[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 49 KB, 1280x720, 1562345340499.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13415542 No.13415542 [Reply] [Original]

Is this true?

>> No.13415552

Immanuel Kant didn't have sex and he is probaly the greatest author at being the worst author, so I don't know what that pedobait charachter is talking about. Also, stop watching anime, it's really bad for you.

>> No.13415583

>>13415542
Which series is it that from?
And no. I'm a virgin myself.

>> No.13415600

>>13415552
>The greatest author at being the worst author
>Stop watching anime

Weirdo

>> No.13415616

I hugged a cute girl once and I think one hugged me before so i'm pretty much not a virgin

>> No.13415632

>>13415542
no

>> No.13415641

>>13415542
No

>> No.13415677

>>13415641
>>13415632
>>13415583
>>13415552
t. virgins

>> No.13415703

>>13415542
I mean if you're reading any work of fiction where sexuality plays a non-insignificant role, all of the subtle sensory and psychic modalities associated with intercourse will be lost on you. For some works, it's probably about equivalent to having never been in a forest, or having never seen the sun set. Could a man who has never gone outside enjoy a work of fiction that has to do with outdoors? Sure! Would he be unable to appreciate it on the same level as someone who has? Absolutely.

>> No.13415718
File: 35 KB, 300x360, 4E91DAD5-BE78-49F6-9DEE-2517BDB4A598.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13415718

>>13415703
Shut up man. Just shut up.

>> No.13415777
File: 230 KB, 1024x768, DA-Hospital Launch.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13415777

Anons I've had sex and it was rather disappointing. All this sex talk is just diffused bullying for mind control, sex is good only with the person you truly love.

>> No.13415799

>>13415542
Do girls like shotas, or do they not? Because I genuinely feel like a little boy and can only view romance as being the dynamic where a maternal girl looks after you and pretends to be your surrogate mother, loving you and letting you call her Mommy, while you yourself love her as her baby boy. Is this okay? Should I be in therapy trying to change my psychology, or should I simply be pursuing such a woman? Do any exist out there, or is my search futile?

I genuinely need answers, please help me here.

>> No.13415809

>>13415703
>Could a man who has never murdered enjoy a work of fiction that has to do with murder?
>Could a man who has never sailed enjoy a work of fiction that has to do with sailing?
>Could a man who has never been to Tajikistan enjoy a work of fiction that has to do with Tajikistan?

This is your brain on experientialism, it being demonstrably false, Empirically, is the final insult. Suffice to say that a man who has never thought cannot enjoy a work of Philosophy at all.

>> No.13415831

>spent many years of my adult life sexless
>also spent many years of my adult life having sex every day
I've felt every emotion life has to offer.
Chadcel is true enlightenment.

>> No.13415878
File: 141 KB, 1280x720, very Freudian.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13415878

>>13415799

>> No.13415924

>>13415809
The response based on my argument to all of those queries is "Sure!"
Furthermore the second rhetorical question rephrases your questions questions.
Would a combat veteran who has had to grapple with the ethical implications of killing find MORE meaning or depth in a work of fiction about murder? Would a man whose grandfather taught him to sail during childhood summers in New England find MORE meaning or depth in a work of fiction about sailing? Would a native Taijik who grew up witnessing political upheaval in his homeland find MORE meaning or depth in a work of fiction about Dushanbe in the 90s?
So the structure of my argumentation remains and besides, this ignores your flimsy implication that murder, sailing, and Taijikstan are experiences on the same level of universality as sex.

>> No.13416000

>>13415552
The question is not about producing literature, it's about discussing it.

>> No.13416139

>>13415878
god i wish that were me

>> No.13416156
File: 103 KB, 503x501, freud.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13416156

>>13415878
This picture is not very Freudian, it lacks a Penis

>> No.13416550

>>13415677
Not actualy bad

>> No.13416566

>>13415677
So what

>> No.13417266

>>13415878
You haven't answered my question - only fuelled my fantasies.

>> No.13417409

>>13416000
based and have sex.

>> No.13417419

>>13415542
Yes. Most of literature is about realizing love. You can't fully understand mortal love without understanding sex. You can't understand sex unless you have done it yourself.

Have sex.

>> No.13417423

>>13415616
Based

>> No.13417548

>>13415809
You will get barely anything out of literature that addresses things you don't know about or haven't experienced. That's a given. Take the book 'A Burglar's Guide to the City', a lot of its readership is comprised of parkour practitioners due to the strong overlap in perception and interaction with the urban space, even though they have nothing to do with burglary, a vaguely curious book turns into something deeply personal and interesting, things a parkour reader gets that few others will, perhaps even the author, even though anyone can read it and get plenty out of it. Usually the core of literature is just the human being that we can all relate to, which is serviceable but it's moreorless a yes to all of your points. The enjoyment and depth of a work is so much greater. In some cases you'll just be glossing over most of it to get those human nuggets if you have no relationship with the content.

As for philosophy, this is actually the strongest 'yes', you should not be reading philosophy if you have not philosophised or grasped at philosophising yourself. You'll acquire 'facts' with no understanding or thinking, you should think for yourself more than the books think for you.

>> No.13417556

>>13415799
Girls like them from the perspective of femdom, a kid is immature and weak, that's it.

>> No.13417559

>>13415809
Cope.

>> No.13417598

>>13415542
For writing? Yes, sex is a significant part of the human experience. Without it, you are limited to writing authentically from the POV of the virgin. Anything else comes off as shallow and one-dimensional.

>> No.13418400

>>13415799
There's a whole irl community called infantalists.

>> No.13419311

>>13415924

Your implicit disqualifying of your own argument with the "sure", just in case you need to retreat, is as pathetic as it being demonstrably false, there is no correlation between people's experience and preferred books. Conflating quantity with universality is also awful.