/lit/ - Literature

[Anonymous No.14288449]

What's a right-wing version of this chart?

[Anonymous No.14288454]

>>14288449
So that is what anime loving trannies read.

[Anonymous No.14288456]

The right is intellectually bankrupt. Your greatest thinker is Ben Shapiro.

[Anonymous No.14288471]

Guenon, Evola, Gentile, Shapiro, Peterson, Spengler, Rubin, Harris, Weinstein, Rogan, Milo, Sean Last, Nick Fuentes, Ryan Faulk, Sargon, Heidegger, Kaczynski

[Anonymous No.14288475]

>>14288456
The left cant meme

[Anonymous No.14288476]

Right wingers don't read.

[Anonymous No.14288481]

>>14288456
Douche Chills, what faggot made this?

[Anonymous No.14288500]

>>14288456
what the fuck is this?

[Anonymous No.14288501]

>>14288471
Why are you grouping together hacks like Heidegger and Spengler with legit people like Nick Fuentes and Ryan Faulk.

[Anonymous No.14288510]

>>14288501
I know you are being ironic but let's be honest and say they are all midwits

[Anonymous No.14288529]

>>14288449
Define right-wing. Depending on wether you want traditionalim, nationalism, laissez-faire economics, individualism or general anti-leftism you'll have different ranges.

About some authors in that very list:

If you mean classical liberalism, natural rights and republicanism, Kant does that a bit but not in those books.

If you mean individualism or critique of collectivism, Neetch and Foucault do that.

William James proposes a sort of Darwinism of ideas and makes a case for religious thought.

Marcel Mauss analyses gift economies as power structures, in a way that contradicts Engels' imaginations of primitive communism.

I don't know all the authors there nor have read most works of some of the authors I do know so I won't comment on those.

[Anonymous No.14288548]

>>14288449
At least 10 of those books can be considered "right wing"

Even more depending on a broader conception of right wing

[Anonymous No.14288552]

>>14288475
The right can't read

[Anonymous No.14288681]

>>14288449
this

[Anonymous No.14288761]

>>14288681
kek

[Anonymous No.14288775]

>>14288681
Its funny because you are exactly right lmfao

[Anonymous No.14288823]

>>14288681
this is me. yup im based.

[Anonymous No.14288885]

>>14288761
>>14288823
Samefag cancer

[Anonymous No.14288889]

>>14288885
t. pol mong shitting a brick
lol keep your virgin mouth closed yer fanny

[Anonymous No.14288907]

>>14288449
The majority of these people are considered right wing by todays standards. Leftists of today would literally call marx a fascist

[Anonymous No.14288917]

>>14288907
>Leftists of today would literally call marx a fascist
gobbledigook

[Anonymous No.14288918]

>>14288681
>trump
>right wing
pick one

[Anonymous No.14288966]

This is the problem with the left. They all live in an abstract world and require mental gymnastics to prove themselves while the right had practical experience in the real world and tradition

[Anonymous No.14289178]

>>14288966
jfc not everything is far left vs far right. Develop some fucking nuance to your views and stop basing your image of the world on hollow stereotypes.

[Anonymous No.14289478]

>>14288552
Atlas Shrugged is 1000 pages long and terrible.

[Anonymous No.14289504]

>>14288449

[Anonymous No.14289622]

>>14288471
this is a bad look for the right

[Anonymous No.14289635]

>>14288449
that same chart read correctly

[Anonymous No.14289651]

>>14288449
>Believing the l/r lie
>>14288456
pic related
>>14288471
underated
>>14288476
tbf nobody on this board does

[Anonymous No.14290119]

>>14289504
Nice.

[Anonymous No.14291116]

>>14288449

[Anonymous No.14291121]

>>14291116

[Anonymous No.14291162]

>>14291116
I like how righties need to be told by a meme that its okay to read Marx

>>14291121
Im economically left but I still like Evola and Guenon, and think right wing socialism is a stupid phrase

[Anonymous No.14291176]

>>14288449
I like how all the good stuff on that chart is right wing.

