[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 52 KB, 640x713, 1574476716617.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14223689 No.14223689 [Reply] [Original]

is he right /lit/?

>> No.14223710
File: 659 KB, 271x223, Ryan-Gosling-Laughing.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14223710

>>14223689
>what kind of Search for Truth is region-specific?
incredibly based old boomer

>> No.14223716

>>14223710
post some webms that make you want to be the woman

>> No.14223723

>>14223689
it's not really region-specific tho, it just started in a particular area and needed a label

>> No.14223729

>>14223689
But algebra and chemistry are region specific, it’s just the West forced everyone to play by its rules.

>> No.14223731

>>14223716
some sissy trap shit?
>>>/r9k/
>>>/b/
>>>/gif/
there you go the tranny boards

>> No.14223732

>>14223689
OH NONONO HE HASN'T HEARD HE HASN'T HEARD PFHAHHAHAHA HE THINKS- OH NONO HE CAN'T! I SIMPLY CAN'T BELIEVE IT! HE STI- STILL HAHAHAHHAHAHAH HE STILL THINKS TRUTH EXISTS PFFFFFFFAHHAHAHAHAH AHAHHA AHAHHA THIS WAS WRITTEN OVER 200 YEARS AFTER NIETZSCHE HHAHAHAHHA AHAHHA AHHAHA PEOPLE TAKE HIM SERIOUSLY HAHAHA AHAHHAHAH AHAHHA AHAH AHAHA AHHAHAHAHHHAGHAHAA AHGAHA AHGAHA AHAHGAHA AHGAHAGHA

>> No.14223738

>>14223729
wow you are reaching richard dawkings levels of retardation

>> No.14223739

>>14223729
algebra is not a "western" idea. the clue is in the name

>> No.14223741
File: 1.00 MB, 1716x1710, 1549889112982.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14223741

Jesus Christ this is pathetic, at least the replies to his dumb tweet give me some hope . When will these clowns stop? are they trying to replace philosophers?

>> No.14223757

>>14223741
Dawkins invented memes, he is the greatest philosopher of our times

>> No.14223770

>>14223741
Who would have though that Schrodinger and Bill Nye would be the only two intelligent people in a picture? Everyone else is an idiot and should be executed. Einstein was retarded, Dawkins is retarded, Krauss is retarded, Tyson is retarded, Bohr is retarded, and Heisenberg is retarded.

>> No.14223774

>>14223741
>are they trying to replace philosophers?
no. no modern scientist gives a shit about philosophy. you can sit and stare at your fucking navels all day if you want. some of us have got more interesting things to do.

>> No.14223776

>>14223731
you forgot another board
>>>/lit/

>> No.14223784

>>14223770
On second thought, Schrodinger is also retarded here, claiming appearance is "not real" (doesn't exist), even though it clearly does as perception.

Who would've thought the only intelligent person in the picture would be Bill Nye, who is driving out the nihilists by showing that which is real exists.

>> No.14223789

>>14223770
>Einstein was retarded
>Bohr is retarded

you have to be 18+ to post. this board is embarrassing

>> No.14223796

>>14223776
you made a mistake, that link directs to this board

>> No.14223803

>>14223689
>implying philosophy has external and globally uniform truth
>>14223732
>>14223774
based

>> No.14223808

That might be the stupidest thing Dawkins ever said in his entire life, if this Twitter is true. No conty calls himself a conty, that's mostly a fucking English label.

>> No.14223829
File: 85 KB, 640x479, qVLgQ.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14223829

What about instead of "Continental Philosophy" we had "Continental Breakfast?"

>> No.14223836
File: 10 KB, 325x325, Arakek.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14223836

>>14223829
Now this is what I cal breakfast!

