificence? Can one Meganorphically transform or is one bound to permanent un-Meganoidal sapience?
What does flexion along the Megandorsal plane look like? Or a Meganauptic leap? When your Meganocrine system is overworked, what to measure first but your Meganto-biliary performance? What are we to make of all Micro-Exon Genes too? How long are we to deny their connection to the Meganian, to all things perceived through the Meganoptics? If one is devoted enough to answer these things and for long periods dwell in an astral Megalopoli, is the architecture Meganorian or Brute-Meg or Megan-Futurist? Or is the dwelled in Megantory an anatomically exacting Meganscape? Are the androgenated aggregations of unvacuoled Meganscription etched upon her former lovers’ deepest most Megantized granules, inescapable, the Megdusa, sunned auburn Megantcles, tickling your face, gracing your neck, flirtatious Megan-edged blades, Meganpture.

[Anonymous No.14332962]

megan fans are the most schizo posters on lit and not in a good way

[Anonymous No.14332969]

>>14332722
>Tried to make eye contact with him but he wouldn't.
d-do normies actually do this?

[Anonymous No.14332987]

>>14332860
For the conspiracy thing desu you can just go to his Twitter, it's full of anti-vax bs

And here: https://www.dazeddigital.com/artsandculture/article/22051/1/tao-lin-accused-of-statutory-rape-and-emotional-abuse

[Anonymous No.14333029]

>>14332969
Do what? Make eye contact on the street? Yes and no. If you have no confidence and stare at your feet all day that's bad, but if you go around making eye contact with every stranger it can come off desperate or aggressive. Normies mostly make eye contact functionally and will only make contact in assessment of a threat or intentional flirtation/intimidation. I am too in love with eye contact and too self aware of its mechanics to be this nonchalant and detached in the deployment of my eye contact, so I am always artificially rolling my eyes around in my head pretending I don't see people and then stealing a sweet glance at last second. Sometimes in a particularly good or bad mood I will go out and dominate others with eye contact, but it is antisocial and in some areas dangerous.

[Anonymous No.14333179]

>>14332987
shut up and fuck your own face

[Anonymous No.14333188]

>>14333179
simmer down tao

[Anonymous No.14333191]

>>14327552
Where can I read on the phenomenology and stetics of kitsch?

[Anonymous No.14333202]

>>14332987
>trust this one mass market because it's the good one and the US "regulates" it

[Anonymous No.14333203]

>>14326969
Embarrassing to think that any man could actually read this crap. The absolute state of men in 2019

[Anonymous No.14333328]

>>14332962
She's a compelling character. I can't speak for other Megheadz but I've been consumed by a short story in which Megan is reborn in late life into a Cybernetically enhanced version of herself, parting with both feet, a hand, a shoulder, her spine, all congenital gastrologic materials, her brain stem too, highly augmented for the suite of motor system augments, and in a nod to Deus Ex an additional heart. But the security of those upgrades comes at a price. Everyone puts in work. She forgets her writing, Baltimore, Brooklyn, maybe even some of the lesser boys. She is inured to combat. She cannot survive a reclamation of the cybernetic materials now pinkishly adhered to her ivory body, and she is distraught at the things she must do in this new mode of life. In a moment of weakness, she uses again. Nothing. Her synthetics obstruct nearly all conventional inebriants and hallucinogens. They are metabolized with nanite proficiency and pervasiveness. But there is an order of the Cybernetic who have sought the development of synthetic incantations to put back into the humanoid cyborg something sacred, perhaps even the godly. They offer her an edge, clarity, proto-omniscience, clairvoyance, remote sight, but these gifts are felt as a rabid rage, a jolt from Mars right in the patch of perineal flesh that remains her only erotically sensate portion, her hips swaddled by grafts of reactive nanosheets meant to protect her unobtainium internals. She felt in those moments an otherworldly super fugue during which only the desire to pounce upon and slay zealously grips her. Unknown to the confident puppetteers so pleased at their formerly literary icon turned super-cleaner, something has been incanted inside those formerly pristine cybernetics that no one can stop, not even can they fathom it when she finally dawns, the blinding, foes smitherined so finely they seem a diffuse sand howled away from her. The Grove's party is crashed, an obscure baptism liquidated, and the cyrogenically tortured remains of Professor David Foster Wallace are discovered, his final plea to Megan giving the two of them the purpose without which they had so peripatetically floundered, a showdown but also a chance to set something big better.

[Anonymous No.14333337]

>Embarrassing to think that any man could actually read this crap. The absolute state of men in 2019

[Anonymous No.14333348]

>>14333202
How about trust the proven fact that vaccines prevent shit like measles and smallpox for decimating human populations, and that anyone who doesn't agree with it, no matter their intention, is indirectly hurting children and their community as a whole

[Anonymous No.14333354]

>>14333328
shouldn't you use a trip

[Anonymous No.14333436]

link to epub? I wanna read this

[Anonymous No.14333445]

>>14333348
>smallpox
anon, you truly have no idea what you are talking about, do you? but you FEEL vaccines are good because they help the whole, whatever the fuck that is.

[Anonymous No.14333454]

>>14333445
Lol, you are just ASKING for the retroactive refutation treatment bud

[Anonymous No.14333519]

>>14333445
None of us do, we're in a fucking 4chan board. But you have to understand, as a bare minimum of common sense, that disease is easily one of the deadliest ails of humanity, and how science has prevent us from suffering tremendous, massive dying unlike before. You think the bug that killed 2/3 of Europe would've had the same effect if we knew how viruses propagate, how to prevent infection, ways to treat it, etc? Do you seriously believe, in a modern, interconnected world where one infected passenger arriving at any airport could trigger a worldwide pandemic that would spread like wildfire, that we don't need vaccines? Or that you wouldn't take all precautions to avoid spreading preventable, fucking awful disease? Do you really believe autism is caused by a fucking vaccine? Cmon man.

