[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 56 KB, 452x650, 8932ce39-2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14197196 No.14197196 [Reply] [Original]

Any good books about lonely women?

>> No.14197203

>>14197196
my diary desu

>> No.14197209

>>14197196
my gf's diary desu

>> No.14197241

You have to make them feel true loneliness. When they fall in love with you then you can start, even better if you dont have any feelings for her. You have to make her understand how little she means in comparison and how your presence is everything and can be withdrawn at any time. Then the real fun can begin

>> No.14197257
File: 28 KB, 480x480, oswald-mosley-1566914453.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14197257

women have intrinsic value due to their fertility therefore they are incapable of feeling "lonely" or unvalued. Men are the "barren" animal therefore we must fill that void with value and prove our worth rather then being deemed worthy by default

>> No.14197272
File: 262 KB, 745x843, 1545803393212.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14197272

-men love to overestimate their performance in bed
-men love to be praised by any woman
-men love to underestimate the lust of women
-men love to underestimate the boredom of women
-there is nothing more boring to a woman than to be fucked over and over by only one man
-men love to think that women love men like women love children
-men love women
-men love to service women
-women love children
-women do not love men
-women are in heat all year long
-women see no reward for faithfulness
-women see the reward for sleeping around
-women see no reward for their virginity
-women do not desire to have only one provider for sex
-women do not desire to stay virgin
-women do not know how to stay virgin
-women do not desire to be prude
-women despise asexual Chads
-women fear of being asexual

-the only gift a man possesses by his sheer existence is to be left alone if he wants it, but ofc very few men want this since very few men kill their infatuation with their spook of ''society'' and women.

>> No.14197280

>>14197196
No such thing

>> No.14197289

Skylark

>> No.14197293

>>14197241
t.psychopath

>> No.14197304

>being able to get empty sex on demand = never feeling loneliness

Y'all keep revealing your shallowness

>> No.14197315

>>14197272
>the only gift a man possesses by his sheer existence is to be left alone if he wants it
Solitude is a blessing and you guys are too dumb to realize it.

>> No.14197323

>>14197304
stfu, homo

>> No.14197335

>>14197315
When solitude is a choice you can say that. When it isn't (i.e the case for everyone here) that is just cope and sour grape juice.

>> No.14197503

>>14197272
>women do not desire to stay virgin
Wrong. Also this >>14197315

>> No.14197525

>>14197196
The Lonely Passion of Judith Hearne

>> No.14197535

>>14197304
I can almost garante you that 60% of those men asking for dates wanted more than just casual sex

>> No.14197543

All women are whores.

>> No.14197641

>>14197543
Including your mom.

>> No.14197646

>>14197257
mosley basysed legpilled XD

>> No.14197781

>>14197543
Merely stating the obvious.

>> No.14197810

>>14197503
Women only "desire" to be virgin around average males and below average subhumans. They want Chad to rip their virginity from their soul.

>> No.14197817

>>14197543
this
i have come to realize that all the women in my family are whores too cousins, aunts, grandma, etc. once you can finally accept that your mom is ultimately a whore too only then can you begin the ascension to solitude and freeing yourself from the desire to be around these demons mashallah

>> No.14197849

>>14197196
>men harrassing women means women can't be lonely

>> No.14197864

>>14197315
You're conflating solitude with solitary confinement.

It's not fun at all if you have no choice or control in it.

>> No.14197868

>>14197849
>It's harassment if I think the guy isn't good enough for me

All men should disregard this doublethink. If she doesn't want messages she knows where the block button is.

>> No.14197887

>>14197304
This but unironically.

>> No.14197890

>>14197196
You have to understand that women seek the thrilling and exciting bad life from thugs and killers. That's why they chase the bad boys and want to domesticate (control) them. They hate the boredom of stability and security which is why they stir up drama in their lives from gossip, infidelity, etc. I'm sure you've heard young women claim that having a serial killer murder them would be exciting given how bland and boring their daily existence is.

>> No.14197907
File: 547 KB, 888x1024, Kanae_smug_laugh.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14197907

>>14197890
>I haven't spoken to a woman outside of an educational institution for over a decade but let me tell you about the femoid psychology: the post
Just have sex, freak.

>> No.14197909

>>14197241
I met a girl who did this to me once

>> No.14197921

>>14197907
>anime
>"have sex"
dilate

>> No.14197934

>>14197272
i want to be left alone BUT I WILL NEVER GET MY WISH BECAUSE CIA NIGGERS ARE LITERALLY SURVEILLING EVERY FUCKING MOVE YOU MAKE AND RECORDING IT IN A DATABASE STORING EVEYR SINGLE BYTE OF INFORMATION REGARDING THE MINUTIAE OF YOUR EXISTENCE TO THE POINT WHERE ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE CAN PREDICT THE REST OF YOUR LIFE

I JUST WANT TO BE FREE FROM THE FUCKING FEDS!!!!!!!! AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

>> No.14197979

>>14197907
My penis is tiny; the experience would be humiliating. No, thanks.

>> No.14198009
File: 481 KB, 694x1024, Nemu_smug.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14198009

>>14197921
just have sex, incel
>>14197979
Then stop spouting bullshit. There are children on this board who actually take that stuff seriously.

>> No.14198016

Would you want to date dudes from reddit though?

>> No.14198017

>>14198009
>Then stop spouting bullshit. There are children on this board who actually take that stuff seriously.

not my fucking problem retard

>> No.14198020

>>14197907
>>14198009
You are definitely a faggot or something worse. I seriously doubt your sexuality is ethical or lawful.

>> No.14198028

>>14197196
IMAGINE BEING INEPT AT BEING A WHORE

>> No.14198031

>>14197543
All men are sex obsessed

>> No.14198035

>>14198031
*all functional humans are sex obsessed

>> No.14198038

>>14198035
exactly

>> No.14198051
File: 832 KB, 1920x1080, lelouch_laugh.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14198051

>>14198020
Visit a prostitute or something, incel. Then you'll understand that you're miserable not because you can't have sex but because you're an awful human being who doesn't understand people.

>> No.14198064

>>14198009
Take what seriously? Facts about women? They should.

>> No.14198067

>dude you aren't really lonely! just date these randoms from reddit who messaged you saying they would! It would totally lead to a fulfilling marriage

When did this place become an incel support group

>> No.14198071

>>14198051
>weeaboo avatarfag with anime dialogues claiming he understands the greater scope of human emotions
if someone here is autistic that's you and only you

>> No.14198073

>>14197272
good thing im bi
fuck women

>> No.14198075

>>14198067
we are at a point in history where we not only have hypergamous whores being the most valuable members of society but also beta men like this anon here defending them and their behavior. why yes how dare she date an average man she deserves chad you go girl!

>> No.14198106

>>14198067
>When did this place become an incel support group

when more and more men kept getting KEKED and BLACKED by late capitalist alienation

>> No.14198110

>>14198106
>capitalist alienation
incels are a thing because of biology but yeah repressing women and sexual communism would at least hide the issue and give incels/lower/average men wives

>> No.14198114

>>14197304
this

>>14197535
That doesn't mean that what they wanted, or their conception of what they wanted, was actually what the woman wanted. If I were a woman I'd opt to be lonely.

>> No.14198123

>>14197543
kek

>> No.14198128

>>14198114
Correct. Women only want Chads. They may settle for average men, but they'll never be happy. The problem is that if they get what they want then society as we know it will blow up. Polygamy is unstable. Women need to be in chains.

>> No.14198133

>>14198064
>>14198071
You yourself know that you've never had a conversation with a woman. Not even once. All your so-called knowledge is a result of you and other incels coming here and just spewing forth vitriol and just absorbing the same hatred coming from other people. You don't know shit. You're just a hateful bitter 20 something freak who thinks that autistic rants by other incels count as a serious psychological studies. All you have is that and some screenshots from dubious websites misinterpreting the occasional study. You don't even people-watch because every time you go outside you become white with rage when you see an interracial couple or something. I don't claim to understand the human condition particularly better than you. What I do know is that this childish delusional shit about hypergamy and branch swinging and all that other worthless PUA stuff is something only people who don't even register others as human beings can believe. That's why normalfags despise you so much. They can smell that implicit and completely unfounded sense of superiority you have and they can't help but sneer at you for it.

