/lit/ - Literature

[Anonymous No.12529701]

'Why are women... so much more interesting to men than men are to women?'

Why do you think fellas?

[Anonymous No.12529710]

the puss

[Anonymous No.12529712]

>>12529701
because we don't need women to survive, so they're a novelty, ornamental beyond reproduction
women need us in the same way they need air. nobody's fascinated by breathing in oxygen are they

[Anonymous No.12529718]

>>12529712
But Woolf said otherwise

[Anonymous No.12529719]

>>12529701
Because men have an innate curiosity about the unknown.

[Anonymous No.12529728]

Men romanticize women, men are a means to an end for women

[Anonymous No.12529846]

>>12529701
I don't think that's true in the least fucking bit.

[Anonymous No.12529923]

>>12529701
Women are interested in interesting men, and let's face it, most people are not interesting at all. Men are more interested in sex, and almost any girl is good for that

[Anonymous No.12529934]

men can find beauty and fascination in even the most wretched of natures things

[Anonymous No.12529960]

>>12529701
Because humanity in general (both generalities and abstractions, in fact) tends to interest men more (women comprise half of this) as opposed to women, who tend to think only about themselves.

[Anonymous No.12529972]

>>12529701
god imagine that pic related was mostly read by women who owned a room of their own and felt enpowered to make crappy imitations (whether ideologically or stylistically) and that’s responsible for like half of women in english academia today.

[Anonymous No.12529980]

there's a mystery to women that is not found of men, they have more depths to them than men have

[Anonymous No.12529984]

>>12529712
please read carefully before posting

[Anonymous No.12529994]

>>12529980
its not that mystery is not found in men, it is that women absolutely do not care about any mystery, they live locally and superficially, so the world, including men seem that way to them

[Anonymous No.12529996]

>>12529972
who do you have in mind
how many female english faculty do you know
to what do you object in their work

[Anonymous No.12530025]

>>12529996
>?
>?
>?
kys faggot

[Anonymous No.12530052]

>>12529718
Woolf was a mentally ill freak, who cares what she said

[Anonymous No.12530064]

>>12529712
>in the same way they need air
/lit/'s metaphor's class, everyone

[Anonymous No.12530079]

>>12529718
it was cope, does it even need to be said?

[Anonymous No.12530094]

>>12530025
you were able to determine they were questions
now answer them

[Anonymous No.12530104]

>>12529718
Woolf also drowned herself and was imo even uglier than George Eliot. Not to say she isn’t a premier literary genius and prose stylist but it was a giant Cope. No woman will ever understand even the stupidest mans inner psychology. Closest we’re Didion, Eliot, and O’Connor

[Anonymous No.12530134]

It's because women are extremely arrogant.

They only care about their own fantasies and imagination, they find themselves endlessly fascinating. It's why they care about signifiers and intangibles in men so much.

[Anonymous No.12530142]

>>12530052
So are you, should we also disregard your comment?

[Anonymous No.12530157]

>>12530142
>no u
powerful

[Anonymous No.12530240]

>>12529701
Privilege
The quality of being 'interesting' is necessarily cultivated in what constitutes your free time i.e. what substantiates your means of survival.
>tomorrow I have to eat
>I need money for food
>I need a job so that I can make money
>one job may not make enough money
>if I do not have a job I will starve to death and die
A woman has significantly more options than a man in this respect, and thus can afford to care about things that are more 'interesting', though few would employ this opportunity to enrich themselves in any meaningful way.
This doesn't even account for the extra work a man puts in for the hope of a more stable life in old age when he can no longer work two or three jobs and go to school.
Three jobs and school fulltime almost killed me this time last year, but I survived. This essence of masculinity is something that most women will never have to deal with.

[Anonymous No.12530246]

who said women are interesting to men?

[Anonymous No.12530265]

I ghosted four women in six months last year specifically because I didn't find them interesting. I'm 22 years old and I've never had sex.
>>12530246
This

[Anonymous No.12530274]

>>12529718
Not exactly an authority in well-being.

[Anonymous No.12530641]

>>12529728
Based and Weiningerpilled

[Anonymous No.12531430]

>>12530104
What do you suggest of didion?

