[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 25 KB, 312x475, 9454.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13983605 No.13983605 [Reply] [Original]

>Questions that don't deserve their own thread
What is the best translation/edition of the phenomenology of spirit? Pic related is the one I usually see around here, but I heard Terry Pinkard's version is "the one."

>> No.13984401

Both Pinkard and Inwood is superior to Miller, but Miller is a lot cheaper.

>> No.13984405

>>13984401
The cover is also more iconic and imo more aesthetic

>> No.13984670

>>13983605
Chads read it in its original language: German

>> No.13985179

Translation doesn’t matter all too much with Hegel, brevity of phrase is more important than the designative word. Hegel uses a limited and particular vocabulary from chapter to chapter and it’s reference should be self explanatory if you use your brain

>> No.13985208
File: 2.93 MB, 560x800, 1570937958408.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13985208

>>13983605
Can someone tldr kant for me so i can read the world as will and representation?

>> No.13985338
File: 1.47 MB, 977x1210, 53b22caf941aba4832541b2ad7a74975.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13985338

I hear there was a debate between two Hegelians one accusing Pinkard of poor interpretation.
And that Inwood's is more readable (better prose), and that Pinkard has some weird unorthodox phrasing (he seems to have translated the words not their meaning, similarly to Miller).
But this is only what I've heard.

>> No.13985347

>>13985208
read Berkley's three dialogues
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=5&ved=2ahUKEwj1loyDyJnlAhWIo4sKHQd0AQUQFjAEegQICBAC&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.earlymoderntexts.com%2Fassets%2Fpdfs%2Fberkeley1713.pdf&usg=AOvVaw3kquQ1tHyCm6LBlTxq921U

>> No.13986647

Pinkard's version is free on marxists.org