/lit/ - Literature

[Anonymous No.14118849]

>texting girl
>ask her favourite book
>she says harry potter and the goblet of fire
>she's 26
Why do so many women not develop their literature tastes beyond children's books? I even thought she was reasonably intelligent up until now. How utterly disappointing.

[Anonymous No.14118864]

Are you really so smart, posting sad frogs on 4chan?

[Anonymous No.14118869]

>texting guy
>ask his favourite book
>"lol books are for nerds"
>I fart

[Anonymous No.14118877]

>>14118864
Yes faggot now leave the thread

[Anonymous No.14118878]

>attempting to talk to woman about your intellectual pursuits

Woman are just cocksleeves. They're not capable of higher level thought. They are aware of this and just want you to pretend like they are while you toss them around and fuck 'em. Sooner you accept this the easier it will be for you. I am being 100% serious.

[Anonymous No.14118886]

>>14118849

probably says more about you that you text girls who read harry potter unashamedly. you are probably not very cool

[Anonymous No.14118894]

>>14118849
Pretense for fornication. I do not pity you and, in fact, rejoice at your misfortune. You attract what you are. Scum.

[Anonymous No.14118898]

>>14118869
>books are for nerds"
this is factually correct though

[Anonymous No.14119002]

>>14118864
>posting frogs is indicative of intelligence

[Anonymous No.14119024]

>>14119002
>>14118877
So if she read a book that you considered intelligent, you would now decide that she is intelligent?

[Anonymous No.14119044]

>>14118878
Hypothetical question - are mtf trannies capable of higher level thought in your opinion?

[Anonymous No.14119054]

>>14118849
im in a good mood so i'll help you out OP
next time ask whats her fav quote.
never go into a discussion of books unless she brings it up

[Anonymous No.14119057]

>>14119044
Well considering they're still men and will never be women, yes.

[Anonymous No.14119106]

>>14118864
this, but

>>14118849
>It's always HP
What about this caused it to rise so far above other genre fiction? Like I get why The Chronicles of Riddick doesn't have huge mainstream appeal, but is HP really that great compared to the competition? I liked the phantom tollbooth as a kid, I guess, but I can't name big long running series that debued before Potter did.

[Anonymous No.14119552]

>>14118878
>They're not capable of higher level thought
10% of men and 1% of women are capable of higher thought.

[Anonymous No.14119577]

>>14118878
Which is why there are more woman in my Literature and Philosophy programs than men right now

[Anonymous No.14119600]

>>14119577
Oh yeah that certainly is indicative of how smart women are.

[Anonymous No.14119601]

>>14119044
>>14119057

Diff anon. answer is no due to mental illness.

[Anonymous No.14119605]

>>14118849
Aristotle said that the ideal age for each gender to get married was 30 for men and 15 for women. Because by then each had already reached the upper limit of their mental development.

[Anonymous No.14119612]

>>14119605
Aristotle also fucked small boys in the ass and kept slaves to wipe his ass.
Lets just say he got btfo'd out hard by diogenes.

[Anonymous No.14119623]

>>14118849
Women are children

[Anonymous No.14119635]

>>14119577
I can't believe you just posted this fucking sentence. It's too retarded to be a troll. You actually think being enrolled in university means anything these days?

>wow I'm so smart because I memorized and regurgitated what Dr. Goldstein told me to and now I have degree in Philosophy woooo~~ I'm so smart

You absolute pygmy of a person. Men created the fields of literature and philosophy thousands of years before your lineage was the faintest fart in the wind. Women are consumers. Women create nothing. god I'm not wasting any more of my time typing this go fuck yourself

[Anonymous No.14119645]

>>14119612
Wtf are you talking about? Perhaps confusing him with Plato or Socrates? Neither were homos and Diogenes was an irrelevant bump.

[Anonymous No.14119656]

>>14119577
Just the fact that they are getting robbed blind of their money for a meme degree is proof that they are dumb whores

[Anonymous No.14120282]

>>14118849
Anon, you'll never find a girl with good literature tastes. Find a qt that read horseshit and slowly gear her tastes towards actual literature. This is the only way to get a /lit/ gf.

