[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 94 KB, 680x788, 73a.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13857971 No.13857971 [Reply] [Original]

refute this /lit/
>pro-tip: you can't

"Relation is neither internal nor external. If it inheres in one of the two terms, it would not relate it with the other term; the same relation cannot inhere in both the terms as it is indivisible; and if it falls outside both the terms, it becomes a third term which requires another relation to relate it with the first two terms and so on ad infinitum. And without a real relation there is no causation and hence no creation."

>> No.13858005

nice waffling mate

>> No.13858031

>>13857971
This is true except the conclusion. There is no causation, only creation

>> No.13858179
File: 83 KB, 900x900, dxl2ui5v2r611.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13858179

>>13858005
>nice waffling mate

>> No.13858858

>>13858031
if there is no causation there can be no real creation

>> No.13859768

bump

>> No.13859783

>>13857971
You fucked up by pretending the internal and external are somehow separate things

Nice mental masturbation

>> No.13860561

>>13859783
how are they not?

>> No.13860720

>>13860561
The same way the abternal and obternal are not.

>> No.13860990

>>13859783
they are mutually exclusive

>> No.13861134

>>13857971
Causality is internal, it's given to us a priori. The understanding puts causes with effects out of necessity, something not unique to humans, because even animals understand the nature of cause and effect. In the external there is no cause and effect, the questions of why and how are purely functions of the understanding