[Anonymous No.14333521]

>ywn slumber in an alkaline miasma as fine feline fur strands tickle your nostrils

[Anonymous No.14333527]

>>14333348
>How about trust

no. as long as jews and the government is involved, i will not trust it.

[Anonymous No.14333531]

>>14333519
>737s are safe bruh
>boeing knows how to build planes bruh
>bernoulli bruh
tell me more about how your murder cult civilization qualifies you to know what's best for the world. who are the next million people you'll kill with a peace process?

[Anonymous No.14333545]

>>14333527
Aight

>>14333531
Do you also slap the back of your head to decalcify your peneal gland?

[Anonymous No.14333661]

what car company or automobile service would make a reasonable sponsor for a Megan Boyle auto-monologue series? her "autofiction" genre could make for some clever puns to sell Megan to the gearheads. she even got her CDL so the more i think about this the more itll work.

[Anonymous No.14333667]

megan hasn't made a video since august and hasn't tweeted since july. has she appeared anywhere else?

[Anonymous No.14333693]

>>14333667
She was in Italy a while ago, and she did a second Liveblog reading. She's still in Maryland, and seems to be doing well. Saw that on her IG @meganassboyle

[Anonymous No.14333731]

>>14333667
>>14333693
she was recently in copenhagen and did a 25+ hour reading end-to-end of Liveblog. there was a pillow fort constructed nearby at an exhibit space/flop house and Megan broadcast her reading live to this location. because of the cold weather, her feet were thoroughly covered and confined to what seemed to be fashionable boots and stylish shoes, not risking any injuries for fashion but not entirely neglecting her self-presentation either. Megan has described her style as tastefully asexual and i think this names it well

[Anonymous No.14333760]

>>14333731

[Anonymous No.14333777]

>>14333693
>>14333731
>>14333760
thanks megheads

[Anonymous No.14333781]

>>14333760
what will the next exciting book from this 40 year old be. will it be EPIC WEED NIGHT. or maybe WEED ADVENTURE: WEED

[Anonymous No.14333787]

>>14327731
Its exhilarating because this is the only place left you can publicly admit to being a misogynist, even though anyone who hangs out with women enough will eventually end up one.

[Anonymous No.14333808]

>>14333781
turns out the dankest dope was sobriety, senpai

[Anonymous No.14333825]

>>14333781
megan is not mira, at least i dont think so. is one of them playing the other as a character?

[Anonymous No.14333835]

>>14333825
how much older than mira is megan?

[Anonymous No.14333846]

>>14333835
approximately seven human earth years

[Anonymous No.14333857]

>>14333835
Megan
>Born: October 15, 1985 (age 34 years),
Mira
>Born: May 28, 1992 (age 27 years)

aging as a woman must fucking suck

[Anonymous No.14333867]

>>14333857
does kinda have a Meganoid nose

[Anonymous No.14333870]

>>14333787
Ive been the single male in the household for like a year now, living with my gf and her sister. Plus I grew up in a house where the only other male was my dad. Most of my friends at the moment are female. In my mfa program it's like 70% female students. I hang out/work/study with women every day, and I'm no closer to hating them than anyone else, because I don't judge people on their gender, but on their actions. If a woman is shitty to me, she's a shitty person, but that's nothing to with her being a woman, it has to do with her being shitty. Do I explain myself?

[Anonymous No.14333876]

>>14333870
no one asked for a faggot's opinion, i can smell your AIDS through your post

[Anonymous No.14333889]

>>14333870
Do they give each other pedicures?

[Anonymous No.14333897]

>>14333857
I know a woman who is in her mid 30's and talks way too much about how she can't get a man.

[Anonymous No.14333899]

>>14333876
Drink some tea.

>>14333889
They don't. At least not to my knowledge.

[Anonymous No.14333909]

>>14333897
it's rough out there man

[Anonymous No.14333915]

>>14333899
Can you ask them why they haven't? Is it for lack of tools and artistic supplies? Do they prefer the salon atmosphere?

[Anonymous No.14333920]

>>14333915
I think they just don't care? They both work a lot and don't really do a ton of self-grooming on their hands and feet. They'll paint their nails and stuff, but that's about it.

[Anonymous No.14333927]

>>14333909
Feet don't age like that. Just ignore the irksome biological system above the ankles and you will never fear ravages of time upon a woman, only a gently clined erosion of beauty's high lusters.

[Anonymous No.14333941]

>>14333909
why do incels and robots think that the concept of aging is something that needs to be explained with image macros

[Anonymous No.14333947]

>>14333941
Is that you, Jordan?

[Anonymous No.14333950]

>>14333781
Megan is sober and making healthy choices and reading Jung now. Her next novel will be the fulfillment of what Dave attempted with The Pale King. I believe this.

[Anonymous No.14333960]

>>14333950
We salute you, Megan!

[Anonymous No.14333974]

>>14333950
>She had to get addicted to get sober all to exactingly retrace Sifu Wallace's legendary path

[Anonymous No.14333989]

>>14333909
another one

i find this topic fascinating, women are so beautiful but it lasts such a short time. you never notice it until it's pointed out to you, because i guess you're attuned to only look for the pretty ones, not the dumpy ones. once you SEE the dumpy ones, you realize they're everywhere, like background scenery

[Anonymous No.14334026]

>>14333989
one more in case anyone else is researching this topic

is this just the drug use or what?