[Anonymous No.14120939]

the thought of being in a relationship with a girl older than 21 is horrifying

[Anonymous No.14120944]

>>14120939
Yeah that's like saying "I can't wait to eat this sandwich that's been in my fridge for a year"

It's not good anymore. Throw it out

[Anonymous No.14120946]

>>14118849
>children's books
Don't insult the genre of children's books. Harry Potter is trash though.

[Anonymous No.14120959]

>>14119635
Based

[Anonymous No.14120962]

>>14120939
>>14120944
Actually the opposite is true. I'm horrified at the idea of dating a girl (or anyone) who's under 22. It's like dating a child, they have no sense of responsibility or depth of character yet. After they enter the real world, people become much better partners and much more interesting/reliable in general.

[Anonymous No.14120969]

>>14119577
Lmao, women take philosophy courses and buy Poetry books to flex on other women, not because they give a shit about the concepts.

[Anonymous No.14120971]

>>14118849
to be honest, harry potter isnt that bad

[Anonymous No.14120973]

>>14120969
he said, on /lit/

[Anonymous No.14120977]

>>14119577
The only degree's that matter are STEM, law and medical professionals.

[Anonymous No.14120984]

OP you're as basic as that girl

[Anonymous No.14120987]

>>14120973
Fair enough.

[Anonymous No.14120989]

>>14120973
Can the juvenile mind possibly fathom the concept of beauty when it has been branded, butchered, stuffed full of preservatives and resold as beauty products which every woman indulges in? Even the strongest of a man's will can be brought to ruin without the proper foundations. How could you expect the emotional child that is a woman to withstand such a relentless barrage of expectations and definitions of both beauty and depth to understand something as complex as philosophy, poetry, or literature. This is why Harry Potter is such a bang with women.

[Anonymous No.14120991]

>>14120989
Sick post.

[Anonymous No.14121000]

>>14120973
Wouldn't the lit variant be, for the uninterested ones, to read the wikipedia page of some subject in order to flex on those who are more retarded? I'm just saying that, if you are on lit and feel that you need to read in order to flex, whilst nobody can check your claims about reading, you are pretty retarded. We can, thus, conclude that if you read and if you are on lit, you are reading for fun, and flexing on lit is not the primary cause. Although, it is possible that the cause of reading is, just as the other anon claims to be the case for women, flexing on others, but not only in lit context.

[Anonymous No.14121003]

>>14118849
>text girl
>ask for her favorite book
>she never replies

[Anonymous No.14121021]

So many men are disappointed that women are children. You should not try to fight it. Treat them as they are and you're rewarded. Next time you're talking to one, just remember that simple truth.

[Anonymous No.14121035]

>>14121003
a girl asked me on bumble what i was reading and i told her i was reading otto rahn, who was actually partially the inspiration for indiana jones, and the nazis killed him, and then i asked what she was reading and she never replied

i don't know what i was supposed to answer, she asked me what i was reading and i told her. i even put in extra effort to make it more human sounding than my normal internal monologue because my normal interlocutors can handle terseness. should i just have said "Otto Rahn. You" because i felt like that would have been rude

[Anonymous No.14121051]

>>14121035
just fucking say youre rereading harry potter

[Anonymous No.14121057]

>>14121051
but i'm not

i'm confused

[Anonymous No.14121063]

>>14118878
This but unironically
Don't mix love and intellect. You should learn to love women in the same way you love a dog or vanilla milkshakes.
Putting your dick into them is fine if you're into that, but you'd never talk to a milkshake about Kant.

[Anonymous No.14121069]

>>14121063
>love women in the same way you love a dog or vanilla milkshakes
>Putting your dick into them is fine

[Anonymous No.14121075]

>>14121063
Yes but a dog can learn loyalty, and a milkshake won't run off and fuck your friend while you're at work.

[Anonymous No.14121086]

>>14118849
women are memes

[Anonymous No.14121097]

>>14121075
> dog can learn loyalty, and a milkshake won't run off and fuck your friend while you're at work.
imagine drinking the milkshake afterwards unknowingly when suddenly your scumbag friend shows you a pic of them fucking

[Anonymous No.14121100]

>>14120962
>Depth of character
What are you, a fictional protagonist who beds only sufficiently expositioned women?

