/lit/ - Literature

[Anonymous No.12483769]

What are some /lit/ approved movies and/or shows?

[Anonymous No.12483774]

Reading Rainbow

[Anonymous No.12483796]

>>12483774
/thread

[Anonymous No.12483799]

>>12483769
Home Alone 2

[Anonymous No.12483804]

>>12483769
Boss Nigger

[Anonymous No.12483805]

>>12483804
It's just released as Boss now.

[Anonymous No.12483813]

I'm saying picrel but really it's Monkey Dust

[Anti-/lit/ !N4bnZoKwfU No.12483816]

TV is literally for retards fuck off

[Anonymous No.12483821]

>>12483799
Yes, and Mouse Trap is /our/ board game

[Anonymous No.12483829]

>>12483816
Any /lit/ approved breakfast cereal?

[Anonymous No.12483833]

>>12483829
lucky charms

[« Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ » !mxvabIoSIE No.12483840]

[Anonymous No.12483841]

>>12483805
What about the theme?

[Anonymous No.12483907]

>>12483816
I can't not be retarded all the time

[Anonymous No.12483937]

>>12483769
Neon genesis evangelion

[Anonymous No.12484017]

>>12483937

[Anonymous No.12484024]

i wont admit publicly but i wanna see that new picard star trek series if its good

[Anonymous No.12484098]

>>12483816
Movies are not TV, retard

[Anonymous No.12484190]

>>12484098
He didn't say they were. You can look up strawmanning yourself.

[Anonymous No.12484309]

Name a better kino than Barry Lyndon.

Pro tip: literally impossible.

[Anonymous No.12484328]

>>12484309
Badlands or Days of Heaven

[Anonymous No.12484348]

good lit movie here
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9qI41zVCB7E

[Anonymous No.12484354]

>>12483769

Better Call Saul is kino. Also The Lives of Others.

[Anonymous No.12484370]

anything in the criterion collection

[Anonymous No.12484371]

>>12484309
movie in op is better than Barry Lyndon

[Anonymous No.12484393]

Pokémon and Naruto

[Anonymous No.12484398]

You don’t need our approval to watch tv idiot, we’re not your dad.

[Anonymous No.12484402]

>>12483769
you can tell any movie pre 2000 had snippets of the writers philosophy and had longer scenes and dialogue to show this, now i don't know what the fuck has happened.

[Anti-/lit/ !N4bnZoKwfU No.12484404]

>>12484098
Movies are long TV shows with more pretension. TV and cinema are for passive, retarded people.

They are literally the opposite of literature, which usurps the internal voice and creates an antagonistic and dynamic dialogue between the self and other selves.

Film is a great stream of soft serve ice cream and candy pieces squirted into the ears of the unthinking and the retarded.

I think it is less embarassing to shit oneself out of laziness than it is to willingly allow some completely inane assemblage of images and audio to penetrate you senses as if you were a cheap whore without any sense of self direction, as if prone to bending over before the stinking phallic propositions of whomever Hollywood or NBC or Netflix has lately chartered to beguile you.

Film is for retards. TV is for retards.

I cannot think of anything more stupid than watching images and audio unfold on a screen.

I think it is far more intelligent to stick your finger in your nose and look out the window, or even at a wall, than to allow your mind to be consumed and violated by a show or a movie.

I have more respect for thumb twiddling than I have for people who watch shows or movies.

Please go away.

[Anonymous No.12484405]

12 angry men
7 Samurai
Usual suspects
The Wire
Mr. Robot

[Anonymous No.12484409]

>>12484405
>Mr. Robot
ugh... uhhh....... grrhrh? blleeh?

[Anonymous No.12484411]

>>12484404
Very good post

[Anonymous No.12484426]

Anything made by this man

[Anonymous No.12484446]

>>12484409
By far the weakest on my list. I just wanted something to round off the list. It’s /lit/ in that you think there’s a plot but there isn’t and it wastes all its time describing things, developing characters for no reason.

[Anonymous No.12484462]

>>12483841
Its still as beautiful as ever

[Anonymous No.12484464]

>>12484404
So you've never actively watched a movie? Its not our fault you only passively enjoy things outside of literature.

[Anonymous No.12484477]

>>12483769
Batman v. Superman: Dawn of Justice

[Anonymous No.12484494]

>>12483769
Ma Nuit chez Maud

[Anonymous No.12484500]

>>12484404
imagine being so thoroughly convinced by your own philosophical shortcomings that you spend this much time writing it up for an off-topic thread only to look like a hypocrite for not being well-read

[Anonymous No.12484501]

Hannibal and Dark are two shows that stuck with me.

