[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 2 KB, 119x124, 5554F885-7444-4714-8F6D-3691DA6C1005.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14037293 No.14037293 [Reply] [Original]

Why is Christianity pronatalism? I want to be clear, I myself am not an antinatalist myself because I believe any harm that may come to a person is limited in terms of severity and durance. However I cant for the life of me think of a bigger asshole thing to do than procreate while upholding the doctrine of Hell, a place of infinite torment that is anywhere between “not very difficult to go to” and “exceedingly hard to avoid”. If you have kids and you think Hell is a real place, then by all means apologize to them. Muslims too.

>> No.14037308

The command to multiply.

>> No.14037312

>>14037293
Because the OT is a demiurgic fabrication. Reproduction extends the domain of death.

>> No.14037323

>>14037293
You only go to hell if you're a shit person. Hell is supposed to be scary.

>> No.14037336

>>14037323
According to God everyone is a shit person

>> No.14037344

>>14037336
Nope.

>> No.14037356

According to tbe theology, to the best of my knowledge, Christians exist to express God's glory on Earth. Creation is not bad and the world is not something to be forsaken
https://www.bible.com/bible/1/JHN.17.kjv

>> No.14037367

>>14037336
Romans 8:28-30

>> No.14037371

>>14037293
It's not pronatalism, retard. It's just anti-abortion and anti-contraception. Sex, if you have it, should be between a married couple and open to conception. It's up to you whether you have sex. Jesus and Paul actually advised against marriage if you're capable of celibacy.

>> No.14037375

>>14037367
Yeah, exactly, so?

>> No.14037382

>>14037371
>It's not pronatalism, retard.

Be fruitful and multiply, dude.

>> No.14037389

>>14037323
>You only go to hell if you're a shit person.
Confirmed for not reading the Bible.

>> No.14037391

>>14037375
Did you even read the verse?

>> No.14037399

>>14037382
>I’m telling those who are single and widows that it’s good for them to stay single like me. But if they can’t control themselves, they should get married, because it’s better to marry than to burn with passion.
Dude.

>> No.14037402

>>14037336
Thats a cope for being shit. Be a good person.

>> No.14037440

>>14037308
this. If you follow God's path you'll find a wife and procreate. Souls need to be born into a human being before they can be redeemed.

>> No.14037460

>>14037391
Nah I just assumed it was the one that goes “there are none that are good. None that seek God. No, not even one.” Etc. I think that would be the most relevant part.

>> No.14037488
File: 6 KB, 215x234, D6AD10FA-882F-4D47-BF0B-1C129B308FE1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14037488

>>14037402
>>14037308
Its hilarious how you douchebags will scramble to find any excuse you can find in scripture to get out if charitable deeds but you’ll go straight to genesis for edicts that tell you to do what you want to do yourself any way. What a bunch of pieces of shit.

>> No.14037516

>>14037488
>get out if charitable deeds
Who said this?

>> No.14037543

>>14037293
Christianity as it existed for most of its history is incompatible with the liberal and utilitarian anthropologies that underlie anti natalism. Human existence and human suffering are transcendentally justified under christianity.

>> No.14037587

>>14037293
What is hell? A bishop once stated that it is choosing to live without God, while on earth. So perhaps hellfire and infinite torment is but a parable, just like how Jesus used to deliver his message. Yes, hell is real. But it might not be literal fire - and regardless, each individual are free to choose the Lords salvation. So raise your kids right, and help lead the world to Christ. The more believers, the better.

>> No.14037594

>>14037488
What is this creep on about?

>> No.14037617

>>14037587
>So raise your kids right
You're taking a risk by having kids at all, they might go to hell. Therefore the only logical conclusion of Christianity is to never have children.

>> No.14037634

>>14037587
that bishop is a wise man. Purgatory is the feeling of remorse, especially if you're surrounded by people you look up to because you feel you're too bad for them. But you can get back into the light of God, you just have to suffer through this time apart from God. Hell on the other hand is the permanent separation from God.

>> No.14037656

>>14037293
Proverbs 22:6
>Train up a child in the way he should go: and when he is old, he will not depart from it.

While your child might possibly go to Hell, he might also go to Heaven. Other children are born all the time, and so it is the case that countless souls are brought into this world and raised improperly. But the more good we doo in the world, and the more good our sins and daughters will do, then the more people will be saved. Anti-natalism is only powerful when the whole world is convinced. But when most people would rather reproduce, it doesn’t really matter if you decide to bring one more person into this world or not.

>> No.14037684

>>14037371
you're the actual retard, you rude person. Of course christianity is pronatalistic.

>> No.14037861

>>14037656
It does matter because that person is a conscious individual

>> No.14037870
File: 296 KB, 1080x1080, 04F2F76C-237A-4310-BBEB-78463C60505B.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14037870

>>14037293
It really isn’t. It was always a death cult
It’s also a contradictory mess as it was cobbled together with an older faith. It suffers its multiple authors

Thomas Paine Age of Reason related

>> No.14038490

>>14037684
It is by no means pro-natal or bust. It clearly approves of the chaste life.

>> No.14039263
File: 124 KB, 653x523, E2D5ED65-6751-4203-BD9C-CE2F423F37E8.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14039263

>>14037543
>antinatalism is utilitarian

If it were then the argument that a world where everyone stops procreating would be terrible for the surviving population would hold but it does not. Antinatalism is actually 100% deontological.

>> No.14039695
File: 27 KB, 500x375, EB52C6EF-01BD-46B2-B5AA-DEE3AD4BA757.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14039695

>>14037308
The “command” to multiply only applies until the world is filled. You don’t think its filled yet?

>> No.14039715

>>14039695
Ha. Where’s that clause?

>> No.14039731

>>14039715
The whole passage goes something like. Be fruitful and multiply, fill all the earth and subdue it. 7 billion people later, you’re arguably off the hook from any such command, never mind the fact your saying that you’re commanded to be fruitful and multiply while you’re wearing a polyester blend shirt, eating a lobster and a porkchop fried in bacon grease with a mixed green side.

>> No.14039769

>>14039731
If you can't use your and you're correctly you should not be here

>> No.14040057
File: 211 KB, 1024x1004, 3C929378-4DE3-402B-8DF4-8E0F03736382.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14040057

>>14039769
It seems like I made that typo once in the entire post. Should I accept this post as your concession?

>> No.14040061

>>14039769
Where is the punctuation in that sentence?

>> No.14040110

> I myself am not an antinatalist myself

based retard op

>> No.14040122
File: 383 KB, 263x301, B23155F2-FF1C-4029-9A47-1CC2BAD200E2.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14040122

>>14040110
Yep, another typo. Guess I have no argument now, because I accidentally placed a redundant word in one of my sentences. Gg no re.