[Anonymous No.14121123]

>ask girl about her favorite books
>her favorites are too difficult for me to understand
mfw

[Anonymous No.14121127]

>>14118849
Most guys would givr a similarly shit answer, like 12 Rules or one of Jeremy Clarksons car books

[Anonymous No.14121135]

>>14121063
>but you'd never talk to a milkshake about Kant.
speak for yourself.

[Anonymous No.14121152]

>>14118849
Meet more women... a good female friend of mine is far and away the most well read person I know, another is on roughly the same level as I am and is one of the more fun people I know to talk books with, been in really succesful reading groups that had several female members.

I honestly dont get why so many of you seem to have such trouble meeting interesting women, be better judges of character and surround yourselves with more interesting people my god

[Anonymous No.14121155]

>>14121152
are you homosexual or otherwise effeminate?

[Anonymous No.14121157]

>>14118849
wom*n not even once

[Anonymous No.14121167]

>>14121155
No and not particularly, I do work in a medical field though which does seem to attract fairly inteligent women

[Anonymous No.14121178]

>>14121035
>i don't know what i was supposed to answer

answer with the title, and mabye the author's name! it's not a complicated question! you feeling weird about what you're reading and giving too much information in an obvious effort to qualify yourself because you're overthinking your response MAKES it weird.

that being said the fact that you're reading about Ariosophy means you almost certainly ARE a fucking weirdo, in which case please tell us if you find the Holy Grail or UFOs in Antarctica

[Anonymous No.14121184]

>>14121167
and you think that might have something to do with the female company you have?
not everyone is a male nurse lmao

[Anonymous No.14121189]

>>14121178
i didn't feel weird about what i was reading, how did you get that impression? i was enjoying what i was reading which is why i was happy to talk about it when she asked me

how is it too much information to give a brief description of the book and its significance? i doubt she knew who otto rahn is. like i said i felt it would be rude to say too little, so that wasn't really an option.

what does "qualify myself" mean?

what makes someone weird or not weird?

[Anonymous No.14121206]

>>14118849
i'm not even trolling or being ironic when i say this: THEY'RE MENTALLY RETARDED

[Anonymous No.14121210]

>>14119552
men incapable of higher thought aren't really men

[Anonymous No.14121217]

>>14121184
Hey not everyone I know is through work, some of the coolest women Ive met have been at volunteer things Ive done. As long as you participate in the world within your areas of interest you will find likeminded people of all genders

[Anonymous No.14121223]

>>14121189
>how did you get that impressio
well, maybe i read too much into your comment "i don't know what i was supposed to answer" which could imply that you went through neurotic thought process i described, also the stuff you said about "human sounding" has very strange vibe as though sounding like a human is something you have to practice

qualifying yourself is explaining too much, giving too much detail. this is game 101, don't do this. and you definitely did overthink your response because you have this cogitation about whether its 'human nsounding' or not, and that made you add extra information. adding extra information is almost always wrong. worrying about tone is wrong, women are not that fragile they don't need or want to be coddled by your warm nice-ness, the question is what information she asked for versus what you gave. "what book are you reading and historical/biographic detail about author" are separate questions. maybe she hears the name and already doesn't give a shit about this subject any more, but you have blown past that and are now boring her with indiana jones and blah blah blah, who cares.

look i know im kind of a dick but i'm trying to help you, even if my previous post was wrongheaded your text game clearly has room for improvment

[Anonymous No.14121231]

>>14121210
given that hypothesis... how many men do you think are alive today?