[Anonymous No.12531437]

>>12530240
>implying women don't work in our day and age

[Anonymous No.12531439]

>>12529712
lol wait until you hit puberty

[Anonymous No.12531451]

Evolution

[Anonymous No.12531456]

>>12531437
>brainlet reading comprehension
Assuming you aren't born into destitute poverty, no woman *has* to work.
NEETs are not as common as the Internet would have you think.

[Anonymous No.12531478]

>>12531456
Most stay-at-homes stays at home to take care of children. Where's the countless free time that you claim then?

[Anonymous No.12531546]

>>12531478
Well are women generally staying at home or working? It can't be both.
My point is that women can be whatever they want in a way that men can't. If a woman wants to go to work it's totally cool and badass.
If they want to blow $100k on a uslesss philosophy / lit degree, it's inspiring. If they want to stay at home and sell homemade soap on Etsy and live off of their parents, it's genius. If they don't want to have kids and spend their thirties still ~sowing their wild oats~, it's progressive.
Of course they would be interesting in contrast to men when the public's consensus of everything perceived to be masculine is problematic and creepy.
This obsessive cottling of women has turned them into emotionally stunted girls that overwhelmingly can't cook, can't clean, hate children, and work useless professions such as HR managers and procurement agents.

[Anonymous No.12531556]

>>12529712
>>12530052
back to r/braincels, pal

[Anonymous No.12531568]

>>12529701
The dangers of being self-absorbed.

[Anonymous No.12531571]

>>12531546
>This obsessive cottling of women has turned them into emotionally stunted girls that overwhelmingly can't cook, can't clean, hate children, and work useless professions such as HR managers and procurement agents.

[Anonymous No.12531604]

>>12529960
woa

[Anonymous No.12531624]

>>12529960
and man have had to think of ways to persuade women into sleeping with them were as women don't have concern themselves with having to persuade men

[Anonymous No.12531651]

>>12530094
thanks for the clarification you autistic twat. you’re really adding to the discussion here. again kys faggot.

[Anonymous No.12531783]

>>12531651
so you can't think of any women in any english departments

[Anonymous No.12531942]

You /pol/cels are pathetic, please leave my board and never come back.

[Anonymous No.12531946]

>>12531942
>You /pol/cels are pathetic, please leave my board and never come back.

[Anonymous No.12531990]

>>12531942
>unironic art ho
Your female privilege protects you from having the shit kicked out of you.

[Anonymous No.12532010]

Most people for the most part arent interesting

Its misogynist but im starting to come into the idea that women on the whole in western societies at least are less interesting thab men, simply becase they dont really have to be. Women are preconditioned to basically idolize the onstiution of marriage and children and this makes them inherently a domesticating conservative and boring force. Plenty of men are boring too but men are allowed the privelege of deciding for themselves what they want out of life free from some of these obligations, for a longer period of time
Marriage and child rearing and fimding the one are on the female mind from childhood until her 30s. They are essentially the core of her identity and her main source of self worth. Consume any media of any kind at all where wlmen are yhe primary authors or consumers and invariably a man is at the center of it. Not because men are so important but because marriage is. This can be seen on the interbet too where women almost always bitch about not being desirable enough or men not being faithful etc.

[Anonymous No.12532025]

>>12532010
this doesnt apply to trans women and to a lesser extent lesbians. they don't have the privilege of buying this myth, and their unique circumstances force an introspection of the degree that straight women (or men) rarely if ever have to deal with, barring a catastrophic incident. this leads to a culmination of a real identity outside of the mainstream and its glorification of institution, and outside the realm of men

[Anonymous No.12532030]

>>12529710
this
anything else is an excuse

[Anonymous No.12532036]

>>12532010
It’s funny you mention that, because that’s what earlier variants of feminism serve to critique. Their belief is that the breaking down of patriarchal boundaries would force more women to self-actualise.

I don’t know if patriarchy is exclusively responsible or not, personally, but I do think it’s logical that complacency in women is socially enforced.

[Anonymous No.12532043]

>>12529701
This literally isn't true.

Men are interested to the extent that they are interested in fucking.

Women on the other hand have to be wooed with style and words and humor. THEN she'll fuck.

[Anonymous No.12532242]

>>12532030
Men don't have an equivalent?