[Anonymous No.12484503]

>>12484500
well its usually young ones who are passionate have we not forgotten?

[Anonymous No.12484514]

>>12484405
12 Angry Humans has a special place in my head, personally for me. It turned me on to black and also white filmography, like mister Charlie Chaplin's and mister Buster Keaton's, as so The Great Dictator is as well on my special list of flicks. I dare say, it's worth watching 12 Angry Men.

[Anonymous No.12484521]

>>12484426
DO NOT summon Griffithposter

[Anonymous No.12484523]

>>12484494
Eric Rohmer is based. This movie captures so many topics that are frequently discussed on this board.

[Anonymous No.12484552]

>>12484404
Oof. There are some incredible plays and films. The idea you are expressing is utterly retarded. It's a different medium, even though both share that they are usually being 'written' at some point.
I don't know about /lit/ films, but here are some works that will inspire:
>anything french new wave cinema
>any fassbinder film (black and white works are my favs)
>early Ingmar Bergman
>any Michael Haneke
>lars von trier. His last film somewhat suggests that concentration camps were the highest work of art, pretty much something straight out of a 4chan post.
>Werner Herzog for documentaries
>orson wells did a fun version of the trial
>Robert Bresson 'journal d'un cure de champagne' - /lit/ knows
>jean luc godar
>Wong Kar-Wai if you like neon Hong Kong
>Satoshi Kon if you a weeb

There is so much more. Just watch this if you are bored right now:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IOeXcXUzyPU

and check out
http://www.ubu.com/film/

>pic unrelated

[Anonymous No.12484560]

Dekalog
Andrei Rublev
The Passion of Joan of Arc
Bicycle Thieves
Citizen Kane
Il Gattopardo
Napoleon
Metropolis
La Dolce Vita
La Notte
The Searchers
A Man Escaped
Naked Childhood
The Conformist
McCabe & Mrs. Miller
Apocalypse Now
The Duellists
Das Boot
Merry Christmas Mr. Lawrence
Black Narcissus
Raging Bull

[Anti-/lit/ !N4bnZoKwfU No.12484568]

>>12484500
I just hate movies and shows. I hate them. I can't stand having to watch them and I get irritated when people I know talk about them.

I think, to be honest, that I'm rather ADD and can't have my attention held by something so passive. So movies and shows have always annoyed the hell out of me, and it's a great pleasure to try and express with a drop of venom how much I hate them.

I went to watch a sci fi movie starring Tom Cruise with friends a few years ago and it was absolutely painful. It seemed like it went for for 7 hours.

I tried Kubrick, David Lynch and Gaspar Noe, and those are much better than more mainstream movies, but I couldnt watch any of them in one sitting.

Watching anything on TV for more than 20 minutes is really uncomfortable and irritating to me, and the post youre replying to contains some of the thoughts I have when I end up doing so.

[Anonymous No.12484570]

>>12484560
Mfw i've already seen all these

[Anonymous No.12484578]

>>12484568
so you are literally retarded and shit posting in thread thats not for you? tripfags i swear

[Anonymous No.12484582]

>>12484570
I mean, all of them are pretty mainstream, but they're a good introduction point for those who want to dig deeper.

[Anti-/lit/ !N4bnZoKwfU No.12484587]

>>12484578
Yes I am retarded

[Anonymous No.12484593]

>>12484587
theres the door

[Anonymous No.12484606]

>>12484370
based pseud

[Anti-/lit/ !N4bnZoKwfU No.12484614]

>>12484593
I am too retarded to use a door. You are stuck with me, and I with you.

[Anonymous No.12484683]

>>12483840
Based

[Anonymous No.12484684]

>>12484405
One of these is not like the others

[Anonymous No.12484844]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1-v7MULx9G8

[Anonymous No.12484886]

>>12484494
One of my favorites as well. Hiroshima mon amour is good too, written by Duras. And Jonas qui aura 25 ans en l'an 2000 as well by Alain Tanner, written by none other than John Berger, who did the Ways of Seeing program.

[Anonymous No.12484915]

>>12484426
Oh no

Ozu and Bresson are better then Griffith

[Anonymous No.12484973]

>>12484915
thanks for the laugh anon

[Anonymous No.12485049]

>>12484521
Pretty sure he's dead, thank god.