[Anonymous No.14291182]

>>14291116

>Wealth of nations
>Leviathan
>Accessible

What?

[Anonymous No.14291196]

>>14291162
/pol/ is esentially anonymous twitter. the value of the discussion that comes from there can vary from pure horse shit to somewhat insightful thought

/pol/ is nice in that it allows for pure uncensored speech.(which is mostly shitposting) but those who filter through the horseshit can get something out of it. which may in turn aspire them to do some actual reading of their own.
In other words, you get what you want out of it.

>>14291162
you like evola and guenon but you havent actually understood what they wrote. if you did, you wouldnt be talking about meme ideologies from a left and right wing perspective in the first place. keep reading though. your heart is in the right place.

[Anonymous No.14291199]

>>14291116
>jews, lefties and liberals
A conspicuous attempt at converting poltards.

[Anonymous No.14291201]

>>14291182
Ok then what should i read before them

[Anonymous No.14291203]

>>14291162
>I'm blah blah blah and I think that blah blah blah and I think that blah blah blah
Kill yourself.

[Anonymous No.14291204]

>>14288449

[Anonymous No.14291207]

>>14291204
aaaaaaaaaand the forced meme is killed

[Anonymous No.14291209]

>>14291199
What are you talking about?

[Anonymous No.14291238]

>>14291209
Most of those authors oppose fascist states and quite a few of them promote liberalism. Those who don't, support monarchy and epistocracy.

[Anonymous No.14291247]

>not collecting the Theory and History of Literature Series as commodity fetishes

[Anonymous No.14291266]

>>14291203
Killyourself fucking nigger, read some theory

[Anonymous No.14291267]

>>14291238
Did you see the second part?

[Anonymous No.14291270]

>>14291203
t. has never read a single word of marxist theory

[Anonymous No.14291319]

>>14291266
>>14291270
seethe more. furthermore, dilate.

[Anonymous No.14291324]

>>14291267
Horrible labeling
Ted was anarchoprim far cry from natsoc.
Burke is the run of the mill conservative who advocated for democracy.
Cioran was a radical pessimist even nihilistic in some regards
Schmitt is legit I'll give you that.
Carlyle is a good read.
Rest is mostly esoteric garabage
Also rand and ron paul is laughable.

[Anonymous No.14291328]

>>14288449

[Anonymous No.14291344]

>>14291319
read theory incel

[Anonymous No.14291349]

[Anonymous No.14291355]

>>14291324
nigha do you not see the fucking labels the fuckin books are under.

[Anonymous No.14291360]

>>14288449
> rightwing
> reads
Anon, I...

[Anonymous No.14291369]

It’s just old, good books, many books from this chart would be on it, most explicitly right wing literature from the 21st century is dog shit, and so is left wing literature, but they’ve successfully memed themselves into believing the veneer of “theory”

[Anonymous No.14291372]

>>14291344
>theorycel calling other people incels
autogynephile

[Anonymous No.14291375]

>>14291324
>horrible labeling
Did you read the fuckin labels? Is ted listed as a fuckin nat soc? /pol/ isnt even fucking nat soc because /pol/ isn't one person.
>rand is laughable
right libertarianism is the shortest on the list. whoever made this clearly isnt too partial to it either.

[Anonymous No.14291394]

>>14291116
no one who read these would continue to take pol seriously

[Anonymous No.14291435]

>>14291324
>horrible labeling
Did you read the fuckin labels? Is ted listed as a fuckin nat soc? /pol/ isnt even fucking nat soc because /pol/ isn't one person.
>rand is laughable
right libertarianism is the shortest on the list. whoever made this clearly isnt too partial to it either

>rest is mostly esoteric garbage
>i havent read their work, so they are esoteric
you didnt mention georges sorel in the authors you were listing off, which means you havent read him which means you are fucking entry level in the shit you read.

