[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 178 KB, 1132x1704, 71FEouREnAL.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13749431 No.13749431 [Reply] [Original]

What's some good fascist /lit/erature? So far for German stuff I've got Hitler, Rosenberg, and Schmitt and for general European stuff I've got Gentile, Codreanu, and Mosley.

>> No.13749522
File: 28 KB, 308x475, 243604.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13749522

>>13749431
bump

>> No.13749524

Might is right, germania

>> No.13749532
File: 45 KB, 262x389, fasc_lit_core.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13749532

must read for those looking to escape brainletdom

>> No.13749541

>>13749524
I'm attempting to make a comprehensive right-wing reading list and I've got plenty of stuff in other categories but I can't help but feel I'm missing some stuff for fascism/natsoc. Might is Right will definitely be on the list but I wouldn't lump it in with Gentile and Mosley

>> No.13749605

>>13749431
From what I've heard, Rosenberg wasn't actually that influential. Even Hitler admitted to not understanding it

>> No.13749630
File: 25 KB, 259x400, 1505122.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13749630

For the American view of things, this is a must read. Rockwell isn't as well spoken as a lot of the German writers, but it's a good read nonetheless.
>>13749605
Hitler believed that Rosenberg should write in a way that the common man could understand, but Rosenberg didnt want to dumb himself down.

>> No.13749654
File: 163 KB, 846x401, 116097903.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13749654

>>13749522
Based

>> No.13749810

Bump

>> No.13749826
File: 119 KB, 614x768, 0A500889-2E7A-49AA-8623-4BC4707285F7.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13749826

>pulls pin

>> No.13749829

>>13749826
As if we needed it to be confirmed that lefties believe they’re justified to lie and be hypocrites

>> No.13749831

>>13749826
This is an incomplete conceptualization of that problematic. Strauss covered it better.

>> No.13749832

>>13749826
>literally has to say he’s a philosopher
You brainlets are such a scary joke...

>> No.13749833

>>13749826

Karl Popper also hates commies you dumb whore

>> No.13749836

>>13749833
she’s an anarchist

>> No.13749838

>>13749826
>As paradoxical as it may seem
It's not a paradox, it's just pretending that you're being tolerant while being intolerant to people you disagree with

>> No.13749844

>>13749836

he hates that too

>> No.13749845

>>13749836
Because of course she is, on top of every other brainlet-tier viewpoint she holds, that takes the cake

>> No.13749846

>>13749838
This, like the slippery slope fallacy, the left is intellectually dishonest

>> No.13749850

>>13749844
does he also hate aging lesbians by any chance?

>> No.13749889
File: 76 KB, 1280x720, Jitka-Maria vail.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13749889

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paradox

>> No.13749895
File: 165 KB, 1008x760, 1566562477648.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13749895

>>13749826
Not just Nazis, but all minority groups too

>> No.13749912

>>13749889
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hypocrisy

>> No.13749935
File: 99 KB, 429x600, starship troopers.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13749935

>>13749826
Once again, an entire spectrum of literature and philosophy is dismissed because "this hurts my feelings". Grow up.

>>13749431
Starship troopers and ender's game (or the sequels it spawned) explore the philosophy of militarism and authoritarianism, and their merits/necessity. In many scifi novels, there's usually a foreign race of aliens that are threatening the dominion of the humans, and that survival is ensured through militarism and discipline, and a general embracing of statism. Both books also have coming of age themes for young boys growing up into fighting age men, and what it means to transition from child to adult.

>> No.13749936
File: 49 KB, 1076x349, Collective interest intesifies.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13749936

>>13749912
>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hypocrisy

>> No.13749949

How are there people who don't have Butterfly filtered yet?

>> No.13749972

>>13749949
I would, but I'm on mobile

>> No.13750075

>>13749532
this is just extreme butthurt against fascists and strong willed men disguised as an academic work

>> No.13750109

>>13749532
Just read the personality traits the author described in relation to fascistic tendencies. It's immediately clear that the contents of the book are bullshit.