[Anonymous No.14121240]

>>14121223
>game 101
Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahah
Jesus christ what a faggot

[Anonymous No.14121242]

>>14121223
no i meant i don't know what i was supposed to answer in the sense that if a man had asked me that question i would have answered more or less the same way, that is giving an actual answer, and i don't anticipate that it would have gone poorly. so i am really asking "why and how are women different from men?"

what is "too much" detail? i keep asking this same question more or less, because i told you, just answering "otto rahn" would have been weird. you initially told me to lie and respond with a book i'm not reading but that seems weird and even manipulative to me.

if i want to stay within the realm of giving an actual answer, i have to face the problem that just the answer by itself ("otto rahn") is rude. i would find it weird if i asked a man "what are you reading?" and he replied "bill jenkins." i'd think, why do you expect me to know who this bill jenkins character is? i'd be waiting for him to continue and briefly explain who jenkins is.

i find the rest of your post unsettling. i hope you're wrong about women because the way you are describing them they are either mentally handicapped or psychopaths. in either of those cases i don't think it would be a good or dignified thing if you were to try to accommodate them by lying and contorting yourself in weird ways that you would not do if you were speaking to a normal person as an equal (i.e. a man).

[Anonymous No.14121245]

>>14118849
Generally speaking because they often quit reading, or at least stop reading regularly, after their teenage years. This is an even bigger problem with the general male population, the average male hardly read at all any more and the male population is literally at the risk of becoming partly illiterate.

[Anonymous No.14121247]

>>14118849
If someone had read only the Harry Potter books, their favorite book would still never be Goblet of Fire. No one likes that book.

[Anonymous No.14121248]

>>14118849
That's fine. The real question is what do You say if they ask You? For me? I'd probably say something like King Lear

[Anonymous No.14121256]

>>14119656
>two modern pillars of the trivium of the artes liberales
>memes
You absolute brainlet.

[Anonymous No.14121257]

>>14120939
I fucked a 19 year old at 25 and now that I have the 'teen sex' meme out of my head I feel like I can better appreciate women my own age. Unfortunately, their eggs are drying up fast so ima stick with the younger bitches when it comes to serious relationships.

[Anonymous No.14121259]

>>14120977
Is that why STEM and law are filled with bros waving around Dad's dealership money?

[Anonymous No.14121262]

>>14121242
>because i told you, just answering "otto rahn" would have been weird.
no it wouldn't. no it isn't. OK this is the crux of the issue, you think that responding to a simple question with a simple answer is "rude". it isn't.

Here, let me sample a completely normal interaction for you:
"What book are you reading?"
"I am reading X by Otto Rahn"

there's nothing 'rude' about this at all. title, name of author, that is all the information being asked for, so that's all you give. your thinking tha tyou have to tell a story to explain this information further without being asked is neurotic bs. this is what might happen afterwards:

"oh, who is Otto Rahn?"
"oh, what is the book about?"
or perhaps you interject a question yourself before this.

the point is that this line of discussion is a SEPARATE QUESTION. i'm telling you, you are coming across as tedious and overly available by answering more than one question at a time, trying to anticipate or jump ahead.

i don't think there is anything else about this for us to clarify, you either see my point or do not, so good luck to you.

>you initially told me to lie and respond with a book i'm not reading but that seems weird and even manipulative to me.
i should have clarified that i am not that person, so i will not respond to anything to do with this

[Anonymous No.14121266]

>>14121057
Well, you're engaging in post hoc ergo propter hoc. She could have ghosted you for any reason under the sun; you just picked the one attached to the habits you're most apprehensive about.

But hell, maybe she was intimidated because she's just rereading Harry Potter.

[Anonymous No.14121269]

>>14121262
thank you for your attempt at help, i don't think it's very good or else i don't understand (i can't rule out that i may be at fault) but either way i still wish you luck as well.

[Anonymous No.14121270]

I don't know where you guys live that you think the average male is different, if anything if I asked to most guys what their favorite book is they would just reply "I don't read books".

[Anonymous No.14121271]

>>14121069
I have my dick in a milkshake right now.

[Anonymous No.14121275]

>>14121152
They have trouble because they're not interesting themselves and are in states of deep projection.

[Anonymous No.14121283]

>>14121035
>>14121057
Maybe she looked Rahn up on Wikipedia, saw he was an SS officer, and thought better of talking to you (and that may have been unfair to you and Rahn).

[Anonymous No.14121287]

>>14121231
Next to none on /lit/.

[Anonymous No.14121290]

i am a severely autistic NEET who hasn't read a book recreationally since 2014

my FSIQ was measured at 148 with the WAIS (tested when I was being screened for attention deficit disorders). reading has not, and will never make anyone intelligent. I'm sorry.

