[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 3.46 MB, 1936x1092, dd.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13368780 No.13368780[DELETED]  [Reply] [Original]

Any books to help cope with the collapse of western civilization?

>> No.13368784
File: 10 KB, 400x250, a4a11b5dcad26f1b1133706f32f341a4.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13368784

The Bible.
St. Alphonsus.
St. Augustine

>> No.13368785

Submission by Houellebecq

>> No.13368788

Something that will give you professional skills in the asian market

>> No.13368791

>>13368780
i'm reading spengler now and he's mostly just rambling about maths and the greeks. not very interesting.

>> No.13368801

I was only going to watch for five minutes but I was enthralled when I tuned in and they were all speaking in spanish and piling on top of each other to be most apologetic over illegal immigration
They literally all want essentially unlimited illegal immigration from the way they're talking, then they're going to be scratching their heads when Trump wins again

>> No.13368805
File: 72 KB, 500x634, Timur-2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13368805

>>13368788
Ha ha. They will take asians in even the lowest kind of jobs long before uppity white men. Practice being a pin cushion to have hardcore torture sex performed on you by glorious asian conquerors. It will be the only skill that might still get you paid in this later century. Maybe islam niggers will treat you nicely if you convert now.

>> No.13368817

Warren is the only one able to articulate policy in detail in the small amount of time they are given.

>> No.13368819

>>13368805
Cool power fantasy

>> No.13368820

>>13368780
Wait where is Sanders?

>> No.13368822

>>13368817
bet she makes a mean succotash

>> No.13368829
File: 109 KB, 1200x630, beta.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13368829

Hola onions Beta!! :DD

>> No.13368831

>>13368820
On tomorrow with the other 10 candidates. They split it.

>> No.13368832

>>13368829
lmao the fucking filter changed s o y

>> No.13368835

>>13368832
Hola newfriend

>> No.13368836

>>13368817
That's because they gave her the most time and are asking her the most questions, brainlet. She's very rehearsed and obviously is mentally ill. She bothers me so much I could only take 5 fucking responses of hers. Yes, I was counting them. Stupid debate. Stupid Lester playing favorites again.

>> No.13368840

>>13368836
Why would they pump up Warren? Do they really think she can take down Trump?

>> No.13368853

>>13368840
They want to divide the Bernie vote as much as possible so that Biden wins.

>> No.13368856

>>13368832
how new r u

>> No.13368863

>>13368853
Hmm.

>> No.13368864
File: 312 KB, 1379x689, 24BF9C20-C72C-40AF-A909-7315FACF6EC2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13368864

>>13368780
Oh. They’re having debates now?

Yay, Tulsi got in there

>> No.13368871

>>13368864
shut the fuck up

>> No.13368872

>>13368840
She could. But yes this >>13368853

>> No.13368883
File: 263 KB, 1269x598, A97C15B8-212E-44EA-9411-351974B0C03B.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13368883

>>13368871
For you; these

>>13368832
I found this out when trying to type S o y lent Green

>> No.13368913
File: 140 KB, 600x900, 9780892811250_4.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13368913

Unironically.

>> No.13368918
File: 507 KB, 1070x601, 33481015d04b3974f9ed7acf616592901b13507ebdabf48ee1d6d09d63acc2c4.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13368918

>If you need a license to drive a car you need a license to buy a gun
What are rights vs privileges?

>> No.13368920

ive been talking way more to my muslim friends

>> No.13368926

>>13368836
They given Warren the least questions, moron

>> No.13368944

Flowers for algernon

>> No.13368945

>>13368918
Whatever the Supreme Court wants them to be brainlet.

>> No.13368946

>>13368918
What did the 2nd Amendment mean by a “well REGULATED militia”?
Quick answer:
It means you’re living a lie.

In the meantime, the 1st amendment is shredded and means nothing to anyone anymore

>> No.13368947

>>13368918
Count yourself lucky Amerifren, us canacuks already need a weekend-long safety course to apply for a gun license to own 5-round 5.56 chinkshit rifles

>> No.13368950

>>13368780

Bernie should parachute in, shoot everyone, and win.

>> No.13368953

>>13368946
It means read Columbia vs Heller you tranny faggot

>> No.13368956

>>13368918
>healthcare and cutting your dick off is a human right
>owning a gun isnt
Feels bad ameribro

>> No.13368957
File: 152 KB, 777x777, 1552936415205.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13368957

There is no coping. Opposition is the only viable option.

>> No.13368958

>>13368946
Ufff

I think it points to a bigger problem, butterbabe. If the second amendment needs to be removed, why? :3

What sort of difference has occurred to make the guns that much more onerous (barring the technological developments).

>> No.13368962

>>13368832
>t. zoomerfaggot

/lit/ is dead

>> No.13368963

>>13368953
Hm? Oh so they changed the wording because of this case? They took the word “regulated” out striping the congress from regulating guns?

No. Clearly not.
Is Assange still alive?

>> No.13368964

Joe Webb should run again. And pick a greenie for his VP.

>> No.13368967

>>13368953
Handguns in the home. That’s the extent from heller.

>> No.13368971

>>13368964
I bet yer whole family’d vote fer ‘im this time

>> No.13368989

Lmao they’ve stopped showing Warren after that anon made a comment. Huh.

>> No.13369010

>>13368822
succotash succotash win some cash

>> No.13369024

>>13368840
She's an economic nationalist too

>> No.13369025

>>13368963
Trump is hiding Assange in my basement

>> No.13369027

>>13368780
honk honk

>> No.13369033

What books do you think they read?

>> No.13369042

>>13369033
Elizabeth Warren doesn't read books, she's part of an oral culture.

>> No.13369065

>>13369033
How to be black

>> No.13369128

>>13368780
Yang gang didn't make it?

>> No.13369139

>>13369042
Warren is a fucking lawyer who has introduced hundreds of bills. Enjoy being an uneducated faggot who's never touched a legal textbook, statute, or code book.

