/lit/ - Literature

[Anonymous No.13623469]

>women dont care about philosophy
>you will never date someone and have thought provoking dialogues with them
should i just turn gay?

[Anonymous No.13623472]

Homosexuality is an abomination. Real philosopher kings desire total celibacy and mastery of the body. You seek pleasure in creatures which shows that you aren't a philosopher but a pseud.

[Anonymous No.13623480]

>>13623469
>women dont care about philosophy
Says who?

[Anonymous No.13623487]

>>13623480
They couldn’t possibly, it’s beyond them

[Anonymous No.13623490]

>>13623469
> He's not already gay
OH NO NO NO NO

[Anonymous No.13623492]

>>13623487
What leads you to believe that?

[Anonymous No.13623498]

The biggest lie of the modern world is that women are intellectually equal to men. Perhaps it is actually true, in a sense, but they seldom strive for rational thought and most women are happy being led by emotion, and using emotional arguments to shut down discourse.

[Anonymous No.13623504]

>>13623498
[citation needed]

[Anonymous No.13623506]

>>13623498
based Schopenhauer

[Anonymous No.13623515]

>>13623469
How many women have you attempted deep dialogue with?

[Anonymous No.13623516]

It's not like you really care about philosophy yourself.

[Anonymous No.13623520]

>>13623469
just tell them some Sartre or some shit

[Anonymous No.13623525]

Ah yes another thread where guys who never talk to women use facts and logic to explain women

[Anonymous No.13623534]

>>13623469
I don't know, anon, I have 2 female friends and I can hold a philosophical conversation with one and at the very least have a meaningful conversation with the other, same with my gf. Maybe you should consider what kind of women you attract and whether it's your fault.

[Anonymous No.13623555]

>>13623534
Can you have a philosophical discussion though

[Anonymous No.13623561]

>>13623516
What is this meme?

All I do care about is philosophy, rationalism and knowledge.

[Anonymous No.13623573]

>>13623561
>All I do care about is philosophy, rationalism and knowledge.
and with a wicked sense of humour

[Anonymous No.13623584]

>>13623469
my girlfriend does and reads more than i do. i compensate for being a philosopher myself

[Anonymous No.13623589]

>>13623534
If they agree with you and you're telling them how it is there is no discussion.
Try discussing with a woman who hold the opposite view you have and they value showing off their opinion.
For example discussing feminism if you are a fascist and they a feminist or discussing economy if you are a l
Libertarian and they are Marxist.

[Anonymous No.13623591]

>>13623469
>tfw didn't fall for the cringe philosophy meme

[Anonymous No.13623601]

>>13623469
>>>/r9k/

[Anonymous No.13623604]

>>13623573
>We live in a fantasy world

[Anonymous No.13623608]

>>13623492
not the same poster, but I've literally never met a woman with any interesting interest. I've met many guys with amazing interest though.

[Anonymous No.13623624]

>>13623608
they are hard to find yes but they exist and often have personality disorders. its the price they have to pay for not being an NPC

[Anonymous No.13623645]

>>13623589
>If they agree with you and you're telling them how it is there is no discussion.
When did he say this?

[Anonymous No.13623655]

>>13623608
You draw universal conclusions based off of subjective experience?

[Anonymous No.13623673]

There are women who care about philosophy, but I'm pretty sure they don't care about having philosophical dialogues with a /r9k/ loser like yourself.

[Anonymous No.13623676]

>>13623645
Maybe I was not clear, I was intending to ask if this was the case. It has been my experience and I was wondering if this was the case for him too.
I do, by the way, know neither mine nor his personal experience is evidence for anything.

[Anonymous No.13623678]

i did actually meet a chick i could talk about philosophy with, she was a canadian studying two grades above what's normal for her age. also she was not ugly
they're extremely rare anon but they do exist

[Anonymous No.13623688]

>>13623469
>should i just turn gay?
Begin with the Greeks.

[Anonymous No.13623693]

>>13623504
>either a midwit or never had a meaningful relationship with a woman

[Anonymous No.13623704]

>>13623693
>still no evidence
Cringe, why make claims like this if you have nothing to back them up?