[Anonymous No.12532260]

>>12532043

Imagine the disaster it would have been if women were the same as men. No buildups to romance, no relationship intricacies, half of literature would have been nonexistent.

[Anonymous No.12532278]

>>12532043
>Women on the other hand have to be wooed with style and words and humor.
not true btw

[Anonymous No.12532450]

>>12532278
r u a london btw?

[Anonymous No.12532456]

>>12532278
??? What is it then?

[Anonymous No.12532538]

>>12529701
Because men project onto real women all manner of idealized qualities and then treat them as vessels in which to experience and from which to draw out those qualities. These can be purely sexual fantasies but they can also - depending on the man's education and tastes - range over romantic, artistic, philosophical, and really any area of interest.

When women turn to do the same to men they tend to end up with nothing but sexual or romantic families. Hence their phantom creation is more limited in scope. More likely to quickly repeat. And so ultimately more quickly exhausted of self-renewing novelty than that of men.

the inflammatory summary. Both genders project their fantasies into the other. Women are more interesting to men because men have richer and more varied projections.

[Anonymous No.12532544]

>>12531783
no, im refusing to engage in any exchange with you because you’re obviously a fucking retard
t. the female president of the fucking mla you dumbshit

[Anonymous No.12532558]

>>12532278
not always, but mostly

[Anonymous No.12532571]

>>12532544
very simple questions:
do you actually know any women in any english department in any english-speaking country, on faculty or adjunct?
if so, who?
and what about their work do you find 'crappy' and/or 'imitative?'

[Anonymous No.12532583]

>>12532571
very simple questions:
how much of a persistent retard are you?

[Anonymous No.12532589]

>>12532544
>im refusing to engage in any exchange with you
the most useless sort of poster, just stop replying then

[Anonymous No.12532590]

>>12529701
I love how she assumes men find women interesting. Also

1 Timothy 2:12 King James Version (KJV)
>But I suffer not a woman to teach, nor to usurp authority over the man, but to be in silence.

[Anonymous No.12532591]

>>12532583
you keep responding, friend.

[Anonymous No.12532605]

>>12532590
paul was and is a scourge upon the body of christ

[Anonymous No.12532625]

>>12532589
I made a statement, you asked borderline retarded questions as if you actually intended to contribute something or respond to what I said, and you merely insisted on the questions rather than making some sort of declarative statement. You’re being a disingenuous pussy and have contributed literally nothing to this exchange, hence why I beg with you, plead with you again: just kys faggot.

>>12532591
samefag

[Anonymous No.12532643]

>>12532625
you said:
>god imagine that pic related was mostly read by women who owned a room of their own and felt enpowered to make crappy imitations (whether ideologically or stylistically) and that’s responsible for like half of women in english academia today.
which is, grammatically, a little confusing but interpreted you as meaning you were of the belief that there must have been some trend amongst some women of taking up virginia woolf, imitating her style and maybe aping some of her political opinions, and that many of these women went on to study english.
the phrase 'women in english academia' suggests to me not students, but rather faculty
and the confidence with which you made this statement was such that i assumed you must be personally acquainted with at least a few of these female english professors and instructors so
i asked who you knew, and how, and what you found objectionable about their work
which seemed to me a natural way to respond to your statement.

[Anonymous No.12532663]

>>12532643
dude are you autistic? and to be charitable here, that’s exactely what I meant, why would I then divulge professors I personally know like some sort oc sociopath when there are a slew of prime examples throughout english academia? just google the shit. im not going to hold your hand and walk you through every cv of barnard grads. if you think im being disingnenuous then say it, make a fucking claim, and let’s duke it out. dont go about enumerating questions like i owe something to your lowly ass.

[Anonymous No.12532690]

>>12532663
i think you are lying
i know you are lying, actually
you made a claim about women in academia
my questions implicitly challenged that claim, which should have been obvious to you
maybe it was, which is why you refused to expose your own ignorance
if it, however, was not obvious, you are even denser than i already took you to be
if there are a 'slew' of 'prime examples' then:
name ONE
remember, this is YOUR opinion so, like
what would i 'google' to find the answer i'm looking for?
'hey google, give me a list of women in english academia that this dumb faggot on 4chan thinks suck'
moron

[Anonymous No.12532700]

>>12532690
confirmed autism
seething

[Anonymous No.12532708]