>> No.13369141

>>13369033
Learning Spanish for dummies.

>> No.13369144

>>13368805
Paper fuckin tigers everywhere, tired of this worn out doomer narrative

>> No.13369145
File: 461 KB, 350x232, tenor.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13369145

>>13369139

>> No.13369167

>>13369139
God you're embarrassing. Just enjoy the joke. None of this shit matters. You think any of the horror is gonna stop because you elect a finance wonk?

>> No.13369172

>>13369128
tomorrow

>> No.13369196

>>13368780
Me? I'm an Andrew Yang kind of guy.

>> No.13369280

>>13368853
this is entirely plausible. They're notorious for underhanded, shady dealings like this.

>> No.13369332

Who won the debate?

>> No.13369336
File: 321 KB, 640x360, 1561606699063.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13369336

>>13369332
Mexico.

>> No.13369462

>>13368801
But none of them want that. You seem kind of tarded anon

>> No.13369470

>>13369336
God that was great. Beto stole that shit right out from Booker

>> No.13369474

>>13368817
are journalists shills on /lit too?

>> No.13369497
File: 19 KB, 375x563, B441B15B-CB50-4149-88E5-2FD5F289830F.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13369497

How shit was their Spanish? I didn’t get to see the debate but I heard, I can only assume it was some shit-tier Duolingo quality

>> No.13369505
File: 374 KB, 1280x720, 21AC658A-D098-4330-9166-3C8390888006.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13369505

What is the appeal of Yang other than

>LMAO the only solution to automation is to....give everyone $1000?

It sounds a lot like
>we want the NEET vote

>> No.13369524

Not American so forgive the ignorance, but I have a question


Why do you have so many candidates for only 1 party? Doesn’t that just clog up the debate and make it so nothing of actual value can be debated?

Why only two parties? From what I can tell there are more than 2, but the big 2 have such a stranglehold that the smaller parties will never win. Why not change that?

>> No.13369531

>>13369524
Good questions

>> No.13369552
File: 28 KB, 240x368, Anatomy of the State.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13369552

>> No.13369556

>>13369524
Technically smaller parties can win the same way, but Americans are pretty brainwashed by the whole party ideology, they would never go against their precious horde

>> No.13369567
File: 20 KB, 380x515, 1441778640.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13369567

>> No.13369576

>>13369556
Anon, as late as the 1992 election a third-party candidate won something like 20% of the popular vote. The two-party system has everything to do with the way the winners of our elections are determined, i.e., by a simple majority. It’s the same reason there’s a de facto two party system in the UK, lib dems notwithstanding

>> No.13369598
File: 26 KB, 326x499, CE50D4FD-5DBC-4875-B0F7-DB889C7E9F40.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13369598

>> No.13369602

>>13368780
The Foundation for Exploration

>> No.13369603

>>13368780
ive been staying away from /pol/itics to the best of my ability. I do like nick fuentes though and he roped me in for this debate. It has made me realize that my best option is to continue to ignore all politics going forward.

>> No.13369606

>>13369497
i guess it was okay? it doesnt take much to just say the right words if you practice enough. the pronunciation and accent gives it away though, those were god awful. be prepared for non spanish speakers to rave about how "good" beto's spanish is

>> No.13369607

>>13369524
1) This is pretty atypical, and I think it will probably hurt the Democrats. I’m only speculating, but I imagine it has to do with the Democratic Party’s failure in the last presidential election and consequent “existential” crisis. Of course they don’t really seem to have learned anything or to have changed, and a milquetoast candidate will probably be selected with the assistance of the DNC and major donors.

2) We have winner-take-all voting system, where the winner of elections is determined by whoever wins the plurality of votes. I think it would require a constitutional amendment to change this, which would be prohibitively hard to get through, even though some politicians and legal scholars have suggested it

>> No.13369610

>>13369603
Why ignore it? Is it because most of these people, barring a few exceptions, don’t care for anything other than power and pleasing corporate overlords

>> No.13369612

Did they really all speak spanish to pander? Hate that shit, like when they do that over enunciation of some spic countries name. Like they know they have the spic vote.

>> No.13369615

>>13369612
im a spic and this shit isnt cute or endearing. if anything it just makes them look more like idiot gringos than they already do

>> No.13369625

>>13368913
Whats that china man doing in the middle there?

>> No.13369635
File: 118 KB, 750x765, DF4CD80B-20D8-4078-B2C3-7CC8ED7689DD.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13369635

I’m really pleased by how well Bernie has managed to influence the Democratic Party.

Will they still fail to nominate Bernie in favor of some boring corporate Democrat and still lose to Trump? Yes

Will the Democrats still be a tone deaf as ever to how the average American feels? Yes

Will the typical corporate Dem still fall to his knees to fellate corporate donors? Yes.

But Bernie’s influence is still being felt, and I dare say some of the questions on M4All, student loans, etc. wouldn’t even be asked this election if not for the fact that he’s still extraordinarily popular, and is arguably one of the only truly likes politicians left in the Democratic Party.

Polite sage as not /lit/ and just more politics

>> No.13369637

>>13369625
Tigers actually have the souls of Chinamen. So if your spirit animal is a tiger, you're being guided by a Chinaman.

>> No.13369638

>>13369610
Yeah I think you pretty much got it. That and these people have nothing to offer me.

>> No.13369649
File: 112 KB, 720x960, D7142DDB-EDB7-4333-83B8-B941411DED44.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13369649

>>13369638
Bernie will be at the debate tomorrow, as is Yang if you’re okay with a “I'll pay you $1000 a month to fuck off and never ask for anything” mentality. Other than that you’re probably on the right track for being disappointed in the Dems.

I’m still completely blown away that they though Hillary was a good candidate in 2016, like how the fuck are you so out of touch

>> No.13369652

>2% wealth tax on rich fucks just like they already tax homes
>comprehensive five point anti-lobbying law
>lower the student debt burden
I see nothing wrong here. She thought she was Indian and put that down after already making into an Ivy league school. Who gives a shit?

