[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 12 KB, 220x298, 220px-SorenKierkegaard.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12479585 No.12479585 [Reply] [Original]

>Kierkegaard's earliest published essay, for example, was a polemic against women’s liberation. It is a reactionary apologetic for the prevailing patriarchal values.

>> No.12479599

>>12479585
Why are so many people so mean in this world? Why would anyone oppose liberation of women, the other sex here with us who deserve as many rights and powers as us men can have? Can someone explain how a person feels justified in such behaviors and attitudes?

>> No.12479729

>>12479585
Wtf I love Kierkegaard now.

>> No.12479794

It's called "Another Defense Of Woman's Great Abilities"

>> No.12479806

>>12479599
based bait poster

>> No.12479822

>>12479599
>how a person feels justified in such behaviors
it's the work of trauma

>> No.12479824

>>12479806
Not bait, at all. Do you seriously feel moral in denying your fellow sex the rights which you are somehow entitled to, they they are not?

>> No.12479829

>>12479822
What do you mean?

>> No.12479836

>>12479829
A traumatic event will make a person feel justified in adopting antisocial behaviour.

>> No.12479856

>>12479836
What was Kierkegaard's traumatic event?

>> No.12479863

>>12479856
Dealing with cunts

>> No.12479866

>>12479856
How should I know? Ask the OP.

>> No.12479895

>>12479599
>Why are so many people so mean in this world?
Ask the feminists. They're the ones who are making life a living hell for many men in this world. For these women liberation is just step one of the plan: the endgame is the matriarchy, female domination, and oppression of the beta cuck males. Give them an inch, they'll take a mile; opposing female liberation is the wisest thing a man could do. Men and women aren't equal, it is self-evident, and thus they shouldn't be treated as if they were.

>> No.12479910

>>12479824
>Do you seriously...
Have you read the paper you are complaining about? Maybe your thread wouldn't be such a shithole if you presented some arguments to the content rather than this emotional knee-jerk you seem to be doing

>> No.12479911

>>12479895
t. male version of a feminist

>> No.12479944

>>12479911
Fight fire with fire. If you turn the other cheek you're only gonna get slapped twice as much. Don't expect women to show any compassion. Feminism in the first place is merely a shit test to sort out the betas and the alphas. At some semi-conscious level women don't believe their own bullshit; they just want to see if you're alpha enough to put them in their place. If you're not, they will simply use you as a beta cuck provider; you will be their "friend" while they're in their prime, and you will raise their children after they hit the wall.

>> No.12479948

>>12479895
You in your very post prove the very reason for the existence of said feminists, believing that women should not be liberated, or they they are not equal to ourselves. You are ignoring millenia of unequal treatment of them, in favor of a few decades of trendiness within media.

>> No.12479961

>>12479910
I'm not commenting on the paper - I'm asking other anons here of the issue in general, which is much larger than a single paper written by a single man. Again, I'm not even speaking about Kierkegaard here.

>> No.12479963

>>12479944
You're not very bright, desu. Good luck.

>> No.12479988
File: 30 KB, 540x491, 1547908294720.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12479988

>>12479948
>or they they are not equal to ourselves.
They aren't. Not physically, mentally, or emotionally which is why they have to use the power of the state to force people to play ball. Ultimately all rights and freedoms enjoyed by women are granted via men being willing to play ball, shut up and go to work. People like Ocasio Cortez are like a roman slave at a bachanal festival who genuinely thinks he reigns now. But the party is winding down.

>> No.12480001

>>12479948
Ask yourself why there has been unequal treatment for millenia. If men were able to "oppress" women for so long, maybe, just maybe, men and women aren't as equal as the mainstream media might want you to think. Nowadays some people are even trying to deny the physical differences between men and women ("women are just as strong as men"), let alone the intellectual ones.

Just because women are people it doesn't mean they should have the same rights as men. Rights should be commensurate to duties, but in present-day society the men are expected to take responsibility for everything whereas the women can cherry-pick and pretend to have the same rights as men but not the same duties. If you don't see anything wrong with that you're either a woman or the ultimate cuck.

>> No.12480010
File: 642 KB, 1476x747, anotherdefense.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12480010

found it

>> No.12480019

>>12479585
>white cis machito had misogynistic views
What a surprise.

>> No.12480020

>>12479599
>>12479948
https://nypost.com/2019/01/18/woman-who-randomly-attacked-people-with-an-ax-gets-prison/
Women should not be allowed to have influence.

>> No.12480031

>>12480010
>this is hating women to people

>> No.12480046

>>12479988
No one is equal to anyone else. No one is you; not even yourself.

>> No.12480051

>>12479599
>deserve
That word deserves better use than baitposting.

>> No.12480054

>>12479863
Kek'd

>> No.12480058

>>12480046
WOW DUDE RLY MAKE U THINK xDDDDD le /lit/ faec

>> No.12480061

>>12479599
Because women are inferior to men and more prone to sin because their souls are more tightly attached to matter (men's being more tightly attached to form). Because of woman's passive nature, however, I will grant you that any time the second sex becomes completely reprobate, it is completely the fault of the men of that society

>> No.12480068

>>12480010

Weak. It's not even resentful misogyny, let alone proper Ontological misogyny.

>> No.12480072

>>12479895
>feminists have a conscious plan
Brainlets everyone. That's like saying a child disobeys their parents because they seek their domination. It's in their nature to test boundaries

>> No.12480095

>>12480058
Shouldn't you be in your containment board?

>> No.12480097

>>12479824
There's no justification to turn an is into an ought other than passion or convenience. I'll defend my privileges because it's on my best interests. Not that I can do anything about women liberation though so I'm better accepting it and going on with my life the best I can.

>> No.12480100
File: 1.07 MB, 1385x1079, 20190126_000831.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12480100

>>12480095
I don't want to talk about guns right now ;^)

>> No.12480101

Kierkegaard shitposted offline under a false name, he wouldve been a decent image board dweller

>> No.12480116

>>12480068
Even calling it misogyny is a stretch.

>> No.12480139

>>12480101
>>12480101
He even wrote that under the pseudonym A.
He was an anon through and through.

>> No.12480785

>>12480095
This is my containment board

>> No.12480885

>>12480010
What the heck? It's a paper dedicated to praising them. Based.

>> No.12480923

>>12480885
Wait, it's sarcasm. Cringe and bluepilled.

>> No.12480943

>>12480061

I'm real intrigued by what appears to be your underlying super-shitty metaphysics. Please, tell me more about form and matter. What are these, and how do souls attach to them?

>> No.12481045

>>12480943
>Please, tell me more about form and matter
>What are these
Not him, but read Aristotle. I don't believe in metaphysics so I don't agree with him but you have to be really fucking stupid and illiterate not to get what he's saying.

>> No.12481981

>>12481045

Certainly. But please, if you can, explain to a dumb and illiterate person how the soul attaches to, as you have so astutely pointed out, Aristotelian matter and form. I just do not understand how. Especially considering the fact that Aristotle is quite adamant that soul is form, which of course you are aware of, having read Aristotle.

>> No.12482014

>>12479824
Because women lack the necessary Y-chromosome for beinghood and are different in essence to men.

>> No.12482188

>>12481981
Read Plotinus