[Anonymous No.12485057]

>>12483769
The films of John Ford

[Anonymous No.12485067]

>>12484552
>early Ingmar Bergman
Implying Bergman's final proper film wasn't one of his absolute best.

[Anonymous No.12485139]

arthouse/foreign films, american films from the 1970s, classic hollywood films, films from the silent era. try tspdt's top 1000 list or jonathan rosenbaum's top 100. sample the filmographies of all the great directors (kurosawa, ozu, bergman, bunuel, tarkovsky, hitchcock, welles, murnau, chaplin, etc., etc., etc.).

for tv series, there are a number of miniseries of high artistic merit. the decalogue, heimat, fanny and alexander, scenes from a marriage, lonesome dove.

a lot of classic anthologies (the twilight zone, the outer lights, alfred hitchcock presents) could be considered /lit/ in a literal sense in that they're sometimes based on the short stories of famous sci-fi/horror/mystery writers. ray bradburry and richard matteson both wrote episodes for the twilight zone. the producers of the twilight zone even acquired the rights to the french adaptation of ambrose bierce's an occurrence at owl creek bridge and aired it as part of the series with serling's narration.

the sopranos is still the greatest american tv series of all-time. don't believe people who say that the wire or breaking bad are better. there are actually a lot of literary references in the sopranos. dostoevsky even gets a shootout:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bzVeLjj6Ao8

[Anonymous No.12485147]

>>12484568
it's hilarious that you're acting this snooty when you don't even have the patience to sit through kubrick or lynch. movies even capeshit watching redditors are capable of enjoying. lmao

[Anonymous No.12485153]

>>12485057
In answering a fawining, slobbering reporter on exactly * how * he filmed a famous, epic scene in one of his westerns Ford responded, with characteristic terseness: "With a camera."

[Anonymous No.12485156]

Most of these

http://www.theyshootpictures.com/gf1000_100-1.htm

[Anonymous No.12485160]

>>12485153
Reddit tier humor

[Anonymous No.12485165]

>>12485139
there's only 3 or 4 good directors nowadays. Imagine the 60s where you could go watch the latest Fellini or Satyajit Ray or Bergman. Amazing.

[Anonymous No.12485166]

>>12484501
Hannibal was enjoying until you realized they needed to come up with a new serial killer making macrame out of their victims every week and it started feeling forced.
Dark was one of the most beautifully shot series I've ever seen but I gave up halfway through because the very talented director also wrote it, and he is not a very talented writer. It was one of the most boringly written series I've ever watched. The director needs to hire a writer, and then we might have something worth talking about.

[Anonymous No.12485168]

>>12485160
Seething 4Ch*Nner

[Anonymous No.12485247]

>>12484552

great recs anon

[Anonymous No.12485280]

>>12484404
>All films have something to do with either Hollywood, NBC, or Netflix

[Anonymous No.12485414]

>>12484501
hannibal is one of the stupidest fucking shows i've ever seen. it took me two attempts just to get through the first episode, and i couldn't any further, it was so dumb. the psychology is laughable. will graham literally has autism superpowers. they claim that because he has aspergers, he's an "empath" who can identify with anyone, including serial killers. isn't the whole thing with aspergers that they don't have a theory of mind? lmao. later, when he's checking out the crime scene where a girl was murdered, he's trying to explain to the lead investigator why the killer doesn't rape his victims, and he goes into the whole thing about how "he could think that is vulgar" and he's a "sensitive serial killer". in reality, basically all serial killers' motives are psychosexual. they have fucked up brains that associated sex with death. this is literally just how they cum.

[Anonymous No.12485464]

>>12485414
>claims Hannibal is pseudo-psychology.
>proceeds to spew pseudo-psychology.

It doens't redeem Hannibal, but you're no better.

[Anonymous No.12485472]

Mike Leigh's naked
Un homme qui dort

[Nora No.12485477]

One of the best tv show's, "lit-wise," is Scenes from a Marriage by Bergman

[Anonymous No.12485524]

diary of a country priest

[Anonymous No.12485535]

>>12484501
Dark is overrated garbage, the krauts can't make movies for shit, their only good works were under soviet control

[Anonymous No.12485536]

>>12483829
Cornflakes with salt
No milk

[Anonymous No.12485545]

>>12485165
there was only 3 or 4 good directors in the 60s (and bergman & ray weren't one of them)

[Anonymous No.12485550]

Kieslowski’s Three Colors trilogy, especially Blue

[Anonymous No.12485551]

>>12484404
>he is too stupid to understand pictures and kino-art.