>> No.14198134

>>14198067
right now.

>> No.14198139

>>14198075
A more rational point in time. It's obvious incels are just salty over their lack of ability to get a mate. How many dudes here complaining about women actually are in a relationship do you think?

>> No.14198145

>>14198128
>Women only want Chads
Either that makes me a chad or something you've said here is incorrect. Going with the latter.

>> No.14198147

>>14198110
ok and? i'd rather women be repressed than me.

>> No.14198149

>>14198147
based

>> No.14198150

>>14198106
fuck off commie

>> No.14198157
File: 547 KB, 559x559, trump.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14198157

>>14198133
>being this mad over getting called out as a weaaboo faggot
if you actually have a gf I can assure you she's cheating on you
you sound weak af lmao

>> No.14198162

>>14198133
>normalfags smell your personality
>but bitches routinely get abused by good looking males
Your entire post is cope. You've never read more than a few sentences of blackpill theory. Read more.

>>14198145
You might be a betabuxxer. Have you ever considered that?

>>14198139
>It's obvious incels are just salty over their lack of ability to get a mate.
And? Does that disprove anything?

>> No.14198180

>>14198114
How did you get to that conclusion? You don't know what either of the sides want unless the fact that both were lonely, wich is remedied by reaching out, like they tried and got punished for it

>> No.14198195
File: 140 KB, 930x1356, guy_debord.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14198195

>>14197907
This is the problem with the people here. Their idea of "women" is just a bunch of 4chan posts. They are so detached from reality that they've become an alien entity to them.

>> No.14198198

>>14198133
did you type this with tears in your eyes, seethelord? lmao

>> No.14198201

>>14198162
It proves that all these remarks are in bad faith

>> No.14198205

>>14198195
why do you think it's a problem with just people here? the average normalfag uses the internet to an unhealthy degree, they're just entrained by twitter or reddit culture as opposed to 4chan, which is just as bitter and maladjusted, but with different scapegoats to sacrifice

>> No.14198215

>>14198195
I think it's more fundamental. They are like literal babies who don't recognize other human beings as creatures of the same type as them. They just don't understand that other people have complex mental processes just like they do. All the talk about "femoids" and this pseudo-scientific language is a reflection of the fact that they consider themselves like some kind of zoologist observing the social dynamics of insects. They can relate to other men online but that's where their humanity ends. It's astonishing that there are people like that on a board dedicated to literature of all things. What the fuck do these people even read if they're like this?

>> No.14198235

>>14198162
>Have you ever considered that?
I consider myself well-liked and content, as well as more knowledgeable of people than you are.

What was that black statistic again? Accounts for 13%, but also half? Instead of just blacks, let's look at the male incarceration rate in general: they make up 50% of the population, but somehow 94% of prisoners. Even just among whites they make up 88%. By the standards of argument this board generally expects, men are just low-quality organisms by their very nature. It's not that women are picky.

>> No.14198237

>>14198180
Or maybe (likely) the failure was on the part of the men.

>> No.14198238

>>14198215
Literature has also become a spectacle

>> No.14198245

>>14197196
Give this post a (you) if you think OPs with "women" in the text should be automatically deleted.

>> No.14198250

>>14198198
>>14198157
>>14198162
You guys don't have any actual rebuttals because you know it's true. I've been like that too, which is why I understand the mindset. I too would unironically lurk places like this and fill my brain with junk about branch swinging, "alpha fucks beta bux", "80/20" and all that other crap which I don't remember any more. It's stupid and pointless and you'll understand that too when you internalize the idea that you're not actually a particularly clever, soulful, deep, and intelligent individual, and that other people are like you more than they're not. Your ideas are so fringe and ridiculous to outsiders because all you need for all that to go away is just a basic sense of being a human being just like everyone else.

>> No.14198259

>>14198215
You are doing exactly the same thing, weeaboo avatarfag
seethe

>> No.14198267

>>14198195
No, their idea of "women" is backed up by how women behave.

>>14198235
>well-liked and content
You're not saying anything. Males are by their nature more aggressive than females, yes. Why are you acting like it's some fantastic revelation that men make up 94% of prisoners? Men are designed to go out and get, women are the receivers. Black males are especially prone to violence. Why would women make up the majority of criminals with that taken into consideration? Do you not understand basic biology?

>>14198250
So you just decided to discard everything because it made you too bitter and you couldn't handle it? Whatever works for you.

>> No.14198268
File: 97 KB, 796x624, 1087BD0C-4249-4449-BF68-FCC1904A9DA6.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14198268

>>14198250
>just ignore concerning developing statistics bro

>> No.14198270

>>14198267
>Males are by their nature more aggressive
Hmm, yeah. Maybe that's the exact fucking problem I was pointing out, retard.

>> No.14198272

>>14198250
>more seething and coping

listen retard, i don't actually believe in anything. i'm too aloof and perpetually ironic to give a shit about your gay arguments. in fact i didnt even read this post. i read your first one which told me all i need to know. stop getting emotional about gay shit on the internet. its embarrassing. god i am so above you

>> No.14198277

>>14198270
What's the problem with that? Women prefer aggressive and dominant males. Are you retarded? Why do you think thugs and serial killers get so much attention? Aggressive Chad shits all over a nice guy normie.

>> No.14198280

>>14198215
except women are LITERALLY biologically incapable of formulating complex mental processes. your comparison to insects was on point. women are basically the insects of people. their brains are inferior. they are inferior.

>> No.14198286
File: 257 KB, 1261x776, thewall.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14198286

>> No.14198288

>>14198277
>Women prefer aggressive and dominant males
This directly contradicts your claim that they're picky. Men make up 94% of the prison pop. If women just liked mindlessly agressive males, they wouldn't have to hold the door shut to so many of them. You can't say that women like what men naturally are and then simultaneously assert that they dislike most men.

>> No.14198300
File: 10 KB, 271x229, seething soyjack.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14198300

>>14198280
>>14198272
>>14198268
>>14198267
Read more literature
>>14198259
I'm not. I'm writing this exactly because I recognize you all as kindred spirits. I've said this multiple times now. I'm writing with a distinct note of disdain and mockery because it's what I feel for myself for being similar to you.

>> No.14198306

>>14198288
>Men make up 94% of the prison pop

exactly. the ideal partner is locked behind bars, all that's left in society are the betabois who are too wimpy and cucked to just grab a bitch by her pussy and seize her as their personal property. naturally she will be picky, she HAS to be picky.

>> No.14198311

>>14198300
what literature concerning the average unremarkable life of a beta orbiter would you recommend? no john green please

>> No.14198312

>>14198288
Most men today aren't naturally aggressive. Because 94% of the prison population is men that means the majority of normal law-abiding men are aggressive? And just because a man is aggressive doesn't automatically mean they are attracted to him. It makes her more attracted, but if he's ugly it won't do that much. He needs to combine it with status to have real success. If some incel goes around acting aggressive and dominant, he'll go to jail. If some thug does it who has money and power, it's another story. But the fact remains that women are more attracted to aggressive men than weak ones. Aggressive Chad will destroy meek Chad 99% of the time. You are obfuscating the argument on purpose. You're either a soi or female. At the very least, you come off as one based on how you think. Cringe.

>> No.14198326

>>14198306
>the ideal partner is locked behind bars
No? Do you not understand the difference between 94% of men being incarcerated, and men aimply making up 94% of the incarcerated population? There are plenty of aggressive people roaming freely.

>betabois who are too wimpy and cucked
Yeah they're wimpy and cucked but also all their competition is imprisoned? Retard.

>naturally she will be picky, she HAS to be picky.
Or maybe what she's been served is simply bad.

>> No.14198332

>>14198311
>what literature concerning the average unremarkable life of a beta orbiter would you recommend
I wouldn't. I literally mean just read good literature. I remember reading Jane Eyre and it having a profound impact on me - not because the book itself is particularly great but because I literally did not conceive of women as being creatures who have complex thoughts before reading a semi-autobiographical story written by a woman about a woman. It's not like I rationally thought that women weren't human. I just didn't feel them to be human on a gut instinct level.