[Anonymous No.14334034]

>>14333989
Whatever I love Miley. I could subsist off her luxe braps and a nitrogenated can of Megan's perspiration indefinitely

[Anonymous No.14334040]

>>14334034
that's not miley, that's lia, former angel (now cube-headed dumpster pig)

[Anonymous No.14334045]

>>14333974

[Anonymous No.14334063]

>>14334040
Chronographic misogyny is an art

[Anonymous No.14334069]

>>14334045
>Megan was Sifu's top student all this time

[Anonymous No.14334075]

>>14333989
this decade has been one wild ride for all kids who enter some sort of 'mom im bisexual' phase when they turn 18 or go to college or whatever

[Anonymous No.14334081]

>>14334075
Holy FUCK

[Anonymous No.14334122]

>>14334081
you ain't seen nothing yet anon.......

https://www.instagram.com/p/ByvOnShnCrJ/

[Anonymous No.14334132]

>>14334122
Wait, did she name the fucking jew? Was all that shitposting about Nick being full of pedos actually true?

[Anonymous No.14334297]

>>14333989
>>14334026
>>14334040

>not understanding angles, lighting and image quality
>not understanding aging
>fetishizing youth to the point of pathology
>misogyny

Never change 4chan

[Anonymous No.14334348]

>>14326978
*contemporary

[Anonymous No.14334389]

>>14334122
so who was raping her? why doesn't she name names? is it just her claiming metoo credits without actually having suffered? fucking hollywood retards are so fucking annoying.

[Anonymous No.14334664]

eternal bump

[Anonymous No.14334673]

>>14333941
it is a novel concept to them. all the women they know have stayed the same since their creation.

[Anonymous No.14335362]

>>14334673
>>14333941
Imagine identifying as an authority on "incels" and then breezily brandishing this "knowledge" to anonymous strangers

[Anonymous No.14335389]

>>14333693
in baltimore?

[Anonymous No.14335411]

>>14335389
Don't 'member right now

[Anonymous No.14335423]

>>14335389
I think she was going to a reading in Germany if she hasn't yet. She's not promoting anything on her social media, but she always said Liveblog was a personal thing ("Liveblog for me, not for thee") and not something for the public.

[Anonymous No.14335629]

>>14334026
>>14333989
>>14333909
women peak at 13. you may not like it, but...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nPxdhnT4Ec8

[Anonymous No.14335927]

>>14333667
The channel was entirely to prove she was still relevant and could attract an audience with her autobiographical ramblings, to secure the publication after her first attempt fell apart.

[Anonymous No.14336251]

>>14335927
Didn't she self publish through Amazon first? I think the strangest Meganism is perhaps how she sockpuppetts her worst criticisms in these threads, there's sometimes so much personal detail that you can't help but wonder if it's her, who else would be so riled up?

[Anonymous No.14336349]

Thank you for this cool thread, I really want to read this book now.

[Anonymous No.14336352]

European here. Anyone care to give me a quick rundown on this garbage that amerifucks read? So I can set it aside and move on.

[Anonymous No.14336386]

>>14336352
>The sick men of Europe

[Anonymous No.14336664]

>>14336251
No, I don't think so. It was always set to come out through Tyrant:
https://www.amazon.com/dp/0988518376/
Except it was set for February 2016. Then she disappeared, eventually got sober, came back, did her videos, and then it was announced again through Tyrant and came out two and a half years after this expected publication date. I remember a couple times in her videos she was clearly wanting to talk about the book but said she couldn't talk about that yet, presumably because it wasn't 100% cleared yet.

[Anonymous No.14336910]

>mood: metal megan

[Anonymous No.14337617]

Slightly stooped, formerly fit fathers that nicknamed their swimmer-shouldered daughter's "Taz," speaking to her in the palm terraced lobby and she is bouncy with energy, flipping between fourth and fifth ballet positions with her bare feet on the polished marble, alternating every other second or so until the father withdraws a cash-wrapped credit card and hands it to Taz, who bounces up gleefully upon her plum-painted toes and thanks and kisses on the cheek her doting Father who is now finally next in line at the concierge and can schedule the day's excursions and does not even inspect the three shadows waiting to take Taz in the purring Range Rover into town for shopping and most certainly drugs, not party drugs but love drugs, Taz being a longtime collector of empathogens, they had long seemed the drug of choice for the dedicated anthropologist needing to build in herself a hyper-sensitive connectivity with her new subjects.

[Anonymous No.14338007]

"It's a little cold for sandals!"

"They're actually therapeutic and anyways my cat expired on my other shoes this morning."

"Your-"

"Puked, pooped, pissed, then passed away."

"Did you leave a pair of shoes in the office?"

"You could say that."

"Are you an employee of ***? ****? I can let you in-"

"I need the medical robotics company."

"There's no tenant here like that, Miss, sorry-"

"No, listen, I'm sorry, this is coming out all wrong, but this is really important."

"This is a private location, Miss. It's a graphics arts production floor and a CPA-"

"I was told in my earliest memories I could always return and the people at this place could help me. I never believed that message until i guess i followed it here just now. And I'm sorry, I know this is weird. But here I am. If you don't know what to do with me, I assume your boss must have gotten others like me. I came knowing this might be a highly awkward introduction. I know this isn't a normal request."

"Other's like you?"

"Other prodigals, oversights of long ago sunsetted projects, DARPA oopsies, fruits of long ago Annapolis futurists with like really large dark budgets. I think they really thought they needed to breed armies and so the scale of certain projects went beyond what people could track."

"Miss, this is private property and it sounds to me like you have no reasons for being here. You are not an employee of any of these firms?"

"No, listen, no, NO! Nonononono, hold it, stop! There is, in there, whoever, they're- I just need to see the elevator and then I'll remember which-"

"Miss, the elevators are off because business is closed."

"You know, you're being a dick. I don't exactly want to be here."

"Miss, do you think I'd be doing my job if I said, 'Sure, rampage through the subsuites and sample the breakroom Lucy tabs and speed pods."

"Y-yes, Yes, that's it, Subsuite 2080 through to 2090

"Miss, this location is closed, but the mall is on subfloor five but you can access it by exiting into the bulk and taking the slutwalk, follow the pink path for the woman safe route. It is haboob season and debris counts are high because of the economy, so please stay on the slutwalk, even if things seem to die down a bit."