>>12532700
yeah man you really rustled my jim-jams ayylmao milhouse milhouse milhouse

[Anonymous No.12532723]

>>12532663
im not the anon you responded to, but i've been to more than a few colleges and with very few exceptions, college professors are basically mediocre. This is especially true of english departments, although by no means is it only the english departments.

the old saying of those who cant, teach is very, very true. I'm by no means any kind of right winger, but College professors belong to that same class that political pundits and journalists belong to. the sniveling, dishonest, mediocre, limp wristed, privelged liberal class thinking that because they put the time into being institutionalized (years at college, or working for someone prestigious), that that means that people should listen to them, despite never having accomplished anything of note outside of these institutions themselves.

[Anonymous No.12532726]

>>12532025
What's a trans woman? I get confused by the ever changing terminology and I don't want to keep up with it.
As for lesbians, they're suffering from a mental illness so their's is a separate case.

[Anonymous No.12532733]

>>12532726
it's a good thing i don't have the means because if i did, you would be gulaged, friend. and im not a larping soviet, you're just twat no offense

[Anonymous No.12532736]

>>12532690
Let me piece it together a bit. Rich women own a room of their own. Rich women get to go to college and study the humanities. Rich women get to study other rich women who also owned a room of their own, and they feel empowered by a some common struggle bullshit when in reality theyre already empowered by their privilege and in a position of power far surpassing any concern enumerated in A Room of One’s Own. They then proceed through academia. They then get phds. They then disseminate their pseud ideology throughout academia all the while patting themselves on the back for preaching the gospel of Mama Woolf. Look at the people associated with the Woolf Society. Look at the people associated with the MLA. Look at the people who teach Woolf at major universities. Look at Toni fucking Morrison. You see why this would be tedious to type out?

[Anonymous No.12532745]

>>12532733
Good lord man you’re fucking insufferable.

[Anonymous No.12532752]

>>12532726
Pretty sure a trans woman is a man pretending to be a woman.

[Anonymous No.12532763]

>>12532745
No, man. What's insufferable is what you're asshole would be if i ever got a hold of it. No homo i'm not gay not that there's anything wrong with that but i personally don't partake but I would absolutely torture your brown starfish with all kinds of rods and utensils right before i set your shitty sorry pathetic ass on fire like a late 17th century purtian female for being such a weak pathetic fuckface

[Anonymous No.12532765]

>>12532763
i think you might be a bit gay

[Anonymous No.12532767]

>>12532690
I also think he is lying and that he isn't at home here, and that he cannot or will not argue his points properly and that he again cannot or will not understand any counter-point or argument which is not his own. I think he might bully his mother and I am sorry for her but she should've kicked his arse sooner.

[Anonymous No.12532768]

>>12532763
>brown starfish
k

[Anonymous No.12532783]

Has a woman ever written anything that’s not completely centered around men? I’m legitimately interested.

[Anonymous No.12532787]

>>12532765
in that case then i'll fuck you in the ass, THEN set you on fire. happy?

[Anonymous No.12532788]

>>12532767
samefag cringe 2.0

[Anonymous No.12532798]

>>12532787
why does there have to be any assfucking at all

[Anonymous No.12532805]

>>12532783
interestingly enough, even the stuff that isn't written around men still in a way is centered on men because it's written in direct conscious opposition to oppression by men

[Anonymous No.12532806]

>>12530052
based and samepilled

[Anonymous No.12532808]

>>12532752
Thanks. So, back to >>12532025
Trans women are not women so they're irrelevant to this also.

>>12532733
Why are you so mad? It is well known that homosexuality is a mental illness. It's also off-topic itt.

[Anonymous No.12532813]

>>12532798
there has to be assfucking.

[Anonymous No.12532840]

>>12532805
This is the stuff I think about when fat barren whores suck my dick from bumble and then I don’t call back. It’s your world ladies, I’m just livin in it.

[Anonymous No.12532847]

>>12532736
why didn't you just jump to the class resentment from the get-go, man?
the best english professor i ever had was english
she was a specialist in the british romantics
i don't think she was ever wealthy--she was an adjunct at a community college at 63
she just loved wordsworth
we never covered woolf in the class i took with her, despite it being a survey course that went through to the end of wwi
but the only actual person you've named here is toni morrison
so, she's emeritus at princeton
okay
what don't you like about her work?
and no, it's not self-evident

[Anonymous No.12532852]

>>12532847
>the best english professor i ever had was english
???
i think i meant 'a woman'

[Anonymous No.12532853]

>>12529712
I am a woman, and you cracked me up. Lol.