>> No.13369655

>>13369652
I’m hoping Bernie gets it, but Warren is an acceptable alternative for me desu, I like her.

>>13369649
Legit laugh every time that fucking video of her collapsing gets posted desu

>> No.13369669

>>13369635
>implying that corporate shill wouldn't just fall back on all that shit

>> No.13369671

>>13368780
Survive the economic collapse by Piero San Giorgio

>> No.13369672

>>13369655
I prefer Bernie just because he sounds like he knows how to get shit done. Unlike Obama he said he'll campaign against any democrat that doesn't support his policies rather than try to placate Republicans who won't vote in favor of anything he wants.

>> No.13369677

>yank politics and all these tankies

>> No.13369680

>>13369652
>more tax
>more law
What if we just got rid of the laws that cause the problem instead of adding more laws?

>> No.13369681
File: 59 KB, 422x550, 0E61713C-E111-4942-9989-A19E202E1D2D.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13369681

Who is the most annoying Democratic candidate, Bros?

For me, it’s Pete buttigieg with Yang at a close second.

>> No.13369688

>>13369607
>>13369607
>I think it would require a constitutional amendment to change this
Maine has at least gotten through ranked choice voting without being shut down by the courts. We could also remove some of the harsh ballot access requirements. The UK has a winner take all system and still manages to get a substantial amount of third party representation in government. We're just particularly bad even among countries with this kind of voting system.

>> No.13369689

>>13369652
>lower the student debt burden
Yeah, lets distribute a shit ton of wealth to privileged people instead of helping, you know, actual poor people.

>> No.13369698

>>13369689
Warren's tax burden alleviation plan is means tested, dummy. The poor get preferential treatment.

>> No.13369700

>>13369505
That’s it.

>>13369524
Simple answer. Shits fucked on purpose. Plus the DNC is a far right party masquerading as a “party of the people”

>>13369655
I used to like her, but I can’t trust her to be anything but an Obama rerun. Not sure About Bernie anymore either. I prefer Tulsi

>>13369681
>Still thinks there’s an immigration crisis.

>> No.13369701

>>13369681
If I had to narrow it down to 2:

Beto:
Lmao what is this Spanish shit? I know you’re trying to Larp as hard as you can as a Latino, but we all know you’re just an Irish Catholic mutt with a nickname. Fuck off

Booker: He’s also talking in mangled Spanish, but at least he’s not Larping. I still remember when he tried to tell off Obama as being too “mean” to the bankers of the 2008 crash....the bankers who got $400 Billion no questions asked, served no jail time, nor got a fine. Absolute shit tier

>> No.13369702

>>13369698
debt burden*

>> No.13369703

>>13369698
The poor don't go to college.

>> No.13369706

>>13369700
Why Tulsi

>> No.13369711

>>13369703
They go to college, they just become indentured servents to do so

Source: first in family to go to college, most childhood meals were bologna sandwiches and whatever leftovers mom brought back from her waitress job

>> No.13369713

Personally liked how, when the candidates were asked about Medicare for All, they immediately started talking about abortion because they know their positions on it suck and they don’t want to miss out on that lobbyist money drying up

>> No.13369717

>>13369711
>They go to college
No they don't. They have to go to work, or live on the street.

>> No.13369723

>>13369703
Look, all keeping students in heavy debt does is stunt economic growth while turning Americans further down the path of anti-intellectualism. We should have never cut the funding to higher education in the first place from having student's cover 20% of tuition to covering 80 in public universities, especially when the cost of making them free is less than the INCREASE Trump gave to our military budget. If anything, we owe a substantial amount of these student's the money just on a moral level for letting them be extorted. The returns you get from investing in education are substantial, and we decided to let private hands take advantage of that fact for their own greed rather than the common good.

>> No.13369724

>>13369706
Sander’s policies plus she didn’t sheepdog us into the 2016 debacle. There’s no guarantee she can end the wars without getting accidentally assassinated, but her anti-war stance almost cost her being allowed to the debates. MSM downplays her from what I’ve seen
Not watching closely at all though

>> No.13369746

>>13369723
>The returns you get from investing in education are substantial
Certain types of education. If the returns were substantial we would't be having this discussion.
>path of anti-intellectualism
How? Having too few college graduates really isn't a problem America has.

>> No.13369751

It’s made how Americans thing the democrats are left wing. America is a lost cause.

>> No.13369758

>>13369751
Elections and the MSM are a lost cause. The people need to work around them.

>> No.13369763
File: 98 KB, 563x1000, stack.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13369763

>>13368784
fpbp

>>13368780

>> No.13369784

>>13369505
It was a joke that smoothbrains never moved on from.

>> No.13369796

>>13368791
tism

>> No.13369801

Tulsi was the only candidate on the Democrats side that I would have realistically considered voting for but the entire party decided to shit on her just because her foreign policy doesn't involve over throwing dictators in far away lands

>> No.13369827

>>13369801
same. I couldn't stand to listen to those idiots so I watched a NOVA episode about Neil Armstrong instead. He was a cool dude. Caught the last couple of minutes on NBC, just long enough to hear Tulsi say Trump should go back into the Iran Deal (giving them billions of dollars to fund terrorism).

Stupid, stupid, stupid.

>> No.13369894

>>13368840
Warren became the compromise pick.

>> No.13369898

>>13369033
unironically, Stirner and Machiavelli

>> No.13369900

>>13368963
If you literally read the federalist papers, you would know the way they used regulated in the second amendment doesn't mean what you think it does.

>> No.13369905

>>13369681
The hispanic guy

>> No.13369908

>>13368784
no

>> No.13369925

Anyone who cares about the 2nd amendment should know that Thom Jeff. who fought to get a bill of rights in the first place also put that in as a compromise to what he really wanted: a restriction on having a standing army to prevent a military take over of the government. Neocons who pretend to care about the founding fathers should locate the nearest rope.