>> No.14223838

>>14223741
Fucking based this might be my new background on my laptop

>> No.14223843

>>14223789
Bohr is a Platonist even though he lived after Nietzsche released the Twilight of the Idols, a complete distruction of the Platonist project, and is therefore retarded.
Einstein is even more retarded, denigrating war as degenerate, even though "War is the father and king of all", Heraclitus.
Just look at the pathetic Einstein-Freud exchange:
https://www.public.asu.edu/~jmlynch/273/documents/FreudEinstein.pdf

But no, you saw on the internet that they were smart, so you better not question anything and sacrifice all personal perspective for a fucking network lol.

>> No.14223849

>>14223843
lot of projection there. you're a moron, kill yourself

>> No.14223861

>>14223770
>>14223784
>"I'm going to intentionally misconstrue the meaning of "reality" as used by the quoted, pretending I don't know they meant extant in the tangible realm outside of consciousness which exists between all of us, in order to paint these people who are far more intelligent than I am as stupid."
Bohr's comments on the objective and subjective mirror your own, albeit phrased differently, by the way. Everyone on the right side of this image is a pseud and it's telling that you both don't understand the big brains on the left and put Bill Nye on the proverbial pedestal.

>> No.14223865

>>14223849
You realize all thought is projection, right? Like, I am projecting what I know, from past experiences, on new and foreign things? I am convinced that you've never thought before.

But you saw people use the "projection" argument on 4chan, so you must be right! lol

>> No.14223869

>>14223741
major league physicists vs IFL science evangelists

>> No.14223876

>>14223865
You realize that words have multiple contextual meanings and that isn't what he meant? JFC you're a fucking idiot dude

>> No.14223881

>>14223861
he nearly does, until he gets to his last line: "Physics concerns what we can say about nature", which is why I threw him happily right in with the retards. But no! They are in black and white so they must be smart! Lol.

>> No.14223899

>>14223865
>"I think Einstein was retarded because he said something that vaguely (when construed the way I did) contradicts Heraclitus (when construed the way I did). Thoughts are real and I thought it, therefore it's correct even though I know nothing about this new and foreign thing!"

>> No.14223901

>>14223876
That is precisely what he meant, idiot, and I'm not going to let the projection argument fly, and I'm never going to let the projection argument fly. There it begins, and there it ends.

>> No.14223908

>>14223899
I never said it was correct, I said it existed. You can't even think and you are trying to argue with me lol.

>> No.14223914

>>14223865
end your life

>> No.14223916

>>14223881
>"Physics concerns what we can say about nature", which is why I threw him happily right in with the retards.
That's true you dipshit. All physics tells us is the mechanics of our universe, not its origin or reason should it have either. Physics can't tell us what exists outside of the universe from which we derive physics. This isn't even big brain stuff and you're too stupid to get it.

>> No.14223924

>>14223901
>>14223908
>"My thoughts existing is relevant to the arguement and somehow a refutation of the point that I have no idea what I'm talking about!"

>> No.14223932
File: 21 KB, 753x960, 1574559002803.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14223932

>>14223865
>>14223843

>> No.14223950

>>14223770
imagine trying so hard to be contrarian that you end up just becoming completely mentally retarded

>> No.14223956

>>14223950
>imagine trying so hard to be contrarian that you end up just becoming completely mentally retarded
wheredoyouthinkyouare.png

>> No.14223982

>>14223916
the use of physics is not to figure out what we can say about nature.

>> No.14223994

>>14223924
it is relevant to Schrodinger saying "the plurality that we percieve is only an appearance; it is not real". Can you even follow an argument?

>> No.14224040

>>14223982
>the use of physics is not to figure out What we can say about nature
It isn't to determine how the universe came to exist or exists, so if it isn't about defining the universe as it exists, what is it for? Frying eggs?
>>14223994
>Can you even follow an argument?
Yes, that's how I know that the chain of responses where I'm included is about another anon's use of the term "projection" and this idiot who intentionally misconstrues every word he can. We were discussing his defense of his projection. Also, reality in the context of Schrodinger's comment means real outside of perception, and that's very obvious considering that he mentions appearance. Just rub two brain cells together, and you can figure out what people actually mean if you aren't autistic