[Anonymous No.12532860]

>>12532788
You're being paranoid

[« Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ » !mxvabIoSIE No.12532865]

>>12532813
>Anal phase

So uncouth, yet drab.

[Anonymous No.12532867]

>>12532853
oh god. tits or gtfo.

[Anonymous No.12532875]

>>12532853
Can you tell us anything about the types of men you like? Also which male author wrote women the best, in your view?

[Anonymous No.12532884]

>>12532847
I did. You’re too autistic and earnest to realize it. I’ve also referenced Barnard, Woolf Society, and the MLA but I guess you need to be pacified the whole way. She’s a woman and a nigger. I’d say it’s pretty self-evident.

[Anonymous No.12532888]

>>12532736
I would point out that you've made a couple of assumptions here but you probably will not respond well to it so I won't bother.

[Anonymous No.12532892]

>>12532865
No, man. What's uncouth is what you're asshole would be if i ever got a hold of it. No homo i'm not gay not that there's anything wrong with that but i personally don't partake but I would absolutely torture your brown starfish with all kinds of rods and utensils right before i set your shitty sorry pathetic ass on fire like a late 17th century purtian female for being such a weak pathetic fuckface

[Anonymous No.12532895]

>>12532888
Oh no please do faggot. And yeah I’ve made a couple of assumptions, it’s mainly because I have a point and I’m articulating it. Not writing a goddamn thesis about a fairly uncontroversial classist statement on fucking 4channel. Who knew Woolf fags were so touchy.

[Anonymous No.12532899]

>>12532892
Butters is not a dude, man

[Anonymous No.12532909]

>>12532875
Quirky, absent-minded men mostly, the types that are logical, not necessarily knowledgeable, and quick to call out inconsistencies. And funny, too, and fussy. I would say someone like Rashkilnov in C&P, who has a balance in heart and mind.

And yes, Dostovesky's females are top-notch in my opinion. They have strength of character while still displaying feminine traits. I hate the "muh girl power" cliche. I don't care if you're tough or intelligent if you're insufferable.

[Anonymous No.12532916]

>>12532909
daily reminder that women don't know what they want

[Anonymous No.12532924]

>>12532884
so, hey
'Barnard' and 'The Woolf Society' and 'the MLA'
those are just tokens of 'academia'
what i have been asking from you are
well
specific people from 'academia' that you take issue with, and what it is you take issue with in their work.
you've named toni morrison
that's one
that's real good, man
but 'being a woman and a nigger'
well
that's just not convincing me that you actually have anything of interest to say on this subject
you know
it's just not convincing me
i don't think the barrier here is any earnestness on my part
i think you're a 'cucked faggot cunt' to be perfectly frank and honest with you my dear good sir but
like
you keep telling yourself whatever you need to

[Anonymous No.12532927]

>>12532909
>Quirky, absent-minded men mostly, the types that are logical, not necessarily knowledgeable, and quick to call out inconsistencies. And funny, too, and fussy.
what

[Anonymous No.12532932]

>>12532924
im proud of you anon. you’ve finally learned. now, really take my advice this time and go kys you eternally insistent retarded faggot.

[Anonymous No.12532934]

>>12532924
the point is they're all the same

[Anonymous No.12532951]

>>12531546
As opposed to emotionally stunted men who can't fix the sink, can't make ends meet, can't stop playing video games or smoking weed, hate responsibility, and have no more ambition than to work part-time at a coffee shop? Only focusing on women belies the over-arching problem that society itself, as well as traditional values, are in decay

[Anonymous No.12532964]

>>12532895
Well, to be fair your assumptions are accurate in describing the type of woman that you allude to. Can we agree, I think we can, that the kind of feminism found in Woolf is not the same kind as the stereotypical - some say programmed - kind of feminism. I admit it, I am a fan of Woolf, regardless of her personal mental illness and I agree with her that women are more interesting to men than the other way around. I think it's something to do with Adam's rib if you think about it from the perspective of the body missing the rib versus the rib being detached and independent of the body, if my finger was detached my body would know it more than my finger, maybe. Anyway, not looking for fights, we should conserve our energy.

