[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 59 KB, 390x338, 1540070720718.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13833728 No.13833728 [Reply] [Original]

>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_important_publications_in_philosophy
>ctrl F
>'Guénon'
>0 results found

>> No.13833793

>Whitehead: 3 results
>Deleuze: 2 results

>> No.13833902

>>13833728
>woah like traditionalism n' sheiiittt
>quality good quantity bad
>STOP
>oooooooo hinduism

>> No.13833921

>old GOOD
>new BAD
such penetrating insight

>> No.13833964

>>13833793
PROACTIVELY REFUTED

>> No.13834106

this is a joke right?

>> No.13834525

>>13833728
>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_people_retroactively_debunked_by_Parmenides
>ctrl F
>Whitehead
>1 result found

>> No.13834535

>>13834525
My F3 showed 0 results

>> No.13834541

>>13834525
>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_people_retroactively_debunked_by_Parmenides
>ctrl F
>1 result found
>Parmenides

>> No.13834577

>>13833921
This is literally "God's will," as in the desire behind the desire for God. What is behind it is nothing more than the most infantile reaction to discomfort. It's so fucking hilarious that idiots actually worship such a thing as the ultimate! God is the Eternal Boomer shouting "change = bad" for all eternity.

>> No.13834586

>>13833728
but actually who tf is this guy

>> No.13834593

>>13833728
Guenon himself maintained that he was not doing philosophy and constantly shit on philosophers

>> No.13834616

>>13833728
He's a metaphysician not in the sense of philosopher, but in the sense of 'magical creatures talk to me'

>> No.13835294

>>13833728
He's a fucking mystic, not a philosopher. Why don't you understand this?

>> No.13835530
File: 74 KB, 700x934, 1547172872095.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13835530

Can someone remind me why should I bother with Guénon's writings ?

>> No.13835539

>>13835530
They’re interesting, even if they’re wrong

>> No.13835573

>>13835539
And by wich one of his many interesting but wrong books should I start ?