>> No.14198333

>>14198326
>he's still going with his nice guys get the female argument
Why do you think nice guys are a meme among normies?

>> No.14198340

>>14198312
>Because 94% of the prison population is men that means the majority of normal law-abiding men are aggressive?
So what about blacks then? Let's start there, from >>14198235. You're going to say 13 and 50 doesn't mean blacks are naturally violent? You can concede that much?

>> No.14198352

>>14198333
The phrase "nice guy" does not actually refer to a guy who is nice, it refers to entitled losers who mistake themselves for nice.

>> No.14198360

>>14198326
>Yeah they're wimpy and cucked but also all their competition is imprisoned? Retard.

yes because modern societies of control are made to punish the strong. betabois aren't actually hauling their competition off to jail, they get cops to do it, and cops are the biggest beta cucks of all. it's an entire system designed from the ground up for the meek to inherit the earth.

>> No.14198377

>>14198360 #
>yes because modern societies of control are made to punish the strong
And yet the weak are still cucked? Read what you're greentexting.

>> No.14198395

>itt seething virgins assert that the weak fraction of the populace is the more powerful, less-weak one

>> No.14198406

>>14198377
they are cucked by their very nature. they were born with cuck souls.

>> No.14198413
File: 157 KB, 1125x1794, women4.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14198413

>> No.14198420
File: 985 KB, 2274x998, women tinder.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14198420

>> No.14198429

>>14198406
And that's no woman's fault.

>> No.14198433
File: 791 KB, 2294x751, weininger.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14198433

Weininger will explain everything to you, OP. They can't be lonely, but they can be pseudo-"lonely" relative to their spoiled rotten lifestyles.

>> No.14198435

>>14198340
What are you even arguing against? Black males tend to be more violent than other males, yes. Black males are also very ugly on average compared to white males. Aggressiveness isn't the whole story, it just makes foids more attracted to you. If you're not above average looking, you need status with it as well.

>>14198352
No, that's the way normies twisted it because it contradicts what women say. Never trust what foids say. Nice guys fit a lot of the criteria women supposedly want in a man. They're nice, caring, hardworking, helpful, etc. The reality is that women lie. They don't give a shit about those things unless you're attractive, have money, or have status. Nice guys eventually become betabuxxers if they make it. Most nice guys aren't 500 lbs. neckbeards in basements, that's just what foids falseflag because they don't actually want a nice man.

>> No.14198452

>>14198435
>that's the way normies twisted it

>>14198333
>Why do you think nice guys are a meme among normies?
>normies?

If that's the way normies twisted it then that's what they mean.

>> No.14198458

>>14198435
>Black males tend to be more violent
And what statistic supports this? Perhaps, the statistic which says the same thing of males in general? Men are the nigger gender, pure and simple.

>> No.14198459

>>14198420
>Girl receives literally thousands of requests
>Is somehow expected to judge his guy by their personality or whatever from the 5 pictures they post and the ~200 word bio

>> No.14198469
File: 82 KB, 1370x220, WfQ2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14198469

>> No.14198473

>>14198452
Nice guys are guys as I've described. I'm saying that when normies use the term, they deflect the actual problems and properties of nice guys and project them as some fat 500 lbs. neckbeards or other social losers and then claim most nice guys are like that. They then use that strawman against everyone who points to nice men being treated like shit. Please think before you post.

>> No.14198475

>>14197196
I feel lonely in crowds.
t. Man.

>> No.14198478
File: 34 KB, 632x296, 1567455088211.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14198478

>>14198332
>It's not like I rationally thought that women weren't human. I just didn't feel them to be human on a gut instinct level.

Has that really changed for you? I still can't see them as fully human. They seem like sheltered children to me.

>> No.14198481

>>14198469
basically
they fuck had in their 20s because the guy who is willing to listen to their troubles for some pus (beta soi) isn't attractive enough. he only gets considered when the woman late 20s or 30+ and the wall is closing in. then she finds her hubby she's been searching for all along after the carousel has done its job

>> No.14198484

>>14198475
I also felt lonely in my previous relationships.

>> No.14198485

>>14198473
>People speak through my personal dictionary, through which I decide what they mean
No

>> No.14198488

>>14198485
>>14198452
don't phonepost please, tourist

>> No.14198490

Imagine using even an ounce of your mental energy over women, dont think when it comes to women, because they surely dont

>> No.14198492

>>14198469
because men are generally pretty low qual

>> No.14198497

>>14198473
You're correct. However, it does stem from reality as well. Being seen as a nice guy is a massive ego trip for said neckbeards.

>> No.14198498

>all these WKs in here
kek

>> No.14198502

>>14198488
>Real oldfags don't even have phones!
Don't post, retard.

>> No.14198506

>>14198498
>WKs
What is this new terminology? Whale king?

>> No.14198508

>>14198498
>94%
>Men are OK! Just open the door!

>> No.14198513
File: 121 KB, 520x588, holes.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14198513

>>14198492
only a lifetime of being worshipped by default for having a vagina, and a mind so stunted that you never think for the five seconds necessary to notice that this is why you're being worshipped and repudiate it, could lead you to think you are "high qual" when your gender is the one that files 3.5% of patents, has invented or created 0.1% of things in (even recent) history, contributes nothing but histrionics to public discourse, etc.

you are a blank slate consumer who exists to wander around and say "I like to have fun :) I like fun things that are fun," but men don't even notice because all they care about is your hole

>> No.14198518

>>14198478
Yes and no. I'm still a freak and I am interested in people in the same way I I am in fictional characters - a sort of canvas where a part of an interesting story plays out. I still don't feel a constant sense of belonging and kinship with other people and humanity at large. What did change is the distance between men and women in my mind. I always had the ability to relate to human males in that way, but women were just a confused swirl of stuff and I couldn't see humanity in them. Now I do, in a same way as men.

>> No.14198520

>>14198497
It also stems from the fact that women are manipulative. I'm not saying there aren't fat neckbeards who think being nice means they should have a gf. However, that's not most nice guys. They're the minority. Most nice guys are average Joes, and women do whatever they can to conceal this fact.

>> No.14198522

>>14198513
I'm a man, try again.

>> No.14198527

mein gott you can just smell the r*ddit in here

>> No.14198532
File: 214 KB, 1200x1200, ted-kaczynski-578450-1-420.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14198532

>>14198513
>patent good!!

>> No.14198535

>>14198532
based kaczynski foid destroyer

>> No.14198541

>>14198522
i just told you not to phonepost.

>>14198520
this. it's the same as being milquetoast these days. if you are genuinely nice and outgoing, people will call you weak, because hypergamous whore women have poisoned people's standards into thinking this is "weak." sure, some nice guys are nice out of weakness, but most people who have an impulse to be considerate and sensitive are just socially normal. it's women's viciousness that is preventing this normal instinct from gelling into a harmonious society by using their pussy as a scarce luxury commodity.

thankfully this brief interlude of pseudo-feminism will be over soon. maybe real feminism will be possible after another thousand years of patriarchy, but either way.

>>14198532
hey look, another MAN who did something notable. where are all the women? oh yeah, invisible to history except when they have some relation to a more famous, more talented man.

>> No.14198551

>>14197543
>>14197641
based and blackpilled

>> No.14198554

>>14198541
Try again.

>> No.14198564

>>14198541
>Men are great because they built this great society for me
>Also I hate this society, and it's women's fault

>> No.14198567
File: 71 KB, 600x480, 49121c7d.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14198567

>>14198215
shoo shoo normie, you will never get it until it's too late you fucking oversocialized bugman.