[Anonymous No.12532973]

>>12532964
>that the kind of feminism found in Woolf is not the same kind as the stereotypical - some say programmed - kind of feminism
No it's all the same shit.

[Anonymous No.12532975]

>>12532951
You know no matter how weak men get in terms of social value or ability we will always be able to kill and beat the living fuck out of any woman. Even the smaller men usually have more muscle mass. It must drive women so crazy.

[Anonymous No.12532978]

>>12532909
I haven't read Dosto yet so I sadly have no background for these remarks of yours. But could you elaborate a bit more on "absent-minded"? I ask because I have literal ADHD and I am wondering if that would fall under such a trait, or if that would be too extreme for what you meant? I am absent-minded by nature. This might sound stupid but do you and girls you know like men who treat you with compassion and really love and care for you? Are the stories about women liking men who are mean to them, simply memes? With many women earning income today, is a man's finances still something you place importance on? If I'm poor in pocket but rich in love, does that mean anything to a modern woman or is that seen as pathetic? Is it gay if I would like to help my fantasy girlfriend in applying her makeup, because I feel it'd be fun and a bonding experience, and also a form of artistic expression? I don't know the names but I'd like to use those brushes and put the various substances onto her while she calmly sits in front of me. Also do girls enjoy cuddling? Is being the big spoon something they ever like? Do most of you seek men that are 6ft+ in height? Is it okay for a man to be a bit submissive to his woman, and to give her more of the power in the relationship? Sorry if these questions were dumb, which they probably are...

[Anonymous No.12532981]

>>12532973
Lol the first feminists were responsible for prohibition never forget my nigga

[Anonymous No.12532992]

>>12532934
the point is fucking prove it faggot
with like
i dunno
fucking examples or some shit
weird right

[Anonymous No.12533003]

>>12532978
lmao i cant even tell if this is serious or not anymore because these people actually exist

[Anonymous No.12533015]

>>12532951
its not traditional values. its comfort and passivity. things are too easy. it is too easy to be weak and mediocre in todays world. you even get rewarded for it. in the western world even a literal homeless drug addict can have access to enough food to be overweight.

[Anonymous No.12533024]

>>12532973
No anon, not all feminism is the same. Men and women are equal but different is not the same as men and women are identical. A man's wife is not the same as his mother or his slave. A woman doesn't have to go out to work is not the same as only a man may work or men and women must both work. A woman's job is to stay at home is not the same as her making up her own mind as to her use of her own time, she can stay at home or work for her own money is not the same as she pays 50% of the cost of living.

[Anonymous No.12533026]

>>12532992
well im not the anon you responded to. i was just making an observation
second of all i dont have to prove shit. idc about you
third of all, im not wrong though and i think u know that but are just bein rly defensive cus deep down u know im right.
fourthly suck my dick pls

[Anonymous No.12533029]

>>12532951
>only focusing on women
The OP is about women, you braindead fucking monkey.

[Anonymous No.12533036]

>>12532978
Mommyposter, is that you?

[Anonymous No.12533045]

>>12533026
show dicc and i will succ ok

[Anonymous No.12533050]

>>12533003
y-yeah haha, just j-joking looool

(it's serious, and even if cringey what do i lose by asking a real grill on an anonymous corngrowing forum? i cant ask this stuff to real grills in real life)

[Anonymous No.12533063]

>>12533050
Not her but you should find you a nice young wife and talk to her about all this stuff. There's no harm in any of what you've said, just don't go getting yourself pegged or any of that other kind of degeneracy.

[Anonymous No.12533073]

>>12532242
Fraid not.

[Anonymous No.12533081]

>>12529701
i think women shouldn't have rights and should be treated like commodities or livestock
they should dress modestly and behave modestly and should obey their husbands and fathers
they shouldn't talk out of line and they shouldn't write
women are animals and should be treated as such

[Anonymous No.12533089]

>>12533029
Are you autistic?