[Anonymous No.14121295]

>>14121271
based

[Anonymous No.14121311]

>>14121290
Reading certainly would have made you smart enough to realize that anecdotal evidence is worthless, especially when shared by an anonymous person on the Internet.

[Anonymous No.14121314]

>>14121290
What was your VCI?

[Anonymous No.14121316]

>>14121223
Not him, but I have a question for you too.
You seem like you're really trying and making a honest effort to teach this guy how to "pick up" girls.
I have had some experiencing texting girls. An some of them even "fell in love with me" (kind of). The point is can please some girls to the point they might feel attracted to me. But I didn't manage yet to make them meet me in the cases which we were both complete stranges. They just don't seem to have the confidence to do that. I just don't manage to make them have this level of trust.
How can I do this? How may I "close" them?

[Anonymous No.14121338]

>>14121075

[Jeff Mangum Died For Your Sins !rAl8Mz2mp2 No.14121347]

>>14118849
dumb women read dumb shit, but dumb men don't read at all. Imagine being a young woman and having to deal with guys who only play video games and jerk off all day

[Jeff Mangum Died For Your Sins !rAl8Mz2mp2 No.14121367]

>>14121290
IQ isn't a measure of applied intelligence, it's a measure of the capability of one's intellect. You can have a high IQ but live a completely useless life, if that IQ isn't applied somewhere and to something (it can be literature, or mathematics, or anything else). Reading is a form of applying one's innate intelligence, not developing it

[Anonymous No.14122061]

>>14121035
You should have said you don't read at all

[Anonymous No.14122135]

>>14119054
>> Having a favorite quote

Is there anything more brainlet than this?

[Anonymous No.14122136]

Will nevrer understand the desire to have your mate be "smart". She just needs to be somewhat comely, faithful and have a desire for rising children. If you want to discuss lierature just make some friends that read.

[Anonymous No.14122151]

I have a girlfriend, ask me anything

[Anonymous No.14122169]

>>14121256
The subjects aren't memes, the degree is

[Anonymous No.14122292]

>>14121259
Well objectively those people are the ones who run society at the middle level so yes.

[Anonymous No.14122311]

>>14121338
it's too early for this shit

[Anonymous No.14122401]

>>14122151
is she hot

[Anonymous No.14122421]

>>14118849
>implying literature makes one 'intelligent'

[Anonymous No.14122425]

>>14118894
based, fuck OP and his manchild entitled post

[Anonymous No.14122426]

>>14119106
I think it's like fantasy for dummies who can't handle the real thing. A friend pushed the first book on me years ago because she knew I liked fantasy. It was okay but very simple and forgettable. People eat more Big Macs than T-bone steaks, too.

[Anonymous No.14122597]

>>14119002
>enjoying harry potter and having fond childhood memories is indicative of intelligence
>>14118849
kys

[Anonymous No.14122603]

>>14119577
Philosophy, really? There was just an outrage in my country because literally ONLY men Applied for philosophy courses in university across the country and the feminists were screeching loudly about something something evil men.

[Anonymous No.14122642]

I realise this is bait or incelposter or whatever, but asking someone "what's your favourite book?" is stupid in the first place.

I was obsessed with Watership Down as a kid and it's still probably my "favourite" book. Doesn't mean only read YA or that I don't acknowledge that there are better books.

If you want to test someone's literary mettle, ask them what they're reading right now, what they've been interested in recently, what kind of classics they favoured, etc etc.

You just want more fuel to justify your faggy view of women being useless because you're terribly uninteresting and can't hold your own in a conversation ("L-lol I read a lot of real literature and stuff haha") and thus they don't give a shit about your hobbies.

[Anonymous No.14122748]

>>14122151
Is she single?

[Anonymous No.14123388]

>>14119577
And most of them don't read, and that's coming from personal college experience.

[Anonymous No.14123396]

>>14121152
This, fuck all these losers.