Surprised how undisturbed she was by her shift in fortunes, Megan accepted the dead-end, apologized, curtsied her toned corduroy legs, and departed the lobby, it dawning on her anew more heavily by the second, seizing her excitedly, silently, a mischievious tickle threaded through Megan and forced her to wring her face to expressionlessly. There were in her now dormant recesses jolted into energetic ticking, arrivals of a long forgotten memories, earliest soap, homes, forgotten teachers, exercises. And in Megan a door opened, double flung apart, clattering the brick, withdrawing into the void all timidity, all dread, all doubt, leaving only the ire.

Megan would return. Her pilgrimage before her now was clear. Had she finally found it? The thing?

[« Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ » mxvabIoSIE No.14338173]

>>14334297
oh yeah you're right, women actually get prettier with age. thinking otherwise is just misogyny and probably pedophilia.

[Anonymous No.14338345]

>mood: abyss megan

[Anonymous No.14339258]

>>14338173
Not what I said. There's like a million factors determining how people age, and whether they remain attractive or not is up to the individual making the judgement. I've met people that get way more attractive when they're older as well as people who don't. People also become attractive in different ways. A girl might be cute and innocent in her youth and become a confident MILF in middle age, for instance.

Its fine to like younger women, its normal, what I'm saying is that to think of women as having a threshold of attractiveness as if this determined their value as human beings is ridiculous and mysognistic, and kinda problematic when considering that a lot of those standards make a super deep emphasis on youth and youthful characteristics, to the point of obsession.

Basically, don't be a dick. Women are people. You can find them attractive/unnattractive. No need to be a dick about it.

[Anonymous No.14339263]

i wonder if megan will write another novel. has she mentioned any other projects after liveblog?

[Anonymous No.14339301]

>>14326969
If it were a fiction, if everything she describes in the novel were a product of her imagination and not a minute-by-minute recounting of the events of her day, she would be a literary genius

[Anonymous No.14339352]

[Anonymous No.14339355]

[Anonymous No.14339360]

[Anonymous No.14339366]

[Anonymous No.14339373]

>>14339366
Love this scene.

[Anonymous No.14339377]

Call me Marmalade al-Ameriki, brothers and sisters because I am jammin

[Anonymous No.14339699]

>>14339258
>You can find them attractive/unnattractive

That's what everyone has been saying. You find them attractive when they're young, and they look like gay men with bad skin after 30.

[Anonymous No.14339843]

>>14339258
this is the first time i have ever actually belieced a 4chan post was made by a woman so excuse me but this has been a long time coming: tits or gtfo bitch

[Anonymous No.14339872]

>>14339377
i don't know why but that picture made me think, what if you wanted to practice the hard ones so you get better at them, so you go and make every single conversation you have for months into an apology somehow so you'll be less anxious during all the rest of your conversations

[Anonymous No.14340149]

Megans video vlogs are my only will to go on

[Anonymous No.14340393]

>>14339843
Feet are an acceptable alternative

[Anonymous No.14340958]

>>14339843
I've had a dick and balls the whole time anon.

[Anonymous No.14341119]

>>14340149
She seems really funny if you know her personally. I'm jealous I don't has a Megfriend

[Anonymous No.14341767]

[Anonymous No.14343253]

>>14341767
cute!

[Anonymous No.14344717]

>>14327552
who is mira?

[Anonymous No.14345379]

>>14344717
One of the notches in Megan's lists of conquests

[Anonymous No.14345381]

>>14327591
Goodnight Megan and Mira

[Anonymous No.14345455]

>>14330927
cringe

[Anonymous No.14345936]

>>14330927
what does this even mean?

[Anonymous No.14346187]

>>14345936
That whenever any thought or comment or opinion outside of the edgelord/sexist/racist dumbfuckery is expressed anons just show up in a swarm to squash it mike they're the white(supremacist) blood cells in the cancer-ridden 4chan ecosystem

[Anonymous No.14346195]

>>14346187
and how is a megan boyle thread testament to that?

[Anonymous No.14346206]

I am very excited to finally read it today! Her mall video in combination with the pure sincerity portrayed in this thread convinced me.

[Anonymous No.14346207]

>>14346195
Cuz a bunch of edgelords showed up like clockwork to insult and demean Megan and her fans just because they expressed views that they disagreed with

[Anonymous No.14346224]

Consider also that Meg documented in pics and video pretty much the entirity of Liveblog writing. Pic related is from the first few chapters, after she'd done heroin and passed out in her bathtub. It's so eerie to see how insanely well she documented her descent. Adds a whole new layer to this autofiction experiment

[Anonymous No.14346229]

>>14346224
There's photos of her feet stop weight scales that coordinate with specific dates of Liveblog, and passages about health and fitness etc.

[Anonymous No.14346238]

>>14346207
>>14346187
That's just the 4chan staff hired to keep threads going, or else used as a professional courtesy (Megan has friends in the mods and jammies) to test the marketability of something or someone. Its not nearly as organic as it wishes to be perceived. Can it really be the case, we found the last isolated bastion of uninfluenced wild internet culture?

[Anonymous No.14346242]

>>14346229
Why doesn't Megan post any pictures of her feet? Do her feet not make her happy anymore? Does she puff on her boots to help with cravings? Did she give up her autopodophilia in her recovery too?

[Anonymous No.14346263]

>>14346242
>>14346229

Is the megs feet thing a meme or like forreal? Honest question

[Anonymous No.14346304]

>>14346224
where are the photos? thats pretty based.

[Anonymous No.14346313]

>>14346263
She thinks feet are funny and it's kinda like "ok, Meggo, you're the artist..."