>> No.14198570

>14198564
>this strawman r*dditor again

>> No.14198571

>>14198554
>get told "don't phonepost" several times
>reply with unfunny, 2-3 word long, white noise posts that amount to saying "Nope."

this isn't a chatroom, tourist. then again because you're a woman you're incapable of ever actually realizing this. your brain is so addled by years of being venerated for your hole that you think showing up to a roundtable and going "I disagree." qualifies as an actual contribution. you can't be cured, because even when someone explains it to you, you just reply "Nuh uh though."

here's my last attempt to contact the atrophied soul that you presumably still have, smothered somewhere deep beneath your pussy-spoiled exterior persona: i don't care if you disagree with me, refute me, etc. just be funny or interesting in the process. don't ASSUME your contribution is automatically interesting just because it's YOUR contribution. that's your pussy talking, and it's all filled up with years of false praise by men.

cast off the shackles off the patriarchy, cast off your merely secondary existence in relation to boners, and say something interesting for the first time in your entire life. go!! right now!! don't phonepost!!!

>> No.14198575

>>14198570
Ted's a real redditor huh

>> No.14198579

>>14198567
Like that pic

>> No.14198581

alright it's definitely a foid

>> No.14198588

>>14198250
>clever, soulful, deep, and intelligent
Chads don't need any of that shit because they have god tier facial aesthetics and a V shaped body.

>> No.14198589

>>14198520
Dude, I know. Girls masturbated to me being beaten up in school. Everything good about them is the artificial layer men put there (such as the looks during [but due to it being from men, only] their fertile period), all else is rotten.
Heck, they get freedom and what do they do? Grow leg hair, bleed in public. Disgusting.

>> No.14198594

>>14198571
>woman
Try again.

>i don't care if you refute me,
>just be funny
The only hole here is in your head, anon. Your gender is the nigger of genders. You accuse people of treating your clubhouse as a chatroom, and yet you want to be instantly praised for sending women PM's. You don't want to contribute to people's lives, you just want to be thanked. Don't pass on your genes.

>> No.14198602
File: 1022 KB, 900x1344, woman_is_the_nigger.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14198602

>>14198594
first of all, women were confirmed as the niggers of gender in the 1970s

second, speaking of genes, what are your plans for after you hit the wall? are you just going to throw caution to the wind and have a couple of autism babies?

>> No.14198605

Could all of the WKs in here just look up Chadfishing? Or just make a fatass landwhale fake Tinder account. That should be a good start.

>> No.14198616

>>14198605
they’re just gonna cope by saying that casual sex doesn’t equal committed relationships lol

>> No.14198617

>>14198602
>first of all, women were confirmed as the niggers of gender in the 1970s
94%

>> No.14198625

They say sex is very important for healthy relationships but the same physical attraction that leads to sex doesn't lead to relationships.

>> No.14198626

I don't understand all the hate about women here. This is the way they are and have always been. Accept it, move on and enjoy them for what they are just like hundreds of generations before you have.

>> No.14198629
File: 122 KB, 1260x448, tinder.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14198629

>>14198616
remember, these are all the women you spent extra minutes agonizing over how to woo and court

>Aw geez, I wonder what I should say.. She's cute haha.. I never get matches!! I wonder what I should say to impress her!!!

meanwhile in another chat window she was SUCKIN' CHAD CUM

>> No.14198632

I'm convinced that women are the enemy nowdays. Even the foreigners seem to get trapped in the west unable to conquer this system. How long until west actually is going to collapse and someone worthy can take this niggerdom down, because I'm losing my hope.

>> No.14198645

>>14198626
Because the system has stopped working for us, yet we are entrapped within it and are expected to bust our asses off to make it work, something which is is entirely against our interest.

>> No.14198650

>>14198626
You're an idiot. That is woman's nature, yes. It was suppressed for most of recent history though. Now it's been unleashed thanks to feminism and J*ws and we're seeing an insane amount of hypergamy. The women of your grandfather's days were also whores on the inside, but they were kept in check. This is no longer the case unless you live in Afghanistan.

>> No.14198656

>>14198650
This.

>> No.14198660

>>14198588
What I was trying to point out is that you believe that you're all of those things to a much greater extent than others, and that's ridiculous and not true. You're not some misunderstood sensitive hero in a world of "NPCs" or whatever. You're just a dweeb who may or may not have an interest in literature.

Anyway, go to a family restaurant and look at the clientele. How many of the people sitting there with friends or families have a "god tier facial aesthetics and a V shaped body"? I'm forced to go outside because I'm in university and I just see a bunch of normal people with a few people at either end of the attractiveness scale. I see plenty of couples. None of the men look like that dumb meme from /int/ with the black-and-white fella. The girls aren't all goddesses either. Some are kinda chubby, some have a weird nose or something. Most of them can manage to find a connection with a fellow human being.

That's what I'm trying to get across all this time. 4chan posts are NOT reality. Stop obsessing over nonsense. What I've been trying to say all this time is that you all believe in this redpill nonsense because you do not acknowledge others as creatures similar to yourselves.

>> No.14198664

>>14197196
My Anecdotals desu

>> No.14198668

>>14198660
You're clearly just coping over being a delta male having to work for substandard leftover poon.

>> No.14198677
File: 12 KB, 258x245, 354deaa3770912621bb816da070346ab.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14198677

>women
>lonely

>> No.14198679
File: 55 KB, 386x419, 1574022490650.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14198679

>>14198664

>> No.14198684

>>14197196
The Setting Sun

>> No.14198682

>>14198660
>I'm forced to go outside because I'm in university
Wow, you're really special, teach me more about life, studentbro. Also, would you not go outside if you weren't forced to due to uni?

>> No.14198687

>>14198664
Except when you're sliding your face as hard as you can against a long 8 inch dildo and pretending it's my penis :3

>> No.14198688
File: 335 KB, 1618x471, buffet.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14198688

>>14198660
let's see

>Who are you to judge anyone??? Everyone is really the same... Nobody is special and nobody is deeper than anyone else
femoid societal control cliche #7

>Everything works out in the end, everybody ends up with somebody, it's YOU doing this to yourself, all your misery and observations about the bad state of society are your fault for being such a weird creepy loser you're actually the bad one not everybody else all your unhappiness is your fault and all a normie's happiness is because they're good people
femoid societal control cliche #3

>Obsessed redpill nonsense incel loser don't OBSESS over things that's weird and you don't want to be weird do you? loser
femoid societal control cliche #0, AKA "Protocol Zero"

>> No.14198694

>>14198660
Most men are betabuxxers. Have you ever heard what women talk about when no men are around? Most of the good hubbies women talk about are men they decided to settle for. What's your point with your post about seeing normal people with wives and shit? Enjoy your 35-year old roastie wife down the road. Remember, you got her because you are a good man and you made it, not because of anything else.

>> No.14198705

>>14198650
Yeah and what? You're not going to change anything, we are all powerless before societal processes. You either accept it and start enjoying life or you spend it in a fruitless rebellion.

>> No.14198713

>>14198705
>we are all powerless before societal processes.

That is completely false. :3

>> No.14198722

>>14197196
90% of those suiters just wanna fuck and chuck so do you blame her for avoiding them?

>> No.14198724

>>14198705
>just stop talking about it! you're powerless!
Why talk about anything in that case?

>> No.14198730

>>14198722
So why does she fuck and orbit Chad and beg him to fuck her again then?

>> No.14198732

the issue is that most men have average to below average attractiveness faces and bodies. that's the problem. this is not the case for women, who in adulthood have a higher average attractiveness than men in the current era do. if the proportion of attractive men and women were to equalize the problem would be mitigated somewhat.

>> No.14198737

>>14198722
>90% of those suiters just wanna fuck and chuck
Yes, and? You're not "lonely" if you're in demand.

>> No.14198741

>>14198713
Then why do we give 'advice' to others about societal problems? Why don't we just say how society will be tomorrow and have everyone be that way?

>> No.14198743

>>14198732
nope, women are not more attractive than men on average. they have access to makeup, fake hair, and other shit that SIGNIFICANTLY alters their appearance by 1-3 points. makeup is a game changer, I will give you that. and even if most men rose in attractiveness like you say, women will always aim for the highest because women are hypergamous. they always go for the top, all you do in this case is shift who the top refers to.

>> No.14198749

>>14198741
You mean in regards to a certain issue? Like 'women are like <<this>>' or 'men are like <<that>>'?

