[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 90 KB, 607x960, 1554134072802.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12870128 No.12870128 [Reply] [Original]

"You don't like me right now, do you?"

If I like this person right now, how do I answer them using yes or no?

>> No.12870132

Maybe

>> No.12870138

I found this but I don't understand the point of it:

Whilst Modern English has a two-form system for affirmatives and negatives, Early Modern English in fact had a four-form system, comprising the words yea, nay, yes, and no. [...] The answers to positively framed questions ("Will he go?") were yea and nay, whilst the answers to negatively framed questions ("Will he not go?") were yes and no. This subtle grammatical nicety of Early Modern English is recorded by Sir Thomas More in his critique of William Tyndale's translation of the New Testament into Early Modern English.

>> No.12870139

run away

>> No.12870142

>>12870128
pige

>> No.12870146

If they asked "You like me right now, don't you?"

"Yes" would make sense.

>> No.12870152
File: 23 KB, 640x559, 1548990390080.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12870152

>yes or no question
>"wat r teh anser agin?"

>> No.12870999

>>12870128
Why prefigure a form of answer that will inevitably leave question as to meaning?

>> No.12871261

Just say "i do" or "i don't". No chance of misunderstanding.

>> No.12871272

>>12870999
Ill never tell ;)

>> No.12872667

>>12870128
Why do you HAVE to use yes or no autist? Fucking disgrace of a thread. Even frogposters are better than you.

>> No.12872671

>>12870128
poor elephond he needs water

>> No.12872674
File: 109 KB, 620x689, A5DF4CBF0940448792416C5894059AFE.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12872674

>>12870128
say "you need to relax"
>>12870146
or this

>> No.12872708

>>12870128
"No, I like you"

>> No.12872716

>>12870128
y-you too

>> No.12872869

>>12870128
No attention-deprived whore that would ask such a question deserves any of my time.