[Anonymous No.14346326]

>>14346304
Google her flickr, they're all there

[Anonymous No.14346523]

>>14346326
>An anthropomorphic steam whistle with a jazz trumpetists puffed out cheeks begins a furious whistling

[Anonymous No.14347434]

The feet of Megan Boyle do not quite smell
Their scent is one of absence, lingered stinks so quell

[Anonymous No.14347501]

>>14330828
>racist
jfc

[Anonymous No.14347502]

>>14326971
>This is a memoir, not a novel.

Lmao okay, you go on expecting a woman to recount actual events and them not be fiction by the time they leave her lips.

Also, it says "a novel," which I can tell because I can read.

[Anonymous No.14347561]

>>14333870
hating women is retarded, its like hating a dog or cat, it cant help doing what its going to do. now being sexist, that is the way to go

[Anonymous No.14347599]

>>14347561
>hating women
That's what flirtation and irresistible negging looks like, lil beta

[Anonymous No.14347605]

>>14347599
you’re not even wrong but that’s not real hatred, queer. more like tough love, homo. also kill yourself, faggot.

[Anonymous No.14347702]

>>14347605
>tryhard homophobe

[Anonymous No.14347849]

>>14347605
Snippety Snip Snip! Castration Day nears. What will your life look like afterwards?

[Anonymous No.14347854]

>>14347561
>women are liars

>>14347561
>women are non-human animals

>>14347599
>begging and mysoginy is actually just flirting

Yeah and y'all don't hate women, right

[Anonymous No.14347872]

>>14347854
way to take an analogy out of context. shows your intellect

[Anonymous No.14347873]

>>14347854
>y'all
Thoughts dismissed

[Anonymous No.14347881]

>>14347854
Ok, Sir Gawain, your creampie is ready

[Anonymous No.14347885]

>>14347872
The implications of the analogy reveal your thinking. It's therefore fully contextual. Don't deflect.

[Anonymous No.14347890]

>>14347849
stay away from my cock, shlomo

[Anonymous No.14347904]

>>14347885
men are called pigs for a reason, a female reason i dont fully understand, but a reason nonetheless. understanding women is better then hating them, and it truly is one or the other. dont respond unless you say something of worth

[Anonymous No.14348010]

>>14347904
Cuz men have been abusing and oppressing women for generations. Men are obviously not all pigs, but when a woman says that there is a cultural background that gives it a deeper context. My issue isn't with the naming, my issue is coming into the discussion with mysoginist assumptions, such as you did by saying and/or implying that understanding women implies accepting as fact all the stereotypes and assorted misogyny. You don't need to hate women if you don't understand them. The issue is you believe women are not people, or different in a fundamental way from men, which they aren't. They're human beings, which is something that seems to escape your understanding.

[Anonymous No.14348028]

>>14348010
The issue is you believe women are [...] different in a fundamental way from men

You're retarded.

[Anonymous No.14348094]

>>14348028
Rather that than be a petty woman hater who uses mental conditions as insults

[Anonymous No.14348098]

>>14327591
haha wouldn't it be funny if she stepped barefoot on me hahaha

[Anonymous No.14348112]

>>14348010
if you dont think sexism is a natural phenomenon, your bluepilled or female. ofc theyre people tard, i have a mom and several sisters, and treat women at face value the same as i do men, and expect about as much. but if you think that women aren’t fundamentally different then men, >>14348028

i dont hate women, if i did i would just come out and say it. i do respect them, on average, less then men, but only because life experience and reading about the nature of relationships uncovers a lot of dark truths about females, not that they can even help their “dark” deeds, not unlike an animal. youre right that if you dont understand women you dont have to hate them, but frankly its likely to happen because women do some really stupid female shit that men never do, and provided those actions have explanation (they do) you can start to treat women like they should’ve been from the start, with patience, understanding, and leading by example. all youre doing is repeating that i hate women like you know more about myself then I do. you argue like a women though, so i understand you’re frustration and cant be bothered by it

[Anonymous No.14348137]

>>14348112
btw you probably wont ever agree with me, because the male viewpoint of women is eternally patronizing, which is somewhat cruel admittedly, but nature can be cruel in that way. its why you cant discuss women with a woman, they just wont agree with you because the female mind argues more emotionally, and how in tf are you going to agree with someone who basically says “you wont ever be on the same level as men in the social hierarchy”

[Anonymous No.14348159]

>>14348112
It's not about whether sexism is natural or not, it's that it objectively makes relationships between the sexes more difficult and combative in a way that benefits no one. Obviously women have biological differences from men, and some female behavior may have biological origin is, but women exist with the same existencial, social and economic anxieties as men, personal and minute differences uncounted. That what I mean. We're not different when you bring it down to the human essence.

Maybe we've just had different experiences, and I'm sorry women in your life caused you to feel like this. People can be shitty, and it's hard to not let that color your perception of other humans. But there is an inherent infantilazation in your statements, and that infantilazation comes from a cultural understanding of women as lesser than men, which contains within itself the understanding of women as lesser people, or not people at all. This is also added on how you say I argue like a woman, using that sexist logic I just described as a put down, which invalidates your previous statement about respecting women. I don't pretend to know you, but your statements and stances give me only reassurances as to your positions on women, which correlate with typical sexist and mysoginist patterns of thought

[Anonymous No.14348186]

>>14348159
Lol get fucked

[Anonymous No.14348200]

>>14348094
>Rather that than be a petty woman hater who uses mental conditions as insults

No one has ever been given a diagnosis of "retarded," you absolute retard.

[Anonymous No.14348209]

>>14348159
>>14348137
>>14348112
>>14348010
>>14347904
>Pedantry as a service
>Brought to you by a global community of pedants

[Anonymous No.14348217]

>>14348200
Dude, it was an actual fucking medical diagnosis. Now it's just become a slur derogatory to people with developmental challenges. Fucking shitty to say, fuckwad

[Anonymous No.14348227]

>>14348217
>Dude, it was an actual fucking medical diagnosis.
Lmao

>Now it's just become a slur derogatory to people with developmental challenges. Fucking shitty to say, fuckwad
You are a retarded person and it's a fucking shitty thing to make other people endure, fuckwad.