I agree, if I think women or men should be a certain way, I shut the person talking about them up and start telling him how much I'm noticing that gender around me start to behave in that way. :3

>> No.14198752

>>14198724
Sure, talk about it, but in the end the one suffering from all the spite, hate, and negative emotions is you whilst women keep on doing whatever they were doing unaffected.

>> No.14198755

>>14198749
Have you noticed results? Have you made people act a certain way by perceiving them collectively like that?

>> No.14198759

>>14198743
>>14198732
let me add that women wearing makeup and other things that would enhance her appearance was for her husband. nowadays she has taken the means of altering her appearance to appease her former oppressors (in her mind) and is using them for her ends. same thing goes for the workforce. the reason your great grandpa could find a sweet becky was because she had no other choice and needed a man to provide. now she can work and make money for herself so why would she settle for average men when she is constantly orbited by them and above average men? she can do better than that

>> No.14198761

>>14198705
So this is the power of the simp... incredible.

>> No.14198764

>>14197272
Nice fiction

>> No.14198766

>>14198755
Why yes, yes I have actually :3

This site is also heavily populated. I have noticed behavioral shifts within the nerdy segment of the population because of my identification on this board. :3

Me and butterfly have changed men and women. Not only that, but you get less done by being anonymous. If you are Anonymous on 4chan, you are assuredly a coward and need to gtfo. :3

>> No.14198769

>>14198743
for every bit of evidence that points to hypergqmy for women i don't see why the same wouldn't exist for men. our species is a bunch of horndogs who would love to fuck whatever we lust for. it does seem like both sexes have around the same desire for monogamous relationships if we are to take the postings of young people on social media at face value-- everyone wants a relationship these days. if there is good evidence that women instinctiually have less of an inclination for monogamy i would like to see it.

>> No.14198777

>>14198694
>Have you ever heard what women talk about when no men are around?
Have you? Where does this boundless fucking confidence comes from?
>Most of the good hubbies women talk about are men they decided to settle for
And I take it you think that men marry women because their love is as pure as spring water and as ardent as the sun? Yeah, no shit. Most people can't find their soulmate and aren't entirely happy in their relationships. What you're doing is just a whole load of whining that you haven't been visited by a real-life anime heroine who will have a perfect figure and will love you exactly for who you are, which is exactly what women do when they whine about not having their ideal boyfriend come along and sweep them off their feet. BUT, and this is important, THEY, just like most men, are sensible enough to distinguish fantasy from reality. THEY are able to find a fellow human being they can love, even if they're chubby or they spend too much time browsing facebook and playing video games or whatever other gripe they have. THEY can understand another person, and you can't. You take it as evidence of inferiority and malice. You're just an autist who can't understand other people.

>> No.14198778
File: 358 KB, 1200x815, exclusive-ted-kaczynski-in-prison.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14198778

Men patented 96.5% of this terrible world

>> No.14198779

>>14197543
Maybe. I love my mom and grandma (RIP).

>> No.14198792

>>14198769
problem is that women have vagina which leaves only men to compete against eachother. it wouldn't be such problem if we still had wars but it's dont so here we are.

>> No.14198822

How come there are so many creepy incels on this board? I expected that much from /pol/ or /r9k/ but I thought this board was about literature?

>> No.14198827

>>14198822
Literature and inceldom are inseparably intertwined.

>> No.14198828

>>14198822
because most men are incel even if they would tell you otherwise. you can't beat basic mathematics.

>> No.14198850

>>14198827
Wrong. Even particularly bitter people like Dostoyevsky or Schopenhauer had multiple relationships. At any rate, most readers are women.

>> No.14198867

>>14198502
no honestly just leave and go back to r*ddit

>> No.14198894

>>14197304
>Y'all
Feel free to fuck off and never return.

>> No.14198904
File: 8 KB, 211x239, crying_wojack.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14198904

>>14198894
>s-stop m-m-mocking me! yo-you-you're not white! re-re-red-di-ditor!

>> No.14198934

>>14198850
>most readers are women
Most readers are shit.
>even particularly bitter people like Dostoyevsky or Schopenhauer had multiple relationships
Yeah, with prostitutes and women alike. Also, Schopenhauer was a misogynist, and Dostoyevsky too(?).

>> No.14198937

>>14198904
what are you talking about
maybe it's time to drop heroine my friend

>> No.14198947

>>14197934
Poor imitation of schizoanon

>> No.14198966

>>14198286
Same goes for most men. Not everyone ages as gracefully as movie stars

>> No.14198969
File: 75 KB, 413x413, 1568016218369.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14198969

fuck women, literally and firguratively

>> No.14198971

>>14198413
I'm fucking crying.

>> No.14198976

>>14198564
>Men are great because they built this great society for me
False, they built the preceding ones, the great ones. Now it's just grey square hell with fake smiles.

>> No.14198979

>>14198966
women on average age like milk compared to men that's the point

>> No.14198997

why are you guys arguing with r*dditors lmao it's fruitless

>> No.14199019

>>14197257
Ugly or flatchested women are often lonely. Society doesn't tend to value traits in women unrelated to looks.

>> No.14199045

>>14199019
You are delusional.

>> No.14199057
File: 134 KB, 317x392, 1543299689732.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14199057

>>14197257
Explain the suicidal epidemics across large swaths of women and men alike? Do you think women who party all night long and ride the cock carousel are feeling intrinsically worthy and content with the lifestyle? Surely it isn't simply unspoken degenerate etiquette from pressured social groups to coerce the norms of relationships in the 21st century ("Oh, you haven't fucked .... yet? That's crazy girl, I'll hook you two up sometime). The norms of fucking around have instilled the behaviour you feel too, as it much harder for men to attain this constant approval of the social group, either sexually or not. There is a reason why social norms consist of women with orbiters and having unconventional types of ugly people associated with a social group. It has become standard hierarchy.

>> No.14199087

>>14198435
"Nice" guys are called "nice" because there is zero other descriptor for them. They aren't intelligent, or interesting, or witty, or good looking, or fit, or have hobbies, or do much with themselves - they figure being 'nice' that they do not have to have any other trait to offer another person. They're nice. But they are also fucking boring. I've seen the ugliest, broke-ass guys get shagged regularly by different women simply because they joined a band or knew a handful of funny lines, or wore a cool jacket. Women are not hard to figure out, just that a lot of men are fucking retards. Easier to blame muh hypergamy than lift a few dumbells regularly, learn how to build stuff, or get a few decent clothes.

>> No.14199088

>>14199019
>flatchested being lonely
it's a well-sought fetish but ok

>> No.14199095

>>14199019
When women say this, it only shows how delusional they are. You can see it from the "flatchested" thing. Yes, it's a meme that men prefer big breasts, and it may even be true. But only women really fixate on this. Any guy who has had a girlfriend with mediocre tits will hear her talk about it self-consciously at some point, and 90% of guys will think "??? they're fine, wtf" and say out loud "they're great, I actually prefer them the way yours are."

The key thing is that women don't experience real, actual rejection or judgement, so they fixate on standards that only exist relative to their isolated bubble of "rejection." They have experienced a few breakups or fights with Chads, who can afford to have insanely high standards, or they've heard indirectly about such altercations, so they think a man rejecting a woman is when a man says "you have small tits." But only Chad really says that and means it, because an underlying premise is that Chad can go somewhere else. Chad can afford to pick and choose between average women in the way that any woman can afford to pick and choose between average men.

It's like when women on Tinder profiles say "Don't do x, y, and z! I ain't got time for that fuckboy shit!" And as a normal, average man you're reading it and think "What the hell..? If I did any of that, she'd just ghost me immediately. Even if I were an asshole, I couldn't really be an asshole in that way, because I'd be blowing my chances. She'd just humiliate me and cut contact." But that's because she's not talking TO YOU, an average man. She's talking to Chad, which for her is an average man. You are nothing, you are dross and chaff. She is talking past you, at Chad.

