/lit/ - Literature

[Anonymous No.13709576]

Have you guys read Otto Weininger's Sex and Character?

Was he really right about women? Are women really creatures with no self? Are women just their sexuality and nothing besides?

>“Woman is soulless and possesses neither ego nor individuality, personality nor freedom, character nor will.”

[Anonymous No.13709591]

>>13709576
No.

[Anonymous No.13709592]

>>13709576
Probably look how they treat men nowadays

[Anonymous No.13709604]

>>13709576
>ugly men have negative opinions on women
Nothing new under the sun

[Anonymous No.13709605]

[Anonymous No.13709608]

Yes. To be an actualised human requires a Y-chromosome. Women are instruments of reproduction for humans.

[Anonymous No.13709609]

>>13709604

[Anonymous No.13709632]

>>13709604
Don't be anti-Semitic.

[Anonymous No.13709635]

>>13709609
I have a dick but i'm also tall and attractive, this is why i don't hate women.

[Anonymous No.13709656]

>>13709604
Chads treat women like shit and don't have high regards for them actually

[Anonymous No.13709673]

>>13709635
And who said he hated women? Saying that water is wet makes me a water hater?

[Anonymous No.13709687]

>>13709656
But they don't waste time creating complex arguments as to why women are bad and should be enslaved.

[Anonymous No.13709697]

The fact that women are always looking for the "strong man" shows how women have no individuality, no self, no soul, no "I". It shows her desire to be nothing but property and they have no control over it.

"Women have no existence and no essence, they are not and they are nothing. One IS Man or one IS Woman, depending on whether or not one IS
somebody."
- Otto Weininger

[« Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ » ǃmxvabIoSIE No.13709699]

>>13709576

another thinly veiled r9pol thread
how tiresome

[Anonymous No.13709711]

>>13709699
Faggot

[« Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ » ǃmxvabIoSIE No.13709722]

>>13709711

incel

[Anonymous No.13709749]

>>13709697
man only hates another man when they are in competition. Women hate each other regardless of anything, probably because they are always competing to mate with the best man, this shows they only serve this purpose in life (Schopenhauer)

[Anonymous No.13709754]

>>13709576
>suicide at the age of 23
yeah this dude had it all figured out

[Anonymous No.13709789]

>>13709576
If this is true, then why shouldn't women just kill themselves en masse? Asking for a friend.

[Anonymous No.13709790]

>>13709754
Ad hominem

[Anonymous No.13709867]

>>13709789
Otto's idea is that women should not exist at all. But because men are also sexual creatures (but not entirely sexual like women) they just won't let them go.
Women lack self-awareness and a sense of truth so why would they kill themselves over something that they can't comprehend?

[Anonymous No.13709976]

Yes he was right. Just browse roastie-twitter and you'll see.

[Anonymous No.13710041]

>>13709687
~~creating complex arguments~~
>making an observation

[Anonymous No.13710062]

>>13709697
Anon, your being sent to Somalia. For personal protection you can either get a a 150 pound manlet or a Navy Seal on his second tour of duty. Who would you prefer to protect you?

[Anonymous No.13710099]

>>13710062
>not keeping a pet gorilla

[Anonymous No.13710119]

>>13709576
Yeah he’s right, I just call them demon devil bitches

[Anonymous No.13710157]

>>13710062
Your comparison doesn't make any sense at all, retard. Plus that only makes it even more obvious that women are totally dependent of men, therefore have no "I", no free will, no personality, no character. No fucking nothing. They are incapable of love, because love is something much more profound than "he's strong and manly so I must have sex with him tee-hee". Women could never appreciate a man for what he is, for his "genius", so to speak. Nor for his beauty, because women do not understand and do not care about beauty. Her idea of beauty is a man's idea of beauty. Women are purely sexual. They are sexuality itself. Otto is right.

[Anonymous No.13710203]

>>13710157
Quintessentially based

[Anonymous No.13710228]

>>13709754
Kek

[Anonymous No.13710229]

Not really. I'm in the math department and I have met some women who are very clever.