What a shame.

[Anonymous No.12485558]

The Matrix trilogy.

[Anonymous No.12485563]

>>12484370
https://www.criterion.com/films/578-armageddon
one of the biggest meme in /tv/ and you don't know it, cringe and bluepilled

[Anonymous No.12485564]

What is the movie about David Foster Wallace called?

[Anonymous No.12485565]

>>12485558
Only 1. 2 and 3 were shit, or at least they sacrificed the philosophical message for action. I feel like they should've just ended it at 1.

[Anonymous No.12485578]

>>12485160
you know he hated the jews?

[Anonymous No.12485584]

>>12483816
Based tripfag

[Anonymous No.12485589]

welles, ford and renoir are fantastic

>>12485139
i'm deeply suspicious of the unanimity people have about this
i don’t believe that anybody can have taste so catholic that he genuinely likes welles AND tarkovsky (AND bergman, christ)

[Anonymous No.12485596]

>>12484404
Quality rant

[Anonymous No.12485598]

>>12483769
Everything by Edward Yang

[Anonymous No.12485604]

>>12484552
in case of Bresson, Mouchette is also good
girl is cutie

[Anonymous No.12485608]

>>12484405
Hi rebbit

[Anonymous No.12485618]

>>12485565
I don't know why I thought I didn't have to say this.
You will die in your sleep tonight if you say anything about the first Matrix being the best and/or the other two being unneccessary.

[Anonymous No.12485620]

>>12485477
It allegedly had a noticable effect on the divorce rates in Sweden.

Allegedly.

[Anonymous No.12485623]

>>12485536
Reminds me of this, you might like to try:
https://www.kelloggs.com.au/en_AU/recipes/nutri-grain-nuts-bolts-recipe.html

[Anonymous No.12485624]

>>12485608
7 samurai and the wire is not a reddit

[Anonymous No.12485629]

>>12485464
what part is pseudo-psychology? i'm not pretending to be an expert, but as far as i know, nothing i said is controversial.

[Anonymous No.12485650]

>>12485563
i swear to god i hate people like you. you're talking about one out of close to a thousand films, many of which are among the greatest ever made. yeah they included a blockbuster to make some money to keep their business going. who cares? name a company with a better catalog who consistently puts out quality releases at their level. you can't.

oh and i don't want to hear you bring up the rock because the rock owns.

[Anonymous No.12485655]

Why does a Japanese cop memorise jose ortega y gasset quotes

[Anonymous No.12485671]

>>12483769
This + Zazie dans le métro is basically as good as film gets

[Anonymous No.12485676]

>>12485650
https://www.criterion.com/shop/browse?director=tarkovsky-andrei
explain

[Anonymous No.12485678]

>>12484552
>fassbinder
Yikes!

[Anonymous No.12485691]

>>12485563
>Films by Bergman, Fellini, Antonioni, Bresson, Dreyer, Bunuel, Kurosawa, Ozu, Mizoguchi, Pasolini, Chaplin, Keaton, Hitchcock, Wilder, Ford, Hawks, Cronenberg, Clouzot, classics, foreign, cult films, you name it
>B-b-but they released Armageddon, so they're a maymay!!!1

you people will be contrarian about anything

[Anonymous No.12485694]

>>12485678
off thymeself

[Anonymous No.12485700]

>>12485650
>name a company with a better catalog who consistently puts out quality releases at their level. you can't.

[Anonymous No.12485703]

>>12485676
explain what? why they have four of tarkovsky's best films? he's widely considered to be one of the greatest and most influential directors of all time. why wouldn't they include him?

[Anonymous No.12485714]

>>12483769
Start with the americans and russians, omit the Germans like Gassbinder and Herzog, they are memes. The only true great asian director was Mizoguchi, Ozu or, honk kong stuff and the taiwanese like >>12485598 who is basically an Antonioni wannabe are memes. Finish with the italians.

[Anonymous No.12485720]

>>12485714
Antonioni is in itself a meme.
Also Kurosawa and Kobayashi are at least partially worth watching.

[Anonymous No.12485725]

>>12485618
You're fucking retarded m8. Explain how the second and third are good and if your argument is good I might just consider staying in this hellhole of a world with you in it.