Chad can afford to be a fuckboy because she WANTS Chad, she wants Chad to stick around, she positively wants to fuck Chad. Even when you get a girl to stick around, in her mind it's a favor to you. It's a concession, she is settling and she knows it. So fuckboy behaviors were never an option for you. When a woman says ":( Men always say I have small tits" what she really means is "All the Chads I exclusively fuck, when they want to be mean (because they can afford to be mean and I'll still do whatever they want because they're 10/10 and I'm 6/10 but think I deserve 10/10 men), they say that I have small tits! So don't do that!!!!"

Women are like social experiments, they are feral children raised to see just how spoiled you can make a human being.

>> No.14199110

>>14198766
>:3
I wanna shove my entire bookstack so deep up your ass that you will not recover from it

>> No.14199115

>>14199110
Only I am allowed to make the angry catface >:3

>> No.14199117

>>14199087
Self-improvement only works for normies.

There’s literally nothing I can think of that’s more cringe than some genetic dead end social outcast low status loser trying to “self improve” to fit into society. It’s like they’re so far off the mark I don’t even know where to begin with them.

The average person, and even the above average, just exist and the things that you consider “normal” just happen to them. No high schooler ever had to “self improve” to get a girlfriend, he just existed, thought it would be cool and fun to play sports, and a girl was attracted to him and they gravitated towards each other. There’s no thought out into any of this, these things just happened through the natural flow of life, no “self improvement” necessary. That’s what happens when you’re not a genetic dead end mentally ill freak, you don’t ever find yourself one night lying in bed alone wondering why you don’t have a single friend or you’ve never kissed a girl at 23 years old. You don’t devise a plan to stop touching your cock for six months in order to look a girl in the eye. You just exist, you go with the societal flow, and you end up with a couple girlfriends and FWBs in high school and college, then a wife, a nice job, a house, and some kids. If you missed out on this flow, it’s probably because you’re complete genetic shit.

>> No.14199123

>>14199095
w __ e __ w
l
e
l
w

>> No.14199124

>>14197289
Im glad there is one other totally based anon

>> No.14199126

>>14198492
This is unironically true.
Factor out the guys in jail, the ones who never went to jail but are violent, low IQ guys (there are more high IQ and also more brainlets among men), gay men, men with severe alcohol and drug problems, men who are only into seeking conquests, men who have really bad genes/bad looks or no personality and what remains are the Chad but it's actually not an impossible standard.
Just - stay out of jail, have a steady job, don't be a retard, don't be a degenerate, don't be so socially backwards that you can't even dress respectably, don't be a weirdo stalker type, have a baseline standard for health when it comes to diet and fitness, and don't be a hardcore drunk/druggie, be reasonably articulate, and don't call a person 20 times a day every day like a stalkerish weirdo.

>> No.14199131

>>14199095
holy based anon don't do em like that

>> No.14199137

Women should get executed after exceeding the number of 3 sexual partners. This would change dating dynamics massively.

>> No.14199138

>>14199095
woah....
the third paragraph feels pretty spot on!

>> No.14199139

>>14199137
Maybe 2 would be better.

>> No.14199141

>>14198245
here's a 'You', friend!

>> No.14199145

>>14199137
>sex bad!
>chastity good!

>> No.14199147
File: 56 KB, 1172x659, yes.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14199147

>>14199145

>> No.14199164

>>14199147
uncontrollable amounts of laughter.

You do not get more serious than that, no one can even come close.

>> No.14199166

>>14199145
Nobody wants to settle for used goods.

>> No.14199169

>>14199117
Painful but true.

>> No.14199172
File: 57 KB, 843x473, Screen_Shot_2018-12-20_at_3.43.27_PM.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14199172

>>14199147
>that's totally me

>> No.14199181

>>14199166
>oh no! vagina had too many dicks in it! thats bad!
Well then change your perceptions instead of letting a spook rule over you. Look for John Greens example on cereal for more insight

>> No.14199184

>>14199181
poor b8

>> No.14199185

>>14199137
>>14199139
This isn't a Hollywood movie. "True love" isn't a real thing where you settle down with a lady and live happily ever after. You guys have such high standards you will probably never be happily married

>> No.14199190

>>14199181
Anon, i have to say, i've yet to see better bait than this.

>> No.14199194

>>14199185
>lady
Oh fuck off

>> No.14199200

>>14199185
Nobody is saying it is. Another strawman from you. That's like your 15th one in this thread.

>> No.14199205

>>14199145
>>14199164
>>14199181
>>14199185
https://ifstudies.org/blog/does-sexual-history-affect-marital-happiness
Turns out being an impulsive hedonist who doesn't think about tomorrow ruins your future, who would have thought.

>> No.14199206

>>14199184
Explain how it isn't a spook

>> No.14199212

>>14199205
um no sweetie it actually doesn't matter if a woman has been emotionally attached to guys before you she stops thinking about them once she gets married to you

>> No.14199216

>>14199205
>literal neo-nazi source
yikes

>> No.14199225

>>14199216
>neo-nazi source
Huh?

>> No.14199238

STOP arguing with screeching r*dditors you morons

>> No.14199257

>>14199238
Which is the r*dditor side?

>> No.14199263

>>14199257
I'm not telling you it's obvious who the r*dditors are if you don't know you're probably one of them

>> No.14199267

>>14199263
Fencesitter

>> No.14199284

do we really need a thread dedicated to discussing incel issues up at every single minute of the day? we know women are hypergamous whores by now so what's the point of having a thread like this one up all the time? I swear there's always one of these threads that gets 200+ replies. it's the same shit repeated every single day. there's nothing new, and it's not even literature related.

>> No.14199289

>>14199284
/lit/ is groundhog day

>> No.14199305

>>14198513
have sex

>> No.14199315

>>14197304
isn't that what you wanted with your stupid sexual revolution?

>> No.14199320

>>14197304
>wahhhh chad won't commit wahhh
Fuck you, roastie.

>> No.14199330

>>14197543
ABSOLUTELY UNDENIABLE REDPILL

>> No.14199344
File: 93 KB, 640x540, cheating1new-w640.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14199344

Today I will remind them. Complain all you want about women but men have always been a lot worse for sleeping around and cheating

>> No.14199353

>>14199344
Men are supposed to have mistresses. A woman would rather share a good man with others than having a mediocre one to herself.

>> No.14199355

>>14199344
>% who reported
>who reported
>one study
>older adults
>older
>women age like milk so their betabux settler ends up cheating on them when they're 30+ wow so surprising
Ok

>> No.14199417

>>14199355
cope

>> No.14199429

A team of researchers from the University of North Texas and University of Notre Dame played 355 young women a rape fantasy over headphones to investigate how aroused they became:

The tape's material tells the tale of a male protagonist who is strongly attracted to the female character. He expresses a desire for sex with her, but she's clearly unresponsive. He attempts to convince her, without success, and she continues to refuse his advances. The male character then overpowers and rapes her. She resists throughout, and at no time gives consent. However, as the man is attractive to her and provides erotic stimulation, she does experience gratification from the forced sex.

In questioning following this, researchers found that overall, 62% of participants reported having a rape fantasy of some type.

Of the women who reported having the most common rape fantasy ("being overpowered or forced by a man to surrender sexually against my will"), 40% had it at least once a month and 20% had it at least once a week.

Women reported that 45% of their rape fantasies were completely erotic and 46% both erotic and aversive. Only 9% of the fantasies are completely aversive.

It is plausible that women underreport their fantasies about rape as well as their positive emotion towards it, in order to avoid being socially undesirable given the taboos surrounding the topic.

The frequency of women's rape fantasies may be related to women's preference for low-empathy males. After all, raping someone requires indifference to their feelings. The ability to rape may also act as an honest signal of physical strength and high status, thus choosing such a male would not only provide protection and access to resources, but rapist tendencies would also confer the same fitness advantage on the offspring. The reluctance to sex and wish to be forced into sex may also test men for their physical strength, as women depend on a physically strong man to be protected, e.g. from other contenders (bodyguard hypothesis).

>> No.14199448

Researchers sought to evaluate niceness by defining it as: "a characteristic that may signal to potential partners that one understands, values and supports important aspects of their self-concept and is willing to invest resources in the relationship." In other words, niceness is the degree to which a person understands, values, and supports his partner's identity and values and is willing to put commitment and effort into the relationship. This is also known in psychology as "responsiveness."