[Anonymous No.14348278]

>>14348159
id agree, but once again you bring my life into it, women have treated me fine. listen, its not that i want to think about women this way, its just the right way of thinking about women (in the most subjective sense) simply put, feminine women like manly men. and being a manly man insinuates not acting womanly. what is acting womanly? well, acting on emotion rather then logic for starters, and generally being more social and socially dependent (not that those are bad things btw, just fax). women are not men, men arent women, deal with it. the thing is that you come out the more sexist person, though not openly. i accept the difference between the masculine and the feminine and see the values, both good and bad, in each. you, on the other hand, are insistent that these differences should be ignored because “um we all have problems though???”

no shit, sherlock. do you also believe there is no difference genetically or culturally between the races? yes, we all have things we can relate to each other about, endless things, but thag doesnt disprove that there is a difference in the sexes, and that acting like we are better then nature by applying equity where it doesnt belong makes both men and women more miserable in the long run.

i said you argue like a woman because you do, i never said it was a bad thing. you did.

[Anonymous No.14348306]

>>14348278
to add onto this, you kept attacking me personally while ive stayed mostly objective. use facts to disprove me, dont bring mudslinging into the argument, it doesnt bring anything to the table. and to clarify what i meant by u r more sexist in ur beliefs, i mean to say you think that subservience is somehow a bad thing. men are usually more dominate then women, no? if you disagree, you’re being untruthful. subservience isn’t inherently bad, in fact its very good. we all fall under the big Gs judgement at the end of the day, so we are all in a way subservient to him, and i have no qualms about that. you have some problem with the fact women are more subservient? why? please explain

[Anonymous No.14348345]

>>14348306
one more thing, dont bother responding. i reread your posts a couple times and came to the conclusion you are in fact retarded.

[Anonymous No.14348460]

>>14348278
>>14348306
>>14348345
Based

[Anonymous No.14349669]

>>14348278
Look, as far as I'm concerned, the correct way to think about women is the correct way to think about anyone else. I make no distinctions. That works for me. It obviously doesn't for you. Arguing emotionally or logically is not a trait of one sex or the other. Culturally, it's a sexist shorthand as our society places logic above emotion in most contexts, thus making "womanly" ways of being shorthand for less valuable. Women wanting manly men and vice versa has nothing to do with it, and behaviors considered womanly or manly don't need to be directly attached to toxic traits. Being a man isn't bad, being a woman isn't bad.

Also there literally is no difference between races. It's not different breeds of humans. Of course people who live in different environments will develop different physical and social characteristics, but that's independent of their genetic make up. There's entire African tribes whose genome is denser and more mixed than almost anyone in Europe or America, and they have similar sociocultural practices because they develop in proximity to one another. Your point on that is moot.

I took your comment about arguing like a woman as pejorative because that is what you implied by the framing of your post.

And in fact, humans have demonstrated in some cases to transcend their nature. For one, the idea that sexism is natural is bogus. It's not a genetic trait, it's a sociocultural one. Pre-agricultural societies were largely egalitarian because their genderroles did not exist. Everyone hunted and foraged and took care of the young and shared food sources.

I never said subservience was evil inherently. My issue is that you frame that as women being naturally "rightfully" subservient to men, when that, as well, is a cultural product more than one of pure human nature. Furthermore, to believe that that is a natural or correct way or being carries the assumption that any other way of being would be Unnatural or wrong. I'm not surprised that the anon who called you based did it with a picture of Hitler.

Finally, your invocation of equality in the eyes of God is also bogus because it exists outside of the immediate terrain of our argument, and it distracts from the facts discussed, those being that you espouse a worldview that justifies misogyny and the supposed inherent superiority of men (and I'd assume, white, straight, men at that), even if you aren't saying it. You're deflecting and using typically deceptive tactics often seen in fascists traits. Again, Hitler pic related. And you're doing it because it allows you to earn an air of superiority over what you consider to be lesser people, such as women. It's very blatant, and disingenuous.

[Anonymous No.14349713]

Cash out that bump limit, megheadz

[Anonymous No.14349736]

>>14349669
*yawn* is this all the female intellect really has to offer? the redpill is that women want it this way, they prefer being taken care of and protected. nothing to do with superiority, just stating facts. and research into history and biology will prove these things. you also fail to grasp that differences in race and gender doesn’t make ones soul better then the other, it just makes then different souls. also you’re just lying to yourself; there are no differences between the races AND their cultures? delusional. even black people would disagree with your opinion. get educated, and stop virtue signaling. people can be treated different as long as their treated well imo, you clearly have a different point of view. good day, m’lady!

[Anonymous No.14349740]

>>14349669
>It's not a genetic trait, it's a sociocultural one
Do you have any evidence of this? All culture in existence are sexist

[Anonymous No.14349814]

>>14349736
Whatever, let's agree to disagree. Might as well end it amicably. Hope you've a good life. Give Liveblog a read, it's worth it. Don't become an American vanguardist. Give your mom a hug.

[Anonymous No.14349827]

>>14349814
aight good talk. ill put it in my queue, im always looking for wacky shit to read. try out “sperm wars”, and “the game” by neil strauss, they’ll open your eyes a bit. btw, can i pretty please sniff your feet perhaps?