[Anonymous No.12485733]

>>12485703
because he's bad

[Anonymous No.12485734]

>>12485714
>Yang an Antonioni wannabe
>posts pietrangeli
>literally the biggest Antonioni wannabe ever
what did you mean by this

[Anonymous No.12485741]

down by law

[Anonymous No.12485759]

>>12485700
lmao. literally one of the worst companies.

[Anonymous No.12485763]

>>12485733
lol. why is tarkovsky bad?

[Anonymous No.12485766]

>>12483769

Rashomon,

True Detective, Season 1,

Secondhand Lions

[Anonymous No.12485772]

>>12485766

oh, and Girl Interrupted

[Anonymous No.12485775]

Ahh, not so fast Morty. You heard Caitlyn Jenner, we’ve got acceptance to achieve Morty. Just you and me, and sometimes the president, and sometimes the supreme court but NEVER the legislature! You wanna know why Morty? Because they FEAR me.
>OK, take it easy, Rick! Th-that's dark.
Oh it gets darker Morty... Welcome to the darkest year of our adventures. First thing that’s different, no more representative government Morty. They threatened to vote against me in Congress, so I made your Congressman and the Senate go away...
>Ohhh fuck...
I repla-burp-ced them both with the defacto-platform of the progressives, AND the democrats.
>Oh man...
The left wouldn’t have accepted me if I wasn't an oppressed minority. So now you know the REAL reason I need everyone to know what's going on inside my bedroom!
>Ohhhh-woah...
I JUST TOOK OVER THE LEFT WING PARTY MORTY!
>Oh man.
And if you tell your Congressman or Senator I said any of this, I’ll DENY it.
>You'll deny it...
And they’ll take my side, because I’m in the hierarchy of intersectionality, Morty. And now you’re gonna have to do whatever I say, Morty, FOREVER! A-and I-I’ll go out date cis-gender people, without telling them, Morty.
>Wh-what are you talking about?
Because that’s, that's what this is all about Morty!
>Dating?
Th-that’s my one arm man. I’m not driven by equality
Morty, that was FAKE!
I-I’m driven by pronoun microagressions those, misgendering lawsuits.
>Lawsuits?
I want "Them" pronouns, Morty.
>Them?
That’s my supreme court Morty!
>What the Hell?
If it takes 9 justices, I WANT MY ACCEPTANCE,
>What're you talking about Rick?
ACCEPTANCE, TOLERANT ACCEPTANCE MORTY!
>What're you talking about?
TH-THAT’S WHAT'S GONNA TAKE US, ALL THE WAY TO THE END MORTY! JUDGE, 9 MORE JUDGES MORTY!
>Misgendering?!
9 MORE JUDGES UNTIL I GET THAT ZE/ZER PRONOUN!
>What is that?!
FOR 97 MORE YEARS MORTY!
>What are you talking about?!
I WANT THAT ACCEPTANCE!!!

[Anonymous No.12485826]

>>12483769
Deadwood

[Anonymous No.12485841]

>>12485650
the company who finally finished & released orson welles' last film

[Anonymous No.12485844]

>>12483769
Micheal Snow's Wavelength is the only true /lit/ film

[Anonymous No.12485871]

>>12485841
Damn I didn't know about this

[Anonymous No.12485887]

>>12484568
>film is bad because I'm too much of a zoomer to sit still for 90 minutes
Jesus Christ, get off this board forever

[« Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ » !!oEULhtSEDhe No.12485977]

>>12485067
It was something, wasn’t it.

>>12485714
>omit Kurosawa
Fucking ridiculous

[Anonymous No.12486027]

>>12485763
the same reasons bergman is. he has not particular talent for filmmaking, only behaving sufficiently like a great artist to gull the gullible.

[Anonymous No.12486040]

>>12485734
There is literally nothing wrong with taking inspiration from other directors

[Anonymous No.12486045]

>>12485871
it's fantastic

[Anonymous No.12486058]

>>12486027
weak bait

[Anonymous No.12486069]

>>12483840
Based daisiesposter

[Anonymous No.12486128]

>>12486058
it happens to be true

[Anonymous No.12486131]

400 blows

[Anonymous No.12486155]

>>12486027
who are your top directors anon?