The researchers found that men who perceived possible female partners as responsive found them to be "more feminine and more attractive." They also found that when men found women to be responsive, it led to a heightened sexual arousal from the men and greater desire for a relationship.

On the other hand, when women perceived their male partner to be more responsive, they were less attracted to the man.

The Internet is full of women claiming the reason they "don't give nice guys a chance" is that those "nice guys" are not actually truly "nice". The more scientifically valid explanation for this behavior based on these findings is that a man's niceness does not appear to be sexually valued by women at all or is perhaps even negatively valued.

An interesting addition is that nice men have substantially lower economic success. In Judge et al. (2012), men who are one standard deviation nicer, had an 18.3% lower income. For women it's 5.47% lower, but they are more agreeable and tend to occupy positions of lower status to begin with. It pays off being disagreeable, in life as a whole, and doubly so with women because women also prefer men with high income.

>> No.14199484

>>14199429
>>14199448
Are women what Aristotle was describing when he said that some people are natural slaves?

>> No.14199518

>>14199484
Yes.

Anderson et al. conducted three studies to examine to determinants of peer status among college students. The studies used peer ratings of popularity to measure status and compared them to self-reports of the Big Five personality dimensions and observer evaluated physical attractiveness of the subjects, based on observation of video clips of the subjects. The first study examined (N = 48; mean age 20) members of a fraternity at a large Midwestern state university, with social status determined by the other fraternities prominence and number of positions and office each member had held. The factors found to be significantly correlated with social status were extroversion (controlled for physical attractiveness r = .40), physical attractiveness (r = .39), and neuroticism was found to be negatively correlated with status (r = -.26). There was no significant correlation found between agreeableness and status.

A second study performed on members of a sorority (N = 45) with an identical procedure to to first study, found only extraversion (r = .43, controlled for physical attractiveness) was significantly correlated with peer status.

Finally, a third study with a longitudinal design and a unisex sample (N = 74) of dormitory residents was conducted. Peer rated status was assessed three times over a year. This study also included self-assessments of peer status, which was found to be be substantially correlated with peer assessed status. Peer status was very stable among the men, with the 'pecking order' among the men clearly being quickly solidified within the first two weeks. The status ordering among women took much longer to be established (by the 4th month), but was ultimately as stable as the hierarchy found among the men. By the final time the peer status among the men was assessed by the researchers, the only significant factors found to be correlated with peer status were extraversion (r = .40) and physical attractiveness (r = .43). Neuroticism was found to be significantly negatively correlated with peer status (r = -.38).

The researchers also found the students intuitions about the personality traits that would aid them in attaining peer status were largely flawed, with the trait they believed would be most important-conscientiousness-not at all related to status attainment. The researchers hypothesis was that physical attractiveness may have been more linked to popularity and status among men because of gender norms rewarding men for sexual success, but sexual success not does not necessarily lead to greater peer acceptance among women. The Big Five dimension agreeableness, basically being 'nice', was not significantly linked to peer status or popularity among both sexes.

A high correlation of looks and social status was also found by Palomares (2018) who found that people determine make such evaluations within milliseconds, also lending credence to the idea that humans in part decide social status by looks.

>> No.14199543

Women aren't neutral to people they perceive as lesser, they are hostile. It's why all the waves of feminism have been so classist (even against women)

Women have also uncritically embodied the marketing campaigns of several industries and think they are better than everyone else.

>> No.14199603
File: 112 KB, 604x604, cumskull.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14199603

>>14197241

>> No.14199630

>>14198579
it needs a body pillow or two

>> No.14199633

>>14199630
BYOBP

>> No.14200115
File: 54 KB, 650x951, 2B66F26A-3948-485D-AEB0-20E1236977B5.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14200115

>>14199057
Well in terms of suicide men dominate no question women “attempt it” more often but one most simply take even the most cursory of look at the statistics to see that successful suicides are dominated by men. And what you call a “socially” enforced hierarchy is actually entirely nature women will natural garner attention or “beta orbiters” as you call it while men are ignored unless they prove themselves worthy of attention. Women were always picky with men that’s why we have much more female ancestors then male ones. Most males in history died alone and were deemed unworthy. Hence why cultural standards/and religions helped stabilize the radical breeding inequality by enforcing monogamy. Since we no longer have any culture in the Western world save for capitalist consumer hedonism the breeding inequality has been brought back which yet agains is hurting low status men while leaving the women unaffected save for the anti breeding propaganda that is drilled into them by their corporate masters and the massive amounts of brain trauma caused by hormonal birth control

>> No.14200142

>>14200115
and it will be replaced or implode because it's an unstable system that doesn't reward average men (majority) while still telling them they have to work to uphold the system

>> No.14200649

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=anECwFYnyh0

>> No.14200891

>>14199289
I think you mean /lit/ is incelhog day

>> No.14200902

>>14197196
Women don't get lonely lmfao fuck off.

>> No.14200912

>>14197543
Fucking based

>> No.14200936

>>14199095
Have sex

>> No.14200937

>>14200902
women do get lonely, it's just in the same way that a billionaire's prodigal spoiled brat child gets "bored"

>> No.14200946
File: 102 KB, 834x828, okc_personality.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14200946

When dating site OkCupid first began, they allowed users to rate prospective partners independently on both personality and looks. Over time, they saw the futility of this approach, as it became apparent that users did not distinguish between personality and looks. In their blog, they cite an example of a "hot" model with no profile filled out, that still scored top points for both looks and personality (even though no one could possibly know anything about the model's personality from an empty profile).

In the end OkCupid disabled the feature, and now only allows one global rating to be given. They published their data from when looks and personality were rated individually so others can see how online dating users consider these two factors essentially the same thing.

Related to this, OkCupid conducted an unwitting experiment pertaining to the effects of profile pictures on one's success in online dating, and the user perceptions of compatibility based on profile text vs photographs. On January 15, 2013, OkCupid celebrated the release of a new app dealing with blind dates by disabling all profile pictures on OkCupid, which they dubbed “Love Is Blind Day”. They found that while overall traffic declined, users were 44% more willing to message first, conversations were lengthier, and contact details were exchanged more often. However, when they restored the profile pictures after the end of the day, they noticed that many of the conversations starting on the day abruptly finished. This further reinforces the idea that displaying one's personality through profile text and messages on online dating apps in an attempt to compensate for physical unattractiveness is likely a doomed endeavor.

>> No.14200997
File: 72 KB, 1080x1020, soy mad.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14200997

>

>> No.14201092

>>14197272
>Woman despise asexual Chads
So fucking true. I had friend that looked like a male model but had serious mental issues(extremely intelligent though), on top of his already domineering personality. Would publicly reject the inevitable approaches by woman whenever we went out and ignored girls trying to talk to him in classes. You do not understand the hatred and bitterness a woman is capable of until you witness them having their spell of feminity flatly rejected or deemed as unimportant by a man they desire. It's like a tear in their fabric of reality, where the image of higher ideals that they can never obtain is finally shown and they'll hate you for displaying the inferiority of the sex

>> No.14201124

Women are the biggest meme in civilized history.

>> No.14201162

>>14200649
She needs to accept someone as her Lord and Savior.

>> No.14201183
File: 193 KB, 398x376, 1572352227116.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14201183

>>14200649
>this
>30s
I know women in their 40s who look better

>> No.14201197

>>14201092
Not the anon you replied to but I've experienced that bitterness and utter rage women can express from being rejected. First time I didn't understand it since I was being very nice but come the second time I realized it spoke to so much more.

>> No.14201214

>>14201197
I have seen that banshee rage and it is not pretty.

>> No.14201371

>>14201197
I'm 5'5" and I had a female acquaintance take me out back during one hang-out with all of out mutual friends and tell me that she couldn't reciprocate my feelings for her.

I wasn't remotely interest in her. When I explained that, in a nice way, she lost it afterwards and called me an "ugly short fuck" to my friends behind my back.

