[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 74 KB, 680x788, 1524808055083.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12512659 No.12512659 [Reply] [Original]

>tfw 133 IQ but still don't enjoy reading books
are books for dumb people?

>> No.12512676

Have you ever stopped to consider that you're the dumb one?

>> No.12512696

Books are for everyone, that being said while I do enjoy reading them, I at times don't think I appreciate them enough
>t. low iq anon who likes books

>> No.12512703

>>12512676
Not possible, 133 IQ is in the fourth standard deviation. In fact, I saw this comment coming before you even posting it

>> No.12512705

>>12512676
yes

>> No.12512709

>>12512659
Do your read technical books?

>> No.12512733

The issue I find with many of my STEM career friends is that they treat books like a word problem in math. The focus on the bare essentials, reading for plot and characters, then get bored because there are only so many archetypes out there

>> No.12512761

>>12512696
I agree with this.
>t. a genius
Don't doubt you appreciate them sufficiently either.

>> No.12512766

>>12512659
Childrens books dont count anon

>> No.12512801

>>12512659
>tfw higher than 133 IQ and enjoy reading books

>> No.12513067

>>12512703
the standard deviation for iq is 15 not 10

>> No.12513391

>>12512659
The pleasure you get from reading may have more to do with personality traits than intelligence. Hard to see the value in literature if you’re not particularly observant or used to analyzing everything in strictly logical terms

>> No.12514114

Dumb people read hard books thinking it will raise their intelligence. Very high IQ people either don't read or read strictly for pleasure.

>> No.12514119

>>12512659
If you're so intelligent, what the fuck do you have to show for it? Bloody cunt.

>> No.12514122

>>12512703
>133 IQ is in the fourth standard deviation
...

>> No.12514139

>>12514119
nothing

>> No.12514288

>>12512659
>133 IQ

you are the cognitive equivalent of a 5'11.5" man

close but no cigar

>> No.12514299

>>12514288
Many doctors, lawyers, engineers, writers, and politicians have lower iqs. 133 a perfectly respectable IQ.

>> No.12514349

>>12512703
you saw vitriol coming your way? ON 4CHAN? holy shit you're a big brain alright.

>> No.12514357

>>12514299
>Many doctors, lawyers, engineers, writers, and politicians have dicks smaller than 3 inches. 4 inches is a perfectly respectable dick size.

>> No.12516400
File: 145 KB, 680x788, 1525010119691.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12516400

>>12512659
I have 135 iq i'm still a total brainlet but atleast I realise having a high IQ just means you're good at IQ tests
IQ is the biggest meme of the century

>> No.12516496

>>12512659
>I'm good at finding patterns but I don't bother discovering any patterns

>> No.12516513

>>12512659
>>12516400
>someone on 4chan having an iq higher than 90.
doubt

>> No.12517190

>>12514288
>you are the cognitive equivalent of a 5'11.5" man

If going by the percentages only ~1.7% of people have an IQ of 132 or above (Mensa eligible), the equivalent height of someone between 6'3 and 6'4 in the United States (the upper 2%), so he's the cognitive equivalent of a 6'3 man. Imagine Mensa being a "tall people club" and 6'2 being the cut off. However, just because you have a big dick doesn't mean you're gonna use it.

>> No.12517254

>>12517190
Nice math anon. Are you a mensa member?

>> No.12517255

>>12516400
>>12512659
haha, that's crazy, I have an IQ in the 130s as well! what a coincidence, that all us intelligent folk just happen to be gathered in this one thread. it's a small world, eh?

>> No.12517320
File: 316 KB, 754x800, 1441776338146.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12517320

>>12512659
>tfw 162 IQ and a 8x6 inch cock
Good luck trying to enjoy life

>> No.12517331

>>12512659
>133 IQ
lol barely functional

>> No.12517364

>>12517320
Why does it look like some anon just made some bullshit labels and stuck some health stickers on it?

>> No.12517385

>>12517364
Because it is

>> No.12517435

>>12517254
>Nice math anon.
thanks, I knew it checks out

>> No.12517473

>>12512709
technically speaking? or technique, manmachine and grouparchitecture? Not relavant to use. Use, need raltionalization. Speak, give need make surplus angsty steampunk wasgonna but got finished figuring what I needed without the manuel to achieve my aethetic totality.

>> No.12517572
File: 64 KB, 285x475, Sam.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12517572

>>12512733
STEMs just need themes and to be distracted from philosophy and law long enough to keep selling them some middling ethical inturpretations of antagonism and social customs and rituals. Mystery is a strip show now. Themes are Chad tier /lit/ discussion because these can address being an egotistical strategist in a Real Time society with Real World consequences. Themes are a language for judges and convicts to mingle with, a custom to study to win atvantage and to be vigilant of in others who would do you wrong; knowledge and consciousness, love constructed and justice a truth of the world, fortune in history and fate in justification. Themes are what give us distinction and eloquence before we can be distinct or plainspoken. What measure of a man is he that stands before a reason and not the reasoner? What say he?