[Anonymous No.12533092]

>>12533081
blessed and truthpilled

[Anonymous No.12533104]

>>12532951
Based. Modern women are gross, but only because modern men are pathetic

[Anonymous No.12533828]

Sexual liberation propaganda made me realize why women were 'oppressed' for so long. It's a necessary means to reign in their destructive tendencies that pose an inherent threat to patriarchal society.
Egalitarianism is a dead end. Worse, it's a bad joke. There's a difference between treating people as equals and people actually being equal. Men and women will never *never* be equal. Only one can rule.

[Anonymous No.12533850]

>permit the essence of feminity to be cheapened into a pornographic Halloween costume for perverted unstable men
>desire the cubicles and fluorescent tubes and late nights and early mornings and soul destroying loneliness of male life because your read Girlboss and thought it was sooo badass
>can't cook
>can't clean
>hate kids
>seriously, unironically believe it's a privilege to be with them
>get treated like whores
>what the fuck! why are men such assholes!
>where did al the good men go?
Interesting. Yes.

[Anonymous No.12533968]

>>12533073
What about pp

[Anonymous No.12533977]

>>12532538
Men draws nearly the same qualities unless you're an artist actively looking for other qualities to experience for your art's sake.

[Anonymous No.12533984]

>>12532783
Bell Jar

[Anonymous No.12533999]

Well I don't think she actually believe those words, because I think Woolf knew that it's actually the other way around.

Women are actually more fascinated by men than men are women, which is why women always want to breed with the hero, because he's the one that builds skyscrapers and creates the most beautiful art, because unlike women, men have to suffer to produce something of value apart from themselves; women just really need to have sex to do the same.

[Anonymous No.12534024]

>>12532853
lies, show boipucci

[Anonymous No.12534031]

>>12532909
>Quirky, absent-minded men mostly, the types that are logical, not necessarily knowledgeable, and quick to call out inconsistencies. And funny, too
that's literally me and still tfw no gf
probably just need to broaden my social circle but man am I incompatible with most people

[Anonymous No.12534085]

>>12532978
>fantasy girlfriend

I also would have liked to paint my girlfriends face, but she didn't wear makeup. She used to call me chooky, because I had a thick upper body, and skinny legs. She said she liked getting home to find me naked in the bedroom, so I started taking days off work to suit her needs. We lived like that for a while, with less food, no new clothes, no alcohol, cigarettes, I even stopped washing most of my clothes and became a nudist in the house.

Then she got hired in an office as, almost simultaneously, I got removed from the roster. But her better income coincided, and things worked out to virtually give me unlimited time to write (after, cleaning, cooking, shopping, bill paying and other organizational tasks).

Nothing much actually changed in the first few months after adapting to my new life, except for Fridays, when she'd come home not long after 9. Those were her nights at the tavern. I'd especially love it when she came home from "first Friday Frink ups" (which is what her colleague, Jason called them, "so that he could get the assonance," I never told her it was alliteration, and I think she might have been doing it on purpose, just to mock me). Frink ups made her so horny. She would come home expecting me ready, and she'd go down on me sometimes with a little slap on my face. She would actually suck my cock until I begged, I begged to go down.

She got promoted really quickly and I was surprised because all she really ever did was talk and listen, talk and listen, to everyone.

Anyway, with the promotion things got even better. She started walking out with trousers. And believe me when I say they were the furthest thing from butch. The way they accentuated her arse on the top and fell just above her ankles made them a mixture of sex and mystery. She started wearing makeup around her eyes too, and Fridays, she would use a slight shade on her upper lip. I never asked if I could apply it though because she wouldn't even let me see her do it. Make up in the bathroom, with the door locked. It became a ritual from one day to the next. Now that I think about it, she adapted to the outside world so quickly. So voraciously, she became a real person of stature.

And I sit here, alone, trying to masturbate to a memory. No, a fantasy.

[Anonymous No.12534224]

>women are interesting

[Anonymous No.12534701]

most women are the same thing, literally, i mean whenever i go to clases, they talk about the same shit, dress the same, have the same opinions, the only thing "different" between them is that some are more extroverts than others, that´s it, how embarrassing!

[Anonymous No.12534729]

>>12529701
This is less objectively true than it is a reflection of how women pride themselves on their ability to deconstruct and belittle men, in order to balance out their physical inferiority

[Anonymous No.12534737]

>>12529712
T.virgino

[Anonymous No.12534740]

>>12529701
Because men are selfless and women are selfish.