>> No.13369931

>>13369925
No one here is a neocon anon.

>> No.13369937

>>13369900
And I suppose jailing and torturing journalists is perfectly legal.

Your laws are nothing

>> No.13369939

Immigration is the single largest issue. Deporting all illegals and visa workers and indefinitely halting all future immigration would help American workers more than any other single policy and its effect stretches further than wages.
It would increase wages more than any other policy, lower the cost of housing even tank it in cities that need it the most such as NYC, the lower pool of labor would encourage companies to train workers themselves instead of relying on college or trade schools, employers would be encouraged to lower the requirements for jobs, employers would have to treat their employees better, the higher wages and much easier time of being middle class would decrease drug addiction and decrease single parent families, etc etc.
Most big cities and metropolitan areas would end up with a $15+ minimum wage without the government having to directly enforce it, that $15+ minimum wage would be due to supply and demand.
Would corporate cock suckers and companies complain about having to pay $15+ due to supply and demand? Of course! I bet they get mad when some leftist says there should be a cap on profit, very hypocritical!
>but muh labor shortage
There is no labor shortage, that is all corporate propaganda to keep the gates open. It is in businesses and the college system's best financial interest to say there is a shortage even if there isn't. The workforce participation rate is 2% lower than it was 10 years ago under Obama. There are millions of people not counted in the unemployment number that should be. The unemployment number is pretty much useless, what matters is wages and the number of people without a job that want one or would be willing to take one if offered enough.
>but there are millions of unfilled jobs
If you care about pay then you should not want all jobs to be filled, all jobs being filled = lower wages. You should want as many open jobs as possible so there is more competition that benefits workers

>> No.13369946

>>13368864
Nietzsche is great but I dislike the portable Nietzsche

>> No.13369954
File: 11 KB, 283x449, 2cbbc11e294499d33ed78df93f229ef010bf069bf9355f39fc9db58bb4d2f5c6.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13369954

>>13368864
Tulsi won

>> No.13369969

>>13369524
because the partys are fake. maybe thats hyperbole, but barely

>> No.13369973

shouting rrrrrobert orourke at my television like a daniel day lewis character

>> No.13369975

>>13369946
If you want to read all of him, go right ahead. The Portable has quite a hefty chunk of his work

>>13369954
She’s quite popular.
The right want out of the wars too, so you know she can beat Trump easily. CIA better not shoot her

>> No.13369978

>>13369937
So you concede the point and admit you have no argument? You just wrote random nonsense besides the point because you knew you lost.

>> No.13369979
File: 33 KB, 620x465, steve-bannon.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13369979

>>13369954
>drudge

>> No.13369989

>>13369978
Sure sure sure. Just don’t shoot anybody.
Fucking moron

>> No.13369992

>>13369989
You didn't refute my point at all. You are the definition of pseudo intellectualism. Just a pathetic waste of space that hides behind insults when proven wrong. Dilate Tranny.

>> No.13370032
File: 65 KB, 1024x711, D791CEA2-A2A9-4D55-B059-00793797BB66.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13370032

>>13369992
——> >>13369937
>Your laws are nothing
Your Federalist Papers aren’t supposed to supersede the constitution, but as i have had to indicate a second time. I don’t care. Law is a house made of shit.

>> No.13370100

>>13370032
seethe more

>> No.13370260

>>13369505
I think at some point he said white people are allowed to exist or something so that automatically made him the most acceptable Democrat in the eyes of conservatives. It's too bad his own party thinks he's evil now.

>> No.13370348

>>13369700
>Your country is totally not being flooded with low iq third worlders, goy. It's totally not a crisis, goy.
tranny opinion discarded

>> No.13370391

Hey guys, how many times did the federalist party win the presidency again?
What was that?
Only once?
Then the democratic-republican party won six times in a row and they had to rebrand themselves as the whigs?

>> No.13370403
File: 208 KB, 657x1024, 2915353450_6f51122bd4_b.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13370403

>> No.13370410

>>13368926
They asked her the most questions, vapid mouthbreether. Watch the first 30 minutes and count.

>> No.13370413
File: 91 KB, 500x446, 1513140606284.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13370413

>>13370032
Yikes. Will butterfaggot ever recover?

>> No.13370416

>>13368918
Non-arguments.

>> No.13370423
File: 28 KB, 400x400, zeihan.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13370423

Fuck philosophy, read geopolitics

>> No.13370433

>>13369681
Pete and Booker. Yang isn't annoying. His fan base is.

>> No.13370450

>>13369711
t not poor
They can't go to college. They're ineligible for parent plus loans which means the maximum coverage of government loans is only enough to cover tuition, scarely. They want more than $8 a meal a day. They want huge expenses for living. It's only remotely possible to go to school poor if you commute. Not every poor person lives close to a school. They be off the busline and may not even have money for a vehicle. Also if poverty forces them out, and they fall into default, they literally cannot go back to school.
>>13369717
This.

>> No.13370477

They all look like demonic rats. Wait a minute...Demo...c...rats...

>> No.13370491

>>13368780
Killing Hope by William Blum
Learn that America deserves it

>> No.13370704

>>13368791
You can't go into spengler expecting a book you breeze through and forget about it, The Decline of the West is a complete restructuring of history and a philosophy of life

>> No.13370713

>>13370704
and completely free from scientific inquiry
just dont read spengler

>> No.13370715

>>13368817
>Make everything free with white peoples money
Wow. Real indepth policy

>> No.13370718
File: 37 KB, 542x475, 1561454883528.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13370718

>>13370713

>> No.13370733

>>13370718
>who needs proofs when I have feelings!

Have sex

>> No.13370745

>muh collapse
Give me a break. You'll know collapse when you see it. This is mild turbulence to put it lightly .

>> No.13370746

>>13370733
bend over

>> No.13370755

>>13370718
I love this meme.