[Anonymous No.14123536]

>>14118849
Bro we fucking get it holy shit. This thread has been thousands of times, they’re shallow, we’ve established that. Most do things half heartedly and expect mounds of praise for their effort. This fact does no excuse you from making this shitty thread that has little to do with literature. You hate on women then make boring threads that, in essence, ape the exact things you hate about them. Fuck off OP, you’re a faggot. Saged

[Anonymous No.14123743]

>>14118849
You are missing your opportunity, anon.
It's your job to bring her out of her adolescent reading phase, into a more mature phase. Gradually introduce her to some of the more traditional classics. Greek mythology might be a transitional method, with a passing similarity to the HP stuff. Maybe guide her to Shelly, Keats, and Wordsworth.
It's up to you to rescue her, anon.
Don't miss a chance to mold her the way you want her.

[Anonymous No.14123871]

>>14119002
>intelligent people have to virtue-signal their intelligence in every single act

[Anonymous No.14123954]

I seriously could not give a straight answer. I read a lot but hardly ever re-read, im more focused into reading new books. If I'd had to choose, maybe it would be The Ghost Seer.

[Anonymous No.14124031]

>>14118849
> expects women to not behave like children
you are a closet homosexual.jpg

[Anonymous No.14124077]

>>14119635
Don't worry, you can reapply next year anon

[Anonymous No.14124102]

>>14123743
Her favourite book is Harry Potter you mongoloid, neither the Greeks or the Romantics are anywhere near this girl's interest or reading level. If OP isn't a retard he'll get her into some 20thc stuff and be grateful if she enjoys that

[Anonymous No.14124106]

>>14124077
Why would anyone actually want to go to a university in Le Current Year?

[Anonymous No.14124125]

>>14124106
As long as you aren't an autist, it's pretty good. Three of four years of making friends, studying something you love, and getting drunk on weekdays. What's not to like? If you're American, sure, don't bother.

[Anonymous No.14125064]

>>14119002
ok zoomer

[Anonymous No.14125770]

>>14122426
Sure but I mean, why HP over other, similar things? Why a big mac over a whopper, etc?

[Anonymous No.14125791]

>talk to qt Hawaiian girl about books before class
>claims she's read 630 books this year
>mostly reads romance
>says she rereads the Twilight Series every year

[Anonymous No.14125804]

>>14125770
It was the biggest book series for kids who grew up in the 90s/00's

[Anonymous No.14125829]

>>14118849
>asking her what her favourite book is.
This is where you went wrong. You decide what it is but asserting your opinions. Women want a guy that has opinions and will play off them.

[Anonymous No.14125841]

>>14119106
The narnia books? Goosebumps?

[Anonymous No.14125874]

>>14118849
Observe the IQ bell curve. Stop forming unrealistic expectations. Winning smart girls is like winning lottery.

[Anonymous No.14125900]

>>14125791
tfw no hapa bookreading gf

[Anonymous No.14125947]

>>14121057
All good relationships are built on a bedrock of lies and misdirection my friend.

[Anonymous No.14125952]

>>14121063
Actual audible laughter, well memes anon

[Anonymous No.14125972]

>>14125900
brother one day we will win this war against the white race and claim our spoils of hapa gfs

[Anonymous No.14125978]

>>14125900
She has a filipino boyfriend too, it's the worst part

[Anonymous No.14125988]

>>14125978
Why even talk to her

[Anonymous No.14125993]

>>14125988
We were just making conversation, I wasn't trying to pitch woo

[Anonymous No.14127119]

>>14121035
"Chads dont require no reading" and then miae kissing noise

[Anonymous No.14127147]

>>14118869
>"lol books are for nerds"
facts give chad the pusy

[Anonymous No.14127181]

>>14118849
OP the only relevant factor is if she is hot or not. Now that you know she does not fulfill your expectations you should pump and dump.

[Anonymous No.14127189]

>>14118864
>I don't like X now that X is popular
I want the meme to die to but this is not any better.

[Anonymous No.14127231]

>>14118864
OP btfo

[Anonymous No.14127254]

>>14127147
ok, now tell me what gets pussy

[Anonymous No.14127260]

>>14125770
But you can be sure any girl who claims hp is her fav also rewatches friends and the office constantly

[Anonymous No.14127508]

>>14125770
I don't know exactly, except what I said before: I think it gave non-readers just enough fantasy to be intriguing without overwhelming them. Kind of the way Game of Thrones on TV gave people who don't normally do fantasy enough boobs and violence to get them past the dragons, though that mostly was a different audience.