>> No.13750536

If you’re Scandinavian, Quisling’s philosophy notes has recently been published. They are somewhat all over the place, but interesting nontheless. Also, the literature by Knut Hamsun is excellent, and he was a fascist. Imperium by yockey
has already been mentioned, but I liked it a lot. If you’re interested in escoteric neo-nazism, Savitri Devi is a good place to start. For Neo-nazism in general, My Awakening by David Duke is also interesting.

>> No.13750717

The only fascist author that tries to be intellectually coherent is Julius Evola.

Fascism is for the weak minded though.

>> No.13751296

>>13750717
How is Evola an intellectually coherent fascist when he explicitly rejects fascism as being too materialistic?

>> No.13751324

>>13751296
This: Evola, like Nietzsche, was above fascism itself, despite its members desperately clinging to them for ideological validation. If I remember correctly, he ended up under surveillance by the nazis for his dangerous views.

>> No.13751336
File: 720 KB, 2000x3501, B0UaUcs.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13751336

>>13749431

>> No.13751399

>>13751324
This is because Himmler got butthurt at him, and the rank-and file brass in the NSDAP didn't understand him, so they thought he was some mushy mystic who wouldn't commit to "correct" race-relations.

Evola wasn't a Fascist, but if you have to be a fascist, you should definitely read Evola so you acknowledge your own position as a necessary concession to the unfortunate state of the world and not as an end goal.

>> No.13751530

>>13751324
During the post war trials, Evola was accused of being a fascist and supporter of the Italian fascist Party. He vehemently denies this, and claimed in stead to be a "Super Fascist" and disappointed by their lack of extremism. All charges were dropped and he walked free

>> No.13751586

>>13749895
I need this book! what book is this??

>> No.13751588

>>13750536
Have you read his notes? If so is there anything to gain from it? I kinda want to read it.

>> No.13751625

>>13751530
Yeah he was arrested and interrogated on suspicions of being a fascist, and during that interrogation and referred to himself as a "superfascist" and for some reason he was released from custody and never bothered again even though it was illegal to be a fascist at the time. Maybe you should look at the original language instead of a misleading translation. Supra means over and above. Evola is literally saying that he is over and above fascism in the same way Nietzsche is claiming his "ubermensch" is over and above man. Nietzsche isn't claiming to be a Superman with x-ray vision.

You're talk over "extremism" is just empty rhetoric. Evo9la stated that he supported fascism only insofar as it supported his own views on hierarchicism and social order which he then goes on to explain, amounts to very little. Then latter on he writes polemics against fascism and criticizes their lack of spiritual content. It's ridiculous to call him a fascist and nobody thought of him as one until Trump was elected and Steve Bannon mentioned him. It just became another dumb vector to attack Trump and tie him to fascism.

>> No.13751627

>>13751586
I think it's a commentary on Aristotle's Politics, but I'm not certain on that. Just a screenshot I saw on a post

>> No.13751885
File: 40 KB, 263x400, 801754.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13751885

This is a good read, OP. Provides good insight into the concepts explored in other peoples works.

>> No.13751931

I can't possibly imagine an intelligent person ever deciding to take fascism seriously, especially as it eventually expressed itself.
>the world is nothing but savage gangs of animals try to destroy society, so lets form a savage gang of animals hell-bent on destroying everything but our society and call ourselves something else because we convinced the state to authorize it
>we're intellectuals, that's why we understand using different words to describe the same things makes them totally different things!
You're nothing but dogs barking at other dogs barking at other dogs barking.

>> No.13751946

>(((((Rosenberg))))

>> No.13751986

>>13751931
Except that's not fascism or nationalsocialism

>> No.13752479

>>13749826
I agree. Let's ban all muslim immigration.

>> No.13752522

>>13749826
That's not what the paradox of intolerance is you fucking idiot. His point was that once a group eschews debate for violence they can no longer be countered with debate.