[Anonymous No.13710343]

Bump
Fuck women

[Anonymous No.13710745]

>>13710157
Men hate large breasts. Just ask any man what quality turns him off the most and he'll say large breasts disgust him. It's rare to find a man who is ok with a female having a pair of disgusting fat blobs on her chest. In porn they'll only hire the flattest chested women they can because the big breasted women always have the fewest fans.

You're right anon, typing nonsense is tons of fun! (pic related)
https://psyarxiv.com/2npfm/

[Anonymous No.13711001]

Based

[Anonymous No.13712013]

Bump

[Anonymous No.13712156]

https://youtu.be/-0Kw2G1GUwc

[Anonymous No.13712170]

>>13709604
at least he's relevant a century after
unlike you I guess

[Anonymous No.13712185]

>>13709576
honestly though, what insight could a 23yo virgin who sudukod himself have on women and relationships? might as well read my diary desu

[Anonymous No.13712188]

>>13709576

Be wary of a woman that:
>uses makeup
>dyed her hair
>exercises in gymthots clothes
>has any tattos, specially in sexual areas (tits, butt, etc)
>has any piercing marks
>likes parties where sex and drugs are very common
>likes musical festivals (see point above)
>likes expensive jewels
>likes to masturbate
>has indecent photos online
>her social media photos has too many likes (I'd say more than 10, not having a social media is ideal)
>has any traces of tinder or dating apps in her phone
>has male friends (goes out with her male friends, women that don't like walking with the girls and enjoy male company are almost always whores)
>has an ex boyfriend with whom she had sex with (or just fucked some other person, male or female)
>isnt a catholic (she can be a muslim or a conservative protestant but it's much worse)
>is too beautiful, model levels of beauty
>lifts weights too heavy for just maintaining health (in other words, lifts to get an ass)
>asks you to pay for every shit and never do something in return or without you asking
>uses guilt to manipulate you
>has any signs of drug use
>links to drink, a lot
>eats fast food as if it grown in trees
>has female friends that have one or more of the above tips (tell me who you walk with, and I'll tell you who you are)
>does not read the bible at least every week
>doesnt follow the bible (thbq most of this list comes from it)
>has some of the whore names (just google it and compare to your experience)
>uses indecent clothing (anything too tight, anything that's much above the knees)
>badmouths you behind your back
>doesn't obey your reasonable orders
>doesn't want to have kids
>is an atheist
>uses large earrings and other whore accessories like chokers
>listens to degenerate music
>knowingly supports companies that finance abortion such as netfilx and disney
>watches perverse, immoral movies and series like Lucifer for entertainment
>is too dumb/guiliable
>is a leftist

[Anonymous No.13712229]

His theory on feminine and masculine characteristics being extant in the manner reminiscent as described by Jung in his Zyzgy model is rather impressive for it's time.

His clinical approach to the analysis of woman is intriguing. However, he does miss many critical and key aspects of the female psychology as a consequence of his turbo virgin status.

I don't think you should be allowed to read Sex and Character until you are married. You simply won't apprehend the severity of the errors in his inferences unless you're in a long term relationship.

[Anonymous No.13712403]

>>13709656
>>13712170
>>13712188
>>13710343
>>13710119
>>13709867
is incels.net your main source of information on women?

[Anonymous No.13712429]

>>13712229
Pls, share your knowledge with us.
What did he miss?

[Anonymous No.13712487]

>>13709576
yes

[Anonymous No.13712496]

>>13709604
>>13709635
>>13709656
>they think like women
oh no no no no no

[Anonymous No.13712557]

>>13709576
She has value. Her value is to please Chad. Not Otto.
Wasn't this guy a virgin? How can a virgin speak about women?
A guy who write a book about women should fuck at least 100 women before opening is mouth.
In all honesty he is kind of right, but i feel he goes too far. Some women are very good at what they do. Albeit i prefer the company of men to do non sexual related stuff.
Also, most of the critique of women can also be addressed to most men. Most men are weak, shallow, stupid. Cowards and lackeys who wants to be close to the source of power. Not challenge it if such power is unfair. Not very different from a women.
In any case, men and women shouldn't be put together to do daily activities. It doesn't really work.
>>13709697
They have strength and personality when it comes to defend their children. About the no individuality thing, some men are wimp, and have a weaker frame than some women.