[Anonymous No.13623718]

>>13623469
Women aren't really for having deep abstract conversations with, they're more about looking beautiful and doing cute stuff.
There is a reason that they put so much effort into their appearance than into things like politics and philosophy like men do

[Anonymous No.13623721]

>>13623704
How would you suggest I back them up?
Should I ask the faculty full of Marxists, postmodernism and feminists the following:
"Yes, I'd like to study how emotiond negatively effect rational decision making in women versus men."

Such studies are not done.

[Anonymous No.13623724]

>>13623469
Good luck finding a man who cares either.

[Anonymous No.13623732]

>>13623721
If such studies are not done, is your entire view based off of subjective experience? Why would you make a universal claim if you have no evidence to support it?

[Anonymous No.13623744]

>>13623469
>thought provoking dialogues
you have those with friends.

women are on a lower frequency, so you simply have to pretend to be interested when she talks about the latest QVC gadget or food fad.

that's just how it is.

[Anonymous No.13623745]

>>13623732
I see it as my moral duty to claim it is the case until the Postmodernists and Marxists hand is forced and studies will be done. I judge it highly immoral to surpress knowledge for ideological gain

[Anonymous No.13623753]

>>13623732
>Source. I need a source.

[Anonymous No.13623760]

>>13623732

[Anonymous No.13623777]

>>13623745
>Unicorns exist because the postmodernists haven't done a study to prove otherwise
>Women all hate chocolate because the postmodernists haven't done a study to prove otherwise
>Women are motivated strictly by buying more makeup until the marxists have proven it otherwise

[Anonymous No.13623779]

>>13623744
>friends
Such a misnomer these days. Most friends aren’t interested in discussing anything outside of their provided reality,
much like females. Provided also the fact that woke sodomy has essentially destroyed most forms of male-male binding, and most times you’re left with the most superficial, low value relationships most women have with other women.

[Anonymous No.13623784]

>>13623753
>>13623760
>p-please stop asking me to back up my claims with evidence! You're just supposed to blindly agree with me!!
This is how you guys sound.

[Anonymous No.13623789]

>>13623777
>Unicorns
Exceptions to the rule do not overrule the rule

[Anonymous No.13623793]

>>13623777
You are either too stupid to stay at /lit/ or you are too angry to think, either way you don't deserve any more of my time.

[Anonymous No.13623795]

>>13623779
>woke sodomy has essentially destroyed most forms of male-male binding
That's unfortunately true, I wouldn't say it destroyed, but it made them mode difficult.

[Anonymous No.13623798]

>>13623789
Completely unrelated

[Anonymous No.13623801]

My ex cared and had good conversations.
Too bad shes now married with a baby haha!

[Anonymous No.13623804]

>>13623793
>still no evidence
Based

[Anonymous No.13623810]

>>13623784
Play stupid games, win stupid prizes.

[Anonymous No.13623846]

>>13623804
here you go

[Anonymous No.13624991]

>>13623469
Here's the answer: Wait for VR AI Wiafus

[Anonymous No.13624997]

>>13623801
lol?

[I Love Harry Potter No.13625226]

>>13623846

[Anonymous No.13625234]

>>13623846
>thinking about naked kids while showering
probably why you can't get along with women desu

[Anonymous No.13625235]

>>13625226
Kek

[Anonymous No.13625245]

>>13623469
I recently ass fucked a late 20's asian tranny in their ass and it was gross, I dont wanna even think about fucking another man

[Anonymous No.13625318]

>>13625226
so women lack empathy and don't even think about men? and men always think about women, within the greater context of realizing women are uncaring and can never give love but only receive.


seems biologically compatible, women are cum holes after all.

[« Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ » !mxvabIoSIE No.13625342]

>>13625318
We’re like an ant colony with specialist types. Many of us care for the young, tons of empathy, we know what love and emotions are for, some are more suited to deep subject matter, we know what’s going on.

[« Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ » !mxvabIoSIE No.13625350]

>>13625318
You, on the other hand, are obsessed with your semen

[Anonymous No.13625393]

Girls don't poop. I know from experience because I've never seen a girl poop. Plus they all smell good and that is not how poop smells which confirms my hypothesis.

[Anonymous No.13625396]

>>13623469
>>women dont care about philosophy
>>you will never date someone and have thought provoking dialogues with them
>s
retarded

i find women more receptive to philosophical thinking than most men. i'm not sure that's a bad thing either.