>> No.13370758
File: 130 KB, 619x619, 1029483040102.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13370758

>>13368817
>Calls for end to private insurance

Jesus even most of lefty/pol/ wouldn't support that shit

>> No.13370765

>>13370718
>>13370755
Who is this gentleman? What is the meaning?

>> No.13370769

>>13370765
The midwit fool professing himself to he wise.

>> No.13370770

>>13369939
fuck off to /pol/ retard

>> No.13370774

>>13369607
The good thing though, is that inter party fighting generally has no effect on the party who is not in power. It caused issues in 2016 because the dems were in control at this point.
>>13369612
Beto was pandering. Castro is from Pinche san antonio.
>>13369635
No kidding.
>>13369672
Warren has been far more procedurally active in congress than Bernie. Bernie is a great talking head, but he has no idea how to structure a law. If only one of the candidates was a law professor or something.
>>13369680
Deregulation has lead to these crisis. There are particular things that should be in place where the government facilitates a competitive market for businesses while still holding companies accountable. Dickey amendments, 2008 financial crisis, medical inflation, education inflation, and plenty of others were all the fault of government "stepping out"
>>13369701
While I love beto's "stake board in a wataburger parking lot" attitude, he really should have ran for a texas seat again. This is embarrassing.
>>13369713
I think that was more an issue of timing and trying to get all their political check marks in.
>>13369801
/pol/ got one thing right, she a qt.
>>13369900
Thank the black panthers and Reagan era racism for your gun rights broski.
>>13369905
The latino guy or the fake latino guy?
>>13369939
>complains about problems unions would fix
>MUH ILLEGALS
>>13370391
BULL MOOSE ALL THE WAY
>>13370477
You forgot your (((THEY)))

>> No.13370775
File: 303 KB, 642x705, 1551296283854.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13370775

>>13369908
Yes.

>> No.13370777

>>13369042
Underrated

>> No.13370780

>>13370769
Is that an actual person who has done so or is it how a person who is wont to do as such is apt to look?

>> No.13370785

>>13370780
The latter.

>> No.13370796

>>13369937
If the laws are nothing, why hinge your original argument on isolating a clause from a law and then deliberately misinterpreting it. The “well regulated militia” argument is stupid off of a board dedicated to the written word, if you have a better argument centered on how no law is sacred anymore (or ever) just start with that.

>> No.13370802

>>13370413
I should get a butterfly tripcode to shitpost with.

>> No.13370823

>>13369567
That's right. Political economy is a failure. Let's have more political economy.

>> No.13370911

>>13368780
I would like to fuck (and suck) Tulsi Gabbard.

>> No.13370913

>>13370911
Low IQ cumbrain.

>> No.13370924

>>13370913
I just wanted to share my thoughts on this event.
Also, I forgot to mention that she cute.

>> No.13370925
File: 84 KB, 1136x420, 8B03D460-8BB7-4EAE-AAFF-419CD8C55789.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13370925

What are we expecting from the debates tonight?

>Softball questions to Biden, the centrist favorite (note: would be hilarious if someone brought up his weird handsy thug with women)

>”Bernie Sanders, why are you an awful person who thinks Stalin did nothing eron type questions

>Yang pandering to NEETS

>overall lack of cohesion and overwhelming confusion

>> No.13370952

>>13370924
Those are not your thoughts. They are programs autoexecuting in response to stimuli. They are only your thoughts insofar as you reinforced this process and intentionally seek it out. You cannot perceive this because you lack the intelligence to.

>> No.13370987

>>13370952
>Those are not your thoughts.
>They are programs autoexecuting in response to stimuli.
Nibba, how these two are different, lol?

>> No.13371002
File: 99 KB, 416x435, 1536571896436.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13371002

>>13370987
>Nibba, how these two are different, lol?

>> No.13371004
File: 150 KB, 2120x2440, 8B09642D-8F42-47FF-A8F0-10E083FAD7B5.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13371004

Love how climate change, the most likely thing to end all human existence, was barely given any air time whatsoever

Very cool Democrat’s, shows us just how serious you lot are!

>> No.13371009

>>13371004
>Love how climate change, the most likely thing to end all human
exaggeration and meme

>> No.13371012

>>13369937
Will anyone please think of the underprivileged journalists?

>> No.13371017

>>13370100
You’re the one worrying over muh gun rights.

>>13370348
Obama deported them already. We now have a net zero immigration with Mexico and now more Canadians get in. Its not really a crisis, its a political football meant to excite a voter base. And you fall for it.

>>13370796
Think it over

>>13371012
Why does freedom of speech and the press mean nothing to you? You prefer fake news? You like that YouTube censors your rightwing vloggers?

>> No.13371018

>>13371004
Npc

>> No.13371030

>>13369139
Holy shit, is this real? Do we actually have someone here who supports a political candidate?

>> No.13371036
File: 76 KB, 1024x576, 97b.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13371036

>>13371030
/lit/ is /yangland/

>> No.13371040

>>13369139
This is the same faggot who wrote the Steven king shit a while back
>waaaaa he's more successful and popular than you
Kill yourself.

>> No.13371041
File: 6 KB, 150x150, index22.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13371041

>>13371017
>trip

>> No.13371043

>>13369139
kys

>> No.13371060
File: 76 KB, 636x960, 65693876_481614552645976_6464923771965800448_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13371060

If there was a presidential candidate that offered this in my country I would vote for him in a heartbeat. If students don't vote for Sanders it means that they are absolutely cucked

>> No.13371081
File: 97 KB, 1080x1331, 768678678.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13371081

>Open borders? Bah, I have not a care in the world. Speed up the capitalist machine, I can compete. Give citizenship to all illegals. This will lower the cost of my low wage based services.

>> No.13371086

>>13371060
You know as well as I do that he’ll be shoved off the tickets by the DNC Machine

>> No.13371097

>>13371009
>>13371018
Europe is roasting idiots

>> No.13371103

>>13371060
Wouldn't this really fuck universities up? good

>> No.13371105

>>13371004
It’s only worth dealing with if we get rid of the communists and anarchists first.