[Anonymous No.13712640]

>>13712557
> most of the critique of women can also be addressed to most men. Most men are weak, shallow, stupid. Cowards and lackeys who wants to be close to the source of power

Read his book.

"Sex and Character argues that all people are composed of a mixture of male and female substance, and attempts to support this view scientifically. "

So anything that's considered "low", "degenerate" in men are female characteristics that the man adopted. And anything that's "great" in woman is a male characteristic. He argues that man can become a woman (degrade himself) because he's one and all, while woman can only adopt certain characteristics.

[Anonymous No.13712774]

>>13712557
>>13712640
It must be really sad to be an incel

[Anonymous No.13712798]

>>13712774
So, you're a cuck?

[Anonymous No.13712817]

>>13712774

[Anonymous No.13712841]

>>13712798
there’s a lot between being an incel and being a cuck
>>13712817
oh so brilliant retard

[Anonymous No.13712869]

>>13712817
do you know a fable by Fontaine - “The Fox and the Grapes”?
it’s a perfect analogy to what you’re doing right now/what incels do in general

[Anonymous No.13712879]

>>13712841
There's three categories. Chad, incel and cuck. Nothing else.

[Anonymous No.13712882]

>>13712640
Okay i see.
Women are chaos. There are necessary. Without women, humanity would have gone extinct, or very weakened.

[Anonymous No.13712894]

>>13712879
where did you take that from? 4chan?

[Anonymous No.13712897]

>>13712879
So Alpha, Beta and Omega. Stop rebranding old things with neologisms and thinking that you're a genius for it, it has been known for a very long time.

[Anonymous No.13712941]

>>13712229
yeah, what did he miss? The more I meet women and spend time with them, the more I realize Weininger is fundamentally right.

[Anonymous No.13712952]

>>13712879
I've some experience with women, and women don't cuck as much as you think. They cheat and then break relationships, but rarely cuck their guy, staying with him, while fucking chad.
I should know, of all the women i fucked, only one was perfectly fine with cheating with me, while being married. She was diagnosed bipolar.
For most, cheating often comes with psychological drama.
Usually, they cheat when they are have already exited the relationship emotionally.
Some women are natural cheaters, but they are a minority. I'd say less than 20%.
We really need to have scientific and exhaustive statistic about paternity fraud. According to paternity fraud statistics, about 30% of children are not of their father's.
However, in reality, i feel that women don't cheat so much, at least in western europa. The statiistic should be probably more around 10%.
I would like to know if cheating really is something cultural, that differs from countries, or if it's a general phenomenon, equally happening everywhere.

[Anonymous No.13712962]

>>13712894
Cold logical deduction. By definition, only Chads get to pick women, therefore, only Chads get to pick virgins.

A cuck is a man who wants the woman he desires to be with other men. Any man who supports women's lib is a cuck then, because women's lib implies that a women can be with as many men as she desires.

Conclusion: If you are for women's lib of any kind, you are for having the future mother of your children fucked by as many men as is hypothetically possible. Note that whether or not this happens hardly matters. You are for it.

[Anonymous No.13712976]

>>13712952
>statistics show 30% children are not their fathers
>you feel that this is not the case
Nice argument you got there buddy

[Anonymous No.13712979]

>>13712952
Read my mathematical proof of your cuckedness >>13712962

[Anonymous No.13712990]

>>13709576
he's right but he shouldn't talk about it so much

[Anonymous No.13713035]

>>13712962
why are you tryning to fit everything into you retarded worldview?
you have to be a very limited person to hold such a simplistic view on human relationships unironically

[Anonymous No.13713038]

>>13709576
Leave this thread and go read Middlemarch. If you still don't think that it's possible for a woman to have both empathy and a rich internal life, go to /r9k/.

[Anonymous No.13713049]

>>13713035
I have presented you with a logical proof of my worldview. The fact that you're still mad tells us a lot

[Anonymous No.13713070]

>>13713049
>logical
lmao

[Anonymous No.13713081]

>>13713038
>a fucking novel

[Anonymous No.13713088]

>>13713049
You reeks inceldom.
I'm totally up for being red pilled about women nature, but not by little piece of shit like you who are in the 0-3 women fucked bracket.

[Anonymous No.13713123]

Most people in this thread haven't even read the book. Bunch of lazy cunts.