[Anonymous No.13625426]

>>13625393
This guy sciences

[Anonymous No.13625455]

>>13623469
>should i just turn gay?
absolutely anon.
w*men are trash.
i took gaypill while being blackpilled and i don't regret this decision

[Anonymous No.13625474]

>>13625342
You’re not a woman, you wish. You’re a troll

[Anonymous No.13625482]

You might have an embarrassingly narrow and loose idea of philosophy anyway

[Anonymous No.13625500]

How many men care about philosophy?

[Anonymous No.13625641]

>>13623789
There's no such thing as "exceptions" to a rule. If there are exceptions, there's no rule.

[Anonymous No.13625714]

>>13625641
bad definition of a rule. you are being difficult on purpose.

[Anonymous No.13625715]

>>13623589
I have those kinds of conversations with my gf all the time. If you want an cute and intellectual gf, then you’re more than welcome to find one. It’s pitiful and grating to head claims like “no woman cares about philosophy or meaningful conversations” when it’s clear that 1) plenty of them exist; and 2) most *men* don’t care about philosophy *either*. I would agree that more men than women care about philosophy, but when both percentages of each gender are in the single digits, what difference does it make?

Trust me, there are tons of women who are experiencing the same anti-modern, anti-degenerate, and intellectual ressentiment that many people on /lit/ experience. And no, most of them did not ride “the cock carousel” past their expiration date—either they were wise enough to never get on it and stuck to meaningful long-term relationships (or saved themselves) or quickly got off of the hedonic treadmill when they sampled a taste and realized it was a spiritual dark hole.

You have to look for them in the right places. But if you guys are really who you say you are and aren’t total unwashed spergs, you should be able to find them.

[Anonymous No.13625717]

>>13625715
a*
hear*

Fucking typos. Serves me right for phoneposting.

[Anonymous No.13625724]

>>13625641
>being this much of a brainlet
Holy wow

[Anonymous No.13625725]

>>13623469
You don't have to have thought provoking dialogues with them.

[Anonymous No.13625738]

>>13625342
>>13625350
Women are obsessed with people. This is a fact. Men are obsessed with objects. This is a fact.

[Anonymous No.13626062]

>>13623469
As charm is the sublime of cunning, comedy is the sublime of discourse. And since it takes more than a play to explain why that is, only a little more experience will do.

[Anonymous No.13626072]

>tfw dating literal ivy league phd student women and they're braindead basic bitches

It doesn't

get

any better

[Anonymous No.13626196]

>>13623469
Women DO care about philosophy
They ARE are easily overawed by philoso-babble
And WILL brand their pussy's with your initials
IF you're a philoso-chad who can speak confidently about ideas they can not comprehend and therefore can not falsify, ergo forcing themselves to capitulate to you
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vsxHKDgvhYY

[Anonymous No.13626211]

Women are sub-huMAN

[Anonymous No.13626212]

>>13625715
>You have to look for them in the right places.
Where are the right places anon? There are some in RW youth political parties, but most of the girls there are sluts who get off on power who get snapped up by politicians above you to become a mistress-staffer.

[Anonymous No.13626217]

>>13626211
I can not fathom how much God must love you if you're asexual. I hate being attracted to women and I (don't hate; that word is too strong) despise women

[Anonymous No.13626219]

>>13626212
>There are some in RW youth political parties, but most of the girls there are sluts who get off on power who get snapped up by politicians above you to become a mistress-staffer.
Trust me, you don’t want to date political bitches. Most of them are INSANE (and only in bad ways). Just find a girl with character who’s down to earth. If you’re looking for a place—imagine where your dream girl would spend her time.

[Anonymous No.13626220]

>>13623469

[Anonymous No.13626221]

>>13623469
Get a woman and love her, basically treat her as your child (expect it's ok to have sex with), I don't see why you would _need_ to be able to talk philosophy with her, you can have your bros for that.

[Anonymous No.13626222]

>>13626211
Women can experience those things through a man. They need a male's beinghood to be fully human. Once they are a part of that husband-wife whole they can become human beings.

[Anonymous No.13626231]

>>13625641
Lol you're not understanding what an rule is then

Fucking faggot women whore bitch nigger cumdumpster leave my board

[Anonymous No.13626241]

>>13626222
Now tell me what a man can only experience through a woman that is of equal value as what women gain through men.

