[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 43 KB, 960x720, How do you even smell it.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13110929 No.13110929 [Reply] [Original]

What ethical philosophy do you think is the best

>> No.13111095

>>13110929
Stoic ethics is the only true answer, anyone who says otherwise is a weak willed hedonist

>> No.13111099

>>13111095
Based and Aureliuspilled.

>> No.13111123

my own personal ethics

>> No.13111129

Occasionalist Neoplatonism

>> No.13111228

>choosing an "ethical philosophy" like a starter pokemon

Analytic philosophy fucking sucks

>> No.13111257

>>13111228
rent free

>> No.13111301

Anything other than modern ethical intuitionism is fundamentally unworkable

>> No.13111305

>>13110929
Absurdism numbah one

>> No.13111312

>>13111228
Not sure how that is at all characteristic of or even a meaningful statement about analytic philosophy.

>> No.13111694
File: 8 KB, 194x260, serveimage-28.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13111694

Virtue is a state of character to which one is adapted by nature and disposed by habit.

>> No.13111704

>>13110929

Ecosophy and nothing comes close.

>> No.13111724

egoism = utilitarianism

>> No.13111740

The un-philosophy. Seriously, metaethics is the extent of what's worth talking about. Do what you know is right, don't do things you know are wrong, and accept that no one is ever going to agree and you'll never be certain that you're correct

>> No.13111757

>>13110929

I started typing and realized I don't really know what kind of ethics I'm aligned with. Hmmm

>> No.13112335

>>13110929
The one which you believe to be the best

>> No.13112369

>>13110929
Kantian deontology.

>> No.13112402

>>13110929
Virtue ethics

>> No.13112427

>>13111111

>> No.13112429
File: 212 KB, 640x812, 1556908804441.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13112429

>>13110929
personally a fan of levinas
of the big three i prefer virtue ethics because i think it provides a good roadmap day to day.
consequentialist logic is always nice for looking at the consequences (duh) of a decision and determining if they are acceptable

>> No.13112573

The one that starts by admitting the singular, fundamental truth: your experience is all that inherently matters to you.

>> No.13113768
File: 337 KB, 908x1390, immanuel-kant-german-philosopher-HRP6G1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13113768

Kantianism.
The necessity of reason as a basis for argumentation assumes the normativity of reason.

>> No.13113798

>>13112429
It feels like levinas is the only one in ethical philosophy who also spiced up with some hot french philosophy shit. Like is there anyone else after hdgger

>> No.13113802

>>13113768
>lets your own children get murdered so as not to lie

>> No.13114064

Christian virtue ethics whereby one makes imitation of Christ a habit

>> No.13114424

>>13110929
the veil of ignorance

>> No.13114443

>>13110929
Best ethics is to follow God's will in whatever situation you're in.

>> No.13114550

>>13110929
i'm a rothbardian ancap libertarian. personal liberty is more important than maximizing total well being.

>> No.13114560

humanistic contextualism

>> No.13114568

>>13113768
based
>>13113802
cringe

>> No.13114578

>>13111095
>>13110929
i wouldn't say the best, but aligning yourself with the logos seems reasonable

>> No.13114783

>>13111095
>weak willed hedonist
opposed to a Stoic, who is a strong willed hedonist

>> No.13115681
File: 82 KB, 383x550, alpha3.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13115681

>>13110929
Good is what profits the species and the outcome justifies the means.

>> No.13115690

deontology

>> No.13115711

>>13114443
So being a puppet of the Jewish sky-daddy ? Why have free will ? Just so there's a possibility he will throw you in hell ?

>> No.13115725

Ethics are orthogonal to the truth

>> No.13115730
File: 163 KB, 730x1100, alpha14.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13115730

>>13115690
Is killing Hitler, Stalin, Mao, Pol Pot etc still morally good in the framework of deontological ethics ? The deed itself is not, only the consequences.

>> No.13117223

>>13113798
>>13112429
Where should i start with levinas

>> No.13117240

>>13115711
cringe & yikes pilled