[Anonymous No.13713124]

>>13712229
based

[Anonymous No.13713160]

>>13713070
This is not an argument.
>>13713088
My proof concerns the nature of men, not of women. Re-read it.

[Anonymous No.13713211]

>>13713160
your premises are: there’re only two types of men, not having problems with a non-virgin means exactly the same thing as desiring your partner to be “fucked by as many men as possible” (there’s a lot between a virgin and a whore, incel), and that all men are as insecure as yourself
conclusion: you based on wrong promises, therefore your whole “logical proof” is incorrect

[Anonymous No.13713240]

>>13713160
there’s no point in trying to rationalise your retarded opinions

[Anonymous No.13713270]

>>13713211
>being a cuck means either willingly or unwillingly having your woman have sex with other men than yourself
>women's liberation has made this more possible than ever before
>therefore, if you support women's liberation, you also accept that your woman (gf, wife, whatever) is fucking other men, rendering you a cuck to begin with

[Anonymous No.13713284]

>>13713211
> your premises are: there’re only two types of men, not having problems with a non-virgin means exactly the same thing as desiring your partner to be “fucked by as many men as possible”
These are not the premises of my proof.
I have not stipulated that there only two kinds of men. I have stipulated that men may be divided in these three types: "incel", "chad" and "cuck".

It would be fair to say that a "cuck" is a man that is okay with the idea of the woman he desires have sex with other men or is even turned on by it. A "chad" is someone who gets pick women to have sex with. Note these two aren't mutually exclusive. I think with this in mind you should be finally able to understand my proof.
>>13713240
You're hysterical, meditate.

[Anonymous No.13713289]

>>13713160
I don't care. You still talk like an incel. Guys who fucked 50 women NEVER says shit like this. They say all women are whores, but not your retarded theory.
By the way fucking virgin, not only Chads get to pick women. It's more complicated than that, and you are not helping with your massive inexperience and retardation.
Trying to be in phase with reality don't mean being a cuck.
By the way incel, there are cucks who have 3 children, biologically theirs and Chads who are fatherless.
Needless to say incel, you have nothing. No sex, no children, no cuck relationship, nothing. Only anime pictures.

[Anonymous No.13713292]

>>13712557
>Wasn't this guy a virgin? How can a virgin speak about women?
orbiters know nothing about women. only virgins have insights about them.

[Anonymous No.13713302]

>>13713284
>Note these two aren't mutually exclusive.
That's better. You classification still doesn't make any sense, since a chad can be an uber chad with one women, and a wimp with an other.

[Anonymous No.13713309]

>>13713270
then there’s honestly nothing wrong about being a cuck
when i was a virgin, i also wanted my partner to be a virgin, but my view changed with experience

[Anonymous No.13713314]

>>13713292
>only virgins have insights about them.
Sorry virgins, but that false.
To understand women, you have to have a large experience of them. Being the cuck, being the Chad, being in a relationship long term, having fucked alpha, having fucked beta. Having children. Having fucked married women.

Virgins have nothing of this. And the first women you'll met, you'll forget every slight insight you think you have.

[Anonymous No.13713316]

>>13712879
>>There's three categories. Chad, incel and cuck. Nothing else.
that's for men who value women. and any man who values a woman is a huge beta.

[Anonymous No.13713326]

>>13713302
These two aren't mutually exclusive in theory. In practice the intersection is extremely rare (so as to be negligible). When it comes to human matters all categorizations have to deal with exceptions.

[Anonymous No.13713331]

>>13713316
Correct, I assumed we were talking about heterosexual men.

[Anonymous No.13713335]

>>13713284
two or three, it doesn’t reallly matter
the fact that you in ironically believe that it’s possible to divide men into only three categories, means that you want to fit everything into your retarded worldview - are a limited person
>It would be fair to say that a "cuck" is a man that is okay with the idea of the woman he desires have sex with other men or is even turned on by it
not everyone is so insecure about themselves

[Anonymous No.13713341]

>>13713309
this is not the point, dude, I am not trying to be a moralist, just proving that you are a cuck whether you think it is "okay" or not..

[Anonymous No.13713345]

>>13713326
What do you even mean by this?
You know there are chads who get cucked without knowing it. You know that anon, no?