I loaned the Belgariad to some HP lovers, and they just couldn't get into it. To me, it's better in every way, and I thought it was still light enough to draw them in. But it takes place fully in a fantasy world with different races and nations and things to wrap your mind around. I think it was just too much for them. HP was, at least at first, more like a magical corner of the real world, which probably made it more manageable for them.

Also, the trope of the mistreated kid under the stairs who is actually a powerful wizard is a potent draw for some personality types, and HP feeds that hard. That's why HP memes are so common on political signs for one side.

[Anonymous No.14127675]

>>14127254
being nice to females unironically

[Anonymous No.14129095]

>>14118849
Does she at least have developed tastes in at least one artistic medium?

[Anonymous No.14129104]

>>14119577
Der ewige credentialist

[Anonymous No.14129109]

>>14121063
when was the last time you spoke to your mother?

[Anonymous No.14129115]

this whole thread is horrifying wtf

[Anonymous No.14130123]

>>14118894
Completely and irrevocably based
I applaud this post

[Anonymous No.14130242]

>>14129115

[Anonymous No.14130417]

Sup intellectual /b/. I come here from /tv/. I hear I can post anything I want regardless of it's relevancy or quality as long as I am able to put an 'intellectual' spin on it or ask for a book recommendation.
I have a few questions for you guys, intellectual /b/.
>What is the philosophy behind COOOOMING!!?
>Are there any books that will teach me to COOM BUCKETS!?
>Are there any quotes or aphorisms on how often one should wash one's cumsock?
>What religion is best for me? Should I LARP as a catholic? I don't go to church and I masturbate to tranny porn daily, but I still want to shame other people for being degenerates.
>What is the epistemological ontological explanation for the existence of trannies with fat dicks? Has tranny idealism been written about yet?
>I'm an incel who hates women. I've never had a girlfriend in my life. I am fucking furious and feel the need to blogpost about my life. Any books for this feel? Don't actually give me book recommendations though, just respond with more incel blogposting.
>Are there any books that explore the ethical question of whether or not it is alright to fill the literature board with off-topic filth? Is it alright to post my incel woes here when /r9k/ exists? Is it alright to post off-topic politics here when /pol/ exists? Theology outside of /his/? Can I spam about Kanye West here when /mu/ exists? Is it really morally apprehendable to take advantage of the ineptitude of the mods?

[Anonymous No.14130487]

>>14124106
Because they're not retard autodides? I for one welcome overeducation. On a personal level it's certainly better than underducation.
t. Masters candidate

[Anonymous No.14130500]

>>14118849
>talking to girls when you could be spending that time reading

[Anonymous No.14130643]

>>14118849
Women are children, when will you understand that for fuck's sake?

[Anonymous No.14130837]

>>14119577
Anyone who needs those programs are obviously morons. LITERALLY JUST READ AND THINK FOR YOURSELF HOLY SHIT

[Anonymous No.14130894]

>>14120962
>It's like dating a child, they have no sense of responsibility or depth of character yet
implying this changes at 22

[Anonymous No.14132091]

>texting boy
>ask her hobby
>upholding shitposting frog meme culture one tab away from unironic redneck nazi who post gore and tentacle porn
>he's 26

[Anonymous No.14132096]

>texting boy
>ask his hobby
>upholding frog shitposting culture one channel away from unironic angry working class neo-nazis who post gore and tentacle porn
>he's 26

I mean do you think your deserve anything?

[Anonymous No.14132109]

>>14122603
Which country?
Looks about 60:40 here in central Europe

[Anonymous No.14132172]

>>14132096
Don't lie, this never happened.

[Anonymous No.14132179]

>>14118849
why do so many men keep entertaining women even though men say women are worthless

[Anonymous No.14132201]

>>14130487
I suppose I don't disagree, but how do you silence the part of your psyche that drums on about how getting a master's degree will most likely get you exactly no where in the academy when making money is the only thing of value in this world?