[Anonymous No.14349832]

>>14349814
>>14349827
this, let him lick your feet roastanon

[Anonymous No.14349843]

>>14349740
Not all of em, but I'm not gonna convince you and thus not gonna put the effort. There is a lot of research into this though, mostly about pre agricultural societies and a few smaller modern societies. As for most societies being sexist, I'd blame that mostly on patriarchal conquest and colonialism, with the exception of the middle east, where it's just patriarchy and religion

[Anonymous No.14349892]

>>14349843
yeah but have you ever though about why it was always men that went on conquests and dominated neighborhood kingdoms and what not? could they be more, dare i say it, aggressive and assertive? maybe even dominant?

[Anonymous No.14349916]

hey, everyone hating on it made me give it a try
pretty good stuff

[Anonymous No.14349919]

>>14349892
Men tend to be more dominant than women, that's true. But I'd say that conquest had more to do with resource hoarding and land than with masculinity.

[Anonymous No.14349941]

>>14349919
idk, i think its more about exploration and money. men aren’t too complicated, we want gold and the truth. its pretty masculine to launch into the unknown, not saying women can’t do it, but especially back then it certainly wasn’t as likely

[Anonymous No.14350000]

Megan Boyle oinks
Crackled toe joints
No snapping disappoints
Purrings rejoice
Songs of her pointes
Golden ratio anoints
Encrypted cyber links
Sweaty hospital shrinks
Crossed soles ripply pinks
Nails strong by zincs

[Anonymous No.14350015]

>>14350000
I commend these digits to muse Megan. May your work be fruitful and your spirit grow unflaggingly mighty.

[Anonymous No.14350060]

>>14349916
Same, treat yourself to the signed edition, anons

[Anonymous No.14350072]

>>14349941
I think curiosity is a human trait. And exploration follows from it. I don't think however that tribes and clans etc would go thru the trouble of organizing raids and risking death just for the rush. It may've been a component, but it was mostly about not starving and making sure other people didn't snatch up your shit. Women didn't go cuz it was safer to keep them and children home, as both of them were usually kidnapped in raids

[Anonymous No.14350106]

>>14350060
pathetic shilling anon

[Anonymous No.14350125]

>>14350072
people were fine where they were, my friend. like you said though, curiosity drove them to reach new heights. its deeper then a “rush”, to these people it couldve been the finding of heaven or some crazy shit, people knew so little back then, you have to put yourself in their shoes. also i totally thought that you believed men and women should be treated the same, am i wrong? you would condone the behavior of the men for not letting the women go with them in that case, wouldnt you agree that we treat the sexes differently for a reason?

[Anonymous No.14350133]

>>14350106
at this point i genuinely can't tell whether it's an actual shill or someone elaborately trolling, because the megan boyle shill is also the guy who keeps posting long stories and fake twitter screenshots about foot fetish things

the boyle shilling is clearly tongue in cheek to an extent even if it is serious, but i can't figure out if it's completely tongue in cheek. i think the funniest possibility is that the guy actually hates megan boyle, but knows that she lurks here or maybe even starts her own shill threads occasionally, so he's fucking that up for her by making it so she IS talked about, but in the wrong way - by spamming cringy shit about her and making everybody else hate her.

alternatively he is just an actual shill and doesn't realize that he's having the opposite effect to what he intends. but i really hope it's a deliberate psy op, and he knows full well he's associating her with his cringe posting and deepening the existing dislike of her that /lit/ had so that it's 10x worse. that makes me laugh

[Anonymous No.14350146]

>>14350133
no, he's just an alt-lit Chris-chan jerking off to megans' feet. i'm sure his single mother bought him an MFA.

[Anonymous No.14350149]

>>14326969
>For your live oration of your Liveblog novel
>For your safe transit between Eurocuck cities
>For your congenial reception amongst the sick men of Europe
Xister Megan, we pray for you

[Anonymous No.14350154]

>>14350146
>i'm sure his single mother bought him an MFA.

[Anonymous No.14350211]

>>14350125
It depends what you considered society to be before agriculture. Before that people moved constantly or had several hubs where they would congregate as a safe zone. I do believe the rush is part of it but I find it hard to belief that the risk v. reward of just "fuck shit up" would be a good sell to a group of precariously living people. As for the equality between sexes, I meant to make the argument that whatever natural way of behaving, we're past, as a species, the point in which those are important. Humans have not existed in natural niches for thousands of years. Cities and capitalism and nations aren't nature, they're human creations. Therefore, our ways of living do not need to adhere to that primal nature, even if it continues to influence us. In other words, we can rise above that status into more complete and wholistic understanding of humanity. I'm not opposed to men and women being treated differently on certain terms. I am opposed to the assumption that one sex is above the other for being different. Do I explain myself?

[Anonymous No.14350228]

>>14326969
>For your highly treaded soles at the behest of every step
>For your athletic ankles, neither slight nor thick
>For your tight tum of old, and your newly playful launch
>For your EuroStar pushed tush sneaking into upgraded seats
>For your expatriot bowels, aspread far away porcelain with nary water below
>For your queues of foreign suitors rigorously tested by Europe's socialized sexual medicine
>For your nightly dry hootenannies of strummed acoustic guitar and charades
>For your Amarillo pollen suede loafers, may their leather interiors cool and support inflamed Meggy piggies or else insulate and keep them dry in the damp chills of Copenhagen, Berlin, Dublin and Transylvania

[Anonymous No.14350235]

>>14350228
Why do you write these? Usually gimmickposters stop when they don't get any attention for it.

