/lit/ - Literature

[Anonymous No.13550446]

Brainlet and pseud tier ideologies

Centrism. Both Apolitical and muh both sides are the same the dichotomy doesn't exist.
Anarcho-capitalism. How can you be worse than american libertarianism.
Trotskyism. For the white and brainlet pseud anticapitalist. Includes the other trot strands like posadism.
Fascism and all its strands. Move away poltards. One of the more brainlet ideologies of the bunch both philosophically and practice wise, especially after the 20th century, and also easily the most evil. This does not include the philosophical writings of heidegger and gentile, unlike trotskyism and anarcho-capitalism which do include the influenced writings.

[Anonymous No.13550508]

>it's impossible to have both conservative and liberal beliefs. pick a team asshole!

[Anonymous No.13550538]

>>13550508
>implying there are two teams, liberal and conservative
Truly centrist brainlet tier

[Anonymous No.13550557]

>>13550446
>be me
>innocent /pol/tard
>browsing /lit/
>see this
REEEEEEEEEEEEE

[Anonymous No.13550563]

>Brainlet and pseud tier ideologies
all ideologies

[Anonymous No.13550574]

so what is a galaxy brain ideology then?

[Anonymous No.13550575]

>>13550538
I was agreeing with you, you stupid molested faggot

[Anonymous No.13550604]

>>13550446
Libertarian Socialism

[« Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ » !mxvabIoSIE No.13550611]

>>13550575
It didn’t look that way. Should have written a disclaimer w/e

[Anonymous No.13550614]

>>13550563

[Anonymous No.13550648]

>>13550574
post-absolutism (after neoabsolutism)
>the horror that there is no sovereign in the modern world
>the elites desperately attempts control over the herd menace

[Anonymous No.13551148]

>>13550446
>Anarcho-capitalism. How can you be worse than american libertarianism.
unpossible

>>13550604
knew a peterson worshipper who unironically went from centre-right to libertarian socialism then back to centre again all the while ranting and raving about how the left/sjws/progressives are ruining society

[Anonymous No.13551186]

>>13550446
>Centrism
People are rarely fundamentally centrist. The real thing this label is used for are people who hold distate for modern political rhetoric.

[Anonymous No.13551226]

>>13551186
there's plenty of disdain for modern political rhetoric from the left/right camps too, brexit is an example of something that didn't fit traditional party lines and the major parties in the uk (tories/labour) are suffering as a result of it

[Anonymous No.13551339]

>>13551226
>there's plenty of disdain for modern political rhetoric from the left/right camps too
Yes, and the centrists typically hold disdain to the point of intentionally ignoring political discussion. It is practically the same as choosing neither, rather than both, but by neither you simply choose to abstain as whole rather than holding a 3rd view. That is the essence of the issue. Centrism is a response to the drama of politics, effectively, because political interest on the side of citizens is commonly used as a source/channel of angst for many people. Centrists are basically always uninformed, and they often choose to remain this way while refusing to speak out or be vindictive on matters they know little to nothing about. A loud centrist is not really saying anything. That is the point. Centrism is a far better alternative to being a psued, that is, consuming media that you do not fully understand, or are not equipped to interpret critically, and drawing conclusion (or more often parroting conclusions of others) to the existence of some societal injustice. This is the fate of many citizens who are self proclaimed political activists, or are just politically active. It is far better for somebody to admit what he does not know than to project his latent angst and frustration onto a cause that to his uneducated and uninformed mind seems just, and therefore affords him a sense of moral superiority while simultaneously giving him a channel to release his angst. Many people who see this are turned off by the senselessness of it all, so they turn to "centrism," which again, is not really centrism in the truest sense. He just rejects the 2 minutes of hate bullshit that many people willingly subject themselves to. It is not correct, therefore, to say centrists are intellectually weaker. Both centrists, the left, and the right, should read more books and learn more about how different professionals view the various mechanisms of society, government, and economics. Mocking somebody for not reading the news and picking a side is missing the point entirely. We cannot all be studied economists or political philosophers, despite the fact that some behave in this way.

[Anonymous No.13551539]

>>13550446
>Fascism and all its strands. Move away poltards. One of the more brainlet ideologies of the bunch
It's what happens when you care about lower classes. A shame and burden.
>both philosophically and practice wise
It's just another branch of the Enlightenment, of course it's barbaric.
>especially after the 20th century, and also easily the most evil.
No way, the other two tolerate judaism, and "we all agree that baby torture is wrong".

[Anonymous No.13552039]

>>13550446

[Anonymous No.13552774]

>>13550446
Accelerationism

[Anonymous No.13553120]

>>13552774
Accelerationism is based though. Same way I feel about hegel's work desu. Even if it is weird af then atleast it is interesting and creative

[Anonymous No.13553122]

>>13552774
accelerationists have the highest average IQ of any praxis

[Anonymous No.13553333]

ancap is better than most left anarchy beccause so much of it is collectivist
the only left anarchy that are better are anarcho-egoism and anarcho-mutualism
but everyone knows the best anarchy is anarcho-distributism and anarcho-monarchism

[Anonymous No.13553438]

>>13553333
I can't tell if anon is serious or not

[Anonymous No.13553445]

>>13550446
>fascism
>does not include the writings of Gentile

[Anonymous No.13553450]

>>13553333
anarchy tends towards centralized states in history, making the entire ideology rather amusing

[Anonymous No.13553451]

>>13550446
Anarchism: Resentment driven teenagers who have no fucking clue what their ideology is all about and can only point to two revolutions with a life expectancy of 3 weeks as 'success' stories. Also many of them have extremely authoritarian personalities.
Communism: Especially funny are the commies who call others bootlickers and then go on to lick the boot of whatever state communist power is in vogue.
>Give the state absolute power, but trust me it'll wither away
>Yeah there havent been any proletarian revolutions and the Bolsheviks practically committed a coup with Czarist deserters, but really it's the proles who do it all.

[Anonymous No.13553466]

>>13553445
Nothing other than Schopenhauer's will with a brainlet rehashing.

[Anonymous No.13553473]

>>13553466
Yeah i also read the Wiki page with Croce's quote.
But the sentence in the OP makes it seems that somehow Heidegger and Gentile are exempt from the brainlet status of fascism. I can understand this for Heidegger since his work is mostly apolitical, but its really hard to dissociate Gentile from fascism considering he wrote the fucking fascist manifesto.

[Anonymous No.13553488]

Stirnerism: Centrism but with cult personalities

[Anonymous No.13554005]

>>13550446
>fascism is le evil

[Anonymous No.13554209]

>>13553333
Anarcho-Monarchist Distributism is the key.

[Anonymous No.13554466]

>>13551226
I still don't understand Brexit completely, why are people so upset about it?

[Anonymous No.13556140]

>>13553445
>>13553473
OP here
Perhaps I should have phrased it better. I meant gentile's actual idealism is not part of the brainlet status of fascism, but once he tries to make his theory subservient to fascism that is when it turns into brainlet tier. And needless to say his writings on fascism and The Doctrine of Fascism are all incredibly brainlet tier. This is unlike trotsky for example who is always pseud tier whether he writes about permanent revolution, his life, or the soviet union.