>> No.13371107

>>13371012
my sides!!!!

>> No.13371109

>>13371060
His policy is cucked. Why pay them off? Why waste 2 trillion dollars? Just make them null and void. It's that simple. If universities raise a fuss, we have show trials for everyone opposed. Credit agencies also would be shut down if they even dare to raise issue with it.

>> No.13371113

>>13371097
Not related to climate, imbecile. Temperature and acute weather events mean nothing. Even the general trend means nothing considering it comes from an n=250 years.

>> No.13371120

>>13371109
Too many boomers with cushy do nothing admin jobs

>> No.13371123

>>13371103
Depends on their arraignment. A lot of student loans come from different companies, who i think are getting their money from the government

>> No.13371125

>>13368805
Whites in China do tremendously well actually, they fetishize whiteness, having a white employee is viewed sort of like having a trophy in your subordinating them.

>> No.13371129

>>13371120
Fuck them and force them out to the fields, mines and factories.

>> No.13371131
File: 82 KB, 750x702, 1200CBB5-F8D8-4AA3-ACA4-E9F5C7FDD15C.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13371131

Unrelated, but did anyone actually fall for that BS story the US was pushing?

Not even Japan fell for it lmao

>> No.13371132
File: 154 KB, 1232x1080, think I'll have a bit.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13371132

>>13371041
>>13370100
>>13370413
Ignore and FILTER the triptranny and it goes away.

>> No.13371136

>>13368832
>summerposting this hard

>> No.13371142

>>13371132
Someone tell him this
If this works how come you still have to say this?

>> No.13371151

>>13371129
Yea strangle them with your stinky boi panties.

>> No.13371165

>>13368784
Well these Jewish texts will certainly give insight into why our civilization is collapsing.

>> No.13371199

>>13371165
Yikes

>> No.13371222

>>13371151
Sodomites would not be allowed period. They would be expelled or euthanized.

>> No.13371226

>>13370704
i can't shake the feeling there's more people talking about it and referencing it than those who have actually read the whole damn thing.

>> No.13371256

>>13369497
poopoo caca, I'm bilingual and it just seemed so forced. "every [to vote]- voter we need representation" Beto 2020 :^)

>> No.13371275

>>13370952
damn.

>> No.13371277

>>13368780
Reminder that as our world grows more insane by the day, with division being found of every sector, it provides oneself a greater platform by which to grow spiritually, having to retain compassion and empathy even as the world around you attempts to fracture everyone into warring factions. To retain one's virtues in such a world is to demonstrate greater strength than in a world where everything was peaceful. And while we'd prefer the latter, we've been given the former, and must navigate it wisely.

Please show kindness to all those you see. May all sentient beings know peace and comfort.

>> No.13371309

>>13368780
Atlas Shrugged

>> No.13371321

>>13371081
>spends actual money on beard trimmers and hair gel products
>meticulously trims beard and chest hair in the mirror to look good for photoshoot

not manly at all. what a waste of an athletic frame

>> No.13371325

>>13370758
>>Calls for end to private insurance
>Jesus even most of lefty/pol/ wouldn't support that shit
You can't be serious. This has been a mainstream leftist position for the last 50 years

>> No.13371326

>>13371226
I have read it and all his essays and books

>> No.13371334

>>13371326
sucks to be you

>> No.13371340 [DELETED] 

>>13371325
the fuck, why? why not just let me keep my insurance and give uninsured people medicare

>> No.13371346

>>13371340
It's not fair. Not equal treatment. It means if you have money, you get better care. This is not what this country was built on.

>> No.13371405

>>13371346
Yeah, but that isn't fair either. I'm not totally anti-socialist, but if you're going to spread out risk then you have to disqualify or control certain behaviours. Homeless and mentally ill people are special cases, but otherwise people who are obese, smokers, murderers/gang bangers, etc., should be limited in the type and amount of tax-funded care they can receive. Providing subsidized safety-nets for such behaviours is inefficient and only ensures we get more of said behaviour.

It's also unfair because genetically divergent populations have different predispositions to disease. Why should one population have to pay for the higher disease rates in another?

>> No.13371429

>>13371405
If only we had a homegenous society

>> No.13371442

>>13368780
On this topic. Should I marry a chinese guy? He's ivy league educated and speaks English as well as Mandarin.
>if you can't beat 'em, join 'em

>> No.13371443

>>13371442
where are you from? are you a girl(female)?

>> No.13371448

>>13371165
based and truthpilled

>> No.13371449

>>13371346
huh? its literally what this country was built on. raping of the less fortunate and then selling movies/music about it is the most american thing there is

>> No.13371452

>>13368918
Cars kill far more people than guns, and all of them unintentionally. Cars are far more dangerous than guns. If anything is going to get banned it should be cars.
>omg like becky omg guns are so bad, i saw on the teevee that a kid shot up his school
>*runs over 5 children with her SUV on the way home because she was texting selfies to instabookchat*

In a civilized society, you wouldn't have a significant risk of death just getting around town.

>> No.13371458

>>13369524
because it´s an illusion that they have a choice, historically larger and more populous states are the most authoritharian

>> No.13371462

>>13371443
Burgerstan and yes, XX chromosomes. He's probably going to be making six figs and he's infatuated with me. If chinks are going to rule the world it would be logical to get on the winning team. I bet his parents own like a dozen rental properties.

>> No.13371471

>>13371462
Well, he sounds like he has his future down pat.

1.) Do you like him? Do you love him?
2.) Are you sexually attracted to him, or do you see yourself sexually attracted to him?

DESU, this probably isn't the type of question to ask 4chan of all places

>> No.13371482

>>13371462
what is your height and weight?

>> No.13371493

>>13371462
it´s an illusion, resurgence of nationalism in western europe and the u.s will backpedalled the liberal reforms and you*ll be outcasted to slavery in mainland china

>> No.13371494

>>13371471
Historically marriages were for economic convenience. I imagine I could grow to love him. He's not unattractive, and he's pretty qt. It's probably the smart decision to go with him.