[Anonymous No.13713347]

>>13713335
>not everyone is so insecure about themselves
Your woman fucked multiple men. And since I don't even believe in linear time, she is perpetually fucking other men at any given moment. In case time is cyclical, you're still perpetually getting cucked.

[Anonymous No.13713350]

>>13713314
yet the guy with most insight about women killed himself at 23 and virgin. Your theory is lacking man

[Anonymous No.13713352]

>>13713345
Yes, but I decided to define "cuck" as someone who is okay with it or turned on by it.

[Anonymous No.13713354]

>>13709576
why are men so insecure when it comes to women lmao

[Anonymous No.13713355]

>>13713347
how many women have you fucked? and how old are you?

[Anonymous No.13713356]

He sounds like an incel who chased only after the trophy wife sort.

[Anonymous No.13713362]

>>13713352
Then it's not the true definition of cuck.
The original chad thundercock might have been cheated on his life. Same for A list hollywood actors.
In the end, you theory is shit, and don't explain shit about the chaotic nature of women.

[Anonymous No.13713363]

>>13713356
dilate

[Anonymous No.13713364]

>>13713354
>lmao
It is clear you're coping, brother. End your delusions and honestly pursuit truth.

[Anonymous No.13713368]

>>13713341
my point is that “cuck” is a meaningless word
you’re like leftists who call every right-wing person a nazi, everything must be black and white for you, so that you don’t feel overwhelmed by reality

[Anonymous No.13713379]

>>13713362
First of all, what I presented wasn't my theory on women. Secondly, I posted a proof of a proposition concerning the nature of men, not women. Read my discussion with the bitter anon above.

[Anonymous No.13713388]

>>13713350
I prefer practical female psychology. At least the collective of 3 men who wrote it fucked women.
Taking advice from a virgin. What a joke. Better take mixed martial arts advices from the guy dressing as sangoku in a cosplay event.

[Anonymous No.13713393]

>>13713302
I'd say better definition for chad is just anyone who has the luxury of mate choice - regardless whether they act on it or not. 80% of women are chad. Maybe 20% of men are chad.

Regarding universal attraction, there's indeed no such thing as ultimate chad, as personal preferences are too diverse and contradictory for that. However there is definitely certain baseline in looks department guaranteeing one becomes a non-chad - insufficient muscle mass weight and height in men. Being a fat fuck in women. This bottom of attractiveness existing separates a lot of people into chad/non-chad group in general sense.

[Anonymous No.13713394]

>>13713362
>Then it's not the true definition of cuck.
I do not subscribe to linguistic prescriptivism. If you are uncomfortable with my usage of the word then simply replace it with "kcuc" or some other word lacking the connotations you find deceitful.

[Anonymous No.13713398]

>>13713309
>but my view changed with experience
You realized you're an evolutionary dead end and resigned to pay for Chad's superior genetics wife's son's upbringing?

[Anonymous No.13713401]

>>13713388
wdym advice? Your allegory would work if I were reading Weininger in order to score some pussy... but this is not the case, man.

[Anonymous No.13713408]

>>13713379
You theory is also shit, because whether you want or don't want to be cheated by your women, about the same thing will happen. You can be very conservative and dominant and be cheated on. You can be a wimp and not being cheated on. Thus your theory is worthless. Accepting, or not accepting to be a cuck, doesn't change the fact that you'll be, or not be a cuck. No really, go fuck a fatty ugly women. You'll see things differently after.

[Anonymous No.13713433]

>>13713398
lmao retard
i don’t even plan to have children
you incels always try to rationalise your opinions by adding some “evolutionary psychology” bullshit

[Anonymous No.13713441]

>>13713408
> whether you want or don't want to be cheated by your women, about the same thing will happen
This has nothing to do with my proof. How many times have you failed to comprehend what I've written? This suggests you're either seething or mentally disabled.

[Anonymous No.13713448]

>>13713398
seriously anon, people who aren’t virgins/have some experience with women don’t pay much attention to such things, unless they have a virgin fetish
if you’re a virgin, looking for a partner that is a virgin as well is a good choice, because you will be probably sexually compatible

[Anonymous No.13713460]

>>13713441
Women are chaos. You cannot control them. Only thing you can do, and it's already gigantic, is DNA test your children. Before this DNA testing thing, i feel we were literally powerless as men.