Spoiler: Nothing

[Anonymous No.13626245]

>>13626196
>He saw she was touched by it
>"I've got this"
>immediately starts talking about how every man wishes to be loved, to find connection with another soul
Yea he's a chad.

[Anonymous No.13626251]

Repeal the 19th and make wife-beating mandatory.

Beat your wives, daughters, and sisters. Oppress women.

Take the man-pill

[Anonymous No.13626255]

>>13623469
My woman likes philosophy. It's hard to find a woman who's into it - much like it's hard to find a man who's into it.

[Anonymous No.13626289]

>>13623469
Once you get to stoicism, you'll realise philosophy and other mental masturbation exercises are a waste of time.

[Anonymous No.13626316]

>find a girl who understands hegel and deleuze better than me
>she is ugly and psychotic with a shitty personality

[Anonymous No.13626398]

>>13623721
>Should I ask the faculty full of Marxists, postmodernism and feminists
Yikes.

[Anonymous No.13626407]

>>13623469
Men don't like philosophy either. How many guys you know who've read the Greeks and are comfortable engaging in philosophical discourse?

[Anonymous No.13626409]

>>13623480
Ask yourself why there is not a single female philosopher

[Anonymous No.13626414]

>>13623525
Why would you need to talk to women to understand them?

[Anonymous No.13626415]

>>13626220
Why do so many female thinkers talk about gender relations, dubious psychology and sexuality?
I highly doubt that every philosopher or intellectual had a problem with their mother.

[Anonymous No.13626417]

>>13626414
Based

[Anonymous No.13626441]

>>13626414
Actually based asf

[Anonymous No.13626442]

>>13626241
>Now tell me what a man can only experience through a woman
Fatherhood, companionship, an estate-manager, a partisan. It will be inherently non-equal because men and women are totally different and therefore what each get out of eachother will be totally different and unique to eachother.

[Anonymous No.13626446]

>>13626219
>Most of them are INSANE
True, but some are normal middle-class girls who get pushed into signing up by their right wing fathers who they obey.

[Anonymous No.13626477]

>>13626409
Judith Butler

[Anonymous No.13626484]

>>13626217
does this even mean anything

[Anonymous No.13626491]

>>13623498
Define rational thought

[Anonymous No.13626495]

>>13623469
>finally meet a girl I can discuss philosophy with
>she studies at the same uni as me
>wishmeluck.jpg
>ask her what she's interested in
>first book she mentions is The Second Sex
Just kill me already

[Anonymous No.13626558]

>>13626220
>Jungian analysist
You see, as a man you are supposed to incarnate the solar/Apollonian principles of creative energy. If you are too intellectual and passive you are castrated by your mother.
Btw yes as a woman i should follow the Lunar energy and be passive, intuitive and emotional and thus not be writing books about psychological analysis but that's besides the point.

[Anonymous No.13626568]

>>13623608
>TFW my fiancee and I just discussed how her recent dream was analogous to Plato's Cave

>>13626495
Too bad, you might have to step outside of your comfort zone to have a real discussion with her.

[Anonymous No.13626584]

>>13626568
Based

[Anonymous No.13626608]

Women aren't worth wasting a second of your life on.

[Anonymous No.13626633]

>>13623480
It's the only male dominated(80% male) humanistic field in my university even though over half of the applicants are female

[Anonymous No.13626639]

>>13626409
Karina Vold, Helen Hester, & Ophelia DeRoy are all currently living female philosophers, Anon.

[Anonymous No.13626646]

>>13623472
>homosexuality is a sin
>Socrates and Plato loved young boys
Thinking

[Anonymous No.13626647]

>>13623469
wrong

[Anonymous No.13626700]

>>13626639
Lol

[Anonymous No.13626714]

>>13625342
>we know what’s going on.

If you did, most thinkers were females, but that's the opposite of reality.

[« Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ » !mxvabIoSIE No.13626735]

>>13625738
>Men are obsessed with objects
No, they’re obsessed with ghosts of objects and people

>>13626714
Faulty reasoning
Existentialism doesn’t seem to bother us as much as men. I think it must be the childbearing and raising, we trust love and life.... but now male absolute rule as brought us to our extinction

[Anonymous No.13626760]

>>13626735
>but now male absolute rule as brought us to our extinction
You are putting all blame on men, flawed reasoning, when in reality there are still women in high positions of power who are as cruel as men are and helped to bringing the "extinction" you talk about into manifestation.

[« Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ » !mxvabIoSIE No.13626788]

>>13626760
They rule as men, as there is only that way to go about it. Anarchism is the feminine way. Direct democracy, smaller manageable groups. Computers to keep us connected

Leaving the evil systems of church, state, money, all your written word laws, to vanish back into thin air where they came from. That’s logical thinking, that’s your balance.

[Anonymous No.13626816]

>>13626446
That's true. People have all sorts of life journeys. Honestly, don't jump to conclusions, and try to see with open eyes.

One of the most real women I've met in my life, I met through Tinder. Why was she there? Because she was people-watching, with no intentions of hooking up. Some women *say* they aren't interested in hookups because they're afraid of being judged. Others say that line because they want to at least get to know somebody and have them provide the veneer of care before having sex. But the rest? They genuinely don't find it pleasurable. Within about three days, we had shared all sorts of amazing conversations with each other and were ready to delete the app. I dated her for three months--eventually realized that we were incompatible long-term, which sucked because I felt that I had landed upon a treasure. But it was fun while it lasted and she brought me out of my comfort zone.

Moral of the story? You might find love in the least expected places. Are most people on Tinder going to be like that? Obviously not. But you could cross paths with all sorts of remarkable people, for all kinds of reasons, when you least expect it. That's just how life works, as it's a journey for everyone. Your odds only increase the more you play--keep your eyes open.

[Anonymous No.13626831]

>>13626788
This is Wiccan-tier matriarchal farming society utopia nonsense. Pornocracy is the worst of all systems of rule and has been whenever it was implemented.

[Anonymous No.13626838]

>>13626646
Pederasty is redpilled

[Anonymous No.13626841]

>>13626788
>They rule as men
True but not because they are imitating the opposite Gender but because dominance and authority is a masculine trait. And everyone has masculine and feminine traits. Is an imbalance you see.

>Anarchism is the feminine way
Is for both genders, it's about achieving balance and discovering objective Morality exists.

[« Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ » !mxvabIoSIE No.13626859]

>>13626831
I reject your characterization of my brief sketch.
This isn’t matriarchy I propose. But if men can’t give up their ghosts for the real world, to hell with you all.

I’ve seen your ridiculous robo-wombs growing a cloned sheep.

>>13626841
I tried to imply all that, yes.

[Anonymous No.13626860]

>>13623498
This.
Women are for sex and cooking, incel. If you're looking for a rationalisation mommy you're doing it wrong.

[Anonymous No.13626864]

>>13626859
Patriarchy > Pornocracy.

[Anonymous No.13626871]

>>13625226

That's even worse.

[« Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ » !mxvabIoSIE No.13626891]

>>13626864
This a new r9k-ism?

[Anonymous No.13627164]

>>13623589
>if you are a fascist
But anon, I'm not retarded.

[Anonymous No.13627259]

>>13624997
It hurts

[Anonymous No.13627281]

>>13626891
Show me ONE (1) pornocracy that worked. Don't say Justinian.

[Anonymous No.13627287]

>>13623498
this

[Anonymous No.13627328]

>>13627281
Julius Caesar used be a ganymede

[Anonymous No.13627371]

>>13626409
Simone de Beauvoir

[Anonymous No.13627391]

>>13626568
well said kek

[Anonymous No.13627402]

>>13623504

> can I get a source on that?
> I really need a Wikipedia article to use that phrase so I know it's legit.

think for yourself. this isn't a claim that you need special data to make an inference about

[Anonymous No.13627427]

I know in theory it's possible. after all you can read women philosophers like Astell, and they are pretty good, but I've never met one in real life.

I think some have been close but they hide it because it's not socially attractive for women to talk about things like that.

I have also met legbeard PhD philosophers who are brain dead and just preach about muh oppression or tech ethics, or some bandwagon garbage.

[Anonymous No.13627440]

>>13626568
>you guys are wrong, my fiancée saw Plato’s allegory of the cave in a comic once and knows about it

[Anonymous No.13627442]

>>13627427
If women gave a damn about being attractive the majority of them wouldn’t be literally fat