>> No.13371495

>>13370450
that seems to be how the system is designed, intentionally. There are scholarships that can help, but spots are very limited.
Also community college can be very affordable, with the ability to transfer credits to a university if you want the piece of paper with a fancier school name on it.

>> No.13371498
File: 133 KB, 800x450, smart grugg.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13371498

>>13371462
I should be able to take those properties for myself because I am stronger and more intelligent than that chink.

>> No.13371501
File: 57 KB, 600x450, 1536766827095.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13371501

>>13371429
If only.

>> No.13371510

>>13371482
US dress size 4, BMI ~20
>>13371493
So you think it's a temporary thing? If he marries me we would have our pick of citizenship, either mcdonaldsland or pandaland, whichever is more advantageous. He's also nice to me and practically worships me. I'm having a hard time seeing the downside. Is love a yes/no thing or can it be grown over time? If women in the past were considered successful if they married a rich husband, should I really be so picky as to turn down a rich guy I don't even dislike?

>> No.13371513

>>13371321
my hair can do that naturally without any kind of hair gel.

I understand what you mean though, vanity is not a manly trait.

>> No.13371535

>>13371493
resurgence of nationalism will only sink the west further into disarray, chaos and isolationism, and is exactly what china and russia want.

>> No.13371536

>>13371510
what state? will you go on a date with me?

>> No.13371541

>>13371536
what economic benefits can you provide me?

>> No.13371547

>>13371541
i also have a 6 figure job offer for when i finish uni and wealthy parents.

>> No.13371553

>>13371277
What a needed post. Thank you kind anon.

>> No.13371565

>>13371081
>>13371321
This man is real? I always thought he was an extremely realistic drawing or 3D model.

>> No.13371573

>>13371462
Fuck him, marry him, divorce him and get half his wealth. Works wonders for western women, and you might give him a lesson in dealing with goldiggers.

>> No.13371600

>>13371498
the chinese unironically have much larger brains than everyone else. There is no stopping them, there is a problem though, they will inevitably occupy the highest payed jobs an all first world high standard of living countries. It will get to the point where the countries with the highest percentage of chinese will be the ones at the top, with China itself at the very top far above anyone else. This is going to create a lot of animosity from the locals of those countries.

>> No.13371605

>>13371600
Larger on average. Smaller distribution. We're not comparing the masses here. We're comparing 160 IQ man against some 120 IQ midwit supreme chink. I could beat him in chess. I could beat him in a fight. I could beat him at almost anything.

>> No.13371610

>>13371547
are you qt? are you coastie or flyover? i won't live in a flyover.
>>13371573
thing is that by the time you divorce him, you're left in your 30s and it might be hard to get another guy. i want to keep a husband for general partner purposes.

but no really. is love yes/no or can it grow over time? was every woman in an arranged/economic marriage always miserable? did everyone just have affairs all the time? out of literature it seems like cheating was more common than not and most wives and husbands detested each other.

>> No.13371614
File: 207 KB, 280x438, 1554221346842.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13371614

>Bernie is running again
>no refunds 2.0 electric boogaloo
this old kike still has democratic support? Lmao imagine the faggots that are voting for him after cucking out to hillary and stabbing his supporters in the back last time.

>> No.13371617

>>13371605
a guy with an iq of 160 wouldn't browse /lit/
we are all midwits here

>> No.13371623

>>13371610
i am from northern california

>> No.13371634

>>13371494
>He's not unattractive, and he's pretty qt
Well, that's always a plus! I've got a qt as well.

>Historically marriages were for economic convenience.
Correct, and I applaud you for your knowledge of such things. If you don't mind, though, I must insist that having affection for your partner is a must.

For example, my mother married my father (lawyer) for the money, she told me herself last year after I got a few drinks in her. And after the first two years of marriage, they hated each other. They stuck together, hating each other and subsequently their lives, for the next 19 years, only splitting up when I graduated college and moved out.

My mother then, 2 years post-divorce, married another wealthy man, an engineer. They've been together for 10 years and are still as happy as the day they got married, and my mother (during that same drinking session) burst into tears about "how happy he made her" and "how much better life is now". The difference is that Mom actually loved this man, and wasn't just using him for his money....I try not to look down on her for this admission, but I must admit it's hard not to.

You seem pretty on top of things, but I have to stress how important being happy with your partner is. I would hate for anyone to end up like my mother or father....extremely unhappy and feeding on their hatred towards each other, only bound by convenience. It honestly seems like a hell onto itself.

If you think he's handsome, going to be successful, and will provide financial and geopolitical stability then that is 100% desirable...but you to ensure that you will be *happy* with him. History is littered with domestic tragedies like my mother and father, and it would pain me if I knew you married a man you grew to hate. It's a very emotionally painful and deading lifestyle, you must be sure you can love this man.

Polite sage, as I'm not contributing to the thread desu.

>> No.13371651

>>13371617
>a guy with an iq of 160 wouldn't browse /lit/
Every person I've ever met with a high IQ preferred to experience life first hand and spent their free time cultivating constant improvements in themselves.

No duh, they would never visit this shithole unless it's to get a giggle with a shitpost.

>> No.13371670

>>13371634
*but you have to ensure
Sorry, English is not my first language, my apologies.

>> No.13371703

>>13371634
I see. I'm just trying to make a decision I won't regret. That's a good answer. Of course the ideal is wealthy, who you also like. Marrying just for money would be pretty terrible.

Since he's specifically Chinese, off the boat, I was worried about wife-beating, but I suppose that's for /int/. Wish there was /lit/ about ideal partner selection in modern times that wasn't ophrah winfrey tier feelgood bullshit.

>> No.13371746

>>13371703
How well do you know him? Have you been on any dates with him?