[Anonymous No.13713483]

>>13713460
>you cannot control them
I beg to differ. It's more like most men don't have the balls what they're naturally supposed to do, with the brave exceptions such as my portrait attached. Women chimping out is entirely man's fault, as women never had any agency to begin with.

if janny sees this: there are like 6 incel threads in the catalog, can't we just coalesce into containment "philosophy of the incel" general thread or something?

[Anonymous No.13713492]

>>13713433
I'm confused. It seems like you're totally on board with the plan to remove yourself from the evolutionary pool and pay for Chad's genes instead, so why the hostility?

[Anonymous No.13713499]

>>13713448
> t. only whores will sex me
Copetown, here we come!

[Anonymous No.13713517]

>>13713499
incel, do you realise that there’s a lot between a virgin and a whore?

[Anonymous No.13713525]

>>13713483
What, slaming her face and go to prison? Is going to prison because of a bitch being alpha?

[Anonymous No.13713526]

>>13713517
There is not. There's only men coping with the fact of having whore mothers, daughters, sisters and wives.

[Anonymous No.13713527]

>>13713517
>there’s a lot between a virgin and a whore?
well, not really

[Anonymous No.13713529]

>>13713492
i don’t care about humanity and the “evolutionary pool”, you’re a proof that progress don’t mean shit, most people are worthless subhumans and the world would be a better place without them

[Anonymous No.13713539]

>>13713526
>>13713527
another example of your retardness, everything has to be black and white, so you don’t feel overwhelmed

[Anonymous No.13713543]

>>13713525
>b-but am afraid, anon
The trick is to put her into prison in your basement before she has a chance to rat you out to the police. You'll probably get caught eventually, so raping her and children she bears frequently is of utmost priority.

[Anonymous No.13713580]

>>13713539
imagine being this cucked

[Anonymous No.13713594]

>>13713539
Other anons are right provided they meant before marriage.
Literally all the benefits of having a virgin bride fades by two (2) partners before the husband. Statistically it is the same marrying a girl like this or a professional. If anything the ex working girl at least has sex on her side and won't resort to the starfish position.
So yes, there is a big thing between virginity and whoring, it is marriage.

[Anonymous No.13713620]

>>13713580
literally everyone who disagrees with you is a cuck according to you, it’s really nothing to be ashamed of to not think like a retarded incel

[Anonymous No.13713665]

>>13713081
What board do you think you're on?

[Anonymous No.13713889]

>>13713364
>tips fedora

[Anonymous No.13713924]

>>13713665
It's /lit/, but it should be /phi/.

[Anonymous No.13713991]

>>13713289
How does a man get this cucked?

[Anonymous No.13714333]

so many seething roasties ITT

[Anonymous No.13714544]

>>13713991
>you
>Being ultra conservative, thinking conservative ideology is the key to happiness and harmony again
>Yet currently sexless when "cucks" are having 20 times more sex than you.

I'm out of this thread. Speaking women with virgin incels is like speaking combat sport with someone who watch dragon ball and never sparred in his life.

[卐 No.13714806]

How did I know this thread was gonna be full of angry and unhappy people? Because men and women don’t exist. There are persons, and when you try to classify them by a set of adjectives your going to get disagreement on top of insult and injury. Read Plato. The forms are an ideal. Read Kant, the ideal is not the case. Read Hegel, the case is a process. Read Heidegger, the process reveals itself. Read Derrida, what reveals itself was always already a form. Calm down people. If your not enjoying a conversation you don’t need to have it

I just had blueberry pancakes at a place called Snooze. Absolutely delicious. It was tart, but rich in flavor. I had some coffee too. I like a little bit of almond milk in my coffee. Savory

[Anonymous No.13714821]

>>13714806
>I just had blueberry pancakes at a place called Snooze. Absolutely delicious. It was tart, but rich in flavor. I had some coffee too. I like a little bit of almond milk in my coffee. Savory
Good for you.
Today i want to ground and pound one of the incel of this thread.
Only way to be sure who is the cuck, and who isn't.