[Anonymous No.12534744]

>>12529980
Women work hard to give this impression their reproductive strategy is dependent on being constantly vague and evasive, in order to discourage betas and identify the Chads who can push through it (shit test). Women are in reality very simple: they all want to get fucked by Chad

[Anonymous No.12534775]

>>12532538
Underrated

[Anonymous No.12534822]

Its true until you consistently start getting womens attention and the reverse starts happening, than you learn how much of a fucking meme they are and how similar they are too.

[Anonymous No.12534983]

>>12532951
>who can't fix the sink
Show me a man or woman out of many who can fix a modern sink and I'll show you a plumber
>can't make ends meet
To what end? Surely a stoner is making ends meet by having money to pay for what he desires?
>Can't stop playing video games
Agreed
>smoking weed is not innately good
Agreed
>Have no ambition
Agreed, but be realistic, many people who work at coffee shops aren't there because they want to be
>Only focusing on women as a problem
Agreed
>Traditional values in decay
Traditional values were in decay as soon as people started communicating over pseudo-reality (internet) than real life.

[Anonymous No.12535013]

When do you think unironic chad harems will be the absolute social norm?

[Anonymous No.12535015]

>>12535013
Right now.

[Anonymous No.12535039]

>>12532260
Those women usually like the softer males

[Anonymous No.12535092]

>>12535039
From personal experience. I'm quite a soft character, I'm sure most people posting on here fit the bill of stubborn but agreeable.
At school I had one girl who was immeasurably desirable ask me for a walk outside, which I did and was so bewildered that I was catatonic.

Later at university I had a girl yell my name once she saw me in a house party and urged me to play some game I can't remember, again, startled. I had no idea what was going on.

Once whilst I was walking to the supermarket through my hometown, two almost-drunk middle aged cougars on a weekday (one attractive, one humbly not so) stumbled into my path and complimented my jacket, openly complimented me soon after on my physical qualities and then after asking for my name, repeated it back to me (both in unison) in a theatrically schoolgirl fawning-way. It paralysed me completely, as I diverged to the supermarket I heard them saying how they liked me.

These 3 occasions have been so rare, so sweet that amongst the infrequent joy of the world, I have been reborn by them in succession. Kind, honest, cheerful women are like heroin. I look like an average guy I suppose. Most women nowadays are exhaustively half-baked in tricks, cynicism and bathed in technological impurities, if only women knew that their smiles light up the world. Use Monsters Inc. as an analogy where boys have been screamed at their whole lives and no one ever thinks to make them laugh it off. I have become bitter enough that women cognisant withhold their joy fountain smiles to spite men.

[Anonymous No.12535104]

>>12535092
Women are mostly oblivious to this which is their true quality. A lot of them think it is only their vagina which gives value so they can be sarcastic belligerent drunks with nothing lost. Shame

[Anonymous No.12535183]

>>12535013
One of my relatives the other day was talking about how this chav impregnated 50 women who went to go on welfare without making a problem for him.
The state already funds it.

[Anonymous No.12535319]

>>12529701
The men who found women really interesting were probably way more likely to reproduce so the behaviour has been bred into men. The women who found men really interesting probably ended up as single mothers so the behaviour has been discouraged over generations.

t. evolution is always right

[Anonymous No.12535323]

>>12529712

Unironically true.

[Anonymous No.12535328]

>>12529701
I disagree with the premise of the question.

[Anonymous No.12535349]

>>12529712
>implying men can survive without the feminine

[Anonymous No.12535350]

Nothing besides my Self is of interest

[Anonymous No.12535416]

>>12535349
modern men have proved this for the past 150 years by living in lawful castration, I'm not sure what your point is.

[Anonymous No.12535426]

>>12535416
>modern men have proved this for the past 150 years by living in lawful castration
Can we really call this living, though?

[Anonymous No.12535431]

Paragraphs in, and already she's being manipulative and sneaky

[Anonymous No.12535451]

>>12535350

[Anonymous No.12535751]

>>12529701
If men were actually interested in women they would ask questions and listen to the response. Men are interested in themselves, they project their insecurities onto women.

[Anonymous No.12535760]

>>12535319
t. does not understand genetics