>>14291394
you barely read any of them at all, and there is another page to the fucking list>>14291121

>taking /pol/ seriously
/pol/ doesnt take /pol/ seriously
it is to fucking shitpost about niggers, jews, and the ills of modern society.
it is like a bar you go to, to blow off some steam. sometimes you have insightful conversations. sometimes you talk shit.

The fact that you even take it so seriously, just please. Fucking read more. Jesus.

[Anonymous No.14291444]

>>14291435
>it is to fucking shitpost about niggers, jews, and the ills of modern society.
someone capable of reading and understanding those books would probably not feel the need to post on or read pol, is my point

[Anonymous No.14291447]

>>14291444
why not?

[Anonymous No.14291457]

>>14291328

Gaddafi's Green Book is very stupid little piece of rambling. He says that people shouldn't own more than one house, car etc while there yet exist other people who have no houses or cars. He rejects representative government as usurpation of the people's authority, proposing to replace it with something (various local committees) which he pretends isn't the same thing, but which clearly is (because there will always be certain people more interested in the workings of local government than others). The image's creator probably demeans the literary/political value of the other books by implying that Gaddafi's little diatribe is worthy of the rest.

[Anonymous No.14291458]

>>14291394
There are plenty of racist antisemitic authors in that list

[Anonymous No.14291459]

>>14291447
because pol is mostly low-effort spam and the average poster is a retard

[Anonymous No.14291462]

The most fun way to troll leftists is to become better at anticapitalism than they are

[Anonymous No.14291463]

>>14289504
Absolutely based
Left outs btfo

[Anonymous No.14291471]

>>14291458
I see a couple, but what's your point?

[Anonymous No.14291479]

>>14291459
>low-effort spam and the average poster is a retard
that is the entirty of the fucking internet
do you think fascism is about opressing minorities and women as well?

[Anonymous No.14291480]

>>14291458
Racism and anti-semitism are leftwing, cuck. Get over it.

[Anonymous No.14291482]

>>14288471
>Nick Fuentes
This dude is a fucking mestizo that just happened to luck out on a white looking phenotype.

[Anonymous No.14291492]

>>14291479
>that is the entirty of the fucking internet
disagree
>>14291479
>do you think fascism is about opressing minorities and women as well?
no, but a large contingent of pol could easily be convinced of that

[Anonymous No.14291499]

>>14291492
>disagree
most of the internet is social media, there is no need for me to explain the rest.

minorities and women should be opressed anyway. whether or not it is the doctrine of fascism.

[Anonymous No.14291514]

>>14291499
>most of the internet is social media
social media is trash and so is pol. the only thing we disagree about is exactly how shitty pol is
>minorities and women should be opressed anyway. whether or not it is the doctrine of fascism.
you seem to be talking past me because i'm not giving you what you want. do you want me to say that racism is bad or something?

[Anonymous No.14291530]

>>14288449
Read Carl Schmitt and Dietrich von Hildebrand

[Anonymous No.14291534]

>>14288761
>>14288775
>>14288823
Trannycels

[Anonymous No.14291537]

>>14288449
That’s not a left wing chart, it’s a theory chart

Nietzsche, Kant, James, and Barthes are not leftist for instance

[Anonymous No.14291540]

>>14291459
>because pol is mostly low-effort spam and the average poster is a retard
>>low-effort spam and the average poster is a retard
>that is the entirty of the fucking internet
>>that is the entirty of the fucking internet
>disagree
>>most of the internet is social media
>social media is trash
Read that again
>do you want me to say that racism is bad or something?
no. I want you to say racism is good and the more minorities you oppress on your day to day basis, the further you bring yourself closer to white heaven.

It's 3AM here in nyc. Gnight.