[Anonymous No.12486165]

>>12486155
You wouldn't have heard of them

[Anonymous No.12486176]

>>12486165
it's okay I have google

[Anonymous No.12486203]

>>12486155
welles, renoir, ford, and cocteau. these boys won't lead you astray

[Anonymous No.12486212]

>>12486131
AKA what your mom gave last night

[Anonymous No.12486222]

Anything of Kieslowski

[Anonymous No.12486228]

>>12486203
Welles? wow so obscure anon. how did you ever hear of John Ford lmao

[Anonymous No.12486244]

>>12486222
based polish tv theology

[Anonymous No.12486245]

>>12486228
>>12486165 wasn't me, i never said they were obscure

[Anonymous No.12486249]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7UvQLo58gY4

[Anonymous No.12486263]

>>12486203
Very based

[Anonymous No.12486268]

>>12486228
>Welles? wow so obscure anon. how did you ever hear of John Ford lmao

this is what it looks like when a pleb puts on a patrician mask

[Anonymous No.12486312]

>>12486245
I should hope not
>>12486268
are you trying to say Welles and Ford aren't obscure? if anon just like Welles and Ford that's fine, they were alright. Welles was overrated but he made some good films; Ford is just classic film Americana.

[Anonymous No.12486320]

>>12486312
*are obscure

[Anonymous No.12486362]

>>12483769
anything by
>bergman
>tarkovsky
>tarr
>kurosawa
>ozu
>eisenstein
>cassavetes
>fellini
>renoir
>truffaut
>pasolini
>visconti
>antonioni
>d.w. griffith
>ford
>lopushanky
>bunuel
>bresson
>dreyer
>godard
>malick
at least as far as entry level film

[Anonymous No.12486365]

>>12486312
He's saying that people who use obscurity as a barometer for quality are plebs pretending to be patrician.

[Anonymous No.12486374]

>>12486365
I was assuming it was this anon, faggot
>>12486165

[Anonymous No.12486383]

>>12486362
take out Malick, looks good

[Anonymous No.12486389]

>>12486383
>take out Malick
Fuck you, don't ever reply to my posts again

[Anonymous No.12486411]

>>12486389
when I found out Malick had a philosophy degree I lost all creative heart, as I myself have that same degree; am I destined to produce the same pretentious dreck that he did?

[Anonymous No.12486489]

>>12486411
There's also Haneke

[Anonymous No.12486571]

>>12486312
welles isn't overrated, in this century i'd say he's received something less than his due; the truly constructive man, the crucified artist, almost alone among the sound directors as one whose style is immediately recognizable after three minutes of film. the violence and charm of orson welles makes him a poet.

ford is a poet as well. a comedian. not for women, of course, but for men, welles himself said. with ford at his best, you get a sense of what the earth is made of

[Anonymous No.12486581]

>>12486571
Even if no one watches Citizen Kane they all put it on their top 10 list because you just have to in America

[Anonymous No.12486595]

>>12483769
East of Eden

[Anonymous No.12486603]

>>12486411
Why do you find it pretentious? Which of his films do you find pretentious?

[Anonymous No.12486613]

>>12486581
if the brotherhood of critics finds it expedient to look for arguments against kane, which is a witness and a testimony to art and nothing else, we will have to watch the grotesque spectacle of the lilliputians attacking gulliver.

[Anonymous No.12486615]

make way, cinemalets

[Anonymous No.12486618]

>>12486603
I couldn't even finish Tree of Life

[Anonymous No.12486620]

>>12486411
you didn't graduate from harvard and you haven't translated any great works, so don't worry

[Anonymous No.12486626]

A Boy and His Dog

[Anonymous No.12486682]

>>12485650
You're just gonna stand there and defend tiny furniture?

[Anonymous No.12486692]

>>12486618
But that's the most intelligible ones out of the ones made in the last decade. It might just be that you're a brainlet.

[Anonymous No.12486725]

Troll 2

[Anonymous No.12486726]

>>12486692
intelligibility can easily scale with pretentiousness
fucking Eraserhead is less pretentious than Malick

[Anonymous No.12486730]

>>12484552
>Fassbinder
non-cinema, over-reliance on the theatrical instead of the cinematic
>Bergman
non-cinema, over-reliance on the theatrical instead of the cinematic
>lars von trier
of low cinematic and artistic value, over-relience on a poor spastic cinematic style which ultimately denies it any real substance. An ultimately empty flimmaker and artist.

[Anonymous No.12486736]

>>12486618
>>12486726
you failed to pass the pleb filter sorry

[Anonymous No.12486739]

>>12486730
Some Bergman was alright but Von Trier is literally garbage. I don't even think about Fassbender

[Anonymous No.12486742]

>>12486736
>Tree of Life
>pleb filter
fuckin' lmao

[Anonymous No.12486767]

>>12486726
Why did you find it pretentious then? Elaborate.