[Anonymous No.13714871]

>>13714821
still mad af

[Anonymous No.13715235]

I reckon yes. I had that revaletion after I realised my female philosophy classmates do not understand Husserl.

[Anonymous No.13715247]

>>13709576
When Marie Antoinette said let them eat cake she was revealing a fundamental flaw of women not the upper class

[Anonymous No.13715455]

>>13714333
and Chapo trannies

[Anonymous No.13715482]

>>13712941
Well, my man, he doesn't have even a cursory apprehension of the manner in which women interact with the affectual behavioral valences which constitute the feminine psychic perceptual reality.

Women, and their judgement of men, the righteous judgement of Man himself, is righteous in that it is justified, in that it constitutes that which selects Man to represent the form in which he takes.

This is a manner of thought which he cannot comprehend due to his inexperience with women.

[Anonymous No.13715503]

>>13709576
>Hitler recalled a remark his mentor Dietrich Eckart made about Weininger: "I only knew one decent Jew and he committed suicide..."

kek

[Anonymous No.13715516]

>>13714806
>Because men and women don’t exist.

haha they kinda do tho

[Anonymous No.13716720]

>>13709576
extreme disdain and admiration are just two sides of the same coin. denigrating females to this extent is putting pussy on a pedestal and is very weak non-male cowardice. women and men are basically the same for the most part. they both suck.

[Anonymous No.13716746]

>>13715455
isn't that Hitler's quote?

[Anonymous No.13716784]

>>13716720
You’ve totally nisinderstood him and are projecting. He had no hatred of women. For him, hating women was misunderstanding them

[Anonymous No.13716967]

>>13709576
>Unironically reading a suicidal incels take on women
Yeah that's gonna be a no for me.

[Anonymous No.13716997]

>good jew
>kills himself
FUUUUUUUUUUUUCK

[Anonymous No.13717115]

>>13710745
Yeah I hate large breasts. So ugly. Ugh
t. man

[Anonymous No.13717207]

>>13709605
This is really based and repelled holy shot lmao. I should reread Weininger lmao.

[Pessoa No.13717236]

>>13710745
What the actual puck are you talking about? I only get turned on by big tits. Flats chests are turn offs and liking ass is for black niggers

[Anonymous No.13717256]

anybody here read this? about to start it

[Anonymous No.13717262]

>>13717256
>weininger bad
>wittgenstein actually thinks he is bad too

[Anonymous No.13717286]

>>13712869
>>13709635
>responding to holes.jpg by just repeating "lol only a virgin would post this"

holy fuck women are dumb. it literally proves weininger right too, because his whole point is that women are outright incapable of thinking beyond sex or status associated with sex. it only goes to reason that when you point this very fact out to them, they reply with "lol you wouldn't think that if you could get sex and have the high status associated with sex"

women are the original cumbrains, men are pale imitators

[Anonymous No.13717294]

>>13714806
Thank you for using a name. Filtered.

[Anonymous No.13717815]

>>13715235
Husserl is the ultimate rationalist chad never backing out from full idealism. It's perhaps the least womanly philosophy from weininger point of view.
Edith stein is the only woman Husserl took a bit seriously (as a secretary).

[Anonymous No.13717914]

>>13709576
I enjoy this particular quote from Otto's book:

>"The negroid sperm has some animalistic magical potency inherent in it which cannot be baulked; thus we see the subconscious longing of white virginal european women lusting after the african male. In a same fashion, the Greeks talked of the Minotaur which is a mythological creature which is half bull and half man. The aim of the priests of that cult seems principally to have been the production of a temporary incarnation of this beast by sending selected women of the community every year into the jungle/forest to mingle with all the imaginable bestial creatures thus to produce a miraculous birth upon returning to community. "

[Anonymous No.13717917]

What Did He Mean By This?
>"The negroid sperm has some animalistic magical potency inherent in it which cannot be baulked; thus we see the subconscious longing of white virginal european women lusting after the african male. In a same fashion, the Greeks talked of the Minotaur which is a mythological creature which is half bull and half man. The aim of the priests of that cult seems principally to have been the production of a temporary incarnation of this beast by sending selected women of the community every year into the jungle/forest to mingle with all the imaginable bestial creatures thus to produce a miraculous birth upon returning to community. "