[Anonymous No.14291551]

>>14291537
Nietzsche is definitely leftist

[Anonymous No.14291553]

>>14291540
>entirety
meaning all of
>most of the internet is social media
not even true, but I chose to ignore this
>all of
>most
are these the same? my general point is that pol is shit tier, even worse than a lot of social media. and somehow if you were right, and pol were no worse than the rest of the internet (which you agree is garbage), what kind of justification is that for wasting your time there? you don't have a point you absolute bitch

[Anonymous No.14291595]

>>14291553
I am up again.
when i said "the entirety" that was hyperbole
>pol is shit tier
>worse than most social media
opinions opinions opinions. i dont give a fuckin shit. i want to talk about whatever the fuck i want to talk about and i can do so on /pol/
i dont know what your whole tool for measurement is for what is better or worse social media is, but whatever it is, it has no basis in objectivity.

[Anonymous No.14291640]

The video game reviewer icycalm has recommended most of these books and the guy is a white supremacist, misogynist, and Nazi supporter.

[Anonymous No.14291800]

Why do people lump Heidegger's philosophy in with the Right? Heidegger is a proto pomo who birthed deconstructionism. He may have been a Nazi and an anti-semite but his philosophy was certainly not right wing at its core. I also don't understand why Kant is thrown into the Theory chart. Are these just memes that I'm not getting?

[Anonymous No.14291835]

>>14291534
I have never seen a person respond to a kek comment before, conservatives are the biggest fucking snowflakes

[Anonymous No.14291844]

>right wingers
>actually reading books, especially political theory
LMFAOOOOOO pick one

[Anonymous No.14291848]

>>14288449
there isn't really one

[Anonymous No.14291907]

>>14291800
>he doesn't know about the hierarchy of being and further as a result that Heidegger was only applicable to the postmodernists/to the creation of postmodernism because he ultimately failed in the intuitive apprehension of the sensed finality to being in a poetic consciousness

[Anonymous No.14291949]

>>14289504
>Half of the books are in conflict with one another, with a quarter praising liberalism, while another damns it to hell
>The central ramble doesn't acknowledge this, nor does it even seem aware of it
Okay then. This is your daily reminder that American conservatives are liberals (economically, social liberalism is something quite different).

[Anonymous No.14292139]

>>14288456
Carlson’s book was fairly interesting. Although he’s hardly a right winger, more of a earlier liberal back when Dems cared about the middle class and unions. Which were staunchly against immigration and devaluation of labor as well as against this free trade which destroyed our manufacturing sector

[Anonymous No.14292152]

>>14288552
Right and left are simplistic terms to describe a incredibly complex set of ideas and issues. And to immediately dismiss your opposition without even having a dialogue and debate and discussing the finer points of each other’s views is a huge problem in today’s society. Dialogue and focusing on compromise and how to fix the urgent problems is the only way forward. But regardless of the belief system most are ideologies who refuse to even see the other side as human or even capable of conversation. Try to not be an elitist and have a civil discussion with someone some time

[Anonymous No.14292348]

>>14291435
Ted is listed as reactionary right which is still egregious. The whole point of the chart is to promote natsoc ideology so my intial assessment is accurate. You're right I haven't sorel but he's not a prerequisite for political theory. You haven't even read fraction of the authors listed on your charts. Hold off on the hipocrisy and also refrain from posting. You're just embarassing yourself. Imagine defending any board in this site especially /pol/. What a joke.

[Anonymous No.14292667]

>>14291537
>William James described his pragmatist philosophical theory as a kind of anarchism: “A radical pragmatist is a happy-go-lucky anarchistic sort of creature”

[Anonymous No.14293654]

>>14292348
>point of the chart is to promote natsoc ideology
Stop posting

[Anonymous No.14293661]

>>14288471
>Kaczynski
kek

[Anonymous No.14293668]

>>14288681
top lel

[Anonymous No.14293680]

>>14291949
Is it necessarily a bad thing that right wingers are willing to read books with differing messages and conclusions? Isn't that just being open to ideas?

[Anonymous No.14293733]

>>14288471
Shapiro, Peterson, Harris, and Milo are legit retards. Rogan isn't a writer. Heidegger is part of the "read theory" meme regardless of his politics.

[Anonymous No.14293866]

>>14291480
Woke and based.

[Anonymous No.14294417]

>>14291116
no

[Anonymous No.14294477]

>>14288449
Its the same chart but read critically