[Anonymous No.12486779]

>>12486742
>un chien andalou
just admit that you're a pretentious pseud yourself and didn't get malick

[Anonymous No.12486783]

>>12484552
>orson wells did a fun version of the trial
did you forget he also made the 3 greatest shakespeare films ever

[Anonymous No.12486787]

>>12486779
>you just don't get it
you do remember all of hollywood jerking him of right? it's like the capeshit equivalent of art house films

[Anonymous No.12486796]

What the fuck is up with all the trips on /lit/ now

[Anonymous No.12486805]

>>12486787
not an argument
shoo shoo pseud

[Anonymous No.12486807]

>>12484404
>People don't realize this is bait
fix the spacing next time, then it would've been more convincing. You almost got the perfect shot, but you slightly crossed the line and gave away your chance.

[Anonymous No.12486816]

>>12486796
Just filter them all, they never contribute anything worthwhile anyways

[Anonymous No.12486826]

>>12486805
'you didn't get it' isn't an argument if the film has all the depth of gold leaf. it's not even the deepest film starring Brad Pitt

[Anonymous No.12486872]

>>12486730
if you don't like fassbinder, you are a fucking pleb who has never read any Brecht

[Anonymous No.12486902]

>>12486872
i don't like brecht

[Anonymous No.12486966]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Q3EnDtbg8w
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tinGphhnl7o
this Movie is so good I can even express my happines that this movie exist. It matches the orginal play perfectly , they are literally quoting Shakespeare the whole time.
For the best experience try to read the book while listening to the Soundtrack.

[Anonymous No.12487002]

>>12486966
this looks horrible mate

[Anonymous No.12487020]

>>12487002
it isn't
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wLzQszNrNkM

[Anonymous No.12487062]

>>12486362
>eisenstein
>visconti
>no Kaufman
>no Linklater
eh, anon

[Anonymous No.12487074]

>>12487062
>Linklater
>Kaufman
The less american hacks you watch the better

[Anonymous No.12487081]

>>12483769
excellent movie for philosophers and masturbators

[Anonymous No.12487090]

>>12487062
oh no no no

out of all people who were omitted from the list you pick this dreck

[Anonymous No.12487104]

>>12487062
Worst taste ITT

[Anonymous No.12487125]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vXf3gVYXlHg
Mr Nobody

[Anonymous No.12487153]

>>12486767
>ooh look compassion started with Dinosaurs see it all means something we are all connected with love and dinosaurs and nature

[Anonymous No.12487167]

>>12487062
well memed

[Anonymous No.12487192]

>>12487153
>malick is pretentious because of a 20 second scene
yikes

[Anonymous No.12487204]

did anyone else think the Sacrifice was dogshit compared to earlier Tarkovsky?

[Anonymous No.12487306]

>>12487204
no

[« Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ » !!oEULhtSEDhe No.12487327]

>>12487204
What metrics do you use for this judgment?

[Anonymous No.12487328]

>>12485477
This is pretty good. Easily in top 10 Bergman.

[Anonymous No.12487338]

>>12485545
Tarkovsky pretty much only cared about Bergman's opinion and he was great. Shitting on Bergman is tryhard psued tier bullshit. Go watch your Goddard and leave film to actual humans.

[Anonymous No.12487393]

>>12487327
It felt like he wanted to make an Ingmar Bergman film and ended up making a fanfiction instead. The opening scene where they were quoting Nietzsche came off stilted (even for Tarkovsky), and the ending, while technically very impressive, resembled Benny Hill more than it did a tragedy. The best scene in the movie was when he redid the Solaris shot with the witch. Also, the mute kid quoting John at the end made me cringe; that's like something I would write.

[Anonymous No.12487415]

>>12487338
based Bergman defender
he was the real deal, even if he did tend to make the same movie over and over

[Anonymous No.12487455]

>>12485156
is that slint?

[Anonymous No.12487479]

>>12487455
lmao

[Anonymous No.12487497]

>>12487338
tarkovsky was horrible (by your leave)

[Anonymous No.12487515]

>>12483829
nope, a /lit/ breakfast is:
coffe+milk+honey, rusks+butter+jam, orange juice.
while watching the news

[Anonymous No.12487527]

American Beauty
Synecdoche, New York
The Dreamers
Kill Your Darlings
Possession
Persona
Last Tango In Paris
KIDS

[Anonymous No.12487538]

my screenplay will be

[Anonymous No.12487558]

>>12487497
wrong

[Anonymous No.12487592]

>>12485563
>doesn't know /tv/ memes
>cringe and bluepilled

[Anonymous No.12487614]

>>12487515
disgusting skinny fat carb addicted metabolic syndrome herd animal

[Anonymous No.12487617]

Kiarostami is incredible. This and Close-Up are probably top 100 movies of all time.