>wife-beating
don't know about that and the Chinese, but the best policy is, if he lays a finger on you, to get the hell out of there.

>Source: An ex who went crazy after his dad passed and pointed a loaded pistol at me when drunk

>> No.13371765

>>13370713
>he believes in science

>> No.13371785

>>13368946
It means the very reverse of a standing army, the ability of the people to take up arms and protect the country, or overthrow it when necessary. Lol retard

>> No.13371815

>>13370032
No, but it reveals what the language used in the constitution actually means at the time it was written. It is clear that you would pretend words don't change though, and insist that the modern definition of regulation should apply rather than the definition used when it was actually written.

>> No.13372027

>>13371565
its a real dude but the photo is heavily edited and the guy looks hardly as buff or "manly" as this would make you believe. Just reverse image search, its some russian and his girlfriend is obsessed with modelling him like a JoJo figure

>> No.13372049

>>13368918
Americ**s are so fucked in the head its not even funny anymore.
Just think about that for a second, every idiot in your country before being allowed to drive has to get a license but you can buy as many literal killing tools as you want because youre murican.
I can hardly believe that anyone with half a brain would support this notion. But yeah, youre burgers after all

>> No.13372069

The Quran

>> No.13372097

>>13369033
Harry Potter

>> No.13372102

>>13371605
source for that tighter distribution claim?
sounds like BS to me.

>> No.13372106

>>13372049
akshully. that's incorrect, and either way, cars kill FAR more people than guns kill. 99% of gun deaths are niggers killing other niggers. but this isn't even /lit/. stop being so assblasted about right to firearms. bongistan has daily knifings and acid attacks, sweden has daily grenadings and explosions, france has trucks of peace.

to keep it on topic: hollerbacks submission happened in france. let's say there are certain problems we don't have in america. use a bit more lube with your ass dildo next time, you seem rather pouty today, francis.

>> No.13372107

>>13371277
Great post, anon.

>> No.13372116

>>13371277
Based and empathy pilled

If we knew each other in real life, you're the type of person that I'd feel honored knowing

>> No.13372126

>>13371277
based but ultimately bluepilled

>> No.13372191

>>13372049
Yeah but they'll also give driver's licenses to any idiot. Haven't you heard the recent news that some regions are granting licenses to illegals? Despite the license hurdle, that's going to be a far more lethal policy than easy access to legal guns (legal guns are responsible for a tiny proportion of actual homocides, sometimes suicides are added to make things scarier).

>> No.13372209

>>13372191
not to mention most illegals just drive without the license at all. cars need far, far more regulation. every day there's a dozen crashes in my city alone from retards behind the wheel. they need to be more restrictive in car sales and car licensing.

>> No.13372262

>>13371277
Empathy and humanity are memes and any sort of social system that is dependent on them is destined to fall apart sooner or later.

>> No.13372291

>>13372049
Literally seething

>> No.13372300
File: 63 KB, 461x394, 1558834642030.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13372300

>>13372049

>> No.13372331

>>13369505
It's not just $1000 a month.
>medicare for all
>you have a right to have all your internet data deleted at any time and know who has your data
>supreme court term limits
>everybody gets $100 a year to donate to political campaigns to combat big corporate donors
>willing to use nuclear power to combat global warming unlike all the other democrats

>> No.13372344

>>13372331
Wtf I love Yang now

>> No.13372348

>>13371277
Unironically based

>> No.13372354

>>13372049
>but you can buy as many literal killing tools as you want
flat out wrong but I guess it's easier to trust blindly anything the media says. j'espère que t'es pas français abruti

>> No.13372394

>>13372331
#4 is potentially clever, not sure how it would turn out in practice, but I'd like to find out.

>> No.13372397

>>13372331
I was unaware of this...he's a lot better now but still not my 1st choice.
What're yall expecting from tonight

>> No.13372445

>>13368801
Trump won't win again, we've reached a critical mass of PoC and anti-immigration rhetoric usually provokes a lef-wing backlash against the downright meanness of it all. Besides, illegal immigration has been worse under him than Obama, because his rhetoric radicalized government employees and judges into thinking Our Values were under attack so they'd do anything humanly possible to prevent deportations from happening.

>> No.13372495

>>13372049
>slew of false statements in hysterical half-literate prose
Yup, it’s eurotard posting. Shouldn’t you be keeping calm? After all it’s slightly hot over there, which means you’ll be having psychosomatic seizures and what not.

>> No.13372538

>>13368780

How can anyone watch this without cringing to death? The only ones I could tolerate were the ones that are polling the lowest. How did this country go to shit so fast?

>> No.13372554

>>13372538
Latino immigration. Don't worry, it'll get worse. Soon well have more street shitting than Mumbai.

>> No.13372565

>>13371405
>being fair isn’t fair!
Stop thinking about money.

>>13371785
You’re talking to an anarchist.

>>13371815
Fuck your constitution, lawyer boy.

>> No.13372570

>>13372331
You know that's not bad at all.

>> No.13372612

>>13372570
Throwing money around won’t work

>> No.13372616

>>13372331
Where does the UBI come from? Is it on top of wellfare/social security? Any income tax plan?

>> No.13372623

>>13371610
This bitch is worthless. Keep looking anon!

>> No.13372625

>>13372612
Whom are you voting for? Bernard?

>> No.13372635
File: 27 KB, 350x708, 95f31h.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13372635

>>13372565
I'm not thinking about money, I'm thinking about finite resources and the quality of people who reproduce.

>> No.13372656

>>13372612
t. insufferable cancerous tripfaggot. please kill yourself and stop polluting the board.

>> No.13372661

>>13372616
His plan is apparently a VAT tax and a carbon tax.

His UBI is opt-in. If you make more than $1000 form current welfare, you can stay on your program, but if you want UBI it will replace what you have.

>> No.13372669

>>13369042
Absolutely wonderful.

>> No.13372672

Reminder that around 2024 all US debt issuance will go towards interest on the debt. It's over, just enjoy the ride.