[Anonymous No.14350272]

>For your highly treaded soles at the behest of every step
>For your athletic ankles, neither slight nor thick
>For your tight tum of old, and your newly playful launch
>For your EuroStar pushed tush sneaking into upgraded seats
>For your expatriot bowels, aspread far away porcelain with nary water below
>For your queues of foreign suitors rigorously tested by Europe's socialized sexual medicine
>For your nightly dry hootenannies of strummed acoustic guitar and charades
>For your Amarillo pollen suede loafers, may their leather interiors cool and support inflamed Meggy piggies or else insulate and keep them dry in the damp chills of Copenhagen, Berlin, Dublin and Transylvania
Xister Megan, we pray for you

[Anonymous No.14350317]

>For your highly treaded soles at the behest of every step
>For your athletic ankles, neither slight nor thick
>For your tight tum of old, and newly playful paunch
>For your EuroStar pushed tush sneaking into upgraded seats
>For your expatriot bowels, aspread far away porcelain with nary water below
>For your queues of foreign suitors rigorously tested by Europe's socialized sexual medicine
>For your nightly dry hootenannies of strummed acoustic guitar and aranciata and charades
>For your Amarillo pollen suede loafers, may their leather interiors cool and support inflamed Meggy piggies or else insulate and keep them dry in the damp chills of Copenhagen, Berlin, Dublin and Transylvania
Xister Megan, we pray for you

[Anonymous No.14350318]

>>14350317
why are you deleting and reposting this

are you getting banned?

[Anonymous No.14350362]

>>14350318
Optimizations

[Anonymous No.14350366]

>>14350211
yes you do and yes you make sense. i tried to explain why i dont think men are more valuable then women, just why they are different and treated the way they are. im more trying to explain why sexism even exists in the first place and still does to this day, while racism has more or less been abolished at a societal scale. race doesnt matter (as much) but gender does, and we shouldnt fool ourselves with the myth of equity when we could just accept the differences and work towards healthier relationships for people. primal doesnt always equal bad.
its kind of like how a real relationship would play out, with the masculine and feminine ramming heads and producing something beyond feminine and masculine. the realest love i've experienced is with a girl i was constantly at odds with, because it was fun. it made us open up to each other in a way you cant with people you are all smiles with. our differences are what make us attracted to each other, so i feel they should be embraced rather then dismissed or flat out ignored. do i explain myself?

[Anonymous No.14350395]

>>14326969
Nice thread, Megheads! Let's finish strong for our namesake!

[Anonymous No.14350743]

Who is ready for the novel of the 2020s?

[Anonymous No.14350751]

>>14350743 (Tao)
nobody except you

[Anonymous No.14350757]

>>14350743
Sounds actually exciting, I hope he doesn't cuck out and do some shit that "satisfies both sides," mainstream and internet people. Just go fucking all the way. Do you want to be the chinky Houellebecq or do you want to be a shoe that tries to fit every size but ultimately fits none?

Of course he'll pull his punches though. Nobody has the balls to go all in these days.

[Anonymous No.14350779]

>>14350757
His book will contain the secrets to curing autism.

[Anonymous No.14350805]

>>14327432
londonfrog's posts have more literary merit than this

i dare anyone to argue otherwise

[Anonymous No.14350819]

>>14350779
Tao should get into the nutrition industry next. Boy is that full of some fucked up shit. Check out The Oiling of America, and Lustig and Taubes on sugar. Rogan unironically has some good podcasts with them. Also Nina Teicholz.

I can't even tell who's jewing who anymore. Either every one of these rogue nutritionists is just a crank, or "mainstream" nutrition is completely bought and sold by corn/vegetable oil industries. Did you know heart attacks are a 20th century phenomenon? Virtually unknown and unreported in the 19th century, when vegetable oil was unknown and most Americans ate boatloads fat, butter, and lard every day.

[Anonymous No.14350888]

>>14350743
Go for it, Tao! We are awaiting your work's completion as one anticipates a rotisserie.

[Anonymous No.14350996]

>>14350805
They're autofictions of different architectures, Londonfrog being perhaps more enjoyable because he is anonymous and uncommercial.

[Anonymous No.14351321]

>>14350366
You do explain yourself, and I agree, though I believe those differences might become more engaging and noteworthy in the context you describe of intimate, personal relationships, rather than in more complex social structures where the individual does not account itself for the complexity. I do think differences are good, and that they should embraced, but I also think there's a lot people who find those differences as grounds for less than stellar, toxic treatments of others, and we should be watchful because for a lot of us is extremely difficult to untangle and understand how those toxic traits are not inherent in the relationships between sexes.

[Anonymous No.14351696]

>>14327566
>>14327799
>>14329088
>>14330822
>>14331100
>>14331888
>>14331966
>>14332166
>>14332577
>>14332722
>>14333188
>>14333777
>>14333899
>>14339355
>>14339366
>>14339377
>>14339699
>>14347599
>>14348200
>>14350000
>>14350133
>>14350211
>>14350366
>>14350888
mischievous numerology but the digital ones endorse megan and meganposting

[Anonymous No.14351760]

>>14350743
not a huge fan of tao, but i'm incredibly curious about this book. he's been working on it for some time now. do we even know what it's about? (other than whatever "leaving society" could mean)

[Anonymous No.14351761]

>>14327279
and you believe it

[Anonymous No.14351800]

[Anonymous No.14351835]

[Anonymous No.14351884]

[Anonymous No.14351956]

[Anonymous No.14351967]

wtg megheads!!

[Anonymous No.14351975]

>>14351967
yeah we've covered a lot of ground in this thread

[Anonymous No.14352069]

>>14351760
No idea, but I'm curious myself. Did he do anything in the way of leaving society or is he still in his usual Brooklyn / NYU social world?

[Anonymous No.14352191]

>>14352069
he got with some other girl and started doing more psychedelic drugs plus reading a lot of alternative news media, particularly around vaccinations, GMO, genetic editing, etc, etc. Also read a lot of Timothy Leary and John C. Lily and that kinda stuff. Has also been doing a lot of automatic writing/visual art.

My guess is he's juts going deeper into his own head and seeing what the fuck he can pull out.

[Anonymous No.14352216]

>>14351967

[Anonymous No.14352532]

>>14352216
>this is a 35 year old woman

[Anonymous No.14352837]

Good thread, MegHeads

[Anonymous No.14352973]

>>14352532
34, 28 at the time