[Anonymous No.12487673]

>>12487617
Close-Up was pretentious clap trap. Kiraostami is terrible when he becomes self-involved (the second/third of the trilogy) or faux naif (the first of the trilogy). Taste of Cherry is the only alright thing he's made. The rest of it belongs in the trash, especially Certified Copy.

Bergman is a lesser Strindberg and Tarkovsky is trash. This board makes /tv/ look patrician.

[Anonymous No.12487866]

>>12487538
no mine

[Anonymous No.12488145]

>>12483829
short black coffee, single vodka shot, cigarette

[Anonymous No.12488261]

>>12487515
>watching the news
>watching

[Anonymous No.12488338]

>>12486222
or Zanussi

[Anonymous No.12488341]

I just rewatch Bresson and Antonioni now. I feel like there’s not much in films for me.

[Anonymous No.12488363]

SHALL I POST IT?
Yes
yes I will post the list
I WILL POST THE LIST
YES

>Griffith
>Murnau
>Eisenstein
>Pudovkin
>Flaherty
>Keaton
>Chaplin
>Bunuel
>Lang
>Hitchcock
>Ford
>Renoir
>Vigo
>Welles
>Ozu
>Mizoguchi
>Powell and Presburger
>Ophuls
>Kurosawa
>Fellini
>Godard
>Jones
>Pajeet Ray
>Bergman
>Tarkovsky
>Scorcese
>Spielberg
>70's Coppola
>Lynch
>Coens

YEEEESSE

[Anonymous No.12488391]

Not entirely sure what a /lit/ approved film would entail. If it's simply a film which has literary qualities, then there's an enormous amount to choose from. If we're talking about films that are of high quality, then you'd have to look in particular at the silent-era and early sound films to see the best that cinema has to offer. There are films and filmmakers which are worth checking out after that period, but cinema - both arthouse and commercial - has lost its way since then.

[Anonymous No.12488414]

>>12484404
Imagine reading shakespeare instead of watching it

[Anonymous No.12488415]

>>12483769
Cyrano de Bergerac (1950)

[Anonymous No.12488426]

>>12487673
>Close-Up was pretentious clap trap
Why is it that people with terrible opinions think "pretension" is any more valid of a criticism than "boring". If you really think Close-Up is a superficial film maybe you should watch it again.

[Anonymous No.12488665]

>>12485671
die pedo filth

[Anonymous No.12488931]

>>12486222
Was going to post this. Best TV show ever. Also Bresson and Dreyer

[Anonymous No.12488945]

[Anonymous No.12488956]

>>12487527
>American Beauty
manvomitsonself3.jpg

[Anonymous No.12489164]

>>12483769
High Noon

[Anonymous No.12489176]

>>12488956
everything on that list is horrible

[Anonymous No.12489796]

>>12483829
alphabits ffs people

[Anonymous No.12489807]

Ivan the Terrible
Orpheus, in fact, anything by Cocteau
Anything from Truffaut

[Anonymous No.12489838]

>>12484328
that retarded kid's voiceover ruined days of heaven for me

[Anonymous No.12489858]

>>12487497
Too psued to understand peak Soviet cinema

[Anonymous No.12489882]

>>12487393
>the ending resembled Benny Hill
disturbingly accurate

[Anonymous No.12489898]

samurai jack
>gotta get back

[Anonymous No.12489912]

>>12486362
So what do you consider non entry-level?

[Anonymous No.12489963]

>>12489912
Probably just shit no one has heard of. I have a buddy who assumes obscurity means quality when regarding film. Its like those people who only listen to bands no one has heard of.

[Anonymous No.12490011]

>>12489963
Yeah, that's what I was expecting.
>muh entry-level
No normie npc knows any of those directors.
They are popular amongst people into film because they are GOOD. Yes, popular usually equals mediocore, but only when referring to REALLY popular shit.
You can call it "entry-level", but think about the utter faggots who claim they're "into film" because they watched pulp fiction, and know who martin scorsese is

[Anonymous No.12490060]

>>12488145

Vittu