>> No.14201378

>>14201371
damn

>> No.14201806

>>14199095
>Tinder
It seems that, much like the women you critique, you're having way too high expectations despite the cesspit you're looking at.
Stop being online for two weeks and start talking to strangers.

>> No.14201818

>>14200937
Actually this

>> No.14201855

>>14198413
Judging by Andrew's behavior, she can't be much of a hot commodity herself.

>> No.14201944
File: 17 KB, 600x600, 1549712570251.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14201944

>>14199181

>> No.14201958

>>14197272
>women love children
Who is fighting to be allowed to kill their own kids?

>> No.14202017

>>14197543
based and clear-minded

>> No.14202496

>>14199057
>Explain the suicidal epidemics across large swaths of women
What a joke, women will knowingly take 0.01% of the effective dose of a painkiller and it will be classified as a "suicide attempt". I know a girl who drank a bottle of cologne in order to "try" and kill herself. It's just a cry for attention in the case of women. Look at how many people ACTUALLY kill themselves, not do a meme attempt

>> No.14202497

>>14199145
>unconsciousness bad
>consciousness good
Not falling prey to your animalistic desires is very desirable.

>> No.14202514

>>14197304
You really think incels desire sex? In that case they can just go fuck hookers and be done with it. Incels, like all humans, desire a deep emotional connection of which sex is just one physical manifestation. "Empty sex" as such doesn't even exist except when you're fucking a hooker (and even then, the prevalence of GFE-services should clue you in as to the REAL motivation of whoremongers). Guys (and girls) desire to feel wanted, which is why you're looking for someone who will consensually have sex with you, even if for just one night. The desire to feel wanted trumps the physical desire for sex in most cases.

>> No.14202528

>>14197868
My ex-gf used to know this guy who for the last 3 years had sent her intermittent messages on Facebook every 7 to 15 days, just "hey" or "hey how are you" without her ever responding except two times 3 years ago. Validation is a powerful drug, even if the guy from whom you're getting it isn't someone you desire

>> No.14202535

>>14198067
>I'm starving, I'm dying of hunger here, someone please help me, I've been going without food for days, won't anyone show sympathy for my plight?
>no thanks, I won't eat plain rice, it's so flavorless
>someone please, I'm starving here

>> No.14202540

>>14198413
This is so needlessly cruel and overtly hypocritical I have a hard time believing it's real

>> No.14202560

>>14202540
Welcome to women

>> No.14202562

>>14198722
>90% of those suiters just wanna fuck and chuck
People just spout this bullshit without any data or even reasoning to back it up. If I have sex with an attractive girl, I want to see her again. For two obvious reasons: sex will get better over time, and two: why go through all the trouble of attracting a mate and then disregard her after one lousy fuck? The only exceptions to this (I imagine) are if you fucked a girl below your standards just to get your rocks off after a dry-spell, or if you're swimming in pussy anyway. I'd much rather keep seeing a girl once a week than fuck her once and never see her again. Seems like a total waste of effort.

>> No.14202572
File: 19 KB, 262x400, eoicf.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14202572

the non-incel answer

>> No.14202573

>>14198067
This is like men complaining they can't get laid when they're shooting for blonde supermodels instead of girls in their league.

>> No.14202665

>>14199095
You can't say this nigga here is wrong.

>> No.14202745

>>14197196
The Easter Parade

>> No.14202753

>>14198722
>fuck and chuck
More like fuck and chain them to a radiator. Fuck and chuck is the safe alternative.

>> No.14202756
File: 29 KB, 399x582, 1570150110253.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14202756

good fucking god how many threads bitching about women do we need

>> No.14202779

>>14199095
>It's like when women on Tinder profiles say "Don't do x, y, and z! I ain't got time for that fuckboy shit!"
All this does is signal to the men on Tinder that they've been used by "fuckboys" in that way before. To any intelligent and non-desperate men these are immediate disqualifiers for a serious relationship.

In a similar way, them putting "not here for hook-ups" or "looking for a serious relationship" does nothing to me except communicate that you will make me wait for sex in a weird attempt to not come across as a slut or easy fuck, while you HAVE had easy sex on the first date before -- so what's in it for me in this exchange? I have to wait, Chad didn't? No thank you. Nothing grinds my gears more than women pretending to be generous lesbians who treat sex as a golden gift from the gods, a reward for worthy men as if the women themselves don't enjoy sex at all.

>> No.14202783
File: 50 KB, 295x473, skylark.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14202783

skylark

>> No.14202974

>>14198777
Good post. Incels are the other side of the mirror of roastie. They have mostly too high standards. Many could fuck a fat or a black women, but guess what, they won't? Sounds pretty much like a roastie who didn't want to settle for billy beta when she was young.
About the red pill, it's mostly true, but reality isn't always that all women are sluts getting provided by billy beta when chad is fucking them behind the curtain. It happen, sure, pretty often, but not constantly. I think the beta buck, alpha fuck dynamic, happens in around 20%-30% of relationships. The rest of relationships are just normal, boring, monogamous relationship without any cuckolding. The women will cheat and dump the guy one day, sure, but will not cuck him during the relationship.

>> No.14203334

>>14197196
Sexual revolution and its consequences have been a disaster for a human race

>> No.14203421
File: 1.99 MB, 332x215, 1567694329859.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14203421

>>14200649
what a trainwreck

>> No.14203436

>>14197810
Wrong again

>> No.14203453

>>14197272
You’re completely defeated in life, aren’t you

>> No.14203462

>>14197304
>justifying female hypocrisy
>Y’all

>>14198114
If the women were actually lonely, they’d settle

>> No.14203515

>>14199019
>Society doesn't tend to value traits in women unrelated to looks.
why should they? The greatest philosophers was Simone de Beauvoir, her works are about "authenticity", i.e. "how do stop being a hipster, and just like things?". It is extremely stupid

>> No.14203521

>>14199172
yes

>> No.14203575

>>14197272
is this covert cuck erotica? Since you have the picture of a nigger beating a white man with a helmet

>> No.14203587
File: 86 KB, 736x195, AAAC08A8-6FF4-4187-9A5C-3CEECAEBA498.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14203587

>>14198413
>>14202540
Her behaviour is a textbook case study.

>> No.14203589

>>14203515
>a fucking literal french who

>> No.14203607

>>14199095
you deserved quads at least for this one

>> No.14203616

>>14200649
It's just begging for attention, the emotion is not real.

>> No.14203655

>>14200649
>I KNOW WHAT I WANT

Should have figured that out 10 years ago.

>> No.14203861

>>14198051
What if I already understand that?

>> No.14203875

>>14203861
kys, wait for death or transcend your condition

>> No.14203900

>>14203875
Sounds gay.

>> No.14203925

>>14202535
incels can't even get the rice you pseud nigger

>> No.14203949

>>14203925
you're really fucking stupid

>> No.14204036

>>14203949
your comparaison didn't made sense at all
do you even use your brain cells before posting?

>> No.14204048

>>14204036
it's the perspective of the "lonely" female, idiot

>> No.14204059

>>14197196
1 those men probably werent the best desu
2 women dont like being propositioned like that, those fucking losers demand romance no matter how much of a femcel they are the sameway incels demand a virgin roastie

>> No.14204068

>>14197203
fpbp

>> No.14204074

>>14197272
I have no idea why fucking normalfags are freaking out over that fucking pic, fucking hockey exists, and a school got shot up the same day, you could at least direct your narcissistic sanctifying outrage at that

>> No.14204281

>>14204059
>those men probably werent the best desu
>implying a femcel deserves the best
never go full mangina

>> No.14204312

>>14204281
do you have chink eyes or something and can only read one tiny slit at a time?

>> No.14204381

>>14197241
"Anon I feel like I don't mean anything to you. I feel that if we break up I'll fall by the wayside and you'll be just fine. You have so many friends that I like and I know they'll all stay friends with you and I'll just be nothing."

t. my qt314 gf

>> No.14204681

>>14198215
based

>> No.14205900

>>14202573
So most incels

>> No.14206128

>>14205900
Silence roastie. Women literally consider the majority of men below average.